Search

Objective: We attempted to determine whether clinical features could differentiate painful small‐fiber neuropathy related to primary Sj€ogren's syndrome (pSS‐SFN) from idiopathic SFN (idio‐SFN). Methods: Validated clinical questionnaires and neurophysiological investigations specific for pain and SFN assessment were performed in 25 patients with pSS‐SFN and 25 patients with idio‐SFN. Results: Patients with idio‐SFN had more frequent severe burning sensations and higher mean anxiety scores and daily pain intensity compared to patients with pSSSFN. Conversely, patients with pSS‐SFN had reduced electrochemical skin conductance measured by Sudoscan_, and almost half of them had the sensation of walking on cotton wool. Conclusion: Our results suggest that idio‐SFN more specifically involved small sensory fibers than pSS‐SFN, in which subtle dysfunction of larger sensory fibers and damage of distal autonomic sudomotor innervation may occur. A practical algorithm is proposed to help to differentiate SFN associated with pSS from idio‐SFN, based on information very easy to obtain by clinical interview. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individuals carrying the amyloidogenic transthyretin (TTR) mutation are predisposed to develop familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP). The first clinical manifestations are often subjective sensory symptoms and, therefore, objective markers are needed to confirm the onset of TTR-FAP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a comprehensive battery of neurophysiological tests to provide early markers of FAP in TTR-mutation carriers. Twenty patients with documented pathogenic TTR mutation were enrolled, including eight clinically asymptomatic carriers and 12 paucisymptomatic carriers who had subjective sensory symptoms or doubtful sensory signs but no firm clinical deficit at clinical examination. Neurophysiological assessment of large fibres consisted of conventional nerve conduction studies. Small-fibre tests included laser evoked potentials, sympathetic skin responses and the measurement of cold and warm detection thresholds and heart-rate variability. Abnormalities in small-fibre tests were found in two of the eight asymptomatic carriers and nine of the 12 paucisymptomatic carriers. In contrast, conventional conduction studies did not show any sign of polyneuropathy. Early neuropathic involvement in TTR-mutation carriers can be detected or confirmed by neurophysiological tests specifically assessing small nerve fibres. These tests did not show any redundancy or difference in their sensitivity, emphasizing the value of combining them for TTR-FAP diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Vinblastine (VBL) is the standard treatment for systemic Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), but little is known about its efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) mass lesions.Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted. Twenty patients from the French LCH Study Group register met the inclusion criteria. In brief, they had CNS mass lesions, had been treated with VBL, and were evaluable for radiologic response.Results: The median age at diagnosis of LCH was 11.5 years (range: 1-50). Intravenous VBL 6 mg/m2 was given in a 6-week induction treatment, followed by a maintenance treatment. The median total duration was 12 months (range: 3-30). Eleven patients received steroids concomitantly. Fifteen patients achieved an objective response; five had a complete response (CR: 25%), ten had a partial response (PR: 50%), four had stable disease (SD: 20%) and one patient progressed (PD: 5%). Of interest, four out of the six patients who received VBL without concomitant steroids achieved an objective response. With a median follow-up of 6.8 years, the 5-year event-free and overall survival was 61% and 84%, respectively. VBL was well-tolerated and there were no patient withdrawals due to adverse events.Conclusion: VBL, with or without steroids, could potentially be a useful therapeutic option in LCH with CNS mass lesions, especially for those with inoperable lesions or multiple lesions. Prospective clinical trials are warranted for the evaluation of VBL in this indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]