1. Podiatry intervention versus usual care to prevent falls in care homes: pilot randomised controlled trial (the PIRFECT study).
- Author
-
Wylie, Gavin, Menz, Hylton B., McFarlane, Sarah, Ogston, Simon, Sullivan, Frank, Williams, Brian, Zoe Young, Morris, Jacqui, and Young, Zoe
- Subjects
PODIATRY ,RISK factors of accidental falls in old age ,NURSING home care ,NURSING care facilities ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EXERCISE therapy ,ACCIDENTAL falls ,LONGITUDINAL method ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,PILOT projects ,EVALUATION research ,SENIOR housing ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,BLIND experiment ,FOOT orthoses - Abstract
Background: Common foot problems are independent risk factors for falls in older people. There is evidence that podiatry can prevent falls in community-dwelling populations. The feasibility of implementing a podiatry intervention and trial in the care home population is unknown. To inform a potential future definitive trial, we performed a pilot randomised controlled trial to assess: (i) the feasibility of a trial of a podiatry intervention to reduce care home falls, and (ii) the potential direction and magnitude of the effect of the intervention in terms of number of falls in care home residents.Methods: Informed by Medical Research Council guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions, we conducted a single blind, pilot randomised controlled trial in six care homes in the East of Scotland. Participants were randomised to either: (i) a three month podiatry intervention comprising core podiatry care, foot and ankle exercises, orthoses and footwear provision or (ii) usual care. Falls-related outcomes (number of falls, time to first fall) and feasibility-related outcomes (recruitment, retention, adherence, data collection rates) were collected. Secondary outcomes included: generic health status, balance, mobility, falls efficacy, and ankle joint strength.Results: 474 care home residents were screened. 43 (9.1%) participants were recruited: 23 to the intervention, 20 to control. Nine (21%) participants were lost to follow-up due to declining health or death. It was feasible to deliver the trial elements in the care home setting. 35% of participants completed the exercise programme. 48% reported using the orthoses 'all or most of the time'. Completion rates of the outcome measures were between 93% and 100%. No adverse events were reported. At the nine month follow-up period, the intervention group per-person fall rate was 0.77 falls vs. 0.83 falls in the control group.Conclusions: A podiatry intervention to reduce falls can be delivered to care home residents within a pilot randomised controlled trial of the intervention. Although not powered to determine effectiveness, these preliminary data provide justification for a larger trial, incorporating a full process evaluation, to determine whether this intervention can significantly reduce falls in this high-risk population.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02178527 ; Date of registration: 17 June 2014. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF