Search

Purpose: This study investigated the impact of weight change on the success of transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs). Methods: The study included 129 patients diagnosed with MMPRTs who had undergone transtibial pullout repair. The patients were screened between July 2018 and November 2021. Patient‐reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). MM extrusion (MME) and ΔMME (postoperative MME – preoperative MME) were calculated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Patients were divided into weight loss (body mass index [BMI] decrease of at least 0.5 kg/m2 after primary repair; n = 63) and weight gain (BMI increase of at least 0.5 kg/m2; n = 66) groups. Both groups had similar demographic variables and preoperative clinical scores; patient‐reported outcomes significantly improved postoperatively. The weight loss group had significantly greater improvement in KOOS–quality of life (weight loss, 29.4 ± 23.7; weight gain, 23.9 ± 27.6; p = 0.034), lower postoperative MME (weight loss, 3.9 ± 1.7 mm; weight gain, 4.2 ± 1.2 mm; p = 0.043) and lower ΔMME (weight loss, 0.8 ± 0.8 mm; weight gain, 1.2 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.002) than the weight gain group. Total arthroscopic healing scores (weight loss, 7.6 ± 1.0; weight gain, 7.2 ± 1.5; p = 0.048) and associated subscales, including anteroposterior bridging tissue width (weight loss, 4.0 ± 0.0; weight gain, 3.8 ± 0.7; p = 0.004) and MM posterior root stability (weight loss, 2.6 ± 0.7; weight gain, 2.4 ± 0.7; p = 0.041), significantly differed between the groups. Conclusions: Weight loss was associated with better meniscal healing and less MME progression after MMPRT repair, highlighting the significance of weight management in individuals undergoing meniscal surgery. These findings provide valuable insights into the clinical significance of weight loss in the success of transtibial pullout repair for MMPRTs. Level of Evidence: Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between intercondylar notch width (ICNW), osteophyte width (OW), and the healing of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) following arthroscopic pullout repair. Methods: The study included 155 patients diagnosed with MMPRTs who underwent transtibial pullout repair. Meniscal healing status was evaluated on second‐look arthroscopy using a previously reported meniscus healing score. Patients were divided into two groups based on this score: the high healing score (group HH, healing score ≥ 8 points) and suboptimal healing score (group SO, healing score ≤ 6 points) groups. Computed tomography scans were performed on patients 1 week postsurgery. ICNW and OW widths were measured and relatively evaluated based on their ratio to the intercondylar distance (ICD), represented as the ICNW/ICD ratio (%) and OW/ICD ratio (%), respectively. Patient‐reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and on second‐look arthroscopy using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant demographic differences between the SO and HH group (n = 35 and 120 patients, respectively). Regarding radiographic measurements, significant differences were observed in the ICNW/ICD ratio (group SO, 24.2%; group HH, 25.2%; p = 0.024), OW (group SO, 2.6 mm; group HH, 2.0 mm; p < 0.001), and OW/ICD ratio (group SO, 3.5%; group HH, 2.7%; p < 0.001). Both groups had similar preoperative clinical scores, but postoperative clinical scores, including KOOS‐activities of daily living (group SO, 83.4; group HH, 88.7; p = 0.035) and VAS (group SO, 19.1; group HH, 11.3; p = 0.005), were significantly better in group HH. Conclusion: The study suggests that ICNW and OW may play a crucial role in MMPRT healing following arthroscopic pullout repair, as evidenced by the worse clinical outcomes associated with a narrower ICNW and wider OW. These findings highlight the potential significance of ICNW and OW assessments when evaluating meniscal repair indications. Level of Evidence: Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The posterior medial meniscal root tear (PMMRT) seriously impacts the tibiofemoral joint biomechanics. Two available techniques for PMMRT repair include the transtibial pullout (TPO) repair and all-suture anchor (ASA) repair techniques. These techniques have not been compared biomechanically. Methods: A total of 20 fresh porcine cadaveric knee specimens were used. All 20 knees were randomly and evenly distributed into four groups (five specimens per group): (1) intact posterior meniscal root, (2) PMMRT, (3) TPO repair technique for PMMRT, and (4) ASA repair technique for PMMRT. The tibiofemoral contact mechanics were investigated using a pressure sensor. All knee specimens were tested by being loaded with 600 N axial compressive force at three different flexion angles (0°, 45°, and 90°). The contact surface area, contact pressure, peak pressure, and time-zero displacement were recorded. Results: The PMMRT caused a significant decrease in contact surface area, an increase in contact pressure, and peak pressure from the reference values observed in the intact meniscus group (P = 0.05, 0.016, and 0.008, respectively). After fixation, no significant difference was observed between the ASA and intact group. Meanwhile, significant differences were found between the TPO and intact group in terms of contact surface area, contact pressure, and peak pressure. In the comparison between the two techniques, the ASA group demonstrated higher contact surface area than the TPO group at the average knee flexion angle (p = 0.05). Conclusion: For most testing conditions, the ASA technique demonstrated superior biomechanical property in terms of contact surface area compared with the TPO technique under compressive loading conditions. The ASA technique could also restore the tibiofemoral contact mechanics to be comparable with those of the native intact knee. Meanwhile, a significant difference in tibiofemoral mechanics, compared with the intact knee, could be observed in the TPO technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Complete meniscal root tears disrupt dispersion of axial loading forces through hoop stresses. This increases point-loading on tibiofemoral cartilage and leads to chondromalacia and accelerated osteoarthritis (OA). Posterior root tears may be treated successfully with a transtibial pullout repair. Varus malalignment also leads to increased medial compartment pressures, increasing the risk of early OA and putting increased stress on the meniscus and stabilizing knee ligaments. In particular, revision medial meniscal root repairs without correction of varus malalignment are at increased risk of failure. Genu varum may be corrected with a medial opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (OW PTO). Indications: Meniscal root repairs are indicated for acute or chronic tears in active patients with healthy cartilage. OW PTO is indicated for varus malalignment in ambulatory patients with healthy cartilage, or who are at risk for failure of meniscal or ligamentous procedures. Technique Description: After exposure of the osteotomy site, arthroscopy is performed through the incision and the revision posterior meniscus root repair is performed via a double-tunnel transtibial pullout technique. The positioning of these tunnels is modified superiorly so as to not cross the planned osteotomy site. The osteotomy is then performed by drilling 2 guide pins under fluoroscopy to delineate the plane of the cut. An OW plate is placed, and the root repair is tensioned last. Results: Double-tunnel transtibial pullout repairs increase meniscal fixation contact surface and have been shown to be biomechanically superior to all-inside fixation techniques. Medial OW PTO restores knee alignment and reduces supra-anatomic stresses in the medial compartment, additionally decreasing the risk of a revision medial meniscus repair failure. Discussion: Biomechanical studies have shown that meniscal root tears are functionally equivalent to complete meniscectomy. Varus malalignment increases the risk of medial meniscal tears, and reduces the risk of a successful long-term repair. We describe a technique for a revision transosseous posterior root repair with concomitant proximal tibial osteotomy, with discussion of surgical pearls and pitfalls. This technique restores anatomic position and native function of the medial meniscus while correcting tibiofemoral malalignment that could jeopardize the repair. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Independent transtibial pullout repair is a common surgical technique for repairing lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs). The shared anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) bone tunnel technique is an alternative technique for LMPRT repair combined with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to avoid the establishment of additional bone tunnels. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of the shared ACL bone tunnel versus the independent transtibial pullout techniques for LMPRT repair combined with ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between March 2014 and February 2018, a total of 48 patients were diagnosed with ACL injury with concomitant LMPRT; 22 patients underwent independent transtibial pullout repair (group T), and 26 patients underwent the shared ACL bone tunnel technique (group S). At a follow-up of >2 years, we compared knee functional recovery using the Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores and the pivot-shift test. Lateral meniscal extrusion, and cartilage degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were also compared. The healing status of the lateral meniscus posterior root was compared using second-look arthroscopy and MRI. Results: The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in group S compared with group T (98.3 ± 11.1 vs 127.9 ± 17.5 min; P =.001). At final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in knee functional scores, pivot shift, or grade of cartilage degeneration. Lateral meniscal extrusion was decreased in group S compared with group T (2.41 ± 0.61 vs 1.59 ± 1.35 mm; P =.014). Second-look arthroscopy revealed stable healing in 16 of 18 patients (88.9%) in group S and 10 of 15 patients (66.7%) in group T (P =.38). Conclusion: Both the shared ACL bone tunnel and the independent transtibial pullout techniques led to satisfactory clinical outcomes. The shared ACL bone tunnel technique is the simpler of the 2 procedures for combined LMPRT repair with ACLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prospective evaluation of clinical outcomes after posterior meniscal root repair utilizing a transtibial pullout technique is limited, and factors that may contribute to outcomes are unclear. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that there would be an overall significant improvement in outcomes after root repair and that differences in clinical outcomes would correlate with age, body mass index (BMI), sex, and meniscal extrusion. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing transtibial medial or lateral meniscal root repair were enrolled prospectively at 2 orthopaedic centers between March 2017 and January 2019. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were obtained to assess for meniscal healing, quantification of extrusion, articular cartilage grade, and subchondral bone changes. Patient-reported outcomes including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were then subdivided by clinical and demographic characteristics to determine factors associated with clinical outcomes. Results: Included were 45 patients (29 female, 16 male; mean age, 42.3 ± 12.9 years; mean BMI, 31.6 kg/m2) who underwent 47 meniscal root repairs (29 medial and 16 lateral; 2 had both). Significant improvements at 2-year follow-up were seen in IKDC score (41.1 vs 78.4; P <.001), Tegner activity level (3 vs 4; P <.001), and VAS pain (2.8 vs 0.7; P <.001). BMI, preoperative malalignment, cartilage status, and progressive meniscus extrusion (Δ = 0.7 mm) did not have a negative impact on IKDC and Tegner scores 2 years postoperatively. Age greater than or equal to 50 years and extrusion pre- and postoperatively were associated with decreased Tegner scores. Progressive meniscal extrusion was associated with a decreased overall improvement in Tegner scores. Conclusion: Transtibial root repair for medial and lateral posterior meniscal root tears demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Increased age, increased BMI, cartilage status, and meniscal extrusion did not have a negative impact on short-term functional outcomes (IKDC), but age greater than or equal to 50 years and extrusion negatively influenced patient activity level (Tegner). Registration: NCT03037242 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the effects of transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) among patients with early osteoarthritis of the knee as measured by the meniscus healing score and to determine whether the meniscus healing score correlates with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade progression. Methods: Forty-seven patients with mild osteoarthritic knees (Kellgren–Lawrence grade ≤ 2 and varus alignment < 5°) who underwent transtibial pullout repair less than 3 months after MMPRT onset were assessed. The association between meniscus healing scores at 1 year postoperatively and cartilage damage of the medial compartment (medial femoral condyle [MFC] and medial tibial plateau [MTP]) were evaluated. The MFC was divided into six zones (A to F) and the MTP into two zones (G and H). The mean ICRS grade for each zone was compared between the primary surgery and second-look arthroscopy. The correlation between cartilage damage and meniscus healing status at the time of second-look arthroscopy in each zone was analysed. Results: The mean time interval from injury to surgery was 63 days, and all clinical scores showed significant improvement. There were no significant differences in the extent of cartilage damage in areas B, C, E, or F (n.s.) for MFC or in areas G and H (n.s.) for MTP. The meniscus healing score and cartilage damage were correlated in the loading areas (B, C, E, and H; − 0.53, − 0.45, − 0.33, and − 0.38, respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Transtibial pullout repair of MMPRTs among patients with mild osteoarthritic knees improved the clinical outcomes and showed a negative correlation between high meniscus healing scores and ICRS grades in the medial compartment loading area. This study suggests that early surgery should be undertaken for patients with mild osteoarthritic knee who develop MMPRTs. Level of evidence: Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a paucity of comparative clinical data between arthroscopic all-inside end-to-end meniscal root suture and transtibial pullout technique in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). Therefore, this study aimed to compare treatment failure, mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of all-inside meniscus root repair versus the transtibial pullout technique and to analyze prognostic factors of postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes. Forty-four patients were included in two therapeutic group: arthroscopic all-inside meniscal suture (MS: 13 knees) and transtibial pullout technique (TP: 31 knees). Primary clinical outcomes at a minimum of 27.2 months postoperatively included Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm Knee Questionnare (LKQ). Radiographic assessment of the knee was performed to determine osteoarthritis severity using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system. In addition, pre and postoperative MRI scans and intraoperative arthroscopic findings were recorded and the correlations between these findings, as outcome predictors and postoperative patients reported subjective outcome were assessed. No significant differences in postoperative KOOS and LKQ scores were found between the MS and TP group (p = 0.38 and 0.17, respectively). During follow-up one patients (7.7%) in the MS group and two (6.5%) in the TP group underwent total knee arthroplasty. The difference did not reach the statistical significance (p = 0.88). No differences were observed in postoperative MRI findings such as meniscal extrusion, osteochondral defect, chondromalacia patella, and bone morrow edema (p = 0.25, 0.97, 0.97, and 0.88, respectively). A univariate model revealed that the presence of postoperative meniscal extrusion; osteochondral defect; chondromalacia patella; increased BMI; age (>40 years) and longer time lapse between clinical onset to surgery (>6 months) were predictors of poor clinical outcome. The presence of meniscal extrusion, osteochondral defect and chondropatia patella portended worst postoperative outcomes in a multiple linear regression model. It can be concluded that both techniques can reach good results when performed properly and if the injury pattern allows meniscal suture may be considered a treatment option for the management of MMPRT in well-selected patients. Patients with increased BMI, preoperative meniscal extrusion, chondromalacia patella, and osteochondral defect were at higher risk of poor clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose/Aim of the study: Posterior root injury of the medial meniscus often leads to articular cartilage degeneration due to altered biomechanics. To avoid dysfunction, the attachment must be repaired using the transtibial pullout technique. To guide appropriate placement of the tibial tunnel, additional details on the normal anatomy of the meniscus insertion are needed. Therefore, we performed a histological analysis of a tibial bone slice with the medial meniscus posterior insertion obtained during total knee arthroplasty surgery. Materials and methods: Horizontal slices of the proximal tibia were obtained from 7 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent total knee arthroplasty. After decalcification, the region of the posterior horn was cut out and segmented into four pieces (2.0 mm thickness; medial to lateral). Sagittal sections were evaluated by safranin O staining or immunohistochemistry with anti-type collagen antibody. Results: Safranin O staining showed that the insertion of the posterior root consisted primarily of fibrocartilaginous layers in segment 2. Anatomically, segment 2 corresponded to the sagittal plane passing through the peak of the medial intercondylar tubercle. In this section, safranin O staining and immunohistochemistry revealed that the anterior one-third of the posterior root insertion was richer in proteoglycans and type II collagen than the central and posterior one-third. Conclusions: Anatomical insertion of the posterior root of the medial meniscus was located at the sagittal plane passing through the peak of the medial intercondylar tubercle. The structure of the medial meniscus posterior insertion was mainly localized in the anterior one-third. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Displaced tibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures require surgical fixation in order to provide an adequate bone healing and to avoid a loss of posterior stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a recently established modified suture bridge technique to a well-established transtibial pullout technique. It was hypothesized that the suture bridge technique shows lower elongation and higher load to failure force compared to a transtibial pullout fixation.Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were biomechanically tested using an uniaxial hydrodynamic material testing system. A standardized bony avulsion fracture of the tibial PCL insertion was generated. Two different techniques were used for fixation: (A) suture bridge configuration and (B) transtibial pullout fixation. In 90° of flexion elongation, initial stiffness and failure load were determined.Results: The suture-bridge technique resulted in a significant lower elongation (4.5 ± 2.1 mm) than transtibial pullout technique (12.4 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001). The initial stiffness at the beginning of cyclic loading was 46.9 ± 3.9 N/mm in group A und 40.8 ± 9.0 N/mm in group B (p = 0.194). Load to failure testing exhibited 286.8 ± 88.3 N in group A and 234.3 ± 96.8 N in group B (p = 0.377).Conclusion: The suture bridge technique provides a significant lower construct elongation during cyclic loading. But postoperative rehabilitation must respect the low construct strength of both techniques because both fixation techniques did not show a sufficient fixation strength to allow for a more aggressive rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The medial meniscus (MM) posterior root has important functions in preventing an excessive loading stress during knee motion and degeneration of the articular cartilage. Although the transtibial pullout repair has become the gold standard for MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs), MM extrusion remains. In addition, during knee extension to deep flexion, the MM posterior segment in the MMPRT knee has been shown to translate toward the posteromedial direction, causing a notable MM posterior extrusion. Thus, the reduction in the MM posteromedial extrusion is one of the important postoperative outcomes to restore the meniscal function and eventually prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis. The present technical note describes an arthroscopic technique addition to the pullout repair, in which an all-inside suture is inserted into the posteromedial part of the MM to reduce the MM posteromedial extrusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) leads to a rapid degradation of articular cartilage. In the treatment of MMPRT, transtibial pullout repair demonstrates a high clinical survival rate. However, there is no reliable method to evaluate the meniscal healing after surgery. We propose an arthroscopic scoring system for evaluating the meniscal healing status. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlations between second-look arthroscopic scores and clinical outcomes after transtibial pullout repair. Methods: Twenty patients who had MMPRTs underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and pain score evaluated by visual analogue scale at preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The healing status of repaired MM was assessed at one year post-operatively using a semi-quantitative arthroscopic scoring system (total, 10 points) composed of three evaluation criteria: (i) anteroposterior width of bridging tissues, (ii) stability of the MM posterior root, and (iii) synovial coverage of the sutures. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between second-look arthroscopic scores and clinical outcomes. Results: Transtibial pullout repairs of MMPRTs significantly improved clinical evaluation scores at one year post-operatively. A median of second-look arthroscopic scores was 6.5 (5.75–8). A good correlation was observed between the arthroscopic score and KOOS quality of life (QOL) subscale. A moderate negative correlation between the arthroscopic score and pain score was observed. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that our semi-quantitative scoring system of meniscal healing correlated with the KOOS QOL subscale following MMPRT transtibial pullout repair. Our results suggest that the second-look arthroscopic score using this system may be a useful scale to determine and compare the healing status of the MM posterior root. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the role of suture cutout in the mechanics of failure of the repaired posterior meniscal root during the early post-operative period when using sutures of different shape.Methods: Twenty medial porcine menisci were randomized in two groups depending on the suture shape used to repair the posterior root: thread or tape. The sutured menisci were subjected to cyclic loading (1000 cycles, (10, 30) N) followed by load-to-failure testing. Residual displacements, stiffness, and ultimate failure load were determined. During tests, the tissue-suture interface was recorded using a high-resolution camera.Results: In cyclic tests, cutout progression at the suture insertion points was not observed for any specimen of either group and no differences in residual displacements were found between use of thread or tape. In load-to-failure tests, suture cutout started in all menisci at a load close to the ultimate failure and all specimens failed by suture pullout. Suture tape had a greater ultimate load with no other differences.Conclusions: In a porcine model of a repaired posterior meniscal root subjected to cyclic loads representative of current rehabilitation protocols in the early post-operative period under restricted loading conditions, suture cutout was not found as a main source of permanent root displacement when using suture thread or tape. Suture cutout progression started at high loading levels close to the ultimate load of the construct. Tape, with a meniscus-suture contact area larger than thread, produced higher ultimate load. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) leads to a rapid degradation of articular cartilage. In the treatment of MMPRT, transtibial pullout repair demonstrates a high clinical survival rate. However, there is no reliable method to evaluate the meniscal healing after surgery. We propose an arthroscopic scoring system for evaluating the meniscal healing status. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlations between second-look arthroscopic scores and clinical outcomes after transtibial pullout repair.Methods: Twenty patients who had MMPRTs underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and pain score evaluated by visual analogue scale at preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The healing status of repaired MM was assessed at one year post-operatively using a semi-quantitative arthroscopic scoring system (total, 10 points) composed of three evaluation criteria: (i) anteroposterior width of bridging tissues, (ii) stability of the MM posterior root, and (iii) synovial coverage of the sutures. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between second-look arthroscopic scores and clinical outcomes.Results: Transtibial pullout repairs of MMPRTs significantly improved clinical evaluation scores at one year post-operatively. A median of second-look arthroscopic scores was 6.5 (5.75-8). A good correlation was observed between the arthroscopic score and KOOS quality of life (QOL) subscale. A moderate negative correlation between the arthroscopic score and pain score was observed.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that our semi-quantitative scoring system of meniscal healing correlated with the KOOS QOL subscale following MMPRT transtibial pullout repair. Our results suggest that the second-look arthroscopic score using this system may be a useful scale to determine and compare the healing status of the MM posterior root. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]