Search

Radial head prostheses (RHP) have been developed to decrease the complications rate following a radial head resection surgery. The aim of the RHP is to replicate the physiological radiocapitellar tracking, reproducing the mechanical function of the native radial head: to stabilize the elbow and to shear the forces passing through the elbow along with the other stabilizers. The currently used RHP models try to achieve this target with three different prosthesis’ strategies: (a) loose fit stem, (b) bipolar radial head or (c) anatomical radial head. Even if the radial head fixation is the preferred technique in every possible case and the resection can be still considered a possible option, in the last years there has been a growing worldwide consensus in using the radial head replacement in patients with unfixable radial head fractures, especially if associated with complex elbow instability. However, complications after a RHP are not uncommon, and their rate is raising as long as the implants number are increasing. The main difficulties are due to the implantation technique that needs to be performed with the same attention and precision used for the replacement of all the other joints, and to the concurrent treatment of the associated lesions. A personalized postoperative rehabilitation program is essential for obtaining good results and decreasing the complications rate. Concern exists for the young age of the patients that often require a RHP: personal experience and literature analysis suggest that if the clinical and radiographic results are positive after a 6-12-month follow-up, good outcomes can be also expected at a medium- or long-term follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is one of the primary elbows stabilizers. It is composed of an anterior bundle (AB), a posterior bundle (PB) and a transverse bundle. In elbow dislocations, until today MCL reconstruction has addressed the AB only. The purpose of this paper is to understand the biomechanical role of the PB of the MCL and to propose a new surgical technique for the simultaneous reconstruction of the anterior and posterior bundles, preventing the risk of recurrent posterior dislocation or posteromedial rotational instability (PMRI).Materials and methods: Sixteen cadaveric elbows were subjected to a force in compression, supination valgus and pronation varus. The residual stability was evaluated in three conditions: intact MCL, sectioned AB and sectioned AB + PB. The tests were performed in collaboration with the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering of the Politecnico di Torino. In six elbows, the MCL was then reconstructed with the new technique.Results: Complete posterior elbow dislocation does not occur until the PB is sectioned. The section of the AB alone causes elbow instability in valgus stress, but not a dislocation. The reconstruction of the AB and the PB using the described technique allows a good recovery of range of motion and joint stability.Conclusions: The PB of the MCL has a primary role in elbow stability against valgus stress, and it prevents elbow posterior dislocation at all flexion angles. The described reconstruction technique should reduce the risk of residual PMRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is one of the primary elbows stabilizers. It is composed of an anterior bundle (AB), a posterior bundle (PB) and a transverse bundle. In elbow dislocations, until today MCL reconstruction has addressed the AB only. The purpose of this paper is to understand the biomechanical role of the PB of the MCL and to propose a new surgical technique for the simultaneous reconstruction of the anterior and posterior bundles, preventing the risk of recurrent posterior dislocation or posteromedial rotational instability (PMRI).Materials and Methods: Sixteen cadaveric elbows were subjected to a force in compression, supination valgus and pronation varus. The residual stability was evaluated in three conditions: intact MCL, sectioned AB and sectioned AB + PB. The tests were performed in collaboration with the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering of the Politecnico di Torino. In six elbows, the MCL was then reconstructed with the new technique.Results: Complete posterior elbow dislocation does not occur until the PB is sectioned. The section of the AB alone causes elbow instability in valgus stress, but not a dislocation. The reconstruction of the AB and the PB using the described technique allows a good recovery of range of motion and joint stability.Conclusions: The PB of the MCL has a primary role in elbow stability against valgus stress, and it prevents elbow posterior dislocation at all flexion angles. The described reconstruction technique should reduce the risk of residual PMRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radial head prostheses (RHP) have been developed to decrease the complications rate following a radial head resection surgery. The aim of the RHP is to replicate the physiological radiocapitellar tracking, reproducing the mechanical function of the native radial head: to stabilize the elbow and to shear the forces passing through the elbow along with the other stabilizers. The currently used RHP models try to achieve this target with three different prosthesis' strategies: (a) loose fit stem, (b) bipolar radial head or (c) anatomical radial head. Even if the radial head fixation is the preferred technique in every possible case and the resection can be still considered a possible option, in the last years there has been a growing worldwide consensus in using the radial head replacement in patients with unfixable radial head fractures, especially if associated with complex elbow instability. However, complications after a RHP are not uncommon, and their rate is raising as long as the implants number are increasing. The main difficulties are due to the implantation technique that needs to be performed with the same attention and precision used for the replacement of all the other joints, and to the concurrent treatment of the associated lesions. A personalized postoperative rehabilitation program is essential for obtaining good results and decreasing the complications rate. Concern exists for the young age of the patients that often require a RHP: personal experience and literature analysis suggest that if the clinical and radiographic results are positive after a 6-12-month follow-up, good outcomes can be also expected at a medium- or long-term follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the recent years, considerable improvements have come in biomechanical knowledge about the role of elbow stabilizers. In particular, the complex interactions among the different stabilizers when injured at the same time have been better understood. Anyway, uncertainties about both nomenclature and classification still exist in the definition of the different patterns of instability.Material and Methods: The authors examine the literature of the last 130 years about elbow instability classification, analyzing the intuitions and the value of each of them. However, because of the lack of a satisfactory classification, in 2015 a working group has been created inside SICSeG (Italian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery) with the aim of defining an exhaustive classification as simple, complete and reproducible as possible.Results: A new all-inclusive elbow instability classification is proposed. This classification considers two main parameters: timing (acute and chronic forms) and involved stabilizers (simple and complex forms), and four secondary parameters: etiology (traumatic, rheumatic, congenital…), the involved joint (radius and ulna as a single unit articulating with the humerus or the proximal radio-ulnar joint), the degree of displacement (dislocation or subluxation) and the mechanism of instability or dislocation (PLRI, PMRI, direct axial loading, pure varus or valgus stress).Conclusions: This classification is at the same time complete enough to include all the instability patterns and practical enough to be effectively used in the clinical practice. This classification can help in defining a shared language, can improve our understanding of the disorder, reduce misunderstanding of diagnosis and improve comparison among different case series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Locking plate fixation is a reliable treatment for many displaced proximal humeral fractures. Carbon fiber-reinforced-poly-ether-ether-ketone (CFR-PEEK) plates have recently been introduced as an alternative to traditional metallic plates. Methods: In a multicenter study involving the Orthopedic Services of 6 Italian hospitals, 182 patients with a proximal humeral fracture were treated with a Diphos H (Lima Corporate, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) CFR-PEEK plate, 160 of whom were followed clinically and radiographically for 2 years or more. Fractures were classified by Neer's system. The functional results were assessed by Constant and DASH scores. Results: The average time to radiographic healing was 5.6 months in 158 of 160 cases. Mean Constant score was 76, and mean DASH score was 28 at 2 years. There were two nonunions (one septic and one aseptic) and 13 cases of partial (9) or massive (4) humeral head necrosis. In three of the 78 patients treated with the first-generation plates, hardware breakage happened during the operation and the plate was replaced. There was no failure among the cases treated with the thicker second-generation plate. In eight cases, there was a perforation of the humeral head by the cephalic screws. Conclusions: CFR-PEEK plates proved as reliable as metallic plates in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The advantages of these new devices include a better visualization of fracture reduction during intraoperative fluoroscopic assessment and easy hardware removal due to the absence of screw-plate cold fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The elbow, intermediate joint of the upper limb, frequently undergoes to pathological events and is especially prone to stiffness. Rehabilitation plays an important role in recovering functional activities. For the rehabilitation team, this goal always represents a challenge, as the treatment has to be continuously modeled and calibrated on the needs of the individual patient, even many times during the same rehabilitation cycle. Containing the effects of immobilization, avoiding to excessively stress the healing tissues, satisfying specific clinical criteria before moving to the next rehabilitation stage, basing the rehabilitation plan on up-to-date clinical and scientific data that can be adapted to each patient and to his/her needs are the basic principles of the rehabilitation plan, which can be chronologically grouped into four rehabilitation stages. After summarizing the general principles of elbow treatment, the specific principles of rehabilitation after elbow fractures and elbow instability are presented, and then the rehabilitative approach to the most frequent and feared pathological conditions of the elbow, namely stiffness, is described. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multidirectional instability (MDI) is a complex shoulder pathology with involuntary subluxation or dislocation in more than one direction accompanied by pain. The pathogenesis is multifactorial including capsular redundancy, significant trauma or repetitive microtrauma. The management of patients with MDI is primarily conservative, with a dedicated rehabilitation protocol of the gleno-humeral and scapulo-thorax joints. When non-operative treatment fails surgical capsuloplasty and labral repair has to be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proximal humerus fractures raise difficulties and uncertainties in diagnostic definition, planning and surgical procedure, as well as in prognostic assessment. In consideration of the most recent acquisitions in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques and locking plates, the Authors discuss the main pitfalls and indicate the most effective solutions. Two different fixation devices (Philos and S3 plate) are compared and technical differences are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Irreparable rotator cuff tears are infrequent but well defined lesions consisting of massive or not rotator cuff tears that are not completely reparable, because of their size and retraction. Patients can present with a variety of manifestations. They may have no or mild symptoms, or may be completely disabled and in severe pain. The true incidence is unknown. The presenting history, physical examination, radiographs and MRI imaging help to guide both diagnosis and treatment. There are no perfect solutions to this complex and sometimes disabling problem. The treatment options range from conservative to surgical intervention and no treatment is best for all irreparable rotator cuff tears. Surgical reconstruction (debridement and partial repair) must be considered for those younger patients for whom functional reconstruction is important; conservative treatment or simple surgical debridement and or clb tenotomy can manage symptoms in other patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]