Search

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computerized 3-dimensional (3-D) motion measurement systems are used by those interested in human motion. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the limits of accuracy in determining intersegmental angles during pendular motion at varying speeds and (2) to determine changes in accuracy introduced by autodigitization and digitization by experienced manual raters. METHODS: Angular speed of a T-shaped pendulum was systematically increased by releasing the pendulum from 4 angles (0 degrees [no movement], 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees). Twelve reference angles calculated from markers placed on the pendulum were estimated over 20 frames for 10 trials at each release position. RESULTS: Mean errors across trials and frames for intersegmental angles reconstructed by a 3-D motion measurement system were within +/- 1 degree across all release positions. An analysis of variance and a post hoc Tukey test revealed that the mean error for the autodigitized trials was larger than that for the manually digitized trials. For the autodigitized trials, the static trials (release position=0 degrees) produced less mean error than the trials with movement produced. The ICCs showed a high degree of consistency among all raters, ranging from .707 to .999. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Our findings support the conclusion that under carefully controlled conditions, a 3-D motion measurement system can produce clinically acceptable measurements of accuracy across a range of angular speeds. Furthermore, acceptable accuracy is possible regardless of the digitization method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Three-dimensional computerized gait analysis continues to grow in use among physical therapists and other clinical specialists interested in quantitative data regarding human ambulation. This study documented the accuracy of reconstructed angular estimates under static and dynamic conditions using the Ariel Performance Analysis System. METHODS: Angular velocity was systematically increased by raising the release position of a T-shaped pendulum. Angular velocities were examined by releasing the pendulum from four angles (0 degree-static, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees). Twelve reference angles were estimated over 20 autodigitized frames for 10 trials at each release position. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) procedures were used to test the hypothesis that the error of angular estimates grows with increasing angular velocity. RESULTS: Mean errors of the reconstructed angles were consistently within +/- 1.0 degree, regardless of angular velocity. An ANOVA revealed a statistically significant angular velocity effect, characterized by release position. The 90-degree release position produced the greatest error, followed by the 120-, 45-, and 0-degree release positions. The error was not significantly different between the 120- and 45-degree release positions. Intraclass correlation coefficients greater than .90 were found for all frame-to-frame angular velocities, except for the 90-degree release position. The angle estimates consistently underestimated the reference angles, regardless of release position. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The results suggest that clinically accurate angular estimates can be obtained across the range of angular velocities used in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]