Search

Soil bulk electrical conductivity (BEC) was evaluated alongside soil volumetric water content (VWC) and soil temperature measurements using the HydraProbe (model HydraProbe, Stevens Water Monitoring Systems, Inc.) (hereafter called HP) with accuracy range of BEC ≤ 0.3 S m−1, and the time domain reflectometry (TDR)‐315L Probe (model TDR‐315L, Acclima, Inc.) (hereafter called AP) suitable for BEC up to 0.6 S m−1, at 23 stations of the U.S. Climate Reference Network. Previous evaluations revealed inconsistent performance of both sensors in some clay soils using manufacturer‐recommended calibrations in converting dielectric permittivity measurements to VWC. Here, we found that hourly values of BEC reached 0.6 S m−1 in high clay content soils and exceeded 2 S m−1 in high saline soils, and these high values of BEC were associated with poor performance and failures of both HP and AP sensors. Large values of BEC occurred in predominantly saturated soils where VWC values reached about 0.5 m3 m−3 for saline soils and about 0.7 m3 m−3 for clay soils, while low magnitudes of BEC were associated with low soil water content and seldomly saturated soils. Low hourly BEC values of less than 0.1 S m−1 were observed in wide variety of soil types, where sensor performance was typically excellent. The most influential factor on BEC was high soil water content conditions. Although dielectric permittivity measurements in estimating the soil water content were sensitive to BEC as some high clay content and high salinity soils increased BEC, the impact of large BEC on dielectric permittivity measurements was smaller in the well‐drained top soil layers than in deep soil layers that remained near saturation. Soil temperature had only a small impact on BEC. With high clay content and high salinity, the specific area of clay minerals was also associated with the magnitude of BEC. Core Ideas: Estimated soil bulk electrical conductivity (BEC) and soil volumetric water content (VWC) at soil depths of 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 cm were evaluated across 23 US Climate Reference Network stations.The estimation of BEC and VWC was based on the use of the 50 MHz HydraProbe and the Acclima 1 GHz time‐domain reflectometry (TDR)‐315L.The evaluation suggested that the clay type, specific surface area, clay content, soil salinity, and soil temperature combined to affect how soil BEC increased and decreased with soil water content. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surface-layer parameterizations for heat, mass, momentum, and turbulence exchange are a critical component of the land surface models (LSMs) used in weather prediction and climate models. Although formulations derived from Monin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) have long been used, bulk Richardson (Rib) parameterizations have recently been suggested as a MOST alternative but have been evaluated over a limited number of land-cover and climate types. Examining the parameterizations' applicability over other regions, particularly drylands that cover approximately 41% of terrestrial land surfaces, is a critical step toward implementing the parameterizations into LSMs. One year (1 January–31 December 2018) of eddy covariance measurements from a 10-m tower in southeastern Arizona and a 200-m tower in western Texas were used to determine how well the Rib parameterizations for friction velocity ( u * ), sensible heat flux (H), and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) compare against MOST-derived parameterizations of these quantities. Independent of stability, wind speed regime, and season, the Rib u * and TKE parameterizations performed better than the MOST parameterizations, whereas MOST better represented H. Observations from the 200-m tower indicated that the parameterizations' performance degraded as a function of height above ground. Overall, the Rib parameterizations revealed promising results, confirming better performance than traditional MOST relationships for kinematic (i.e., u * ) and turbulence (i.e., TKE) quantities, although caution is needed when applying the RibH parameterizations to drylands. These findings represent an important milestone for the applicability of Rib parameterizations, given the large fraction of Earth's surface covered by drylands. Significance Statement: Weather forecasting models rely upon complex mathematical relationships to predict temperature, wind, and moisture. Monin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) has long been used to forecast these quantities near the land surface, even though MOST's limitations are well known in the scientific community. Researchers have suggested an alternative to MOST called the bulk Richardson (Rib) approach. To allow for the Rib approach to be used in weather forecasting models, the approach needs to be tested over different land-cover and climate types. In this study, we applied the Rib approach to dry areas of the United States and found that the approach better represented turbulence variables than MOST relationships. These findings are an important step toward using Rib relationships in weather forecasting models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) has been engaged in ground‐based soil water and soil temperature observations since 2009. As a nationwide climate network, the network stations are distributed across vast complex terrains. Due to the expansive distribution of the network and the related variability in soil properties, obtaining site‐specific calibrations for sensors is a significant and costly endeavor. Presented here are three commercial‐grade electromagnetic sensors, with built‐in thermistors to measure both soil water and soil temperature, including the SoilVUE10 Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) probe (hereafter called SP) (Campbell Scientific, Inc.), 50 MHz coaxial impedance dielectric sensor (model HydraProbe, Stevens Water Monitoring Systems, Inc.) (hereafter called HP), and the TDR‐315L Probe (model TDR‐315L, Acclima, Inc.) (hereafter called AP), which were evaluated in a relatively nonconductive loam soil in Oak Ridge, TN, from 2021 to 2022. The HP manufacturer‐supplied calibration equation for loam soils was used in this study. While volumetric water content data from HP and AP were 82–99% of respective gravimetric observations at 10 cm, data from SP were only 65–81% of respective gravimetric observations in the top 20‐cm soil horizon, where soil water showed relatively large spatial variability. The poor performance of the SP is likely due to poor contact between SP sensor electrodes and soil and the presence of soil voids caused by the installation method used, which itself may have caused soil disturbance. Core Ideas: Volumetric soil water content observations were evaluated inside a custom‐built soil testbed.The SoilVUE10 TDR was compared with the 50 MHz HydraProbe and the Acclima 1 GHz Time‐Domain Reflectometry (TDR)‐315L.Soil water content measurements by the SoilVUE10 TDR were less accurate than measurements by the other probes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dry deposition of aerosols from the atmosphere is an important but poorly understood and inadequately modeled process in atmospheric systems for climate and air quality. Comparisons of currently used aerosol dry deposition models to a compendia of published field measurement studies in various landscapes show very poor agreement over a wide range of particle sizes. In this study, we develop and test a new aerosol dry deposition model that is a modification of the current model in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. The new model agrees much better with measured dry deposition velocities across particle sizes. The key innovation is the addition of a second inertial impaction term for microscale obstacles such as leaf hairs, microscale ridges, and needleleaf edge effects. The most significant effect of the new model is to increase the mass dry deposition of the accumulation mode aerosols in CMAQ. Accumulation mode mass dry deposition velocities increase by almost an order of magnitude in forested areas with lesser increases for shorter vegetation. Peak PM2.5 concentrations are reduced in some forested areas by up to 40% in CMAQ simulations. Over the continuous United States, the new model reduced PM2.5 by an average of 16% for July 2018 at the Air Quality System monitoring sites. For summer 2018 simulations, bias and error of PM2.5 concentrations are significantly reduced, especially in forested areas. Plain Language Summary: Aerosol dry deposition is an important sink for atmospheric particles that are a health hazard and a significant climate forcer. Uncertainties in modeling aerosol dry deposition hamper accurate predictions of air quality and climate. A new aerosol dry deposition model is developed that better agrees with observations of aerosol dry deposition velocity for a variety of vegetation such as forests, grasslands, and water surfaces. This improved aerosol dry deposition model when incorporated into air quality and climate models will improve the accuracy of model predictions. Key Points: New aerosol deposition velocity model agrees better with observations than current modelsImpaction on microscale obstacles such as leaf hairs is key processNew aerosol deposition velocity model increases dry deposition of PM2.5 compared to the current Community Multiscale Air Quality model [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emissions are a central component of atmospheric chemistry models. The Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) is a software component for computing emissions from a user-selected ensemble of emission inventories and algorithms. It allows users to re-grid, combine, overwrite, subset, and scale emissions from different inventories through a configuration file and with no change to the model source code. The configuration file also maps emissions to model species with appropriate units. HEMCO can operate in offline stand-alone mode, but more importantly it provides an online facility for models to compute emissions at runtime. HEMCO complies with the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) for portability across models. We present a new version here, HEMCO 3.0, that features an improved three-layer architecture to facilitate implementation into any atmospheric model and improved capability for calculating emissions at any model resolution including multiscale and unstructured grids. The three-layer architecture of HEMCO 3.0 includes (1) the Data Input Layer that reads the configuration file and accesses the HEMCO library of emission inventories and other environmental data, (2) the HEMCO Core that computes emissions on the user-selected HEMCO grid, and (3) the Model Interface Layer that re-grids (if needed) and serves the data to the atmospheric model and also serves model data to the HEMCO Core for computing emissions dependent on model state (such as from dust or vegetation). The HEMCO Core is common to the implementation in all models, while the Data Input Layer and the Model Interface Layer are adaptable to the model environment. Default versions of the Data Input Layer and Model Interface Layer enable straightforward implementation of HEMCO in any simple model architecture, and options are available to disable features such as re-gridding that may be done by independent couplers in more complex architectures. The HEMCO library of emission inventories and algorithms is continuously enriched through user contributions so that new inventories can be immediately shared across models. HEMCO can also serve as a general data broker for models to process input data not only for emissions but for any gridded environmental datasets. We describe existing implementations of HEMCO 3.0 in (1) the GEOS-Chem "Classic" chemical transport model with shared-memory infrastructure, (2) the high-performance GEOS-Chem (GCHP) model with distributed-memory architecture, (3) the NASA GEOS Earth System Model (GEOS ESM), (4) the Weather Research and Forecasting model with GEOS-Chem (WRF-GC), (5) the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), and (6) the NOAA Global Ensemble Forecast System – Aerosols (GEFS-Aerosols), as well as the planned implementation in the NOAA Unified Forecast System (UFS). Implementation of HEMCO in CESM2 contributes to the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICA) by providing a common emissions infrastructure to support different simulations of atmospheric chemistry across scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emissions are a central component of atmospheric chemistry models. The Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) is a software component for computing emissions from a user-selected ensemble of emission inventories and algorithms. While available in standalone mode, HEMCO also provides a general on-line facility for models to compute emissions at runtime. It allows users to re-grid, combine, overwrite, subset, and scale emissions from different inventories through a configuration file and with no change to the model source code. The configuration file also maps emissions to model species with appropriate units. HEMCO complies with the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) for portability across models. We present here a new version HEMCO 3.0 that features an improved three-layer architecture to facilitate implementation into any atmospheric model, and improved capability for calculating emissions at any model resolution including multiscale and unstructured grids. The three-layer architecture of HEMCO 3.0 includes (1) a Data Input Layer that reads the configuration file and accesses the HEMCO library of emission inventories and other environmental data; (2) the HEMCO Core that computes emissions on the user-selected HEMCO grid; and (3) the Model Interface Layer that re-grids (if needed) and serves the data to the atmospheric model, and also serves model data to the HEMCO Core for computing emissions dependent on model state (such as from dust, vegetation, etc.). The HEMCO Core is common to the implementation in all models, while the Data Input Layer and the Model Interface Layer are adaptable to the model environment. Default versions of the Data Input Layer and Model Interface Layer enable straightforward implementation of HEMCO in any simple model architecture, and options are available to disable features such as re-gridding that may be done by independent couplers in more complex architectures. The HEMCO library of emission inventories and algorithms is continuously enriched through user contributions, so that new inventories can be immediately shared across models. HEMCO can also serve as a general data broker for models to process input data not only for emissions but for any gridded environmental datasets.We describe existing implementations of HEMCO 3.0 in (1) the GEOS-Chem 'Classic' chemical transport model with shared-memory infrastructure, (2) the high-performance GEOS-Chem (GCHP) model with distributed-memory architecture, (3) the NASA GEOS Earth System Model (GEOS ESM), (4) the Weather Research and Forecasting model with GEOS-Chem (WRF-GC), (5) the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), and (6) the NOAA Global Ensemble Forecast System – Aerosols (GEFS-Aerosols), and the planned implementation in the NOAA Unified Forecast System (UFS). Implementation of HEMCO in the CESM2 model contributes to the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICA) by providing a common emissions infrastructure to support different simulations of atmospheric chemistry across scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dry deposition is an important loss process for atmospheric particles and can be a significant part of total deposition estimates calculated for critical loads analyses. However, algorithms used in large-scale air quality and atmospheric chemistry models to predict particle deposition velocity as a function of particle size are highly uncertain. Many of these algorithms, although derived from a common heritage, predict vastly different particle deposition velocities for a given particle diameter even under identical environmental conditions for major land use classes. Even more problematic, for vegetated landscapes (forests, in particular) the algorithms do not agree very well with available measurements. In this work, we perform a sensitivity study to estimate how significant the uncertainties in particle deposition algorithms may be in an air quality model's predictions of ground-level fine particle concentrations, particle deposition and overall total deposition of nitrogen and sulfur. Our results suggest that fine particle concentration predictions at the surface may vary by 5-15% depending on the choice of particle deposition velocity algorithm, while particle dry deposition is affected to a much greater extent with differences among algorithms >200%. Moreover, if accumulation mode particle dry deposition measurements over forests are correct, then dry particle deposition and total elemental deposition to these landscapes may be much larger than is typically simulated by current air quality and atmospheric chemistry models, calling into question commonly available estimates of total deposition and their use in critical loads analyses. Since accurate predictions of atmospheric particle concentrations and deposition are critically important for future air quality, weather and climate models and management of pollutant deposition to sensitive ecosystems, an investment in new dry deposition measurements in conjunction with integrated modelling efforts seems not only justified but vitally necessary to advance and improve the treatment of particle dry deposition processes in atmospheric models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The assumption that the roughness Reynolds number (Re∗) can be used as a basis for quantifying the boundary-layer property kB-1(=ln(z0/z0T)) as in some modern numerical models is questioned. While Re∗ is a useful property in studies of pipe flow, it appears to have only marginal applicability in the case of treeless terrain, as studied in the two experimental situations presented here. For both the daytime and night-time cases there appears to be little correlation between kB-1 and Re∗. For daytime, the present studies indicate that the assumption kB-1≈2 is acceptable, while for night-time, the scatter involved in relating kB-1 to Re∗ suggests there is little reason to assume a direct relationship. However, while the scatter affecting all of the night-time results is large, there remains a significant correlation between the heat and momentum fluxes upon which an alternative methodology for describing bulk air-surface exchange at night could be constructed. The friction coefficient (Cf) and the turbulent Stanton number (St∗) are discussed as possible alternatives for describing bulk properties of the air layer adjacent to the surface. While describing the surface roughness in terms of the friction coefficient provides an attractive simplification relative to the conventional methodologies based on roughness length and stability considerations, use of the Stanton number shares many of uncertainties that affect kB-1. The transitions at dawn and dusk remain demanding situations to address. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]