1. Exercise intensity measurement using fractal analysis of heart rate variability: Reliability, agreement and influence of sex and cardiorespiratory fitness.
- Author
-
Sheoran, Samrat, Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Antonis, Simpson, Clare, Ashby, Martin, Webber, Elliot, and Weaving, Dan
- Subjects
CARDIOPULMONARY fitness ,RESEARCH funding ,SEX distribution ,EXERCISE intensity ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,HEART beat ,LACTATES ,STATISTICAL reliability - Abstract
The study aimed to establish the test-retest reliability of detrended fluctuation analysis of heart rate variability (DFA-α1) based exercise intensity thresholds, assess its agreement with ventilatory- and lactate-derived thresholds and the moderating effect of sex and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) on the agreement. Intensity thresholds for thirty-seven participants (17 females) based on blood lactate (LT
1 /LT2 ), gas-exchange (VT1 /VT2 ) and DFA-α1 (αTh1 /αTh2 ) were assessed. Heart rate (HR) at αTh1 and αTh2 showed good test-retest reliability (coefficient of variation [CV] < 6%), and moderate to high agreement with LTs (r = 0.40 – 0.57) and VTs (r = 0.61 – 0.66) respectively. Mixed effects models indicated bias magnitude depended on CRF, with DFA-α1 overestimating thresholds versus VTs for lower fitness levels (speed at VT1 <8.5 km⋅hr−1 ), while underestimating for higher fitness levels (speed at VT2 >15 km⋅hr−1 ; VO2max >55 mL·kg−1 ·min−1 ). Controlling for CRF, sex significantly affected bias magnitude only at first threshold, with males having higher mean bias (+2.41 bpm) than females (−1.26 bpm). DFA-α1 thresholds are practical and reliable intensity measures, however it is unclear if they accurately represent LTs/VTs from the observed limits of agreement and unexplained variance. To optimise DFA-α1 threshold estimation across different populations, bias should be corrected based on sex and CRF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF