Search

Introduction: Current recommendations for regional stroke destination suggest that patients with severe acute stroke in non‐urban areas should be triaged based on the estimated transport time to a referral thrombectomy‐capable center. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis to evaluate the association of pre‐hospital workflow times with neurological outcomes in patients included in the RACECAT trial. Workflow times evaluated were known or could be estimated before transport allocation. Primary outcome was the shift analysis on the modified Rankin score at 90 days. Results: Among the 1,369 patients included, the median time from onset to emergency medical service (EMS) evaluation, the estimated transport time to a thrombectomy‐capable center and local stroke center, and the estimated transfer time between centers were 65 minutes (interquartile ratio [IQR] = 43–138), 61 minutes (IQR = 36–80), 17 minutes (IQR = 9–27), and 62 minutes (IQR = 36–73), respectively. Longer time intervals from stroke onset to EMS evaluation were associated with higher odds of disability at 90 days in the local stroke center group (adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) for each 30‐minute increment = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.06), with no association in the thrombectomy‐capable center group (acOR for each 30‐minute increment = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98–1.01, pinteraction = 0.021). No significant interaction was found for other pre‐hospital workflow times. In patients evaluated by EMS later than 120 minutes after stroke onset, direct transport to a thrombectomy‐capable center was associated with better disability outcomes (acOR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.03–2.17). Conclusion: We found a significant heterogeneity in the association between initial transport destination and neurological outcomes according to the elapse of time between the stroke onset and the EMS evaluation (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02795962). ANN NEUROL 2022;92:931–942 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The evolution of the symptomatic intracranial occlusion during transfers from primary stroke centers (PSCs) to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) for endovascular treatment (EVT) is not widely known. Our aim was to identify factors related to partial or complete recanalization (REC) at CSC arrival in patients with a documented large vessel occlusion (LVO) in PSC transferred for EVT evaluation to better define the workflow at CSC of this group of patients. Methods: We conducted an observational, multicenter study from a prospective, government-mandated, population-based registry of stroke patients with documented LVO at PSC transferred to CSC for EVT from January 2017 to June 2019. The primary end point was defined as partial or complete REC that precluded EVT at CSC arrival (REC). We evaluated the association between baseline, treatment variables and time intervals with the presence of REC. Results: From 589 patients, the rate of REC at CSC was 10.5% in all LVO patients transferred from PSC to CSC for EVT evaluation. On univariate analysis, lower PSC-NIHSS (median 12vs.16, p = 0.001), tPA treatment at PSC (13.7 vs. 5.0%; p = 0.001), presence of M2 occlusion on PSC (16.8 vs. 9%; p = 0.023), and clinical improvement at CSC arrival (21.7 vs. 9.6% p = 0.001) were associated with REC at CSC. On multivariate analysis, clinical improvement at CSC arrival (p < 0.001, OR: 5.96 95% CI: 2.5–13.9) and PSC tPA treatment predicted REC (p = 0.003, OR: 4.65, 95% CI: 1.73–12.4). Conclusion: REC at CSC arrival occurs exceptionally in patients with a documented LVO on PSC. Repeating a second vascular study before EVT would not be necessary in most patients. Despite its modest effect, tPA treatment at PSC was an independent predictor of REC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prehospital stroke code activation results in reduced pre- and in-hospital delays and triage and transport of stroke patients to the right centers. In Paraguay, data about acute reper fusion treatment are not available. Recently, a pilot prehospital stroke code program was implemented in the country in November 2016. In an observational, single-center cohort study with a before–after design, from April 2015 to July 2018, we found that 193/832 (23.1%) of stroke patients were stroke code activated, and from these, 54 (6.5%) were brought to hospital under the prehospital stroke code protocol. Fifty-eight patients (58 alteplase and 2 additional endovascular treatment) received reperfusion therapy. Prehospital stroke code patients had a lower mean door-to-CT time (24 vs. 33 min, p = 0.021) and lower mean door-to-needle time (35.3 vs.76.3 min, p < 0.001) compared to in-hospital stroke code patients. Prehospital stroke code is feasible in Paraguay and has a positive impact on in-hospital acute stroke management, reducing delays and increasing the rates of reperfusion treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Cardiac Echoscan is the simplified transthoracic echocardiogram focused on the main source of emboli detection in the acute stroke diagnosis (Stroke Echoscan). We describe the clinical impact related to the Stroke Echoscan protocol in our Center. METHODS Acute stroke patients who underwent the Stroke Echoscan by a trained stroke neurologist were included (Echoscan group). All examinations were reviewed by cardiologists. The main embolic stroke etiologies were: ventricular akinesia (VA), severe aortic atheroma (AA) plaque and cardiac shunt (SHUNT). The rate of the embolic stroke etiologies and the median length of stay (LOS) were compared with a cohort of patients studied by cardiologist (Echo group). RESULTS Eighty acute stroke patients were included. The sensitivity (S) and specificity (E) were: VA ( S 98.6%, E 66.7%, k = .7), AA ( S 93.3%, E 96.9%, k = .88) and SHUNT ( S 100%, E 100%, k = 1), respectively. The rate of AA diagnosis was significantly higher in Echoscan group (18.8% vs. 8.9%; P = .05). Echoscan protocol significantly reduced the LOS: 6 days (IQR 3-10) versus Echo group 9 days (IQR 6-13; P < .001). CONCLUSION The Echoscan protocol was an accurate quick test, which reduced the length of stay and increased the percentage of severe AA plaque diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]