Search

Study design: Prospective cohort study. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with clinically meaningful improvement, patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment at 2 years follow-up in patients undergoing single-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods: Patients who underwent a primary, single-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2006 and 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional spine registry. Baseline characteristics and PROMs including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS), Mental Component Score (SF-36 MCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) back pain, and VAS leg pain were collected preoperatively, at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 2 years. Results: A total of 997 patients were included. Multivariate analyses showed that increasing age (OR 1.039, P <.001) and better preoperative ODI (OR.984, P =.018) were associated with achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for VAS Back. Increasing age (OR 1.032, P =.007) and better preoperative VAS Back (OR.783, P <.001) were associated with achieving MCID for VAS Leg. Lower BMI (OR.952, P =.024) and better preoperative ODI (OR.976, P <.001) were associated with achieving MCID for SF-36 PCS. Importantly, a better preoperative SF-36 MCS was associated with MCID attainment for ODI (OR 1.038, P <.001), satisfaction (OR 1.034, P <.001) and expectation fulfilment (OR 1.024, P <.001). Conclusion: Patients who were older, have less preoperative disability and better preoperative mental health were significantly more likely to attain clinically meaningful improvement in PROMs and postoperative satisfaction after single-level TLIF. Identification of these factors would aid surgeons in patient selection and surgical counselling for single-level TLIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study Objectives: To compare early postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes between 2-level minimally invasive (MIS) trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: Fifty three consecutive patients undergoing 2-level lumbar interbody fusion from L3-L5 for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were enrolled. Twenty four patients underwent LLIF and 29 underwent TLIF. Results: Operative time and length of stay were similar between LLIF and TLIF (272.8 ± 82.4 vs 256.1 ± 59.4 minutes; 5.5 ± 2.8 vs 4.7 ± 3.3 days, P >.05), whereas blood loss was lower for LLIF (229.0 ± 125.6 vs 302.4 ± 97.1mls, P =.026). Neurological deficits were more common in LLIF (9 vs 3, P =.025), whereas persistent deficits were rare for both (1 vs 1, P = 1). For both groups, all patient reported outcomes visual analogue scale (VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, ODI, SF-36 physical) improved from preoperative to 2-years postoperative (P <.05), with both groups showing no significant differences in extent of improvement for any outcome. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion demonstrated superior restoration of disc height (L3-L4: 4.1 ± 2.4 vs 1.2 ± 1.9 mm, P <.001; L4-L5: 4.6 ± 2.4 vs.8 ± 2.8 mm, P <.001), foraminal height (FH) (L3-L4: 3.5 ± 3.6 vs 1.0 ± 3.6 mm, P =.014; L4-L5: 3.0 ± 3.5 vs -.1 ± 4.4 mm, P =.0080), segmental lordosis (4.1 ± 6.4 vs -2.1 ± 8.1°, P =.005), lumbar lordosis (LL) (4.1 ± 7.0 vs -2.3 ± 12.6°, P =.026) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch (−4.1 ± 7.0 vs 2.3 ± 12.6°, P =.019) at 2-years follow-up. Conclusion: The superior radiological outcomes demonstrated by 2-level trans-psoas LLIF did not translate into difference in clinical outcomes compared to 2-level TLIF at the 2-years follow-up, suggesting both approaches are reasonable for 2-level lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on examining the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaedic specialist training in Singapore. It highlights disruptions caused by the pandemic, such as the suspensionsion of rotations and teaching activities, and the need for modified teaching strategies. It reports that orthopaedic residents faced challenges in maintaining patient contact and surgical exposure, and it emphasizes the importance of developing resilient contingency plans.

Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is a rare but devastating complication post spinal surgery. We present three cases of post spine surgery ICH that were associated with high drain outputs postoperatively. The first patient underwent C1–C6 instrumented fusion and C4–C6 decompression. 950 mls hemoserous fluid was drained via suction drain immediately postoperatively. He suffered cerebral hemorrhage with tonsillar herniation and was brain dead on the same night. The second patient underwent C1–T1 instrumented fusion with C3–C4 decompression. 400 mls hemoserous fluid was drained via suction drain shortly after skin closure. He suffered subdural hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage and intraventricular hemorrhage, with persistent neurologic deficits and required long-term institutionalised care. The third patient underwent L2–L4 decompression and instrumented fusion. 480 mls hemoserous fluid was drained via suction drain 2 hours postoperatively. He suffered subdural haemorrhage but eventually recovered fully. An excessive drain output, especially within first few minutes to hours postoperatively, may signify a CSFleak. Suction drains should be used with caution in these cases as negative suction in the presence of a dura tear increases risk of post spine surgery ICH. In these cases, the use of non-suction drains should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the relationship between body mass index (BMI) subjective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after 1- and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Overview of Literature: The prevalence of cervical spondylosis and ACDF in expected to continue rising among the aging population of Asia. Moreover, the prevalence of obesity is also increasing. However, limited information is available about the mechanism by which BMI affects PRO after ACDF. Methods: Total 878 patients underwent ACDF between 2000 and 2015. After excluding patients with previous cervical instrumentation, >2 levels fused, missing BMI measurement, or neoplastic/trauma indication for surgery, 535 patients were included. The PRO measures of the Neck Disability Index, Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for Neck Pain, NPRS for Limb Pain, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons--Neurogenic Symptom Score, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score were used. Patients were grouped based on their preoperative BMI, as per the World Health Organization guidelines for Asian populations. PRO scores were collected preoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the relationship of BMI category with the individual score, accounting for several factors that are likely to affect the outcomes. Results: Total 19 (3.4%) were underweight, 155 (28.0%) were normal weight, 112 (20.3%) were overweight, and 267 (48.3%) were obese. Patients across all BMI categories experienced significant and similar improvements in their postoperative PRO scores. There were no significant differences in the preoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 2-year postoperative PRO scores of the groups. Rate of reoperation was highest in patients with grade II obesity at 8.07%; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Irrespective of the BMI, all patients exhibited similar satisfactory outcomes following ACDF. The results support surgery in all subgroups of patients with symptomatic nerve compression in the cervical spine [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Osteoblastoma is a primary benign tumour which commonly presents in the younger population during the second decade of life. However, more aggressive osteoblastomas may present with features of aneurysmal bone cyst, and these can occur at uncommon locations. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 12-year-old child having an osteoblastoma on the left side of T11 with secondary aneurysmal bone cyst presenting with neurological deficits and myelopathic symptoms. Surgical debulking of the lesion with decompression laminectomy and posterior instrumentation of the spine was performed. The child is currently recovering well with improvement of neurological deficits. Discussion/Conclusion: Osteoblastoma with aneurysmal bone cyst of the thoracic spine is a rare condition with few reports in the literature, and surgical intervention with complete excision has been demonstrated here with recovery of neurological function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Allografts and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are the two most commonly used materials in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, their effectiveness in two-level ACDF remains controversial. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level ACDF with plate fixation using either a structural allograft or a PEEK cage.Methods: From 2010 to 2015, 88 consecutive patients underwent two-level ACDF, of whom 53 received an allograft and 35 patients received a PEEK cage. All PEEK cages were filled with local autografts. All clinical outcomes were prospectively collected before and six months and two years after surgery. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using a visual analogue scale for neck pain and limb pain, the Neck Pain and Disability Score, the Neck Disability Index, the Neurogenic Symptom Score, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Radiological outcomes were assessed preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at the final follow-up.Results: A preoperative comparison revealed no difference between the two patient groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, preoperative symptoms, operation level, or follow-up (mean = 42.8 months). No differences in the improvements in clinical outcomes were observed between the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in mean disc height, segmental height, and segmental lordosis postoperatively. The fusion rate for the PEEK cage was 100% at both levels, while the fusion rate for the allograft group was 98.1% at the cephalad level and 94.2% at the caudad level (p > 0.05). Subsidence at the cephalad level occurred in 22.9% (8/35) of segments in the PEEK group and 7.7% (4/52) of segments in the allograft group (p = 0.057). At the caudal level, a higher incidence of cage subsidence was noted in the PEEK group than in the allograft group [37.1% (13/35) versus 15.4% (8/52)] (p = 0.02). Overall, subsidence was noted in 30% (21/70) of the PEEK group and in 11% (12/104) of the allograft group (p <  0.05).Conclusion: The use of PEEK cages resulted in a higher rate of subsidence in two-level ACDF than the use of allografts. Two-level ACDF using either allografts or PEEK cages resulted in similar clinical outcomes, radiological improvements in alignment and fusion rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although several studies have suggested that minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) may be especially beneficial in the elderly population due to lower operative morbidity and faster postoperative recovery, there are limited studies investigating the functional outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction in elderly patients after MIS-TLIF. Furthermore, existing studies had substantial clinical, diagnostic, and surgical heterogeneity.Questions/purposes: We asked if elderly patients could experience comparable (1) patient-reported pain, disability and quality of life, (2) perioperative complications, and (3) radiological fusion rates as their younger counterparts after MIS-TLIF.Methods: Prospectively collected registry data of patients undergoing primary, single-level, MIS-TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2012 and 2014 were reviewed. We included 168 patients, 39 of whom were at least 70 years old. Of the 129 patients younger than 70 years old, propensity-score matching was used to select 39 younger controls with adjustment for sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and baseline clinical outcomes. Perioperative complications and radiologic data were compared.Results: There was no difference in back pain (mean difference -0.3 [95% confidence interval -1.0 to 0.5]; p = 0.52); leg pain (mean difference -0.1 [95% CI to 0.6-0.5]; p = 0.85); Oswestry Disability Index (mean difference -2.9 [95% CI -8.0 to 2.2]; p = 0.26); and SF-36 physical (mean difference 3.0 [95% CI -0.7 to 6.8]; p = 0.107); and mental component summary (mean difference 1.9 [95% CI -4.5 to 8.2]; p = 0.56); up to 2 years postoperatively; 85% of younger patients and 85% of elderly patients were satisfied (p > 0.99) while 87% and 80%, respectively, had fulfilled expectations (p = 0.36). Four perioperative adverse events occurred in each group. There was also no difference in the rate of fusion (87% in younger patients and 90% in elderly patients; p = 0.135).Conclusions: When clinical and surgical heterogeneity were minimized, elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion not only had comparable rates of perioperative complications but also experienced similar improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. A high rate of satisfaction was achieved.Level Of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There is limited literature on the management of neglected healed (fused) bilateral cervical facet dislocation. The authors report a case of a middle aged male who developed a bilateral facet dislocation but only sought treatment 14 months post injury when he experienced pain and deformity in the cervical spine. Case report: A 42-year-old male was pushed into a 1.2-m pool by accident and hit his head on the bottom. He immediately felt a sharp pain in his neck but was able to get out of the pool by himself and at the emergency department was found to have no neurological deficit. Standard trauma radiographs were performed and a grade 1 anterolisthesis of C4 on C5 was observed without any facet subluxation or dislocation. An emergent Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine confirmed X-ray results and in addition demonstrated injury to the posterior ligament complex and a broad-based posterior disc bulge. Computed Tomography (CT) scans revealed no facet dislocation or fractures. Unfortunately, the patient failed to come for his follow-up visits and at 14 months post injury, represented with pain and deformity with impairment of horizontal gaze. Computed tomography and MRI demonstrated a fused (bony) bilateral facet dislocation at C4/5. A cervical spine reconstruction consisting of a posterior-anterior-posterior approach was performed to address both the deformity and the pain. At 32-month follow-up, the patient remains well with no neurological symptoms, minimal neck pain and successful fusion. Conclusion: Current literature does not offer a clear solution to the management of healed neglected bilateral cervical facet dislocation. The presence of circumferential bony fusion around the deformity necessitates a posterior and anterior release and subsequent stabilization to address this complex problem. We also wish to highlight the order of the reconstructive approach and the need to recognize instability of the cervical spine despite normal CT scans in order to prevent late deformity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an established treatment for structural instability associated with symptomatic disk degeneration (SDD). Stand-alone ALIF offers many advantages, however, it may increase the risk of non-union. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) may enhance fusion rate but is associated with postoperative complication. The optimal dose of BMP-2 remains unclear. This study assessed the fusion and subsidence rates of stand-alone ALIF using the SynFix-LR interbody cage with 6 ml/level of BMP-2. Methods: Thirty-two ALIF procedures were performed by a single surgeon in 25 patients. Twenty-five procedures were performed for SDD without spondylolisthesis (SDD group) and seven procedures were performed for SDD with grade-I olisthesis (SDD-olisthesis group). Patients were followed-up for a mean of 17 ± 6 months. Results: Solid fusion was achieved in 29 cases (90.6 %) within 6 months postoperatively. Five cases of implant subsidence were observed (16 %). Four of these occurred in the SDD-olisthesis group and one occurred in the SDD group (57 % vs. 4 % respectively; p = 0.004). Three cases of subsidence failed to fuse and required revision. The body mass index of patients with olisthesis who developed subsidence was higher than those who did not develop subsidence (29 ± 2.6 vs. 22 ± 6.5 respectively; p = 0.04). No BMP-2 related complications occurred. Conclusion: The overall fusion rate of stand-alone ALIF using the SynFix-LR system with BMP-2 was 90.6 %, comparable with other published series. No BMP-2 related complication occurred at a dose of 6 mg/level. Degenerative spondylolisthesis and obesity seemed to increase the rate of implant subsidence, and thus we believe that adding posterior fusion for these cases should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]