Search

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) causes a progressive limitation of functional capacity, poor quality of life (QoL) and increased mortality, yet unlike HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) there are no effective device-based therapies. Both HFrEF and HFpEF are associated with dysregulations in myocardial cellular calcium homeostasis and modifications in calcium-handling proteins, leading to abnormal myocardial contractility and pathological remodelling. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy, based on a pacemaker-like implanted device, applies extracellular electrical stimulation to myocytes during the absolute refractory period of the action potential, which leads to an increase in cytosolic peak calcium concentrations and thereby the force of isometric contraction promoting positive inotropism. Subgroup analysis of CCM trials in HFrEF has demonstrated particular benefits in patients with LVEF between 35% and 45%, suggesting its potential effectiveness also in patients with higher LVEF values. Available evidence on CCM in HFpEF is still preliminary, but improvements in terms of symptoms and QoL have been observed. Future large, dedicated, prospective studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in patients with HFpEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We investigated the role of the dynamic changes of pulmonary congestion, as assessed by sonographic B-lines, as a tool to stratify prognosis in patients admitted for acute heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFpEF). Methods: In this multicenter, prospective study, lung ultrasound was performed at admission and before discharge by trained investigators, blinded to clinical findings. Results: We enrolled 208 consecutive patients (mean age 76 [95% confidence interval, 70–84] years), 125 with HFrEF, 83 with HFpEF (mean ejection fraction 32% and 57%, respectively). The primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF re-hospitalization occurred in 18% of patients within 6 months. In the overall population, independent predictors of the occurrence of the primary endpoint were the number of B-lines at discharge, NT-proBNP levels, moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation, and inferior vena cava diameter on admission. B-lines at discharge were the only independent predictor in both HFrEF and HFpEF subgroups. A cut-off of B-lines > 15 at discharge displayed the highest accuracy in predicting the primary endpoint (AUC = 0.80, p < 0.0001). Halving B-lines during hospitalization further improved event classification (continuous net reclassification improvement = 22.8%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The presence of residual subclinical sonographic pulmonary congestion at discharge predicts 6-month clinical outcomes across the whole spectrum of acute HF patients, independent of conventional biohumoral and echocardiographic parameters. Achieving effective pulmonary decongestion during hospitalization is associated with better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), an association between left atrial (LA) dilatation and dysfunction is expected, but the degree of coexistence of the two abnormalities and their relative prognostic role is not known. Methods and results: A total of 626 HFrEF patients formed the study population. All of them underwent a comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation. LA maximal volume was indexed to body surface area (LAVi); LA function was assessed using strain analysis during the reservoir phase: peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) analysis. Study primary endpoint was overall mortality or hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Four groups of patients were included in this study according to LAVi (≤34 or >34 mL/m2) and PALS (≤23% or >23%); 61 (10%) patients had normal LA volume and function (Group 1), 58 (9%) had LA dilatation but normal function (Group 2), 100 (16%) had normal volume but abnormal function (Group 3), and 407 (65%) had enlarged left atrium and abnormal function (Group 4). PALS was associated with primary endpoint in patients with both normal‐size [Groups 1 and 3: hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88–0.96; P = 0.0006] and dilated left atria (Groups 2 and 4: HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.96; P < 0.0001). In contrast, LAVi was associated with the primary endpoint in patients with abnormal LA function (Groups 3 and 4: HR 1.018, 95% CI 1.011–1.024; P < 0.00001) but not in those with normal PALS (Groups 1 and 2: HR 1.023, 95% CI 0.99–1.057; P = 0.1). Conclusions: Left atrial dilatation and dysfunction frequently but not invariably coexist. PALS emerged as a significant prognostic parameter in HFrEF even in the absence of LA dilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: We evaluated the impact of echocardiographic epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) on cardiovascular haemodynamics, metabolic profile and prognosis in heart failure (HF) using combined cardiopulmonary‐echocardiography exercise stress. Methods and results: We analysed EAT thickness of HF patients with reduced (HFrEF, n = 205) and preserved (HFpEF, n = 188) ejection fraction, including 44 controls. HFpEF patients displayed the highest EAT, while HFrEF patients had lower values than controls. EAT showed an inverse correlation with natriuretic peptides, troponin T and C‐reactive protein in HFrEF, while having a direct association with troponin T and C‐reactive protein in HFpEF. EAT was independently associated with peak oxygen consumption (VO2) and peripheral extraction (AVO2diff), regardless of body mass index. EAT was inversely correlated with peak VO2 and AVO2diff in HFpEF, while a direct association was observed in HFrEF, where lower EAT values were associated with worse left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In HFpEF, increased EAT was related to right ventriculo–arterial (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/systolic pulmonary artery pressure) uncoupling. After 21 months of follow‐up, 146 HF hospitalizations and 34 cardiovascular deaths were recorded in the HF population. Cox multivariable analysis supported an independent differential role of EAT in HF cohorts (interaction P = 0.01): higher risk of adverse events for increasing EAT in HFpEF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.37] and for decreasing EAT in HFrEF (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54–0.91). Conclusion: In HFpEF, EAT accumulation is associated with worse haemodynamic and metabolic profile, also affecting survival. Conversely, lower EAT values imply higher left ventricular dysfunction, global functional impairment and adverse prognosis in HFrEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We combined cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) to identify early haemodynamic and metabolic alterations in patients with hypertension (HT) with and without heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Methods and Results: Fifty stable HFpEF-HT outpatients (mean age 68 ± 14 years) on optimal medical therapy, 63 well-controlled HT subjects (mean age 63 ± 11 years) and 32 age and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age 59 ± 15 years) underwent a symptom-limited graded ramp bicycle CPET-ESE. The acquisition protocol included left ventricular cardiac output, global longitudinal strain, E/e', peak oxygen consumption (VO2 ), non-invasive arterial-venous oxygen content difference (AVO2 diff) and lung ultrasound B-lines. There was a decline in peak VO2 from controls (24.4 ± 3 mL/min/kg) to HFpEF-HT (15.2 ± 2 mL/min/kg), passing through HT (18.7 ± 2 mL/min/kg; P < 0.0001). HFpEF-HT displayed a lower peak cardiac output (9.8 ± 0.9 L/min) compared to HT (12.6 ± 1.0 L/min; P = 0.02) and controls (13.3 ± 1.0 L/min; P = 0.01). Peak AVO2 diff was reduced in HFpEF-HT and HT (13.3 ± 2 and 13.5 ± 2 mL/dL vs. controls: 16.9 ± 2 mL/dL; P < 0.0001). A different left ventricular contractility was observed among groups, expressed as low-load global longitudinal strain (-16.8 ± 5% in HFpEF-HT, -18.2 ± 3% in HT, and 20.9 ± 3% in controls; P < 0.0001), and distribution of E/e' and B-lines [HFpEF-HT: 13.7 ± 3 and 16, interquartile range (IQR) 10-22; HT: 9.5 ± 2 and 8, IQR 4-10; controls: 6.2 ± 2 and 0, IQR 0-2; P < 0.0001].Conclusions: Reduced peak VO2 values in HT with and without HFpEF may be the result of decreased AVO2 diff. CPET-ESE can also identify mild signs of left ventricular systo-diastolic dysfunction and pulmonary congestion, promoting advances in personalized therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Assessment of the prognostic role of left ventricular stiffness ( LVS) in patients with aortic stenosis ( AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation ( TAVI). Methods We performed a complete two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic study before and after TAVI in patients with severe AS at high surgical risk. In order to assess LVS, we measured LV end-diastolic pressure ( EDP) invasively during TAVI and LV end-diastolic volume ( EDV) by means of echocardiography. We defined LVS as the EDV indexed by body surface area at an EDP of 20 mm Hg ( EDVI20). Our aim was to assess the impact of LVS on one-year all-cause mortality after TAVI. Results One hundred sixty-six patients undergoing TAVI (64% female; mean age 82.7 ± 5.1 years) were enrolled. Seven patients died within the first 30 days after TAVI and 21 within 1 year. Overall follow-up duration was 580 ± 478 days. At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality were moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak ( PVL; HR 4.7, 95% confidence interval [ CI] 1.9-11, P=.0003), female gender ( HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0-12, P=.045), and EDVI20 ( HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98, P=.015). In particular, patients with higher LVS ( EDVI20≤48 mL/m2) had a 1-year mortality of 26.9% vs 7.4% in patients with lower LVS ( EDVI20>48 mL/m2; HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6-10.6, P=.0007). Patients with higher LVS who developed moderate-to-severe PVL had the worst outcome (incremental chi-square test, P=.014). Conclusion In patients with AS, an increased LVS has a negative prognostic impact. Development of significant PVL in patients with higher LVS had an incremental adverse effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]