Search

Purpose: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention. Methods: Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay. Results: Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups. Conclusion: Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range. Trial registration number: UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A technical qualification system was developed in 2004 by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. An analysis of the EnSSURE study on 3188 stage II–III rectal cancer patients, which was performed by including the participation of qualified surgeons as assistants and advisers without restricting their participation as operators, revealed that the participation of technically qualified surgeons in surgery improved the technical and oncological safety of laparoscopic rectal resection. Aim: This secondary retrospective analysis of the EnSSURE study examined the advantage of qualified surgeons participating in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). Methods: The outcomes of low anterior resection were compared between groups with and without the participation of surgeons qualified by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (Q and non‐Q groups, respectively). We used propensity score matching to generate paired cohorts at a one‐to‐one ratio. The postoperative complication rate, short‐term results (hemorrhage volume, operative time, number of dissected lymph nodes, open conversion rate, intraoperative complication rate, and R0 resection rate), and long‐term results (disease‐free survival rate, local recurrence rate, and overall survival rate) were evaluated. Results: The frequencies of postoperative complications, anastomotic bleeding, and intraperitoneal abscess were significantly lower, the operative time was significantly shorter, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter, and the number of dissected lymph nodes was higher in the Q group. No significant differences were observed in disease‐free survival, local recurrence, or overall survival rate rates between the groups. Conclusion: The participation of qualified surgeons in LAR is technically advantageous. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stage IVA cervical cancer is a tumor that invades the mucosa of the bladder or rectum without distant metastasis and is difficult to treat, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy is recommended. Although radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a treatment option for stage IVA cervical cancer, the evidence is limited. A 51-year-old woman with bulky cervical cancer and rectal invasion was referred to our hospital. Paclitaxel and cisplatin were administered as neoadjuvant chemotherapies. After two cycles of chemotherapy, the tumor size decreased markedly. Total pelvic exenteration was performed, and a complete resection was achieved. Four cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin were administered postoperatively. Thirty-three months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient was alive and free of disease. Radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a treatment option for stage IVA cervical cancer with bulky tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: There are no existing reports on proton beam therapy (PBT) for local control (LC) of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (LMCRC). We calculated the LC rate of PBT for LMCRC and explored the influence of each factor on the LC rate. Materials and methods: Cases in which PBT was performed at our center between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively selected from the database. Patients with LMCRC without extrahepatic lesions and no more than three liver metastases were included. Effectiveness was assessed based on LC, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Adverse events (AEs) are described. Factors that may be related to LC were also investigated. Results: This study included 23 men and 18 women, with a median age of 66 (range 24–87) years. A total of 63 lesions were included in the study. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness)/22 fractions. The median follow-up period was 27.6 months. The 3‑year LC, OS, and PFS rates were 54.9%, 61.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. Our multivariate analysis identified the distance between the tumor and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as a factor associated with LC (P = 0.02). No grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed. None of the patients experienced liver failure during the acute or late phase. Conclusion: Care must be taken with tumors that have reduced planning target volume coverage owing to organs at risk restrictions, especially in tumors near the GI tract. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a case of a 70-year-old male with delayed perforation in the cecum treated by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage for a pelvic abscess. The lesion was a 50-mm laterally spreading tumor, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed. No perforation was detected during the operation, and en bloc resection was achieved. He had fever and abdominal pain on postoperative day (POD) 2. Computed tomography (CT) revealed the intra-abdominal free air, leading to a diagnosis of delayed perforation after ESD. Vital signs were stable, the perforation was considered minor, and endoscopic closure was attempted. The colonoscopy under fluoroscopy showed no perforation in the ulcer and no leakage of the contrast medium. He was managed conservatively with antibiotics and nothing per os. Symptoms improved; however, a follow-up CT on POD 13 revealed a 65-mm pelvic abscess, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage was successfully performed. The follow-up CT on POD 23 showed the reduction of abscess, and the drainage tubes were removed. Emergent surgical treatment is crucial in delayed perforation because it has a poor prognosis, and reports of conservative therapy for colonic ESD with delayed perforation are few. The present case was managed with antibiotics and EUS-guided drainage. Thus, EUS-guided drainage can be a treatment option for delayed perforation after colorectal ESD, if the abscess is localized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Oral function management has been recognized as important strategy for preventing postoperative complications. In this historical cohort study, we focused on the patients who planed gastrectomy, and investigated the appropriate duration and frequency of preoperative oral care to prevent complications after surgery. Methods: Patients who planed surgery for gastric cancer between 2012 and 2018 were enrolled. We defined intensive oral care (IOC) as initial intervention at least three weeks before surgery and follow‐up intervention within a week before surgery. As the primary outcome, the incidence of postoperative infectious complications was compared between the IOC and non‐intensive oral care groups. Results: A total of 576 patients were enrolled, including 66 with IOC. The incidence of infectious complications was 2/66 (3.0%) in the IOC group and 64/510 (12.5%) in the non‐intensive oral care group. After adjusting for confounding factors, patients with IOC exposure had a lower chance of developing postoperative infectious complications (odds ratio; 0.217, 0.051–0.927). Conclusions: Intensive oral care can help prevent postoperative infectious complications after gastrectomy. These findings suggest that appropriate preoperative oral care includes at least two interventions: three weeks or more before and within one week before surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The safety of drinking in patients who have undergone total gastrectomy for gastric cancer has not been established. We conducted a clinical trial to investigate the trend in alcohol absorption in actual patients. Methods: Patients who received total gastrectomy with lymph‐node dissection and Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction six or more months ago were enrolled. Participants drank 1 unit (20 g) of ethanol within 1 h starting at least 1 h after a meal. The blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was then estimated by a measurement of the breath alcohol concentration. The peak and trend in the BAC in patients was compared with that in healthy volunteers who were matched with patients for the alcohol‐sensitive genotype. Results: Ten patients and 10 healthy people were enrolled in the BAC evaluation. The peak BAC (%) was 0.158 in patients after total gastrectomy versus 0.110 in control (P < 0.001). The mean half‐life of BAC was 58.0 min in the patient group and 94.0 min in the control group, although the mean time to complete drinking was significantly longer in the patient group than in the control group at 40.8 versus 21.9 min (P = 0.009). Conclusion: Drinking alcohol is likely to carry a risk of increasing the BAC in patients who have undergone total gastrectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Perioperative oral management has been reported to be effective for preventing postoperative infectious complications. In addition, severe periodontal disease was identified as the significant risk factor for complications after gastrointestinal surgery. We investigated the bacteriological association between the periodontal pocket, stomach mucosa and drainage fluid to determine whether oral bacteria directly cause intra-abdominal infection after gastrectomy. Methods: Patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery for gastric cancer were prospectively enrolled. We evaluated the similarity of bacterial strains in periodontal pocket, stomach mucosa and fluid from drainage tube. Gingival crevicular fluid and dental plaque were collected from the periodontal pocket and cultured to detect bacteria. Specimens from the resected stomach were collected and used for bacterial culturing. Drainage fluid from the abdominal cavity was also cultured. Results: All of 52 patients were enrolled. In the periodontal pocket, α-Streptococcus spp., Neisseria sp., and Prevotella sp. were mainly detected. Bacterial cultures in the stomach mucosa were positive in 26 cases. In 20 cases (76.9%), the detected strains were the same as those in the periodontal pocket. Six patients had the postoperative intra-abdominal infection after gastrectomy, and the same bacterial strains was detected in both of drainage fluid and periodontal pocket in two patients with severe periodontal disease. Conclusions: We found the bacteriological association that same strain detected in periodontal pocket, stomach and in intra-abdominal drainage fluid after gastrectomy in patients with periodontal disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effectiveness of perioperative oral management in gastrointestinal surgery remains unclear. To elucidate the clinical significance of oral care, we investigated the relationship between the oral environment and postoperative infectious complications (POICs) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: This was a single-institute and historical cohort study of 341 patients. The participants were isolated from consecutive patients undergoing planned radical resection for gastrointestinal carcinoma from January 2016 to June 2017. Dentists assessed the oral environment for periodontal disease, hygiene status, dry mouth, fur on tongue, and tooth stumps. All patients received scaling and tooth brushing instructions. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for POICs among the different oral statuses. Results: The surgical procedures performed were gastrectomy in 123 (36.1%), colorectal resection in 185 (54.2%), and pancreatoduodenectomy or others in 38 (11.1%). POICs occurred in 48 patients (14.1%), including deep organ space infection in 20, surgical site infection in 11, anastomotic leakage in 5, urinary tract infection in 4, pneumonia in 2, and others in 6. After adjusting for confounding factors, periodontal disease was isolated as an independent risk factor for POICs (odds ratio 2.091, p = 0.037, 95% confidence interval 1.045–4.183). Other variables of oral environment such as hygiene status, dry mouth, fur on tongue, and tooth stumps did not have a significant impact on POICs. Conclusions: Periodontal disease is a risk factor for infectious complications after gastrointestinal surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]