Search

Citrate dialysate (CD) has been successfully used in conventional hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy; however, no study has compared pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (oL-HDF). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of citrate anticoagulation for oL-HDF and the metabolic changes and quality of life of patients on hemodialysis treated using both modes Eight dialysis patients were treated with CD containing 0.8 mmol of citric acid for 4 weeks in each phase. Visual clotting scores were investigated as the primary endpoints. Adequacy of dialysis, laboratory parameters, and quality of life were measured as secondary objectives. The mean clotting scores in the pre-dilution mode were significantly lower than those in the post-dilution mode and in all phases except the heparin-free phase (p < 0.001 in the baseline phase, p = 0.001 in phase 1, and p = 0.023 in phase 2). The values of Kt/V in both modalities were comparable except during the baseline phase, in which the values of pre-dilution were significantly greater than post-dilution (2.36 ± 0.52/week vs. 1.87 ± 0.33/week;95% CI −0.81 to −0.19, p = 0.002). The patient's quality of life regarding their physical activity level was significantly higher in the post-dilution mode than in the pre-dilution mode at baseline and in phase 1 (p = 0.014 and 0.004 at baseline and in phase 1, respectively). Metabolic changes did not differ between the two modes. Citrate dialysate decreased or prevented anticoagulation in both pre- and post-dilution modes of oL-HDF without significant side effects and had comparable adequacy of dialysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The cost resulting from peritoneal dialysis (PD), conventional hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) in pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has not been estimated to date in Greece. The present single-center retrospective study aimed to estimate the mean annual cost of the above methods, as well as the individual components of this cost. Methods: Twenty pediatric patients undergoing the three different methods of renal replacement therapy were included in this study. Their mean total annual cost was estimated by the method of micro-costing and the bottom-up approach. Results: The mean total annual cost for PD patients (n = 7) was estimated at EUR 56,676.04; for conventional HD patients (n = 9), it was EUR 39,786.86; and for OL-HDF patients (n = 4), it was EUR 43,894.73. The PD method was found to be more expensive than the other two methods (p < 0.001 vs. conventional HD and p = 0.024 vs. OL-HDF). PD consumables used for daily application had the greatest contribution to the total annual cost. The total mean annual cost in the groups of patients undergoing HD and OL-HDF did not differ significantly (p = 0.175). The total operating cost of the renal dialysis unit had the greatest contribution to the total mean annual costs of both the conventional HD and OL-HDF techniques. Conclusions: This cost analysis provides useful information to healthcare policymakers who make decisions about the treatment of children with ESRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Online hemodiafiltration (OHDF) has a lower mortality rate than hemodialysis (HD). We aimed to investigate the impact of the albumin leakage on the mortality of patients receiving HD or OHDF. Methods: In this single-center study, consecutive patients receiving renal replacement therapy between January and April 2018 were retrospectively registered. Using (1:1) propensity score matching, 3-year all-cause mortality was compared between patients receiving HD and OHDF, and the impact of albumin leakage on the mortality rate in both groups was investigated. Results: Of the 460 patients, 137 patients receiving HD were matched with an equal number of patients receiving OHDF. OHDF was associated with higher albumin leakage (p < 0.001) and a lower mortality than HD (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Albumin leakage was associated with mortality in patients receiving HD (per 1 g increase, hazard ratio (HR): 0.495, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.275–0.888) and patients receiving OHDF (per 1 g increase, HR: 0.734, 95% CI: 0.588–0.915). Patients receiving HD, with the highest albumin leakage tertile (>3 g), had a similar mortality rate to patients receiving OHDF, with similar albumin leakage. Conclusions: The negative relationship between albumin leakage and mortality suggests the benefit of removing middle- to -large-molecular-weight substances to improve survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is a treatment modality using diffusion and ultrafiltration. There are two types of dilution methods in OL-HDF: pre-dilution, which is commonly provided in Japan, and post-dilution, which is commonly provided in Europe. The optimal OL-HDF method for individual patients is not well studied. In this study, we compared the clinical symptoms, laboratory data, spent dialysate, and adverse events of pre- and post-dilution OL-HDF. We conducted a prospective study of 20 patients who underwent OL-HDF between January 1, 2019 and October 30, 2019. Their clinical symptoms and dialysis efficacy were evaluated. All patients underwent OL-HDF every 3 months in the following sequence: first pre-dilution, post-dilution, and second pre-dilution. We evaluated 18 patients for the clinical study and 6 for the spent dialysate study. No significant differences in spent dialysates regarding small and large solutes, blood pressure, recovery time, and clinical symptoms were observed between the pre- and post-dilution methods. However, the serum α1-microglobulin level in post-dilution OL-HDF was lower than that in pre-dilution OL-HDF (first pre-dilution: 124.8 ± 14.3 mg/L; post-dilution: 116.6 ± 13.9 mg/L; second pre-dilution: 125.8 ± 13.0 mg/L; first pre-dilution vs. post-dilution, post-dilution vs. second pre-dilution, and first pre-dilution vs. second pre-dilution: p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 1.000, respectively). The most common adverse event was an increase in transmembrane pressure in the post-dilution period. Compared to pre-dilution, the post-dilution method decreased the α1-microglobulin level; however, there were no significant differences in clinical symptoms or laboratory data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Citrate dialysate (CD) has been successfully used in conventional hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy; however, no study has compared pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (oL-HDF). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of citrate anticoagulation for oL-HDF and the metabolic changes and quality of life of patients on hemodialysis treated using both modes Method: Eight dialysis patients were treated with CD containing 0.8mmol of citric acid for 4weeks in each phase. Visual clotting scores were investigated as the primary endpoints. Adequacy of dialysis, laboratory parameters, and quality of life were measured as secondary objectives. Results: The mean clotting scores in the pre-dilution mode were significantly lower than those in the post-dilution mode and in all phases except the heparin-free phase (p<0.001 in the baseline phase, p=0.001 in phase 1, and p=0.023 in phase 2). The values of Kt/V in both modalities were comparable except during the baseline phase, in which the values of pre-dilution were significantly greater than post-dilution (2.36±0.52/week vs. 1.87±0.33/week;95% CI −0.81 to −0.19, p=0.002). The patient’s quality of life regarding their physical activity level was significantly higher in the post-dilution mode than in the pre-dilution mode at baseline and in phase 1 (p=0.014 and 0.004 at baseline and in phase 1, respectively). Metabolic changes did not differ between the two modes. Conclusion: Citrate dialysate decreased or prevented anticoagulation in both pre- and post-dilution modes of oL-HDF without significant side effects and had comparable adequacy of dialysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Online hemodiafiltration (OHDF) for renal replacement therapy has two modes: pre- (pre-OHDF) and post-dilution OHDF (post-OHDF). To elucidate the precise differences between the two modes, a clinical study was performed using the same polysulfone hemodiafilters in the same patients. Eight patients were treated with ABH™-22PA for 6 weeks: 3 weeks of pre-OHDF (with substitution volumes of 24, 36, and 48 L) and 3 weeks of post-OHDF (6, 8, and 10 L). The reduction ratios of urea, uric acid (UA), creatinine (CRE), inorganic phosphorus (iP), beta-2-microglobulin (β2-MG), and alpha-1-microglobulin (α1-MG) were evaluated. The removal amounts of β2-MG, α1-MG, and albumin were also evaluated by analyzing the spent dialysis fluids. The types and numbers of adverse events (AEs) and device malfunctions were recorded. The reduction ratios of urea, UA, CRE, iP, and β2-MG were comparable among all conditions, while that of α1-MG tended to be slightly higher in post-OHDF than in pre-OHDF. The removal amounts of α1-MG and albumin in pre-OHDF and post-OHDF were significantly greater with the maximum substitution volume than with the minimum volume. However, the selective removal indices, which were obtained by dividing the amount of α1-MG removed by the albumin level, tended to be slightly higher in pre- than in post-OHDF. No device-related AEs or device malfunctions occurred in either mode. No significant differences in inflammatory responses, evaluated by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6, were observed. This study provides removal performance and safety data regarding the application of ABH-22PA for pre- and post-OHDF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Expanded hemodialysis (HDx) is expected to provide enhanced permeability of medium-sized molecules, selective solute retention, and better internal retrofiltration. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficiency for removal of β2-microglobulin with 3 different extracorporeal therapies (ETs): high-flux hemodialysis (HF), online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), and HDx. The secondary objective was to evaluate the efficiency of removal of other uremic toxins, including urea, phosphate, CRP, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-⍺, indoxyl sulfate, and p-cresol. Methods: This single-center, randomized, and cross-over study was performed. Patients were randomized to determine the initial modality of treatment, each period lasted 4 weeks and between one modality and another, there was a washout period of 1 week. Reduction ratios (RRs) of different-size molecules and albumin were calculated for the different ET. Results: Twenty-two patients were included, β2-microglobulin RR was greater during both OL-HDF and HDx as compared to HF (RR 62% vs. 73% vs. 27%, respectively, p = <0.0001), and there was no significant difference between HDx and OL-HDF (p = 0.09). A decrease in serum phosphate levels was observed in the HDx and OL-HDF periods, contrary to an increase in HF (−0.79 mg/dL vs. −1.02 mg/dL vs. + 0.11 mg/dL, respectively, p = <0.0001). There was no difference in RRs of other molecules (BUN, CRP, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-⍺, indoxyl sulfate, and p-Cresol). There was no decrease in serum albumin in any ET. Conclusion: HDx provides enhanced removal of β2-microglobulin and phosphate as compared to HF, and similar efficacy as with OL-HDF. HDx should be considered an alternative to chronic convective therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The present cross‐sectional study aimed to compare the prevalence, the characteristics of post‐dialysis fatigue and the length of recovery time after hemodialysis in prevalent end‐stage renal disease patients (ESRD) receiving bicarbonate hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF). Methods: Patients were suffering from post‐dialysis fatigue if they spontaneously offered this complaint when asked the open‐ended question: "Do you feel fatigued after dialysis?". Moreover, each patient was invited to rate the intensity, duration, and frequency of post‐dialysis fatigue from 1 to 5. In order to assess RECOVERY TIME AFTER DIALYSIS, patients were invited to answer to the following single open‐ended question: "How long does it take you to recover from a dialysis session?" Findings: We included 335 patients: 252 received HD and 83 received HDF. Post‐dialysis fatigue was present in 204 patients (60.9%). Prevalence of post‐dialysis fatigue did not differ significantly between patients on HD (62.3%) and on HDF (56.6%; p = 0.430). Median recovery time after dialysis was 180 min [180–240] and did not differ significantly between the two subgroups (180 min [130–240] and 240 min [120–332] p = 0.671, respectively). Median post‐dialysis fatigue intensity, duration, and frequency were 3 [1–5], 3 [1–5], and 4 [1–5] and did not differ significantly between patients on HD and on HDF. At the multivariate analysis, age, ADL and hemoglobin levels were the independent predictors of the HDF treatment. Discussion: Prevalence and characteristics of post‐dialysis fatigue do not differ significantly between patients receiving bicarbonate HD or HDF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There is no standard for insoluble particulate matters in dialysate. We evaluated the insoluble particulate matters in online prepared substitution fluid. Methods: We evaluated particle diameters and constituent elements of particles in online prepared substitution fluid and the final endotoxin retentive filter (ETRF). Results: The measurement results with particles in the online prepared substitution fluid and particles attached to the final ETRF revealed that Ca‐containing particles accounted for 11 particles and Si‐containing particles accounted for 19 particles of 30 particles detected in the online prepared substitution fluid and the final ETRF. Conclusion: We presume that insoluble particulates in online prepared substitution fluid were Ca and Mg precipitated from dialysate and Si precipitated from dialysis water. Even if two ETRFs were connected in series, these particles were formed in the final ETRF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Determining the optimal dialysate sodium remains one of the challenges of hemodialysis prescription. Several arguments suggest that the dialysate sodium should be individually adjusted according to the patient's natremia. This strategy is greatly facilitated by using an algorithm. Only three such algorithms have been embedded in hemodialysis machines for the widespread generalization of this strategy in clinical routine: the Diacontrol (Hospal‐Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deerfield, IL, USA), the HFR‐Aequilibrium (Bellco‐Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland), and the Na‐control (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad‐Homburg, Germany). Methods: Model the solute mass‐transfer across the dialyzer membrane in online hemodiafiltration and adapt the Diacontrol algorithm based on a single‐pool kinetic model of sodium balance for quantifying ionic balance and managing tonicity. Results: (1) Substituting sodium measurements with conductivity measurements allows the control of tonicity which is a more physiological parameter than natremia. (2) Consideration of all ion exchanges as a whole and not just sodium exchange avoids some of the assumptions required by kinetic modeling of sodium balance. (3) Equations provided by the model are applicable to both hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration. (4) The differences between this model used by Diacontrol and the models on which the other two software's (HFR‐Aequilibrium and Na‐control) are based are highlighted. Conclusions: The single‐pool kinetic model developed for the management of natremia in hemodialysis is also valid for the management of tonicity for both conventional hemodialysis and all online hemodiafiltration procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Supra hemodiafiltration with reinfusion of the endogenous ultrafiltrate (Supra-HFR) is a dialysis technique used to improve uremic toxin removal in the range of the middle molecular weight molecules. Supra-HFR does not require the preparation and online infusion of highpurity dialysis water because it allows the production of an endogenous ultrafiltrate that undergoes detoxification through an adsorbing resin. Patients and Methods: We investigated the ability of Supra-HFR to remove fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), interleukin 8 (IL-8), and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha) after a single session dialysis in nine patients affected by end stage renal disease (ESRD). The same patients underwent a single session of online hemodiafiltration (OLHDF) to evaluate possible differences in FGF23 and IL-6 levels. Results: A significant reduction in FGF23 was observed with both Supra-HFR (p=0.001) and OL-HDF. As for TNF-alpha and TGF-alpha, which were measured using Supra-HFR only, their percentage values were significantly lower at the end of dialysis than at the start (p=0.0028 and p=0.03, respectively). This did not change with post-dialysis rebound. Supra-HFR was found to have no effect on IL-6 and IL-8. Interestingly, the removal rate for FGF23 and IL-6 was similar to that observed with OL-HDF. Conclusion: Supra-HFR was not superior to OL-HDF, with suboptimal convective volume in the removal of the molecules tested, especially FGF23, which is considered a large middle molecular weight uremic toxin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is associated with delayed MTX-excretion and life-threatening toxicity. Glucapridase, the recommended therapy, is expensive and not always available. Case series: We describe 3 cases (69, 67, 73 years) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who developed AKI and early-onset severely delayed MTX elimination after HD-MTX. MTX serum concentrations were 101 and 69 μmol/L at 24 h after administration in two patients and 34 μmol/L at 32 h in the third. Management and outcome: Since glucarpidase was unavailable, we performed daily high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) or online hemodiafiltration (HDF) sessions (median duration, 6 h). The median serum MTX elimination half-life during HDF/HF-HD sessions was similar in all patients (median, 4.4 h; IQR, 3.8–5.3 h), but serum MTX concentrations rebounded after each dialysis by a median of 40% of the trough concentrations. The three patients underwent multiple dialysis sessions, until MTX serum concentrations remained sufficiently low to be neutralized by leucovorin. Only 1 patient developed severe pancytopenia, and renal function normalized in all patients after 3–6 weeks. Discussion: In conclusion, when glucarpidase is unavailable or delayed, early, repeated and prolonged HDF/HF-HD effectively enhance MTX elimination and prevent toxicity in patients with AKI and severely delayed MTX elimination after HD-MTX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Expanded hemodialysis (HDx) has a high capacity for removing medium and medium‐large molecules; however, there are no specific recommendations during HDx for anticoagulation of the dialysis circuit. We aimed to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of anticoagulation procedures using the venous port and 40 mg enoxaparin in HDx compared to high‐flux hemodialysis (HF‐HD) and postdilution online hemodiafiltration (HDF). We compared anticoagulant activity in 11 patients in HDx, HF‐HD, and HDF under similar dialysis conditions. In the 33 dialysis sessions, 40 mg enoxaparin was administered through the venous port, and pre‐ and postdialysis antifactor Xa activity (aXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), postdialysis clotting time of the vascular access, visual clotting score of the dialyzer, and any complications with the extracorporeal circuit or bleeding were registered. APTT postdialysis in HDx was not significantly different from that in HF‐HD and HDF. Postdialysis aXa in HDx was not significantly different from that in HF‐HD and HDF. We found no significant differences in visual clotting score of the dialyzer. Enoxaparin administered through the venous port was sufficient for anticoagulation within the extracorporeal circuit in HDx, HF‐HD, and HDF. There were no differences in postdialysis aXa or APTT, most likely because when low molecular–weight heparin is applied through venous port, lesser enoxaparin concentration reaches the dialyzer. Thus, we conclude that the dose of enoxaparin administered through the venous port should not be adjusted according to dialysis technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemodialysis‐related headache (HRH) is a well‐known clinical event. It is considered as one of the most commonly reported neurological symptoms among hemodialysis patients. Its epidemiological, physiological, clinical, and therapeutic data remain scarce and are poorly studied. Our aim was to determine the frequency of HRH in the region of Casablanca, Morocco, to describe its clinical characteristics and to explore the hypothesis that renal replacement techniques, such as conventional versus online hemodiafiltration may have an association on clinical adverse effects like HRH. A descriptive, cross‐sectional, and multicentric study was carried out among 100 chronic hemodialysis patients for at least 6 months. HRH was defined according to criteria published by the International Classification of Headache Disorder third edition beta version (ICHD3β) [1]. Two different HD‐modalities (standard HD and OL‐HDF) have been investigated in order to explore their impact on HRH. Headache was reported by 60% of the patients including 41.6% of hemodialysis‐related headache. HRH had on average a duration of 7.4 hours, pulsatile among 38% of interviewed patients and of moderate intensity in 48% of cases. In total, 51.3% of patients undergoing conventional hemodialysis modality reported HRH compared to 12.5% undergoing online hemodiafiltration technique (OL‐HDF) (P =.008). Hemodialysis‐related headache remains a poorly studied clinical event despite its high prevalence. Its diagnosis, management, and especially its prevention remain a challenge for the neurologist and the nephrologist. Our results suggest that OL‐HDF is a promising therapeutic and preventive tool to reduce the incidence of HRH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Evidence suggests that online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is associated with improved survival. Whether the dose-response relationship between convective volume and mortality may be confounded by selection bias or descends from practice patterns is not clear. We sought to evaluate the role of patients' characteristics and practice patterns on OL-HDF dose and mortality in a large private dialysis network in the Republic of Russia. Methods: In this multicenter, historical cohort study, we included adult incident patients on OL-HDF with at least 90 days of survival on renal replacement therapy in centers belonging to the Russian Federation Fresenius Medical Care network (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016). We evaluated predictors and outcomes (survival) of substitution volume target achievement (Qsub > 21 L/session). Results: Among 1,081 enrolled patients, the average Qsub was 22.9 (±3.2) L/session; the mean ultrafiltration volume was 1.6 (±0.8) L/session. The mean age was 55.8 ± 13.2; 42% were woman. Most common comorbidities were congestive heart failure (39.7%) and peripheral vascular disease (21.7%). The average hemoglobin was 9.3 ± 1.3. The case-mix adjusted center effect accounted for 20% of variance in Qsub. The top 10 most important variables associated with higher Qsub were effective Qb, serum protein, Charlson's comorbidity index, hemoglobin, year of dialysis initiation (proxy of high Qsub treatment policy in the clinic network), predialysis heart rate, serum bicarbonate, serum phosphate, age, serum sodium, and dry body weight. In addition, we found that the association of Qb with Qsub is moderated by year of enrollment, intradialytic weight gain, and coronary artery disease, whereas higher hemoglobin concentration moderated the relationship between treatment time and Qsub. Finally, Qsub between 21 and 25 L/session was associated with longer 5-year survival. Conclusions: Both center-dependent clinical practice standards and patient clinical conditions substantially contributed to the risk of low Qsub. We confirmed previous evidence indicating better survival among patients with Qsub ≥ 21 L/session. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The mortality of dialysis patients treated with high-volume online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is better than hemodialysis, but is still higher than healthy population. Low daily physical activity increases cardiovascular mortality. Addition of intradialytic exercise (IDX) program might improve physical activity and health status in OL-HDF patients. This pilot open-labeled randomized-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of IDX on physical activity and other clinical parameters in OL-HDF patients. Methods: Twelve OL-HDF patients were randomized into control (n = 6) or IDX (n = 6) groups. The subjects in IDX group were trained to exercise using a cycle ergometer for 60 min during each OL-HDF session. Physical activity measured as daily step count using a wrist-worn triaxial accelerometer, physical fitness, or cardiorespiratory fitness assessed by VO2max and other physical performance tests, lean body mass determined by the Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quality of life (QOL), and various parameters were compared between baseline and 6 months. Results: The baseline physical activity status was comparable. Following 6-month IDX, the physical activity was significantly improved in IDX group [+ 1048.79 (+ 741.50, + 2792.54) vs. − 362.06 (− 1626.82, − 167.47) steps/day, p = 0.01], while physical fitness and QOL were unchanged. The lean body mass parameters were preserved in the IDX group while seemed to decrease in the control group. Serum albumin was significantly increased in the IDX group (p = 0.01). The hemoglobin changes were significantly better (p = 0.01) and the erythropoietin resistance index was significantly lower in the IDX group (p = 0.03). Phosphate reduction was significantly greater in the IDX group (p = 0.04). Conclusions: IDX could improve physical activity and other metabolic parameters in OL-HDF patients and these might contribute to further improvement in clinical and survival outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03353844. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although high‐volume postdilution online hemodiafiltration (ol‐HDF) is superior to high‐flux HD in removing all kinds of uremic toxins and improving survival, this treatment is not available in most HD centers. The present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness in removals of protein‐bound (indoxyl sulfate [IS]), middle‐molecule [beta‐2 microglobulin (B2M) and alpha‐1 microglobulin (A1MG)], and small‐molecule uremic toxins between super high‐flux HD (SHF‐HD), HD with a novel SHF dialyzer and high‐volume postdilution ol‐HDF in a noninferiority fashion. Fifteen prevalent HD patients were randomly allocated into two sequences of 12‐week treatment periods of SHF‐HD treatment and later high‐volume postdilution ol‐HDF period or vice versa. Each treatment period was divided by a wash‐out phase of 4‐week high‐flux HD. Twelve of 15 patients could complete the study. When compared with high‐volume postdilution ol‐HDF (convective volume of 24.4 ± 3.52 L), SHF‐HD provided comparable reduction ratio values of IS, B2M, and A1MG with mean difference of 5.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] ‐1.63, 13.37), 1.98 (95% CI,‐0.21, 4.18), and 22.96 (95% CI, ‐1.91, 47.83), respectively. The spKt/Vurea was not different. The predialysis levels of all uremic toxins at baseline and after 12‐week treatment did not differ between both groups. Although albumin loss in dialysate in SHF‐HD was greater than high‐volume postdilution ol‐HDF, the serum albumin levels after 12‐week SHF‐HD treatment were significantly higher than baseline. In conclusion, SHF‐HD provides noninferior effectiveness to high‐volume postdilution ol‐HDF in removing various uremic toxins with significantly increased serum albumin levels despite higher albumin loss. SHF‐HD might be an effectively alternative treatment when high‐volume postdilution ol‐HDF is not available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As increasing demand for hemodialysis (HD) treatment incurs significant financial burden to healthcare systems and ecological burden as well, novel therapeutic approaches as well as innovations and technological advances are being sought that could lead to the development of purification devices such as dialyzers with improved characteristics and wearable technology. Novel knowledge such as the development of more accurate kinetic models, the development of novel HD membranes with the use of nanotechnology, novel manufacturing processes, and the latest technology in the science of materials have enabled novel solutions already marketed or on the verge of becoming commercially available. This collaborative article reviews the latest advances in HD as they were presented by the authors in a recent symposium titled "Frontiers in Haemodialysis," held on 12th December 2019 at the Royal Society of Medicine in London. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Restoring and controlling fluid volume homeostasis is still a challenge in contemporary end‐stage kidney disease patients treated by intermittent hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF). This primary target is achieved by ultrafiltration (dry weight probing) and control of intradialytic sodium transfer (dialysate‐plasma Na gradient). The latter task is mostly ignored in clinical practice by applying a dialysate sodium prescription uniform for all patients of the dialysis center but unaligned to individual plasma sodium levels. Depending on the patient's natremia, a positive gradient gives rise to intradialytic diffusive sodium load and postdialytic thirst. On the contrary, a negative gradient may cause unwanted diffusive sodium removal and intradialytic symptoms. To overcome these challenges, a new conductivity‐based electrolyte balancing algorithm embedded in a hemodialysis machine with the aim to achieve "zero diffusive sodium balance" in HD and online HDF treatments was tested in the form of a prospective clinical trial. The study comprised two phases: a first phase with a conventional fixed‐sodium dialysate (standard care phase), followed by a phase with the electrolyte balancing control (EBC) module activated (controlled care phase). The results show a reduction in the variability of the intradialytic plasma sodium concentration shift, but it is overlain by a small but statistically significant increase in the mean plasma sodium levels. However, no clinical manifestations were observed. This sodium load can be explained by the design of the algorithm based on dialysate conductivity instead of sodium concentration. Furthermore, the increase in plasma sodium can be corrected by taking into account the potassium shift during the treatment. This study showed that the EBC module incorporated in the HD machine is able to automatically individualize the dialysate sodium to the patient's plasma sodium without measuring or calculating predialytic plasma levels from previous laboratory tests. This tool has the potential to facilitate fluid management, to control diffusive sodium flux, and to improve intradialytic tolerance in daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent evidence suggests a better reduction rate of some uremic toxins with expanded hemodialysis (HDx). Methods: Prospective study including 8 hemodialysis patients. We divided the study in 2 phases; within the first one, we assigned 4 patients (group 1) to undergo online hemodiafiltration with a PF 210H dialyzer, and the other 4 patients (group 2) to undergo HDx with the high retention onset Theranova 500 dialyzer during 24 sessions. Later, during the second phase and after a washout period, the same patients were switched to receive HDx (group 1) and HDF (group 2). Results: No differences were found in the Urea and β2-microglobulin reduction ratio. However, in the case of myoglobin, the reduction ratio with HDF was 35 vs. 60% with HDx (p < 0.001). Similarly, in the case of prolactin, the reduction ratio with HDF was 45 and 61% with HDx (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We conclude that HDx is not inferior to online hemodiafiltration in the clearance of small and middle molecules and could be superior in the clearance of larger middle molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The evidence concerning online hemodiafiltration (HDF) includes the following: (1) the increase of removal of uremic toxin, (2) the prevention of dialysis rerated hypotension, (3) the recovery of survival, and (4) the recovery of dialysis related uncertain symptoms. Although clinical evidence has been noted, the hypothesis of the efficacy of HDF are still indefinite and require further precise research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The majority of studies suggesting that online hemodiafiltration reduces the risk of mortality compared to hemodialysis (HD) have been performed in dialysis-prevalent populations. In this report, we conducted an epidemiologic study of mortality in incident dialysis patients, comparing post-dilution online hemodiafiltration and high-flux HD, with propensity score matching (PSM) used to correct indication bias.Methods: Our study cohort comprised 3,075 incident dialysis patients treated in 64 Spanish Fresenius Medical Care clinics between January 2009 and December 2012. The primary outcome of this study was to investigate the impact of the type of renal replacement on all-cause mortality. An analysis of cardiovascular mortality was defined as the secondary outcome. To achieve these objectives, patients were followed until December 2016. Patients were categorized as high-flux HD patients if they underwent this treatment exclusively. If >90% of their treatment was with online hemodiafiltration, then the patient was grouped to that modality.Results: After PSM, a total of 1,012 patients were matched. Compared with patients on high-flux HD, those on online hemodiafiltration received a median replacement volume of 23.45 (interquartile range 21.27-25.51) L/session and manifested 24 and 33% reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (all-cause mortality hazards ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.94 [p = 0.01]; and cardiovascular mortality HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.90 [p = 0.008]).Conclusions: This study shows that post-dilution online hemodiafiltration reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to high-flux HD in an incident HD population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several uremic toxins have been identified and related to higher rates of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Bisphenol A (BPA) accumulates in patients with chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the usefulness of online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) in reducing BPA levels. Thirty stable hemodialysis patients were selected to participate in this paired study. During three periods of 3 weeks each, patients were switched from high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) to OL-HDF, and back to HF-HD. BPA levels were measured in the last session of each period (pre- and post-dialysis) using ELISA and HPLC. Twenty-two patients (mean age 73 ± 14 years; 86.4% males) were included. Measurements of BPA levels by HPLC and ELISA assays showed a weak but significant correlation (r = 0.218, P = 0.012). BPA levels decreased in the OL-HDF period of hemodialysis, in contrast to the HF-HD period when they remained stable ( P = 0.002). In conclusion, OL-HDF reduced BPA levels in dialysis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Survival with online hemodiafiltration (OL‐HDF) is higher than with hemodialysis; frequent hemodialysis has also improved survival and quality of life. Home hemodialysis facilitates frequent therapy. We report our experience with 2 patients with stage 5 CKD who started home hemodialysis with OL‐HDF in November 2016. After a training period at the hospital, they started home hemodialysis with OL‐HDF after learning how to manage dialysis monitors and how to administer water treatment. We used the “5008‐home” (FMC©) monitor, and the Acqua C© (Fresenius Medical Care) for water treatment. Water conductivity was always checked before and during dialysis sessions and was always 2.5 to 3 mS/cm. Water cultures always fulfilled the criteria for ultrapurity. As far as we know, this is the first report on patients receiving OL‐HDF at home. The technique proved to be safe and valid for renal replacement therapy and transfers the benefits of hospital convective therapy to the home setting. Future data will enable us to determine whether survival has also improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) seems to represent the gold standard in the field of replacement of renal function by dialysis. High convective fluxes have been correlated with better clinical outcomes. Sometimes, however, there are technical barriers to the achievement of high blood flows adequate to perform effective convective therapies. In spite of optimized procedures, the progressive increase in transmembrane pressure (TMP), the blood viscosity due to hemoconcentration and blood path resistance sometimes becomes inevitable. We propose two possible solutions that can be operated automatically via specific software in the dialysis machine: predilution on demand and backflush on demand. Predilution on demand consists in an automatic feedback of the machine, diverting part of the filtered dialysate into a predilution mode with an infusion of 200 ml in 30 s while the ultrafiltration pump stops. This produces a sudden hemodilution with a return of the parameters to acceptable values. The performance of the filter improves, and the pressure alterations are mitigated. Backflush on demand consists in an automatic feedback of the machine triggered by the TMP control, producing a positive pressure in the dialysate compartment due to a stop of filtration and rapid infusion of at least 100 ml of ultrapure dialysate into the hollow fiber. This not only produces a significant hemodilution, but also backflushes the membrane pores detaching protein layers and improving membrane permeability. These are two examples of how technology will permit to overcome technical barriers to a widespread diffusion of HDF and adequate convective dose delivery. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many pieces of evidence of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) have been reported, and the clinical advantage of postdilution online HDF with sufficient substitution is now established. After the approval of online HDF in 2012, the number of online HDF patients has been dramatically increasing in Japan and reached 10% of the total dialysis population at the end of 2013. One of the marked characteristics of Japanese online HDF is a widespread use of predilution treatment and, in 2013, 90.8% of online HDFs were carried out with the predilution mode. The main reason for the wide use of predilution online HDF results from the low blood flow rate in Japan, by which it is difficult to substitute a sufficient volume during the limited treatment time. Other reasons to choose the predilution mode include the reduction of albumin loss and the suppression of membrane fouling during treatment. Contrary to postdilution treatment, adequate clinical evidence has not been reported for predilution online HDF to provide a better outcome of the patients. A further clinical trial is expected to elucidate the clinical advantages over conventional hemodialysis for predilution online HDF. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Retrospective randomized clinical studies have shown that online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is associated with a lower risk reduction of mortality than standard hemodialysis. Summary: In all of these large randomized studies, the convective volume seemed to be an important issue, but the optimal OL-HDF dose has not yet been defined. This article, to make a EUDIAL working group position, reviews the association between survival and convective volume, the minimum recommended replacement volume, the importance of the infusion flow rate, and the main limiting factors in achieving a high convective volume. Finally, the article discusses whether the convective dose should be normalized to body size. Key Messages: At present, there is sufficient scientific evidence to indicate that OL-HDF treatment reduces mortality risk and that it should be the first-line option in hemodialysis patients. It seems reasonable to recommend that patients should receive the highest possible convective dose and that the largest possible blood flow should be used to obtain the highest possible infusion flow rate. Based on the results of secondary analyses of the main clinical trials, the current recommendation of the optimal dose of OL-HDF, in the postdilutional mode and on a thrice-weekly treatment schedule, would be a convective volume higher than 23 liters/session. There is insufficient scientific evidence to recommend that the convective dose should be normalized to body size. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Our aim was to investigate the effect of on-line HDF versus high-flux (HF) hemodialysis (HD) on a patient's health-related satisfaction level. Methods: Overall, 72 patients, on regular low-flux HD for 51 ± 26 month mean age of 54 ± 12 years, were randomized to HF (group 1, n = 36) and to HDF (group 2, n = 36) and followed up for 24 months. Assessment was based on the patient's satisfaction level using modified questionnaires of the validated Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF) version 1.3. Results: The HDF group achieved a higher satisfaction level than the HF group (p < 0.0001) with less cramps (3 ± 5 vs. 55 ± 8), itching (9 ± 10 vs. 48 ± 10), joint pain and stiffness (24 ± 10 vs. 83 ± 8), and improvement in general mood (94 ± 9 vs. 28 ± 16), sexual performance (57 ± 10 vs. 5 ± 5), and social activity (82 ± 9 vs. 15 ± 8). Conclusion: High-efficiency postdilution on-line HDF versus high-flux HD significantly improved patients' satisfaction and quality of life, including social, physical, and professional activities. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

P-wave dispersion (PWD) (difference between the maximum and minimum P-wave duration), has been proposed as a useful predictor of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The consequences of hemodialysis (HD) on PWD and P-wave duration have not been unequivocally documented and understood, and may be complex. We aimed in this work to demonstrate the effects of online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) on the risk of developing AF through assessment of PWD. Thirty-three pediatric patients (14 males and 19 females with mean age of 11.66 ± 2.93 years) on conventional HD for at least 6 months underwent echocardiography, 12-lead electrocardiogram and PWD calculation. Then they were switched to OL-HDF for another 6 months and same parameters were reassessed. Thirty sex- and aged-matched healthy children, served as controls. PWD significantly decreased upon switching to OL-HDF (P < 0.001) and fractional shortening significantly improved (P < 0.001). Mean PWD of controls (24 ± 6 ms) was significantly less than PWD before and after OL-HDF (P < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Online HDF significantly decreased PWD and hence also the potential of AF development, which may invite a higher consideration of this renal replacement modality in a pediatric population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Online hemodiafiltration ( OL-HDF) has now demonstrated some benefits in reducing mortality. It seems that rising convective volumes improve the outcomes, but the risks of it, such as albumin leakage, are not well defined yet. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the albumin leakage using two different filters with 20 and 30 L of post-dilution OL-HDF. In this cross-sectional study, 20 prevalent patients receiving post-dilution OL-HDL were included. We analyzed two dialyzers: FX1000, FMC and Polyflux 210H, Gambro. During four consecutive dialysis sessions, monitors were programmed using control-volume to obtain 20 or 30 L with both dialyzers. We collected albumin samples of the effluent at 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min and performed area under the curve ( AUC) determinations for evaluating the losses. Mean patient age was 60 ± 9 years, and 70% were men. Albumin leakage was significant higher with Polyflux 210H when compared to FX 1000 FMC. A convective volume of 30 L produced greater albumin leakage than 20 L with both filters, though only with the FX 1000 FMC was it significant (minimum albumin leakage during first hour with FX 1000 FMC 20 L: 79.2 [0.0-175.7] mg; 30 liters: 403.3 [63.5-960.7] mg; with PF 210 Gambro 20 L: 869.1 [420.0-3214.7] mg; 30 L: 1841.7 [443.8-3417.5] mg). During OL-HDF, convective transport causes albumin leakage at least during the first hour. The albumin concentration in the effluent differs according to the type of filter used and the convective volume. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acetate in standard acetate-containing bicarbonate ( AC) dialysis fluid could induce peripheral vasodilatation, suppression of myocardial function, and inflammatory cytokine production, resulting in intradialytic hypotension in conventional hemodialysis ( HD) patients. Online hemodiafiltration ( HDF) provides superior hemodynamic stability over HD. The potentially additive hemodynamic benefits of the novel acetate-free bicarbonate ( AF) dialysis fluid in online HDF have never been explored before. The present randomized, double-blind, crossover study was conducted in 22 online HDF patients to investigate the impact of AF dialysis fluid on hemodynamic and cytokine changes compared with AC dialysis fluid in online HDF. The results demonstrated the comparable changes of arterial pressure between AF and AC online HDF. During the study periods, the incidences of composite intradialytic hypotension and other adverse events were not different. The baseline and hourly changes of cardiac index, cardiac output, and peripheral vascular resistance during dialysis were comparable ( P = 0.534, 0.199, and 0.641, respectively). The percent reductions of NT- proBNP and cTnT were not significantly different (72.6 ± 12.3 vs. 72.6 ± 12.8%, P = 0.99 and 35.2 ± 12.8 vs. 36.7 ± 12.0%, P = 0.51). The changes of all pro-inflammatory cytokines ( IL-2β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory cytokine ( IL-10) during dialysis were comparable between both groups. In conclusion, AF dialysis solution does not offer additional hemodynamic benefit for stable online HDF patients. The hemodynamic stability provided by online HDF might protect the adverse effects of acetate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patients' perception of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a consistent and powerful predictor of the outcome of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients under dialysis. This study aims to identify factors that could affect the HRQOL of ESRD patients under online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). Methods: We evaluated 322 ESRD patients under OL-HDF (59.63 % males; 64.9 ± 14.3 years old) from five dialysis units in the north of Portugal. Socio-demographic data, comorbidities, hematological data, iron status, dialysis adequacy, nutritional and inflammatory markers were collected from patients records. Patient's reported HRQOL score was assessed by using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF). Results: ESRD patients showed a mean (±SD) of 53.17 % (±15.31 %) in SF-36 total score, 50.17 % (±9.51 %) in the SF-36 mental component summary (MCS) and 49.75 % (±9.44 %) in the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS). Red cell distribution width (RDW), feminine gender and diabetes were found as significant predictors of SF-36 total score of HRQOL, which accounts for 12 % of the total explained variance. Patient satisfaction, RDW, body mass index and gender were identified as predictors for the PCS, which accounts for 22 % of total explained variance. Furthermore, patient satisfaction and dry weight were found as predictors for MCS. These predictors accounted for 28 % of the total explained variance. Conclusions: Our results showed that the coexistence of diabetes, gender and erythropoietic disturbances are predictors of HRQOL in patients under OL-HDF and suggest that more attention should be given to woman patients, to the improvement of anemia and to diabetic patients, who are more prone to perceive a worst HRQOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Unlike conventional hemodialysis treatments, which rely almost solely on diffusion-related mechanisms for solute removal, hemodiafiltration (HDF) allows more efficient removal of higher molecular weight toxins due to convective transport mechanisms. To facilitate the removal of these toxins in HDF treatment modalities, dialyzers with highly efficient high-flux membranes are necessary. This study assessed the large uremic toxin removal ability of a high-flux dialyzer (FX CorDiax 60) specifically designed to facilitate convective therapies compared with a standard high-flux dialyzer (FX 60). Methods: In an open, randomized, cross-over, single-center, controlled, prospective clinical study, 30 adult chronic hemodialysis patients were treated by post-dilution online HDF with the FX 60 or the FX CorDiax 60 dialyzer. All other dialysis parameters were kept constant in both study arms. The reduction rate (RR) of blood urea nitrogen, phosphate, β2-microglobulin (β2-m), myoglobin, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, albumin and total protein as well as the elimination into dialysate was intraindividually compared for the two dialyzer types. Results: For FX CorDiax 60 versus FX 60, the RR was significantly higher for blood urea nitrogen (86.23 ± 4.14 vs. 84.89 ± 4.59%, p = 0.015), β2-m (84.67 ± 3.79 vs. 81.30 ± 4.82%, p < 0.0001), myoglobin (75.23 ± 10.48 vs. 58.60 ± 12.1%, p < 0.0001), prolactin (72.96 ± 9.68 vs. 56.91 ± 13.01%, p < 0.0001) and α1-microglobulin (20.89 ± 18.27 vs. 13.60 ± 12.50%, p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in the RR for phosphate, α1-acid glycoprotein, albumin and total protein. Mass removal was significantly higher with the FX CorDiax 60 than with the FX 60 for β2-m (0.26 ± 0.09 vs. 0.24 ± 0.09 g, p = 0.0006), myoglobin (1.83 ± 0.89 vs. 1.51 ± 0.76 mg, p = 0.0017), prolactin (0.17 ± 0.13 vs. 0.14 ± 0.08 mg, p = 0.02) and albumin (4.25 ± 3.49 vs. 3.01 ± 2.37 g, p = 0.03). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that treating patients with an FX CorDiax 60 instead of an FX 60 dialyzer in post-dilution HDF mode significantly increases the elimination of middle molecules. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We examined the hypothesis that mixed-dilution online hemodiafiltration (MIXED) rather than predilution online hemodiafiltration (PRE) could enable patients with low blood flow rate (Qb) to benefit from advantages of convective therapies. Methods: Thirty-eight patients were included in a prospective, randomized, crossover and multicenter study conducted with a view to comparing the equilibrated Kt/V, reduction ratio (RR) of phosphates, β2-microglobulin (β2-M) and myoglobin (myo) between PRE and MIXED, each at two Qb values of 250 and 300 ml/min during 4 h sessions with a FX1000HDF dialyzer. Albumin losses (Alb) were also measured in 12 patients. Results: MIXED was always found to be more efficient compared to PRE notably for middle molecules (MM). RRβ2-M: MIX250: 81.3 ± 3.6 vs. PRE250: 75.2 ± 5.9; MIX300: 82.7 ± 3.6 vs. PRE300: 78.1 ± 5.4; RRmyo: MIX250: 70.2 ± 3.6 vs. PRE250: 42.6 ± 2.6; MIX300: 70.6 ± 3.6 vs. PRE300: 45.7 ± 3.6 and with Alb <3.0 g/session. Conclusion: MIXED allows patients unable to provide sufficiently high Qb to achieve high levels of MM removal. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypercytokinemia plays a central role in pathogenesis and is related to the high mortality in sepsis-related acute kidney injury ( AKI). Besides the established cytokines, vascular endothelial growth factor ( VEGF) is demonstrated as an important factor in enhancing vascular leakage in sepsis. This prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of cytokine removal between online hemodiafiltration ( HDF), which combines convective and diffusive solute removal, and high-flux hemodialysis ( HD). Twenty-eight sepsis-related AKI patients were included and randomized into online HDF and high-flux HD. The percentages of the reduction ratio in plasma cytokines were measured as primary outcomes. Other clinical parameters were determined as secondary outcomes. When compared with high-flux HD, online HDF provided significantly greater percentages of the reduction ratio in plasma cytokine levels, including VEGF ( P < 0.001), IL-6 ( P = 0.001), IL-8 ( P = 0.021), IL-10 ( P = 0.011), and tumor necrosis factor-α ( P = 0.029). There were no significant differences in intradialytic blood pressures. Online HDF revealed better renal recovery and shorter length of hospitalization than high-flux HD. In conclusion, online HDF in sepsis-related AKI could provide significantly better removal of VEGF and other cytokines and these were associated with better renal outcome than high-flux HD. Thus, online HDF would offer a potential role in hypercytokinemic state in sepsis-related AKI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: We examined the effects of different online hemodiafiltration techniques on microinflammation and endothelial damage/repair. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective crossover study. Flow cytometry was used to measure CD14+CD16+ monocytes, apoptotic endothelial microparticles (EMPs), and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). Results: Patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis showed a marked chronic inflammatory state (HF-HD 11 ± 2) versus healthy subjects (HS 3.9 ± 2.3; p < 0.05). High convective transport, independent of the technique used, improves microinflammatory parameters (OL-HDF 7.3 ± 2.1 or MID 6.5 ± 3.4; p < 0.05) and the endothelial damage/repair balance compared to HF-HD (EPCs HF-HD 0.3 ± 0.2), with no differences found between the two modalities (EPCs OL-HDF 0.6 ± 0.1, MID 0.6 ± 0.2; p < 0.05). Conclusion: An increase in convective transport improves the microinflammatory state and the endothelial damage/repair of these patients independently of the technique used. Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hemodiafiltration with online preparation of the substitution [online high-flux hemodiafiltration (OHDF)] and hemodiafiltration with prepared bags of substitution (HDF) are important, recently widely used renal replacement therapies in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, there is little information on the comparative impacts of these modalities versus conventional low-flux hemodialysis (HD) on the quality of life (QoL) of HD patients. This study investigates the effect of dialysis modality on QoL in chronic HD patients. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, cross-over, open label study, 24 patients were enrolled. Their age were 62 ± 13.34 years (mean ± SD), with the duration of dialysis of 31 ± 23.28 months (mean ± SD). Five of the patients were women. QoL was measured by the Short-Form Health Survey with 36 questions (SF-36) and subscale scores were calculated. Each patient received HD, OHDF, and HDF for 3 months, with the dialysis modality subsequently being altered. They completed the questionnaire of QoL at the end of each period. Results: There were statistical significant differences in QoL for the total SF-36 [36.1 (26.7-45.7) and 40.7 (30.2-62.8)], for classic low-flux HD and high-flux hemodiafiltration, for bodily pain [45 (26.9-66.9) and 55 (35.6-87.5)], and for role limitations due to emotional functioning [0 (0-33.3) and 33.3 (0-100)], respectively. The scores did not differ significantly between the two types of hemodiafiltration. Conclusions: Our study indicates that QoL differs significantly among patients receiving low-flux HD and high-flux hemodiafiltration, on total SF-36, bodily pain, and role limitations due to emotional functioning. Convective modalities may offer better QoL than diffusive HD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Phosphate is an important factor in explaining the high progress of vascular calcification among dialysis patients. Today, phosphate concentration is measured in plasma on a regular basis. The aim of this study was to find out if it is possible to estimate total removed phosphate (TRp) in spent dialysate utilizing UV absorbance during hemodiafiltration. Methods: Eleven patients were monitored online with UV absorbance at 297 nm, three times during one week each (n = 33). Dialysate samples were taken at different times during treatment and from a collection tank to chemically determine phosphate concentrations. Two mathematical models (UVIND and UVGROUP) were tested to estimate TRp with supervision by UV absorbance and compared with TRp measured in the tank (reference). Results: High correlation between UV absorbance and phosphate concentration for each single patient and lower for the whole group together was found. TRp was (mean ± SD) 30.7 ± 7.3 mmol for the reference and 30.8 ± 8.2 and 29.1 ± 5.2 mmol for UVIND and UVGROUP, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates a novel possibility to estimate TRp based on linear relationship between online monitoring of UV absorbance and concentration of phosphate in spent dialysate. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Guidelines recommend regular measurements of the delivered hemodialysis dose Kt/V. Nowadays, automatic non-invasive online measurements are available as alternatives to the conventional method with blood sampling, laboratory analysis, and calculation. Methods:In a prospective clinical trial, three different methods determining dialysis dose were simultaneously applied: Kt/VDau (conventional method with Daugirdas' formula), Kt/VOCM [online clearance measurement (OCM) with urea distribution volume V based on anthropometric estimate], and Kt/VBCM [OCM measurement with V measured by bioimpedance analysis (Body Composition Monitor)]. Results:1,076 hemodialysis patients were analyzed. The dialysis dose was measured as Kt/VDau = 1.74 ± 0.45, Kt/VOCM = 1.47 ± 0.34, and Kt/VBCM = 1.65 ± 0.42. The difference between Kt/VOCM and Kt/VBCM was due to the difference between anthropometric estimated VWatson and measured VBCM. Compared to Kt/VDau, Kt/VOCM was 15% lower and Kt/VBCM 5% lower. Kt/VDau was incidentally prone to falsely high values due to operative errors, whereas in these cases OCM-based measurements Kt/VOCM and Kt/VBCM delivered realistic values. Conclusions:The automated OCM Kt/VOCM with anthropometric estimation of urea distribution volume was the easiest method to use, but Kt/VBCM with measured urea distribution volume was closer to the conventional method. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A significant and increasing number of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are treated with online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), even in the absence of more conclusive survival data. OL-HDF affords several clinical benefits including control of anemia of CKD, a common affliction in dialysis patients. In efforts to understand the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the purported benefits of OL-HDF, we examined the potential role and impact of OL-HDF on key stages of anemia and its correction: erythropoiesis of bone marrow, circulating erythrocytes and on anemia therapy. We review evidence that indicates OL-HDF may modulate key processes of anemia and its therapy, including underlying conditions and responses of uremic toxicity and inflammation that aggravate anemia. Our assessment indicates that OL-HDF favorably impacts anemia by not only eliminating putative uremic inhibitors that suppress erythropoiesis, reducing red cell destruction and increasing iron availability, but also by mechanisms restricting underlying inflammation and endothelial dysfunction that are crucial to both CKD and anemia. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) is an extracorporeal technique for solute removal in renal failure, which takes advantage of an enhancement of convective treatment by the large amount of ultrapure nonpyrogen dialysate being used for substitution of the ultrafiltered volume. It offers many advantages aside from its safe inflammatory profile, which is attributable to the use of ultrapure dialysate and highly biocompatible dialysis membranes. Due to an improved convective clearance, significantly increased removal of large or protein-bound uremic retention solutes can be achieved, with a potential benefit on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent observational data indicate that online HDF offers a survival advantage even after adjustment for comorbidity and dialysis efficiency. Research has been ongoing to maximize further the effectiveness of the technique by new technical innovations such as transmembrane-pressure feedback control or mid-dilution online HDF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) is a new hemodialysis technique combining convection and diffusion and thus also enabling the purification of large molecules. As yet, only a small number of clinical experiences have been published about the effectiveness and safety of online HDF. We present a prospective and observational study conducted on 31 patients treated with online HDF in our center in the last 4 years. The purpose of the study is to compare the evolution of the following aspects before and after starting online HDF: dose of dialysis, purification of medium-sized/large molecules, inflammation, nutrition, Ca-P metabolism, anemia, and intradialytic complications. Online HDF increased Kt/V to 31.0% (p>0.001) and reduced postdialysis β2-M to 66.4% (p>0.001). The rest of the parameters analyzed did not vary significantly. During online HDF, episodes of symptomatic hypotension fell by 45% in relation to conventional hemodialysis, and no relevant complication occurred. Online HDF is very useful in patients in whom we need to increase replacement therapy, such as patients with a large body surface, those in whom we suspect a residual syndrome or those who have been receiving dialysis for a long time and for whom we wish to prevent amyloidosis. Online HDF is safe and better tolerated than conventional hemodialysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) are 2 innovative renal replacement therapies. Convincing evidence has shown that both techniques are superior to conventional hemodialysis in many aspects. The aim of the present investigation was to compare online HDF and AFB in 12 stable maintenance hemodialysis patients in a prospective, randomized crossover trial. Twelve stable dialysis patients, age 49.7 ± 11.3 years and on dialysis for 83.5 ± 76.7 months, were treated prospectively and randomly by either AFB, predilution HDF (pre-HDF), or postdilution HDF (post-HDF) for a total of 36 weeks using exclusively F60S high-flux dialyzers. Routine blood biochemical tests, bone metabolism parameters, and clearance for both small and larger molecular weight substances were measured at defined intervals. During the trial period inter- and intradialysis symptoms, e.g., hypotensive episodes and intradialysis arterial blood gas analyses, were recorded. Both online HDF and AFB were well accepted by the overwhelming majority of patients and also by the dialysis staff. Pretreatment sodium, total and ionized calcium, chloride, bicarbonate, and urea did not differ within or between the 3 treatment groups. Potassium increased slightly in HDF patients while phosphate and β2 -microglobulin (β2 -M) decreased in all groups. After dialysis, AFB patients exhibited a significantly higher bicarbonate concentration and lower potassium level when identical potassium concentrations in dialysate were used. Patients receiving AFB manifested less intradialysis partial pressure of oxygen drop and partial pressure of carbon dioxide rise than those on HDF treatments. HDF treatments could afford higher single-pool and double-pool Kt/V, higher effective urea and β2 M clearance, and lower total interdialysis symptom scores than the AFB treatment method. While bone metabolism parameters did not differ between the 3... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are known to suffer from chronic inflammation as the result of an ongoing subacute cytokine induction, which may contribute considerably to dialysis-related, long-term morbidity and mortality. Preparation of infusate from cytokine-inducing dialysis fluid and its administration in large quantities as well as the use of high-flux membranes bear the risk of aggravating the chronic inflammatory response among online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) patients. In order to assess the inflammatory risk associated with online HDF, we compared the cytokine induction profile of ESRD patients receiving either online HDF or low-flux hemodialysis (low-flux HD). Specifically, we measured spontaneous and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) release during ex vivo incubation of whole blood. Ultrapure dialysis fluid and polysulfone membranes were used for both treatment modalities. LPS-stimulated release of TNFα and IL-1Ra was elevated for both online HDF and low-flux HD patients compared to healthy individuals (TNFα: 2,336 ± 346 and 2,192 ± 398 versus 1,218 ± 224 pg/106 white blood cells [WBC]; IL-1Ra: 2,410 ± 284 and 2,326 ± 186 versus 1,678 ± 219 pg/106 WBC). Likewise, spontaneous production of TNFα, but not IL-1Ra, was higher in online HDF and low-flux HD patients than in normal controls (37 ± 32 and 22 ± 19 versus 0.8 ± 0.3 pg TNFα/106 WBC). There was no difference in spontaneous and LPS-stimulated cytokine release between both dialysis groups. In addition, intradialytic cytokine induction was not significant for either treatment modality as spontaneous and LPS-stimulated cytokine release were not increased postdialysis. These findings indicate that online HDF does not contribute to chronic leukocyte activation and, consequently, does not place... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article examines the effects of different dialysis modalities on the removal of the circulating uremic factors causing increased red blood cell (RBC) phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization. The groups of uremic retained solutes are listed. The process by which increased exposure of PS on the outer surface of RBC membrane may be involved in the pathophysiology of uremia is described.

Background: Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is associated with better removal of both small and middle molecules and might improve survival compared to conventional hemodialysis (HD). Nevertheless, hemodiafiltration (HDF) can lead to an increase in albumin loss across the dialyzer, especially with high permeability membrane and high convective volume (CV). We present the case of a patient treated by OL-HDF who developed severe hypoalbuminemia resulting from massive albumin loss into dialysate.Case Presentation: A 71-year-old woman with ESRD started renal replacement therapy in December 2016. She was treated by high volume post-dilution OL-HDF, 4 h, 3 times per week. The dialyzer was the Phylther HF20SD (a 2.0m2 heat sterilized high flux (HF) polyphenylene membrane from Bellco). At the initiation of dialysis, the serum albumin was 4.0 g/dl. During the following months, the patient developed severe hypoalbuminemia. The lowest value observed was 2.26 g/dl in July 2017. Diagnostic workup excluded nephrotic syndrome, hepatic failure and malabsorption. The patient was shifted from OL-HDF to standard HF HD, keeping the same dialyzer and dialysis schedule. During the following months, we observed a progressive correction of the hypoalbuminemia (3.82 g/dl at last follow-up). To precise the impact of the epuration technique on the albumin losses in this patient, we measured the amount of albumin in dialysate during one session with the Phylther HF20SD on OL-HDF and one session with the same filter but on standard HD. The CV was 29.0 l for the HDF session. The total albumin losses were 23.6 g on OL-HDF and 4.6 g on HD.Conclusion: OL-HDF can lead to significant albumin loss into the dialysate, especially with high permeability membrane and high CV. When prescribing post-dilutional OL-HDF, the choice of the dialyzer membrane should be made with caution. Users of the steam sterilized polyphenylene membrane, the Phylther SD, should be informed of the risk of large albumin loss with this membrane during post-dilution OL-HDF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The health safety conditions governing the practice of online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) do not yet incorporate the risks related to the presence of endocrine disruptors such as bisphenol A (BPA). The aim of this study was to assess, for the first time, the exposure to BPA but also to its chlorinated derivatives (ClxBPA) (100 times more estrogenic than BPA) during OL-HDF. We demonstrated that BPA is transmitted by the different medical devices used in OL-HDF: ultrafilters, dialysis concentrate cartridges (and not only dialyzers, as previously described). Moreover, BPA has been found in dialysis water as well as in ultrapure dialysate and replacement fluid due to contamination of water coming from municipal network. Indeed, due to contaminations provided by both ultrafilters and water, high levels of BPA were determined in the infused replacement fluid (1033 ng.L−1) from the beginning of the session. Thus, our results demonstrate that dialysis water must be considered as an important exposure source to endocrine disruptors, especially since other micropollutants such as ClxBPA have also been detected in dialysis fluids. While assessment of the impact of this exposure remains to be done, these new findings should be taken into account to assess exposure risks in end-stage renal disease patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Haemodiafiltration (HDF) combines diffusive and convective solute removal in a single treatment session. HDF provides a greater removal of higher molecular weight uraemic retention solutes than conventional high-flux haemodialysis (HD). Recently completed randomized clinical trials suggest better patient survival with online HDF. The treatment is mainly used in Europe and Japan. This review gives a brief overview of the presently available evidence of the effects of HDF on clinical end points, it speculates on possible mechanisms of a beneficial effect of HDF as compared with standard HD and ends with some perspectives for the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]