Search

The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of attentional focus instructions on acute changes in the transverse relaxation time (T2) of the femorotibial cartilage and in cartilage volume during repeated drop‐jump landings. Ten healthy females (Mage = 20.4 ± 0.8 years) performed a drop landing task from a 50 cm high box over the course of 3 days (50 repetitions each day) across three attentional focus conditions: external focus (EF: focus on landing as soft as possible), internal focus (IF: focus on bending your knees when you land), and control (CON: no‐focus instruction), which was counterbalanced across focus conditions. T2 mapping and the volume of femorotibial cartilage were determined from magnetic resonance imaging scans at 1.5 T for the dominant knee before and after completing the drop landings in each attentional focus condition per day. Results indicated a smaller change in cartilage T2 relaxation time and volumetry in the central load‐bearing lateral cartilage under the EF, compared to IF and CON. Moreover, the change in T2 and cartilage volume was greater for lateral tibial cartilage as compared to femoral cartilage and was independent of attentional focus instructions. No significant acute quantitative changes were observed in the medial compartment. The peak vertical ground reaction force was found to be the lowest under the EF, compared to IF and CON. These findings suggest that external focus of attention may reduce cartilage load, potentially aiding in the control or management of cartilage injuries during landing in female athletes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, we investigated the discriminative capacity of knee morphology in automatic detection of osteophytes defined by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International atlas, using X‐ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. For the X‐ray analysis, we developed a deep learning (DL) based model to segment femur and tibia. In case of MRIs, we utilized previously validated segmentations of femur, tibia, corresponding cartilage tissues, and menisci. Osteophyte detection was performed using DL models in four compartments: medial femur (FM), lateral femur (FL), medial tibia (TM), and lateral tibia (TL). To analyze the confounding effects of soft tissues, we investigated their morphology in combination with bones, including bones+cartilage, bones+menisci, and all the tissues. From X‐ray‐based 2D morphology, the models yielded balanced accuracy of 0.73, 0.69, 0.74, and 0.74 for FM, FL, TM, TL, respectively. Using 3D bone morphology from MRI, balanced accuracy was 0.80, 0.77, 0.71, and 0.76, respectively. The performance was higher than in 2D for all the compartments except for TM, with significant improvements observed for femoral compartments. Adding menisci or cartilage morphology consistently improved balanced accuracy in TM, with the greatest improvement seen for small osteophyte. Otherwise, the models performed similarly to bones‐only. Our experiments demonstrated that MRI‐based models show higher detection capability than X‐ray based models for identifying knee osteophytes. This study highlighted the feasibility of automated osteophyte detection from X‐ray and MRI data and suggested further need for development of osteophyte assessment criteria in addition to OARSI, particularly, for early osteophytic changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, we developed a gray level co‐occurrence matrix‐based 3D texture analysis method for dual‐echo steady‐state (DESS) magnetic resonance (MR) images to be used for knee cartilage analysis in osteoarthritis (OA) studies and use it to study changes in articular cartilage between different subpopulations based on their rate of progression into radiographically confirmed OA. In total, 642 series of right knee DESS MR images at 3T were obtained from baseline, 36‐ and 72‐month follow‐ups from the OA Initiative database. At baseline, all 214 subjects included in the study had Kellgren‐Lawrence (KL) grade <2. Three groups were defined, based on time of progression into radiographic OA (ROA) (KL grades ≥2): control (no progression), fast progressor (ROA at 36 months), and slow progressor (ROA at 72 months) groups. 3D texture analysis was used to extract textural features for femoral and tibial cartilages. All textural features, in both femur and tibia, showed significant longitudinal changes across all groups and tissue layers. Most of the longitudinal changes were observed in progressors, but significant changes were observed also in controls. Differences between groups were mostly seen at baseline and 72 months. The method is sensitive to cartilage changes before and after ROA. It was able to detect longitudinal changes in controls and progressors and to distinguish cartilage alterations due to OA and aging. Moreover, it was able to distinguish controls and different progressor groups before any radiographic signs of OA and during OA. Thus, texture analysis could be used as a marker for the onset and progression of OA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Morphological changes in knee cartilage subregions are valuable imaging‐based biomarkers for understanding progression of osteoarthritis, and they are typically detected from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). So far, accurate segmentation of cartilage has been done manually. Deep learning approaches show high promise in automating the task; however, they lack clinically relevant evaluation. We introduce a fully automatic method for segmentation and subregional assessment of articular cartilage, and evaluate its predictive power in context of radiographic osteoarthritis progression. Two data sets of 3D double‐echo steady‐state (DESS) MRI derived from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were used: first, n = 88; second, n = 600, 0‐/12‐/24‐month visits. Our method performed deep learning‐based segmentation of knee cartilage tissues, their subregional division via multi‐atlas registration, and extraction of subregional volume and thickness. The segmentation model was developed and assessed on the first data set. Subsequently, on the second data set, the morphological measurements from our and the prior methods were analyzed in correlation and agreement, and, eventually, by their discriminative power of radiographic osteoarthritis progression over 12 and 24 months, retrospectively. The segmentation model showed very high correlation (r > 0.934) and agreement (mean difference < 116 mm3) in volumetric measurements with the reference segmentations. Comparison of our and manual segmentation methods yielded r = 0.845–0.973 and mean differences = 262–501 mm3 for weight‐bearing cartilage volume, and r = 0.770–0.962 and mean differences = 0.513–1.138 mm for subregional cartilage thickness. With regard to osteoarthritis progression, our method found most of the significant associations identified using the manual segmentation method, for both 12‐ and 24‐month subregional cartilage changes. The method may be effectively applied in osteoarthritis progression studies to extract cartilage‐related imaging biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Structural dynamics of calcified cartilage (CC) are poorly understood. Conventionally, CC structure is analyzed using histological sections. Micro‐computed tomography (µCT) allows for three‐dimensional (3D) imaging of mineralized tissues; however, the segmentation between bone and mineralized cartilage is challenging. Here, we present state‐of‐the‐art deep learning segmentation for µCT images to assess 3D CC morphology. The sample includes 16 knees from 12 New Zealand White rabbits dissected into osteochondral samples from six anatomical regions: lateral and medial femoral condyles, lateral and medial tibial plateaus, femoral groove, and patella (n = 96). The samples were imaged with µCT and processed for conventional histology. Manually segmented CC from the images was used to train segmentation models with different encoder–decoder architectures. The models with the greatest out‐of‐fold evaluation Dice score were selected. CC thickness was compared across 24 regions, co‐registered between the imaging modalities using Pearson correlation and Bland–Altman analyses. Finally, the anatomical CC thickness variation was assessed via a Linear Mixed Model analysis. The best segmentation models yielded average Dice of 0.891 and 0.807 for histology and µCT segmentation, respectively. The correlation between the co‐registered regions was strong (r = 0.897, bias = 21.9 µm, standard deviation = 21.5 µm). Finally, both methods could separate the CC thickness between the patella, femoral, and tibial regions (p < 0.001). As a conclusion, the proposed µCT analysis allows for ex vivo 3D assessment of CC morphology. We demonstrated the biomedical relevance of the method by quantifying CC thickness in different anatomical regions with a varying mean thickness. CC was thickest in the patella and thinnest in the tibial plateau. Our method is relatively straightforward to implement into standard µCT analysis pipelines, allowing the analysis of CC morphology. In future research, µCT imaging might be preferable to histology, especially when analyzing dynamic changes in cartilage mineralization. It could also provide further understanding of 3D morphological changes that may occur in mineralized cartilage, such as thickening of the subchondral plate in osteoarthritis and other joint diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]