Search

Abstract   Objective Medication errors are frequent in a hospital setting and often caused by inappropriate drug handling. Systematic strategies for their prevention however are still lacking. We developed and applied a classification model to categorise medication handling errors and defined the urgency of correction on the basis of these findings. Setting Nurses on medical wards (including intensive and intermediate care units) of a 1,680-bed teaching hospital. Method In a prospective observational study we evaluated the prevalence of 20 predefined medication handling errors on the ward. In a concurrent questionnaire survey, we assessed the knowledge of the nurses on medication handling. The severity of errors observed in individual areas was scored considering prevalence, potential risk of an error, and the involved drug. These scores and the prevalence of corresponding knowledge deficits were used to define the urgency of preventive strategies according to a four-field decision matrix. Main outcome measure Prevalence and potential risk of medication handling errors, corresponding knowledge deficits in nurses committing the errors, and priority of quality improvement. Results In 1,376 observed processes 833 medication handling errors were detected. Errors concerning preparation (mean 0.88 errors per observed process [95% CI: 0.81–0.96], N = 645) were more frequent than administration errors (0.36 [0.32–0.41], N = 701, P N = 492) were more often involved in errors than enteral drugs (0.32 [0.28–0.36], N = 794, P Conclusion We successfully applied a newly developed classification model to prioritise medication handling errors for prevention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic used in the treatment of infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Resistance to linezolid has been associated with a G2576U mutation in domain V of the 23S rRNA.Patient and methods: We present clinical details and susceptibility data from multiple Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from a liver transplant patient over 13 months. MICs of linezolid, vancomycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin were determined using Etest. Molecular typing was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Domain V of the 23S rRNA gene in the vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was amplified. Linezolid concentrations were analysed by HPLC.Results: We report the emergence of resistance to linezolid in a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium during linezolid treatment. After discontinuation of the linezolid therapy, the isolate reverted to susceptibility. However, after re-administration of linezolid the vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium became resistant to linezolid again. The isolates that were resistant to linezolid had a G2576T mutation in their 23S rDNA.Conclusion: We describe a clinical case that shows the shift of a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from linezolid resistance to susceptibility and then back to resistance again related to linezolid therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Moxifloxacin is a recently developed fourth-generation methoxyquinolone with a broad spectrum of activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic bacteria and anaerobes. The aim of the present study was to assess the penetration of moxifloxacin into gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal tissues to evaluate its potential role as an antimicrobial drug in bacterial infections of the GI tract.Patients and methods: Twenty-eight patients undergoing GI-tract surgery received 400 mg of moxifloxacin twice pre-operatively [eight patients orally (po) and 20 patients intravenously (iv)], of whom 22 completed the study. Mucosal tissues (three stomach, three small bowel and 16 colon) and serum samples were collected and moxifloxacin concentrations were measured by HPLC.Results: The highest tissue concentrations were detected in the mucosa of the stomach (10.9 ± 5.1 mg/kg), followed by colon mucosa (7.8 ± 7.1 mg/kg after iv; 6.6 ± 3.6 mg/kg after po) and small bowel mucosa (5.4 ± 0.5 mg/kg). The tissue-to-serum ratio of moxifloxacin was 2.0 ± 1.6 in the small bowel mucosa, 5.8 ± 3.4 and 6.8 ± 3.9 in the colon mucosa after po and iv administration, respectively, and 9.7 ± 5.7 in the stomach mucosa.Conclusion: Moxifloxacin penetrates into and accumulates in the mucosa of the stomach, small bowel and colon. The clinical applicability of moxifloxacin administration for bacterial GI-tract infections should be investigated in controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: Objectives Adequate antimicrobial therapy is crucial for the survival of critically ill patients with severe nosocomial infections. Tigecycline, the first available agent in the new class of glycylcyclines, is active against multiresistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this observational, retrospective evaluation was to assess tigecycline use patterns in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of a tertiary care centre. : Methods Data from 70 patients receiving tigecycline in the SICU were analysed. We reviewed tigecycline use in terms of demographic data and co-morbidities, disease severity, clinical indication, microbiology, therapy regimens and mortality. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for mortality. : Results The majority of patients had co-morbidities such as cancer (51%) or renal replacement therapy (57%). The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of patients at admission was 27. Intra-abdominal infection was most frequently diagnosed (50% of patients); intra-abdominal infection and pneumonia were diagnosed in 14%. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was found in 16% of patients (colonization; infection: 6%) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in 27% (colonization; infection: 21%). The mean duration of tigecycline therapy was 9 ± 4 days; 76% of patients received tigecycline in combination, with 64% being treated second line. APACHE score and renal replacement were identified as predictive factors for mortality. SICU mortality was 30%. : Conclusions Tigecycline treatment of critically ill SICU patients with severe sepsis or septic shock appeared to result in remarkably low mortality. Tigecycline may be an important treatment option for septic patients with infections resistant to other available agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]