Search

The use of a direct reading photoionization detector (PID) to determine short-term solvent exposures is described in the present paper. To assess the relevance of such a total exposure evaluation it was necessary to compare it with the real concentration of pollutants. This comparison was made by measuring in parallel with the PID determination the concentration of each pollutant using a standard technique, i.e. sampling on charcoal tubes and subsequent analysis by gas chromatography. Laboratory tests showed that the linearity of the answer of the PID is good for many compounds and for a mixture of these compounds. Similar tests were carried out for painters in workplaces with the same good correlations (determination coefficient r2 close to 1) between the PID response and the real concentration of the pollutants measured on the sampling tubes. The use of PID also allowed determination of the exposure profile of the workers and comparison of the short-term exposure to the corresponding limit values. Many cases of the short-term limit values being exceeded were revealed by use of the PID, although very few cases of the long-term limit values have been found by the usual sampling (charcoal tube) and analytical (gas chromatography) methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The expiratory bradypnoea indicative of upper airway irritation in mice was evaluated during a period of 60 min of nasal exposure to methyl-2-cyanoacrylate, ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate, isopropyl-2-cyanoacrylate and 2-methoxyethyl-2-cyanoacrylate vapors using nose only exposure. Irritation of the upper respiratory tract caused a concentration-dependent decrease in the respiratory rate. The maximum effect occurred within the first 10 min of exposure and was followed by a drop-off in the response during the remainder of the exposure period. The airborne concentration resulting in a 50% decrease in the respiratory rate of mice (RD50) was calculated for each chemical. The results show that the four chemicals had similar irritant potencies. The RD50 values of methyl-2-cyanoacrylate, ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate, isopropyl-2-cyanoacrylate and 2-methoxyethyl-2-cyanoacrylate were 1.4, 0.7, 0.6 and 1.0 p.p.m. Tentative estimates of threshold limit values showed that 0.1 RD50 was closer to the values recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists for methyl- and ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate than 0.03 RD50. On the basis of a threshold limit value for short-term exposure limit (TLV STEL) equal to 0.1 RD50, the TLV STELs for the four cyanoacrylates should not exceed 0.1 or 0.2 p.p.m. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]