Search

Background: The unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique has garnered significant attention for its little paraspinal iatrogenic damage, expedited recovery, and low complication rates. This method is also applicable to open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the outcomes associated with unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF), minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and TLIF for Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: The study examined the outcomes of 79 patients with Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level intervertebral fusion. Clinical assessments included the measurement of pain levels using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), surgical data, and demographic information. Imaging techniques were utilized to evaluate the fusion rate. Results: The VAS-Back demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in Group UBE-TLIF compared to the other groups at the one-week postoperative evaluation (p <.05). Additionally, the UBE-TLIF group exhibited a significantly longer total operative time compared to the other groups (p <.05). However, it was noted that the Postop Hemovac drain were significantly greater in the MIS-TLIF and TLIF groups compared to the UBE-TLIF group (p <.05). Conclusions: The present research demonstrated the effectiveness of UBE-TLIF, MIS-TLIF, and TLIF as surgical approaches for treating Meyerding grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. Among these methods, UBE-TLIF demonstrated a reduction in Postop Hemovac drain, and an increase in operative duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study was aimed to explore the mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: The clinical data of young and middle-aged patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed and divided into an observation group and a control group according to surgical methods. The observation group was treated with minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) combined with orthopedic robot-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; while the control group underwent traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Perioperative indicators, waist and leg pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications were compared between groups. Results: A total of 32 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in this study, with the average age of 50.3 ± 2.7 years old. There were 17 patients in the observation group and 15 patients in the control group. Although the new surgical technique for the observation group may require longer operative time, it showed significant advantages in reducing intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and shortening hospital stay. These benefits might result in faster recovery for patients, reduced risk of complications, and improved overall quality of life. The new technology was also significantly better compared to the traditional method in terms of VAS scores and ODI at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. These results provided patients with better treatment options and potentially a faster path to recovery. One case with infectious incision in the observation group and one case with intraspinal hematoma formation in the control group were observed. However, there was no statistical difference in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The non-contact orthopedic robot navigation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis was demonstrated to be minimally invasive, precise, and stable surgical method. It is a treatment option worth considering for suitable patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiological observations at the cervicothoracic junction in horses with or without related clinical signs have not been comprehensively described. The aim was to evaluate the seventh cervical (C7) to second thoracic (T2) vertebrae in horses with neck‐related clinical signs (neck pain and/or stiffness, neck‐related forelimb lameness, or general proprioceptive [spinal] ataxia) and control horses. This prospective analytical cross‐sectional study included 127 control horses and 96 cases, examined using standardized clinical and radiological protocols. Univariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to identify factors associated with radiological abnormalities. Severe modeling of the articular processes at C7–T1 was more likely in cases compared with controls, OR, 4.25; CI, 1.04–17.36; P =.04. Cases were more likely to have spondylolisthesis at C7–T1 than controls, OR, 3.61; CI, 1.75–7.44; P <.001. There was a lack of uniformity of disc space width at C6–C7, despite normal alignment of the vertebrae, in five (5.2%) cases and no control horses. Discospondylosis was seen in 9 (9.4%) horses at C7–T1 and 10 of 64 (15.6%) at T1–T2. The sagittal ratio for T1 was smaller for horses with neck‐related forelimb lameness (P <.0002), neck pain/ stiffness (P =.04), or neurological cases (P <.001) than controls. The prevalence of radiological abnormalities at C7–T1 and T1–T2 highlights the importance of careful evaluation of the cervicothoracic junction in horses with neck‐related signs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Objectives: Isthmic spondylolisthesis (iSPL) occurs most commonly in L5/S1 and L4/5. This study investigates the association between spinopelvic anatomy and the pathogenesis of iSPL. Methods: Spinopelvic parameters as well as severity of slip grade were measured in sagittal spine radiographs of symptomatic patients with iSPL in segments L4/5 and L5/S1. Means were calculated and differences between both groups were analyzed. A correlation between the analyzed parameters and degree of slippage was performed. Results: We included 73 subjects in this study; 11 in L4/5 group and 62 in L5/S1 group. Pelvic anatomy significantly differed between L4/5 and L5/S1 iSPL (Pelvic Incidence (PI) 54.8° vs 66.3°, P value =.006; Pelvic Radius (PR) 124.4 mm vs 137.4 mm; P value =.005 and Sacral Table Angle (STA) 101.0° vs 92.2°, P value <.001). The relative degree of slippage was significantly higher in the L5/S1 group (L4/5 29.1% vs L5/S1 40.1%, P value.022). We also observed a significant correlation between pelvic anatomy and the severity of the slip in iSPL at the L5/S1 level. Conclusions: Pelvic parameters PI and STA play an important role concerning the level of occurrence and severity of iSPL. Spinopelvic anatomy determines the pathogenesis of iSPL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The value of adding fusion to decompression surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal canal stenosis remains debated. Therefore, the comparative effectiveness and selected healthcare resource utilization of patients undergoing decompression with or without fusion surgery at 3 years follow-up was assessed. Methods: Using observational data from the Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study and a target trial emulation with index trial benchmarking approach, our study assessed the comparative effectiveness of the two main surgical interventions for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis—fusion and decompression alone in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal canal stenosis. The primary outcome-measure was change in health-related quality of life (EuroQol Health Related Quality of Life 5-Dimension 3-Level questionnaire [EQ-5D-3L]); secondary outcome measures were change in back/leg pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale), change in satisfaction (Spinal Stenosis Measure satisfaction subscale), physical therapy and oral analgesic use (healthcare utilization). Results: 153 patients underwent decompression alone and 62 had decompression plus fusion. After inverse probability weighting, 137 patients were included in the decompression alone group (mean age, 73.9 [7.5] years; 77 female [56%]) and 36 in the decompression plus fusion group (mean age, 70.1 [6.7] years; 18 female [50%]). Our findings were compatible with no standardized mean differences in EQ-5D-3L summary index change score at 3 years (EQ-5D-3L German: 0.07 [95% confidence interval (CI), − 0.25 to 0.39]; EQ-5D-3L French: 0.18 [95% CI, − 0.14 to 0.50]). No between-group differences in change in back/leg pain intensity or satisfaction were found. Decompression plus fusion was associated with greater physical therapy utilization at 3 years follow-up. Conclusion: Decompression alone should be considered the primary option for patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the efficacy of biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-LIF) in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated with osteoporosis. Methods From June 2021 to June 2022, 36 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated with osteoporosis were treated with BE-LIF, including 9 males and 27 females, aged (65.94 ± 6.83) years (range: 51 ~ 76 years). All were single segment, and the responsible segment was L3/4 in 4 cases, L4/5 in 26 cases, and L5/S, in 6 cases. Imagingexamination showed 1 and 2 degree of spondylolisthesis in 28 and 8 cases, and degenerative and ischemic spondylolisthesis in 24 and 12 cases respectively. Preoperative average bone mineral density T value of the lumbar spine was (-3.19 ± 0.82) SD, and T value of the femur (-2.26 ± 0.86) SD. Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate lumbar spine function; visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate low back pain and leg pain. ODI, VAS of low back and leg pain were recorded respectively before the operation, at discharge and at the last follow-up. MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the surgical efficacy at the last follow-up. The anterior and posterior disc height, segmental lordotic angle and percentage of slip were measured on the lateral lumbar X-ray films before and after the operation. All patients received standard anti-osteoporosis treatment after surgery. Results All patients completed the operation in one stage. The average operation time was (160.97 ± 35.01) min (range: 105~245 min), and the average intraoperative blood loss was (72.50 ± 47.53) ml (range: 20 ~ 150 mL). The mean follow-up time was (15.17 ± 6.53) months (range: 6 ~ 26 months). There were statistically significant differences in both VAS score of back and leg and ODI score at discharge and last follow-up when compared with those before the surgery (F = 107.48, 103.66, 55.52, P < 0.001). Macnab criteria of the last follow-up showed excellent in 21 cases, good in 12 cases, fair in 3 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 91.7%. Radiographic results showed that the height of the anterior and posterior disc height, segmental lordotic angle and percentage of slip were all improved immediately after surgery and at the last follow-up when compared with those before operation, but the anterior and posterior disc height, segmental lordotic angle at the last follow-up were decreased comparing with those immediate after the operation; the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The fusion rate at the last follow-up was 91.7% (33/36). The complication rate was 13.8% (5/36), including 1 case of intraoperative endplate injury, 1 case of nerve root cuff tear, 1 case of delayed postoperative wound infection, and 2 cases of posterior cage migration. Conclusion BE-LIF for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated with osteoporosis can achieve better immediate reduction effect, good clinical outcomes and high fusion rate in short-term follow-up, but the anterior and posterior disc height, segmental lordotic angle are partially lost at the last follow-up. There are still complications, and beginners should be cautious when performing the operation. Postoperative standardized anti-osteoporosis treatment is still an important measure to ensure the curative effect of surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This retrospective case series evaluated the effectiveness of minimally invasive spine surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) using the "trial-in-situ" technique for reducing high-grade spondylolisthesis. The surgical management of grade ≥III spondylolisthesis has been controversial, with various methods documented in the literature, including in-situ fusion, in-situ trans-sacral delta fixation, distraction techniques, and external reduction techniques. Recently, MIS techniques have gained popularity. This study analyzed 18 cases of high-grade spondylolisthesis treated with MIS-TLIF using the "trial-in-situ" technique. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI) scores. The spinopelvic parameters and sagittal balance were also analyzed. Preoperatively, the spinopelvic parameters were deranged, with a mean pelvic tilt of 28.31°, which improved to 13.91° postoperatively. Similarly, the sacral slope improved from 45.65° to 38.01°. VAS and mODI scores improved postoperatively, indicating the effectiveness of the "trial-in-situ" technique in reducing high-grade spondylolisthesis and achieving a better sagittal profile and spinopelvic parameters. The findings indicate that MIS-TLIF using the "trial-in-situ" technique is a viable and effective method for treating high-grade spondylolisthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In this study we aimed to identify whether paraspinal muscle morphology could play a role in surgical decision-making in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively collected database between January 2013 and May 2023. Consecutive women and men, who visited our outpatient clinics with chronic LBP, neurogenic claudication, and had lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for their complaints were included into the preliminary dataset. We compared the patients who had conservative management (conservative group) or underwent surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis (surgical group) in terms of intervertebral disc degeneration, end-plate changes, fatty infiltration in the paraspinal muscles and spinopelvic parameters. Results: Conservative and surgical groups were similar in terms of severe IVDD and Modic changes at any lumbar level. Surgical group had significantly fattier erector spinae compared to the conservative group. Regression analysis and ROC analysis revealed an OR of 1.088 and a cut-off value of 17 points for fatty infiltration in the erector spinae to predict which patient could undergo surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Conclusion: Each 1-point increment in fatty infiltration in the erector spinae at any lumbar level increased the likelihood of surgery by 8%. Lumbar spondylolisthesis patients with fatty infiltration score for erector spinae at or above 17 were more likely to have surgery. We recommend clinicians to focus on improving erector spinae muscles in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Low-grade isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) of the lumbar spine are distinct pathologies but both can be treated with lumbar decompression with fusion. In a very large cohort, we compared patient-reported outcome in relation to the pathology and chief complaint at baseline. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis using the EUROSPINE Spine Tango Registry. We included 582 patients (age 60 ± 15 years; 65% female), divided into four groups based on two variables: type of spondylolisthesis and chief pain complaint (leg pain (LP) versus back pain). Patients completed the COMI preoperatively and up to 5 years follow-up (FU), and rated global treatment outcome (GTO). Regression models were used to predict COMI-scores at FU. Pain scores and satisfaction ratings were analysed. Results: All patients experienced pronounced reductions in COMI scores. Relative to the other groups, the DS-LP group showed between 5% and 11% greater COMI score reduction (p < 0.01 up to 2 years' FU). This group also performed best with respect to pain outcomes and satisfaction. Long-term GTO was 93% at the 5 year FU, compared with between 82% and 86% in the other groups. Conclusion: Regardless of the type of spondylolisthesis, all groups experienced an improvement in COMI score after surgery. Patients with DS and LP as their chief complaint appear to benefit more than other patients. These results are the first to show that the type of the spondylolisthesis and its chief complaint have an impact on surgical outcome. They will be informative for the consent process prior to surgery and can be used to build predictive models for individual outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Femoro-Sacral Posterior Angle (FSPA) system and the pelvic incidence (PI) system are utilized for measuring sagittal spino-pelvic morphology in patients with high-dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (HDDS). This study aimed to analyze the accuracy and stability of these two systems. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients diagnosed with HDDS who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital (HDDS group), along with 45 patients without spondylolisthesis (normal group). Three orthopedic surgeons utilized the FSPA and PI systems to measure various parameters, including FSPA, pelvic angle(PA), sacral incidence (SI), PI, pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed to assess the inter-observer consistency of measurements. Results: There was significant differences in all the parameters between the normal and HDDS groups (p < 0.05), except for SS (p = 0.508). Specifically, SI was lower in HDDS group than in the normal group (23.0 ± 13.4 vs. 38.6 ± 7.1), whereas SS was higher (35.3 ± 15.7 vs. 33.6 ± 7.4). Within HDDS group, there was no statistically significant difference in PI (p = 0.159), SS (p = 0.319), and FSPA (p = 0.173) between pre- and post-surgery measurements. The ICC results indicated superior reliability for the FSPA system (0.842–0.885) compared to the PI system (0.682–0.720) within the HDDS group. Conclusion: Compared with the PI system, the FSPA system demonstrated higher accuracy in evaluating spino-pelvic morphology in HDDS patients. Moreover, it exhibited higher ICC values, indicating higher inter-observer reliability, thus serving as an effective method for assessing spino-pelvic morphology in HDDS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of decompression alone and fusion for L4-5 DLS in different age cohorts (< 70 years, ≥ 70 years). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression or fusion for L4-5 DLS and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Outcome measures were: (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI; Visual Analog Scale back and leg, VAS; 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score, SF-12 PCS), (2) minimal clinically important difference (MCID), (3) patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), (4) response on the global rating change (GRC) scale, and (5) complication rates. The decompression and fusion groups were compared for outcomes separately in the < 70-year and ≥ 70-year age cohorts. Results: 233 patients were included, out of which 52% were < 70 years. Patients < 70 years showed non-significant improvement in SF-12 PCS and significantly lower MCID achievement rates for VAS back after decompression compared to fusion. Analysis of the ≥ 70-year age cohort showed no significant differences between the decompression and fusion groups in the improvement in PROMs, MCID/PASS achievement rates, and responses on GRC. Patients ≥ 70 years undergoing fusion had significantly higher in-hospital complication rates. When analyzed irrespective of the surgery type, both < 70-year and ≥ 70-year age cohorts showed significant improvement in PROMs with no significant difference. Conclusions: Patients < 70 years undergoing decompression alone did not show significant improvement in physical function and had significantly less MCID achievement rate for back pain compared to fusion. Patients ≥ 70 years showed no difference in outcomes between decompression alone and fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The objective of this systematic review and metaanalysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis. Methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Ovid Medline databases was conducted to find randomized control trials (RCTs) or cohort studies that compared decompression alone and decompression plus fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis. Operation time; reoperation; postoperative complications; postoperative Oswestry disability index(ODI) scores and scores related to back and leg pain were collected from eligible studies for meta-analysis. Results: We included 3 randomized controlled trials and 9 cohort studies with 6182 patients. The decompression alone group showed less operative time(P < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss(p = 0.000), and no significant difference in postoperative complications was observed in randomized controlled trials(p = 0.428) or cohort studies(p = 0.731). There was no significant difference between the other two groups in reoperation(P = 0.071), postoperative ODI scores and scores related to back and leg pain. Conclusions: In this study, we found that the decompression alone group performed better in terms of operation time and intraoperative blood loss, and there was no significant difference between the two surgical methods in rate of reoperation and postoperative complications, ODI, low back pain and leg pain. Therefore, we come to the conclusion that decompression alone is not inferior to decompression and fusion in patients with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In order to restore the individual's health in lumbar stabilization surgeries, it is aimed to bring the sagittal alignment closer to normal values, to eliminate the findings, and thus to increase the quality of life of the individual by reducing the disability level. The aim of this study is to measure the effects of lumbar region stabilization surgeries performed in our clinic on some angular values in the spine, disability and quality of life. Preoperative (preop) and postoperative (postop) radiographs of 30 individuals over the age of 40 who applied to our clinic with various lumbar region complaints and underwent lumbar stabilization surgery between the years 2020–2022 were taken. Lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope and pelvic inclination angles were measured from the images obtained. The Visual Analog Scale was used to measure the pain of individuals, the Oswestry Disability Index to measure the disability level, and the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire to measure the quality of life. Preop and postop data were analyzed with the SPSS 23.0 program and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The lumbar lordosis angles of individuals who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery approached normal values and the difference between preop–postop lumbar lordosis angle averages was significant (p < 0.05); It was observed that the harmony between the lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination angles increased, the pain decreased and the difference between preop–postop pain values was significant (p < 0.05), disability levels decreased and quality of life increased. Conclusions: The decrease in the level of disability and the increase in the quality of life seen in individuals who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery were associated with the decrease in pain; The changes in angular values are considered to be clinically significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate in vivo 6-degree-of-freedom (DOF) vertebral motion in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) during various functional weight-bearing activities. Methods: Fifteen asymptomatic volunteers (mean age 54.8 years) and fourteen patients with IS at L4-5 (mean age 53.4 years) were recruited. The positions of the vertebrae (L4-L5) in the supine, standing, flexion–extension, left–right twisting and left–right bending positions were determined using previously described CT-based models and dual fluoroscopic imaging techniques. Local coordinate systems were established at the center of the anterior vertebra of L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis (AIS), the posterior lamina of L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis (PIS) and the center of the L5 vertebra to obtain the 6DOF range of motion (ROM) at L4-L5 and the range of motion (ROM) between the AIS and the PIS. Results: The translation along the anteroposterior axis at L4-L5 during flexion–extension, left–right bending and left–right twisting was significantly greater than that of the healthy participants. However, the translation along the mediolateral axis at L4-L5 presented paradoxical motion under different positions: the ROM increased in the supine-standing and flexion–extension positions but decreased in the left–right bending and left–right twisting positions. The separation along the anteroposterior axis during flexion was significantly greater than that during standing, on average, reaching more than 1 mm. The separation along the mediolateral axis during standing, flexion and extension was significantly greater than that in the supine position. Conclusions: This study revealed the occurrence of displacement between the AIS and PIS, primarily in the form of separation during flexion. Symptomatic patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis exhibit intervertebral instability, which might be underestimated by flexion–extension radiographs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the degeneration patterns of paraspinal muscles in double-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (dl-DLS) versus single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (sl-DLS). Methods: A total of 67 dl-DLS and 73 sl-DLS patients were included. Multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), and psoas major (PM)'s fatty infiltration (FI) and relative cross-sectional area (rCSA) were measured. Sagittal parameters such as lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS) were also assessed. Comparisons and correlation analysis were performed between the 2 groups. Results: MF atrophy is worse in dl-DLS patients from L3–4 to L5–S1, with higher FI from L1–2 to L5–S1 compared to sl-DLS patients. ES atrophy and FI are more pronounced in dl-DLS patients from L1–2 to L5–S1. PM atrophy is more significant in dl-DLS patients at L2–3 to L5–S1, with heavier FI from L1–2 to L3–4, though no difference in FI from L4–5 to L5–S1. The rCSA and FI of MF and ES show significant differences between adjacent segments in both groups, except for MF rCSA between L3–4 and L4–5 in dl-DLS. In dl-DLS, PM rCSA negatively correlates with PT from L4–5 to L2–3, while FI of MF and ES in L5–S1 positively correlates with LL. In sl-DLS, PM FI in L4–5 and L5–S1 negatively correlates with LL. Conclusion: Degeneration of MF, ES, and PM is more severe in dl-DLS patients, particularly at the spondylolisthesis level. Severe paraspinal muscle degeneration can lead to spinal force imbalance and progression from sl-DLS to dl-DLS. The degradation of PM and ES correlates negatively with PT and SVA, indicating a link to pelvic decompensation and SVA abnormalities, potentially causing disproportionate degenerative changes in dl-DLS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: Determine impact of standard/novel spinopelvic parameters on global sagittal imbalance, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, and clinical outcomes in patients with multi-level, tandem degenerative spondylolisthesis (TDS). Methods: Single institution analysis; 49 patients with TDS. Demographics, PROMIS and ODI scores collected. Radiographic measurements—sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL mismatch, sagittal L3 flexion angle (L3FA) and L3 sagittal distance (L3SD). Stepwise linear multivariate regression performed using full length cassettes to identify demographic and radiographic factors predictive of aberrant SVA (≥5 cm). Receiver operative curve (ROC) analysis used to identify cutoffs for lumbar radiographic values independently predictive of SVA ≥5 cm. Univariate comparisons of patient demographics, (HRQoL) scores and surgical indication were performed around this cutoff using two-way Student's t-tests and Fisher's exact test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: Patients with increased L3FA had worse ODI (P =.006) and increased rate of failing non-operative management (P =.02). L3FA (OR 1.4, 95% CI) independently predicted of SVA ≥5 cm (sensitivity and specifity of 93% and 92%). Patients with SVA ≥5 cm had lower LL (48.7 ± 19.5 vs 63.3 ± 6.9 mm, P <.021), higher L3SD (49.3 ± 12.9 vs 28.8 ± 9.2, P <.001) and L3FA (11.6 ± 7.9 vs −3.2 ± 6.1, P <.001) compared to patients with SVA ≤5 cm. Conclusions: Increased flexion of L3, which is easily measured by the novel lumbar parameter L3FA, predicts global sagittal imbalance in TDS patients. Increased L3FA is associated with worse performance on ODI, and failure of non-operative management in patients with TDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine of the impact of ALIF with minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) on perioperative outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and the rates of fusion, subsidence, and adjacent segment stenosis. Methods: All adult patients who underwent one-level ALIF with UPSF or BPSF at an academic institution between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively identified. Postoperative outcomes including length of hospital stay (LOS), wound complications, readmissions, and revisions were determined. The rates of fusion, screw loosening, adjacent segment stenosis, and subsidence were assessed on one-year postoperative CT. Lumbar alignment including lumbar lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, regional lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and sacral slope were assessed on standing x-rays at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final postoperative follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared outcomes across posterior fixation groups. Results: A total of 60 patients were included (27 UPSF, 33 BPSF). Patients with UPSF were significantly younger (p = 0.011). Operative time was significantly greater in the BPSF group in univariate (p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (ß=104.1, p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss, LOS, lordosis, pelvic parameters, fusion rate, subsidence, screw loosening, adjacent segment stenosis, and revision rate did not differ significantly between fixation groups. Though sacral slope (p = 0.037) was significantly greater in the BPSF group, fixation type was not a significant predictor on regression. Conclusions: ALIF with UPSF relative to BPSF predicted decreased operative time but was not a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. ALIF with UPSF can be considered to increase operative efficiency without compromising construct stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Degenerative spondylolisthesis causes translational and angular malalignment, resulting in a loss of segmental lordosis. This leads to compensatory adjustments in adjacent levels to maintain balance. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are common techniques at L4-5. This study compares compensatory changes at adjacent L3-4 and L5-S1 levels six months post LLIF versus TLIF for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. Methods: A retrospective study included patients undergoing L4-5 LLIF or TLIF with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation (no posterior osteotomy) for grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Pre-op and 6-month post-op radiographs measured segmental lordosis (L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI), along with PI-LL mismatch. Multiple regressions were used for hypothesis testing. Results: 113 patients (61 LLIF, 52 TLIF) were studied. TLIF showed less change in L4-5 lordosis (mean = 1.04°, SD = 4.34) compared to LLIF (mean = 4.99°, SD = 5.53) (p = 0.003). L4-5 angle changes didn't correlate with L3-4 changes, and no disparity between LLIF and TLIF was found (all p > 0.16). In LLIF, greater L4-5 lordosis change predicted reduced compensatory L5-S1 lordosis (p = 0.04), while no significant relationship was observed in TLIF patients (p = 0.12). Conclusion: LLIF at L4-5 increases lordosis at the operated level, with compensatory decrease at L5-S1 but not L3-4. This reciprocal loss at adjacent L5-S1 may explain inconsistent improvement in lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) post L4-5 fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Knowledge: International Journal is the property of Institute for Knowledge Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aplasia of the lumbar pedicle is a rare condition, frequently associated with low back pain. Its recognition is fundamental in the definition of the correct treatment. We performed a literature review in order to clarify how to best diagnose and treat this rare anatomical condition. A comprehensive literature search for studies published through October 2020 was performed, using the following algorithm: "aplasia" OR "aplastic" OR "hypoplasia" OR "hypoplastic" OR "absent" OR absence" AND "pedicle" AND "lumbar" OR "sacral" OR "lumbosacral". References from reviewed papers were further evaluated for the inclusion of other relevant studies. Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review for a total of 24 adult patients. Another case of left L5 pedicle aplasia treated at our hospital has been described and included in the present review. This anatomical condition may be suspected in plain x-Ray, but CT scan 3D reconstructions may help to confirm the diagnosis in equivocal cases. Low-back pain and radiculopathy are the main signs and symptoms. The treatment was described in 14 cases. Eight patients underwent surgical intervention. In cases with spondylolisthesis, fusion surgery was performed with different techniques, obtaining an excellent clinical outcome. Pedicular aplasia is a rare condition that must be recognized in patients with a low back. When it is associated with spondylolisthesis, fusion surgery should be the preferred option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Lumbar spine fixation and fusion is currently performed with intraoperative tools such as intraoperative CT scan integrated to navigation system to provide accurate and safe positioning of the screws. The use of microscopic visualization systems enhances visualization and accuracy during decompression of the spinal canal as well. Methods: We introduce a novel setting in microsurgical decompression and fusion of lumbar spine using an exoscope with robotized arm (RoboticScope) interfaced with navigation and head mounted displays. Conclusion: Spinal canal decompression and fusion can effectively be performed with RoboticScope, with significant advantages especially regarding ergonomics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Balikesir Health Sciences Journal / Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi is the property of Balikesir Health Sciences Journal (BAUN Health Sci J) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Spine Research is the property of Japanese Society for Spine Surgery & Related Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: There is a lack of knowledge about the biological process of intercorporal bone graft remodeling after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery and whether this process is associated with changes in back pain and intercorporal fusion status. As an alternative to the commonly used but unreliable fusion criteria, Hounsfield units can be used to quantify biological activity and changes in bone mineral content. However, studies assessing Hounsfield units conducted to date do not provide sufficient details about how the bone grafts were segmented to measure the Hounsfield units to allow for replication, and did not assess individual patient trends in graft changes over time. Using the data of nine patients after posterior lumbar interbody fusion, a novel Hounsfield units measurement procedure was developed and used to explore its usability to quantify the bone graft remodeling process. Case details: We report a case series of nine patients (six male, three female, mean age 64 years, all Caucasian) who all had computed tomography scans performed at 1 and 2 years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Overall, seven out of the nine (78%) cases had a 3–41% increase in their bone grafts' Hounsfield units between 1 and 2 years after surgery. The cases showed large interindividual variability in their Hounsfield units values over time, which coincided with varying levels of back pain and intercorporal fusion status. Conclusion: The Hounsfield units measurement procedure used for this case series may be useful to quantify intercorporal bone graft remodeling in patients after posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and may be used as an adjunct diagnostic measure to monitor bone graft remodeling over time. Future research is warranted to explore how to interpret bone graft Hounsfield units-values and Hounsfield units trajectories in light of clinical variables or intercorporal fusion status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans, a Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped, obligate anaerobic bacterium of the Oscillospiraceae family, has not been previously reported in human infections. This study reports the first case of bacteraemia and potential vertebral osteomyelitis caused by Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans. Case presentation: An 82-year-old man with a history of diabetes, chronic renal failure, and prior spinal surgery for spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis presented with fever and lower back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple vertebral osteomyelitis lesions. Initial blood cultures identified methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which prompted vancomycin treatment. However, repeated blood cultures not only confirmed persistent MRSA, but also detected Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Despite surgical removal of the spinal hardware and antimicrobial therapy, the patient's osteomyelitis worsened, necessitating transfer for further management. Subsequent analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing identified the GNB as Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans. Conclusions: This is the first documented instance of human infection with Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans, signifying its pathogenic potential in vertebral osteomyelitis. The involvement of anaerobic bacteria and the possibility of polymicrobial infections complicate the diagnosis and treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis. This report underscores the need for caution when identifying the causative organism and selecting an appropriate treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most common complications of lumbar fusions is cage subsidence, which leads to collapse of disc height and reappearance of the presenting symptomology. However, definitions of cage subsidence are inconsistent, leading to a variety of subsidence calculation methodologies and thresholds. To review previously published literature on cage subsidence in order to present the most common methods for calculating and defining subsidence in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) approaches. A search was completed in PubMed and Embase with inclusion criteria focused on identifying any study that provided descriptions of the method, imaging modality, or subsidence threshold used to calculate the presence of cage subsidence. A total of 69 articles were included in the final analysis, of which 18 (26.1%) reported on the ALIF approach, 22 (31.9%) on the OLIF approach, and 31 (44.9%) on the LLIF approach, 2 of which reported on more than one approach. ALIF articles most commonly calculated the loss of disc height over time with a subsidence threshold of > 2 mm. Most OLIF articles calculated the total amount of cage migration into the vertebral bodies, with a threshold of > 2 mm. LLIF was the only approach in which most articles applied the same method for calculation, namely, a grading scale for classifying the loss of disc height over time. We recommend future articles adhere to the most common methodologies presented here to ensure accuracy and generalizability in reporting cage subsidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) are commonly employed to treat lumbosacral radiculopathy. Despite anti-inflammatory properties, the addition of 3% hypertonic saline has not been studied. Objective Compare the effectiveness of adding 0.9% NaCl (N-group) vs. 3% NaCl (H-group) in TFESI performed for lumbosacral radiculopathy. Methods This retrospective study compared TFESI performed with lidocaine, triamcinolone and 0.9% NaCl vs. lidocaine, triamcinolone and 3% NaCl. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced a ≥ 30% reduction in pain on a verbal rating scale (VRS; 0–100) at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients who improved by at least 30% for pain at 1 and 6 months, and who experienced ≥15% from baseline on the Oswestry disability index (ODI) at follow-up. Results The H-group experienced more successful pain outcomes than the N-group at 3 months (59.09% vs. 41.51%; P  = .002) but not at 1 month (67.53% vs. 64.78%; P  = .61) or 6 months (27.13% vs 21.55%: P  = .31). For functional outcome, there was a higher proportion of responders in the H-group than the N-group at 3 months (70.31% vs. 53.46%; P  = .002). Female, age ≤ 60 years, and duration of pain ≤ 6 months were associated with superior outcomes at the 3-month endpoint. Although those with a herniated disc experienced better outcomes in general with TFESI, the only difference favoring the H-group was for spondylolisthesis patients. Conclusions 3% hypertonic saline is a viable alternative to normal saline as an adjunct for TFESI, with randomized studies needed to compare its effectiveness to steroids as a possible alternative. Registration Thai Clinical Trials Registry ID TCTR 20231110006 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiological outcomes of full-endoscopic lumbar laminotomy (FEL) with those of subtotal lumbar laminectomy (STL) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: In this prospective randomized trial a total of 52 patients were enrolled from May 2016 to September 2021 after providing written informed consent. The authors investigated 45 patients who were followed up for more than 6 months. Results: There were significant improvements in visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores after the operation in both groups. The FEL group tended to have significantly shorter hospital stay. Interestingly, a statistically significant increase in postoperative lumbar lordosis and segmental angle was observed in the FEL group and both groups, respectively. Spondylolisthesis was exacerbated or newly developed in five of the 21 patients (24%) in the STL group. In contrast, improvement in spondylolisthesis was observed in two of the 24 patients (8%) in the FEL group. There were no complications that resulted in fatal sequelae and no significant difference in the complication rate. Conclusions: The clinical results of FEL were similar to those of STL. In addition, the results of FEL were superior to those of STL in terms of a decrease in the postoperative length of stay and radiologic instability, such as iatrogenic spondylolisthesis. The results of this study indicate that FEL is a comparable surgical method to STL for LSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate variation in treatment decisions among spine surgeons in South Africa and the association between surgeon characteristics and the treatment they select. Methods: We surveyed 79 South African spine surgeons. We presented four vignettes (cervical spine distractive flexion injury, lumbar disc herniation, degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis, and insufficiency fracture) for them to assess and select treatments. We calculated the index of qualitative variation (IQV) to determine the degree of variability within each vignette. We used Fisher's exact, and Kruskal–Wallis tests to assess the relationships between surgeons' characteristics and their responses per vignette. We compared their responses to the recommendations of a panel of spine specialists. Results: IQVs showed moderate to high variability for cervical spine distractive flexion injury and insufficiency fracture and slightly lower levels of variability for lumbar disc herniation and degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis. This confirms the heterogeneity in South African spine surgeons' management of spinal pathologies. The surgeon characteristics associated with their treatment selection that were important were caseload, experience and training, and external funding. Also, 19% of the surgeons selected a treatment option that the Panel did not support. Conclusion: The findings make a case for evaluating patient outcomes and costs to identify value-based care. Such research would help countries that are seeking to contract with providers on value. Greater uniformity in treatment and easily accessible outcomes reporting would provide guidance for patients. Further investment in training and participation in fellowship programs may be necessary, along with greater dissemination of information from the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate preoperative (pre-op) radiographic characteristics and specific surgical interventions in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) who underwent lumbar fusion surgery (LFS), with a focus on analyzing predictors of postoperative restoration of segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL). Methods: A retrospective review at a single center identified consecutive single-level DLS patients who underwent LFS between 2016 and 2022. Radiographic measures included disc angle (DA), SLL, lumbar lordosis (LL), anterior/posterior disc height (ADH/PDH), spondylolisthesis percentage (SP), intervertebral disc degeneration, and paraspinal muscle quality. Surgery-related measures included cage position, screw insertion depth, spondylolisthesis reduction rate, and disc height restoration rate. A change in SLL ≥ 4° indicated increased segmental lumbar lordosis (ISLL), and unincreased segmental lumbar lordosis (UISLL) < 4°. Propensity score matching was employed for a 1:1 match between ISLL and UISLL patients based on age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, and osteoporosis condition. Results: A total of 192 patients with an average follow-up of 20.9 months were enrolled. Compared to UISLL patients, ISLL patients had significantly lower pre-op DA (6.78° vs. 11.84°), SLL (10.73° vs. 18.24°), LL (42.59° vs. 45.75°), and ADH (10.09 mm vs. 12.21 mm) (all, P < 0.05). ISLL patients were predisposed to more severe intervertebral disc degeneration (P = 0.047) and higher SP (21.30% vs. 19.39%, P = 0.019). The cage was positioned more anteriorly in ISLL patients (67.00% vs. 60.08%, P = 0.000), with more extensive reduction of spondylolisthesis (− 73.70% vs. − 56.16%, P = 0.000) and higher restoration of ADH (33.34% vs. 8.11%, P = 0.000). Multivariate regression showed that lower pre-op SLL (OR 0.750, P = 0.000), more anterior cage position (OR 1.269, P = 0.000), and a greater spondylolisthesis reduction rate (OR 0.965, P = 0.000) significantly impacted SLL restoration. Conclusions: Pre-op SLL, cage position, and spondylolisthesis reduction rate were identified as significant predictors of SLL restoration after LFS for DLS. Surgeons are advised to meticulously select patients based on pre-op SLL and strive to position the cage more anteriorly while minimizing spondylolisthesis to maximize SLL restoration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Isthmic spondylolisthesis most commonly occurs in the lumbosacral junction and can cause backpain and radicular pain as well as stiffness with progressive immobilization, with a negative impact on an individual's ability to work and quality of life. Multiple operative treatments are currently available. This study aims to compare complications, demography, and clinical features between anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior lumber body fusion (PLIF) in the operative treatment in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Methods An analysis of data from the German spine registry (Deutsche Wirbelsäulengesellschaft [DWG]-Register) of patients who underwent operative treatment (PLIF and ALIF) for isthmic spondylolisthesis in the sacrolumbar junction in 170 departments between January 2017 and May 2021 was performed. Age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, surgical approach, smoker/nonsmoker, as well as severeness of the spondylolisthesis according to the Meyerding classification were evaluated. Results In total, 602 patients undergoing fusion in L5/S1 were identified in the registry, n = 570 PLIF (group 1) and n = 32 ALIF (group 2). A significant difference in the ASA score between the two groups was noted; group 1 had more patients suffering a more debilitating disease in comparison to group 2. There was no significant difference in gender, grade of spondylolisthesis, age, or smoking status. Significant differences were found in operative and postoperative variables and complications (fusion material, dura injury). Conclusion No difference was found between the two procedures in terms of symptomatic benefit of patients who underwent either ALIF or PLIF. According to the DWG Register, PLIF was the preferred method to treat isthmic spondylolisthesis in the sacrolumbar junction in Germany. To compare these two spine fusion techniques, further studies with an adequate sample size and follow-up period are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One expanding area of bioinformatics is medical diagnosis through the categorization of biomedical characteristics. Automatic medical strategies to boost the diagnostic through machine learning (ML) methods are challenging. They require a formal examination of their performance to identify the best conditions that enhance the ML method. This work proposes variants of the Voting and Stacking (VC and SC) ensemble strategies based on diverse auto-tuning supervised machine learning techniques to increase the efficacy of traditional baseline classifiers for the automatic diagnosis of vertebral column orthopedic illnesses. The ensemble strategies are created by first combining a complete set of auto-tuned baseline classifiers based on different processes, such as geometric, probabilistic, logic, and optimization. Next, the three most promising classifiers are selected among k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Decision Tree (DT). The grid-search K-Fold cross-validation strategy is applied to auto-tune the baseline classifier hyperparameters. The performances of the proposed ensemble strategies are independently compared with the auto-tuned baseline classifiers. A concise analysis evaluates accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-ACU metrics. The analysis also examines the misclassified disease elements to find the most and least reliable classifiers for this specific medical problem. The results show that the VC ensemble strategy provides an improvement comparable to that of the best baseline classifier (the kNN). Meanwhile, when all baseline classifiers are included in the SC ensemble, this strategy surpasses 95% in all the evaluated metrics, standing out as the most suitable option for classifying vertebral column diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of lumbar decompression and instrumented fusion without reduction in a cohort of female patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 25 female patients who underwent posterior lumbar decompression and instrumented fusion at a single institution between January 2010 and January 2020, all of whom were followed up for at least 12 months. The study measured changes in pain and disability using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), along with changes in vertebral alignment, olisthesis, grade, and slip angle. Results: Significant reductions were observed in pain intensity (VAS scores decreased from 7.4 to 4.08, p<0.001) and disability levels (ODI scores reduced from 65.12 to 31.04, p<0.001). Improvements were also noted in the listhesis grade (from 2.08 to 1.28, p<0.001) and a decrease in sacral slope (p=0.017). The change in the slip angle was not statistically significant (p=0.074). No significant changes were observed in pelvic tilt (p=0.353). The only reported complication was adjacent segment degeneration in one patient, which required revision. Conclusion: In situ fusion without reduction can effectively alleviate pain, improve function, and lead to spontaneous correction of olisthesis grade in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, particularly those with low-grade slips. These outcomes support the efficacy of in situ fusion as a safer, less invasive alternative to vertebral reduction. This approach could influence clinical decision-making in the management of degenerative spondylolisthesis, although further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are necessary to validate these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case: A 62-year-old woman receiving romosozumab for 3 months underwent extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. From 1 week after surgery, she experienced gradually increasing pain from the right groin to the front of the thigh. Examination revealed ossifying myositis in bilateral psoas major muscles. Etidronate treatment was initiated, improving pain after 4 days. Computed tomography showed lesion disappearance by 3 months after surgery. Conclusion: We report a rare case of myositis ossificans in bilateral psoas major muscles following XLIF surgery, possibly influenced by intraoperative manipulation and romosozumab treatment. Etidronate administration may be effective, as with heterotopic ossification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The comparative effectiveness of decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty versus decompression plus instrumented lumbar spinal fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis is unknown. Methods: In this randomized, controlled, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial, we assigned patients who had single-level lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis to undergo decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty (arthroplasty group) or decompression plus fusion (fusion group). The primary outcome was a predetermined composite clinical success score. Secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), Short Form (SF)-12, radiographic parameters, surgical variables, and complications. Results: A total of 321 adult patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion, with 219 patients assigned to undergo facet arthroplasty and 102 patients assigned to undergo fusion. Of these, 113 patients (51.6%) in the arthroplasty group and 47 (46.1%) in the fusion group who had either reached 24 months of postoperative follow-up or were deemed early clinical failures were included in the primary outcome analysis. The arthroplasty group had a higher proportion of patients who achieved composite clinical success than did the fusion group (73.5% versus 25.5%; p < 0.001), equating to a between-group difference of 47.9% (95% confidence interval, 33.0% to 62.8%). The arthroplasty group outperformed the fusion group in most patient-reported outcome measures (including the ODI, VAS back pain, and all ZCQ component scores) at 24 months postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in surgical variables or complications, except that the fusion group had a higher rate of developing symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration. Conclusions: Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis, lumbar facet arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of composite clinical success than fusion was at 24 months postoperatively. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Rare coexistence of disease or pathology Background: Cervical spondylolysis with spondylolisthesis is a rare disorder. According to previous reports, the spondylolisthesis is usually Meyerding Grade I, with only a limited number of cases receiving surgical treatment. We hereby report a special case of cervical spondylolysis with Grade-II spondylolisthesis, treated with single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and present a literature review related to this problem. Case Report: Here, we report the case of a 52-year-old man who complained of posterior neck pain and numbness of the bilateral upper limbs. Radiological examination showed bilateral spondylolysis of the C6 and Meyerding Grade-II spondylolisthesis of C6 on C7 with instability. The patient underwent a single-level C6/C7 ACDF surgery. The symptoms of neck pain and bilateral upper-limb numbness were relieved immediately after surgery. The immediate postoperative radiological examination showed successful restoration of sagittal alignment. At 3-month follow-up, the patient had returned to normal life without any symptoms. At 2-year follow-up, computed tomography showed that C6-C7 fusion had been achieved and alignment was maintained. Conclusions: Cervical spondylolysis, as an uncommon spinal disorder, has been regarded as a congenital abnormity, and has unique radiological characteristics. For most of the cases with cervical spondylolysis, even with Grade-II spondylolisthesis, single-level ACDF can achieve good clinical and radiological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Orthopädie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Study Design: This was a retrospective case-control study using 8 years of data from a nationwide database of surgical outcomes in the United States. Purpose: This study aimed to improve our understanding of the risk factors associated with a length of stay (LOS) >1 day and aid in reducing postoperative hospitalization and complications. Overview of Literature: Despite the proven safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), some patients face prolonged postoperative hospitalization. Methods: Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset from 2011 to 2018. The cohort was divided into patients with LOS up to 1 day (LOS ≤1 day), defined as same day or next-morning discharge, and patients with LOS >1 day (LOS >1 day). Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of LOS >1 day. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare pre- and postdischarge complication rates. Results: A total of 12,664 eligible patients with TLIF were identified, of which 14.8% had LOS ≤1 day and 85.2% had LOS >1 day. LOS >1 day was positively associated with female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3, and operation length of >150 minutes. Patients with LOS >1 day were more likely to undergo intraoperative/postoperative blood transfusion (0.3% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001) and reoperation (0.1% vs. 0.6%, p=0.004). No significant differences in the rates of postdischarge complications were found between the matched groups. Conclusions: Patients with worsened preoperative status, preoperative diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, and prolonged operative time are more likely to require prolonged hospitalization and blood transfusions and undergo unplanned reoperation. To reduce the risk of prolonged hospitalization and associated complications, patients indicated for TLIF should be carefully selected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A retrospective cohort study using the Kaplan-Meier method with propensity-score matching. Purpose: To evaluate whether the presence of prevalent morphometric vertebral fractures (VFs) poses a risk for subsequent clinical VFs after short-fusion surgery in women aged ≥60 years with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Overview of Literature: VFs are common osteoporotic fractures and are associated with a low quality of life. Subsequent VFs are a complication of instrumented fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. Thus, risk factors for subsequent VFs after fusion surgery must be analyzed. Population-based studies have suggested that prevalent morphometric VFs led to a higher incidence of subsequent VFs in postmenopausal women; however, no studies have investigated whether prevalent morphometric VFs are a risk factor for subsequent VFs after fusion surgery in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods: The study enrolled a total of 237 older female patients: 50 and 187 patients had prevalent morphometric VFs (VF [+] group) and nonprevalent morphometric VFs (VF [−] group), respectively. The time to subsequent clinical VFs after fusion surgery was compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Moreover, 40 and 80 patients in the VF (+) and VF (−) groups, respectively, were analyzed and matched by propensity scores for age, follow-up duration, surgical procedure, number of fused segments, body mass index, and number of patients treated for osteoporosis. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the VF (+) group had a higher incidence of subsequent clinical VFs than the VF (−) group, and Cox regression analysis showed that the presence of prevalent morphometric VFs was an independent risk factor for subsequent clinical VFs before matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated comparable results after matching. Conclusions: The presence of prevalent morphometric VFs may be a risk factor for subsequent clinical VFs in older women with degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent short-fusion surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A retrospective case-control propensity score-matching study. Purpose: This study aimed to longitudinally evaluate whether preoperative ligamentous stenosis at the spondylolisthetic segments could affect the incidence of symptomatic adjacent canal stenosis following one-segment fusion surgery. Overview of Literature: Several risk factors for symptomatic adjacent canal stenosis following fusion surgery have been assessed. Patients with lumbar canal stenosis mainly due to ligamentum flavum (LF) hypertrophy (ligamentous stenosis) also have LF hypertrophy in other segments. Methods: In total, 76 patients participated in this case-control study (neurologically symptomatic adjacent canal stenosis, n=33; neurologically asymptomatic cases at follow-up, n=43). Their risk factors during surgery and magnetic resonance (MR) images before the surgery and at follow-up were evaluated. Data from the two groups (n=25 each) were matched using propensity scores for age, sex, time to MR imaging at follow-up, surgical procedure, and LF hypertrophy in adjacent segments before the surgery and analyzed. Results: Compared with the asymptomatic group, the symptomatic adjacent canal stenosis group had a significantly larger LF area/spinal canal area in the spondylolisthetic segments before the surgery. During the follow-up periods (in months), they had a larger LF area/spinal canal area in the adjacent segments: the two values were significantly correlated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for determining symptomatic adjacent canal stenosis were high compared with on the cutoff value for the LF area/spinal canal area at the spondylolisthetic segments before the surgery. These results were the same after matching. Conclusions: Symptomatic adjacent canal stenosis is mainly caused by LF hypertrophy. Ligamentous stenosis at the spondylolisthetic segments before fusion surgery might be strongly associated with symptomatic adjacent canal stenosis at follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) with Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery, interbody fusion implants play a key role in supporting the vertebral body and facilitating fusion. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of implantation depth on sagittal parameters and functional outcomes in patients undergoing PLIF surgery. Methods: This study reviewed 128 patients with L4‐L5 LDS between January 2016 and August 2019. All patients underwent an open PLIF surgery that included intravertebral decompression, implantation of pedicle screws and cage. We grouped according to the position of the center of the cage relative to the L5 vertebral endplate. Patients with the center of the cage located at the anterior 1/2 of the upper end plate of the L5 vertebral body were divided into Anterior group, and located at the posterior 1/2 of the upper end plate of the L5 vertebral body were divided into Posterior group. The lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and slope degree (SD) was measured for radiographic outcomes. We used the visual analog scale (VAS) and the oswestry disability index (ODI) score to assess functional outcomes. Paired t‐test was used to compare imaging and bedside data before and after surgery between the two groups, and independent sample t‐test, χ2 test and Fisher exact test were used to compare the data between the two groups. Result: The mean follow‐up of Anterior group was 44.13 ± 9.23 months, and Posterior group was 45.62 ± 10.29 months (P > 0.05). The LL, SL, PT, SS, SD and PI‐LL after operation showed great improvements, relative to the corresponding preoperative values in both groups (P < 0.05). Compared to Posterior group, Anterior group exhibited far enhanced SL (15.49 ± 3.28 vs. 13.67 ± 2.53, P < 0.05), LL (53.47 ± 3.21 vs. 52.08 ± 3.15, P < 0.05) outcomes and showed depressed PI‐LL (8.87 ± 5.05 vs. 10.73 ± 5.39, P < 0.05) outcomes at the final follow‐up. Meanwhile, the SL in Anterior group (16.18 ± 3.99) 1 months after operation were also higher than in Posterior group (14.12 ± 3.57) (P < 0.05). We found that VAS and ODI at the final follow‐up in Anterior group (3.62 ± 0.96, 25.19 ± 5.25) were significantly lower than those in Posterior group (4.12 ± 0.98, 27.68 ± 5.13) (P < 0.05). Conclusions: For patients with LDS, the anteriorly placed cage may provide better improvement of SL after PLIF surgery. Meanwhile, the anteriorly placed cage may achieve better sagittal parameters of LL and PI‐LL and functional outcomes at the final follow‐up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Klippel–Feil syndrome (KF) is a rare disease defined as single or multi-level cervical vertebra fusion. KF could be accompanied by other spinal anomalies or isolated, and in which case necessity of whole spine screening is not clearly known. KF is investigated in terms of prevalence, gender distribution, fusion types, and frequency of accompanying anomalies according to types of KF. Methods: Approval from our hospital's ethics committee was received for this single-center, retrospective study. Considering the exclusion criteria among the 40,901 cervical spine MRIs, 40,450 patients were included in the study. It was re-evaluated for KF, fusion level, classification, cervical scoliosis, and other musculoskeletal and spinal anomalies. Results: 125 (0.309%) of 40,450 patients is diagnosed with KF, which is more common in women (P < 0.001). Single fused segment 106 (84.8%), multilevel fused segments 8 (6.4%), contiguous fused segments 11 (8.8%) are observed. Upper level KF is detected in 13 (10.4%) patients. The frequency of additional anomaly is significantly higher in upper level KF compared to other level fusions (P < 0.001, Chi-square t). The cervical scoliosis is diagnosed 34 (27%). In KF patients with scoliosis, the frequency of additional anomalies was significantly higher (P < 0.001, Chi-square t). Conclusion: Klippel–Feil prevalence is 0.309%, it is frequently observed in women, and at C2–C3 level. Additional anomalies are especially associated with 'contiguous fused segments' and 'upper level' types. Klippel–Feil with scoliosis is an indicator of increased risk for associated anomalies, and examination of the whole spine is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Traumatic subaxial fractures account for more than half of all cervical spine injuries. The optimal surgical approach is a matter of debate and may include anterior, posterior or a combined anteroposterior (360º) approach. Analyzing a cohort of patients initially treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for traumatic subaxial injuries, the study aimed to identify predictors for treatment failure and the subsequent need for supplementary posterior fusion (PF). Methods: A retrospective, single center, consecutive cohort study of all adult patients undergoing primary ACDF for traumatic subaxial cervical spine fractures between 2006 and 2018 was undertaken and 341 patients were included. Baseline clinical and radiological data for all included patients were analyzed and 11 cases of supplementary posterior fixation were identified. Results: Patients were operated at a median of 2.0 days from the trauma, undergoing 1-level (78%), 2-levels (16%) and ≥ 3-levels (6.2%) ACDF. A delayed supplementary PF was performed in 11 cases, due to ACDF failure. On univariable regression analysis, older age (p = 0.017), shorter stature (p = 0.031), posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) injury (p = 0.004), injury to ligamentum flavum (p = 0.005), bilateral facet joint dislocation (p < 0.001) and traumatic cervical spondylolisthesis (p = 0.003) predicted ACDF failure. On the multivariable regression model, older age (p = 0.015), PLL injury (p = 0.048), and bilateral facet joint dislocation (p = 0.010) remained as independent predictors of ACDF failure. Conclusions: ACDF is safe and effective for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine fractures. High age, bilateral facet joint dislocation and traumatic PLL disruption are independent predictors of failure. We suggest increased vigilance regarding these cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spondylolisthesis is characterized by the displacement of one vertebral body in relation to the adjacent vertebra. It is commonly observed in the lower lumbar region and can be caused by a variety of factors, including spondylolysis (a fracture in the pars interarticularis) or degenerative disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming increasingly popular as the primary modality for evaluation of low back pain and is often used in the absence of radiographs or Computed Tomography. However, it can be challenging for radiologists to differentiate between the two types of spondylolisthesis based on MRI alone. The goal of this article is to identify key imaging features on MRI that can aid radiologists in differentiating between spondylolysis and degenerative spondylolisthesis on MRI. Five key concepts are discussed: the "step-off" sign, the "wide canal" sign, T2 cortical bone signal on MRI, epidural fat interposition, and fluid in the facet joints. The utility, limitations and potential pitfalls of these concepts are also discussed to provide a comprehensive understanding of their use in differentiating between the two types of spondylolisthesis on MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Interventional treatment options for the lumbar degenerative spine have undergone a significant amount of innovation over the last decade. As new technologies emerge, along with the surgical specialty expansion, there is no manuscript that utilizes a review of surgical treatments with evidence rankings from multiple specialties, namely, the interventional pain and spine communities. Through the Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS), the purpose of this manuscript is to provide a balanced evidence review of available surgical treatments. Methods: The PSPS Research Committee created a working group that performed a comprehensive literature search on available surgical technologies for the treatment of the degenerative spine, utilizing the ranking assessment based on USPSTF (United States Preventative Services Taskforce) and NASS (North American Spine Society) criteria. Results: The surgical treatments were separated based on disease process, including treatments for degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis. Conclusions: There is emerging and significant evidence to support multiple approaches to treat the symptomatic lumbar degenerative spine. As new technologies become available, training, education, credentialing, and peer review are essential for optimizing patient safety and successful outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the morphometry of paraspinal muscles in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS), and healthy individuals. Methods: Thirty-seven pairs of DS patients were selected using propensity score matching with IS patients, while 37 healthy individuals matched for age, sex, and BMI were selected as controls. The relative cross-sectional area (rCSA), and relative functional cross-sectional area (rfCSA) of paraspinal muscles were measured, and the degree of fatty infiltration (FI) was calculated. Based on occupational differences, the patients were also divided into worker and farmer groups, and the same measurements were taken on them. Results: At the L3/L4 level, the multifidus (MF) FI was greater in the DS and IS groups than in the control group, the erector spinae (ES) rfCSA was higher in the IS group than in the DS and control groups. At the L4/L5 level, MF rfCSA was smaller in the DS and IS groups than in the control group; ES rfCSA was higher in the IS group than in the DS and control groups. At the L5/S1 level, MF rfCSA was smaller in the DS and IS groups than in the control group; ES rfCSA was higher in the IS group than in the DS group. At the L3/L4, L4/L5 level, MF rfCSA were higher in the worker group than in the farmer group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The morphological changes in paraspinal muscles in patients with DS were dominated by selective atrophy of the MF, while in patients with IS, the morphological changes in paraspinal muscle showed selective atrophy of the MF accompanied by compensatory hypertrophy of the ES. The surgeon should consider the morphological differences in paraspinal muscle between different types of lumbar spondylolisthesis when establishing the appropriate surgical program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and spondylolisthesis (SPL) are characterized as degenerative spinal pathologies and share considerable similarities. However, opinions vary on whether to recommend exercise or restrict it for these diseases. Few studies have objectively compared the effects of daily physical activity on LSS and SPL because it is impossible to restrict activities ethnically and practically. We investigated the effect of restricting physical activity due to social distancing (SoD) on LSS and SPL, focusing on the aspect of healthcare burden changes during the pandemic period. Methods: We included first-visit patients diagnosed exclusively with LSS and SPL in 2017 and followed them up for two years before and after the implementation of the SoD policy. As controls, patients who first visited in 2015 and were followed for four years without SoD were analyzed. The common data model was employed to analyze each patient's diagnostic codes and treatments. Hospital visits and medical costs were analyzed by regression discontinuity in time to control for temporal effects on dependent variables. Results: Among 33,484 patients, 2,615 with LSS and 446 with SPL were included. A significant decrease in hospital visits was observed in the LSS (difference, -3.94 times/month·100 patients; p = 0.023) and SPL (difference, -3.44 times/month·100 patients; p = 0.026) groups after SoD. This decrease was not observed in the data from the control group. Concerning medical costs, the LSS group showed a statistically significant reduction in median copayment (difference, -$45/month·patient; p < 0.001) after SoD, whereas a significant change was not observed in the SPL group (difference, -$19/month·patient; p = 0.160). Conclusion: Restricted physical activity during the SoD period decreased the healthcare burden for patients with LSS or, conversely, it did not significantly affect patients with SPL. Under circumstances of physical inactivity, patients with LSS may underrate their symptoms, while maintaining an appropriate activity level may be beneficial for patients with SPL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Expected operative challenges in minimally invasive spine surgeries as a result of restricted surgical field, unfamiliarity with surgical approaches and fear of complications are behind the preference of using traditional "open" spine surgery. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of mini-open Wiltse approach in comparison with the conventional midline approach for posterolateral lumbar stabilization and fusion. Patients and methods: A retrospective comparative study conducted on 49 patients with low grade single level lumbar spondylolithesis who were surgically treated in our Department between May 2020 and May 2022. Patients who were surgically treated with traditional midline approach were included in group (A) and patients in whom the mini-open Wiltse approach was used, were assigned to group (B). The two groups were compared regarding various intra and postoperative parameters. Results: Group (A) included 27 patients (55.1%) operated upon with the classic midline approach and 22 patients (44.9%) were surgically treated using the Wiltse approach (group B). The mean patients' age (50.43 ± 5.538) years and L4-5 was the most commonly affected level (71.4%). The intra-operative parameters (operation time, blood loss and fluoroscopy time) showed significant lower results (P < 0.001) among patients of group (B). No cases in the group (B) required blood transfusion versus 5 cases in group (A) (P = 0.033). Postoperatively, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were significantly improved in each group in comparison to the preoperative scores (P < 0.001). However, after 3 months the ODI score in group (B) was superior to that in group (A) (P = 0.045) and postoperative VAS score in group (B) was significantly improved compared to that in group (A) at discharge (P = 0.016), and also after 1 and 3 months (P < 0.001). Patients operated with Wiltse approach had a shorter duration of hospital stay but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.090). Conclusions: Because of minimal trauma to the muscles and soft tissues, the mini-open Wiltse approach can be faster, safer and requires less recovery time as opposed to the classic midline approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) and midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) in patients with spondylolisthesis. Methods: This study retrospectively compared the patients who underwent MIS TLIF (n = 37) or MIDLIF (n = 50) for spinal spondylolisthesis. Data of surgical outcomes (postoperative one-year fusion rate and time to bony fusion), clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] for spine function), and complications were collected and analyzed. Results: There was more 2-level fusion in MIDLIF (46% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.038). The MIS TLIF and MIDLIF groups had similar one-year fusion rate and time to fusion. The MIDLIF group had significantly lower VAS at postoperative 3-months (2.2 vs. 3.1, p = 0.002) and postoperative 1-year (1.1 vs. 2.1, p = < 0.001). ODI was not significantly different. The operation time was shorter in MIDLIF (166.1 min vs. 196.2 min, p = 0.014). The facet joint violation is higher in MIS TLIF (21.6% vs. 2%, p = 0.009). The other complications were not significantly different including rate of implant removal, revision, and adjacent segment disease. Conclusion: In this study, postoperative VAS, operation time, and the rate of facet joint violation were significantly higher in the MIS TLIF group. Comparable outcomes were observed between MIDLIF and MIS TLIF in terms of fusion rate, time to fusion, and postoperative ODI score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]