Search

Introduction: An intermediate catheter (IMC) may pose a risk of intraprocedural rupture (IPR) during coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs), because the pressure on the microcatheter and coil might be more direct. To verify this hypothesis, this study explored whether use of an IMC might correlate with an increased rate of IPR during coil embolization for RIAs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 195 consecutive aneurysms in 192 patients who underwent initial coil embolization for saccular RIAs at our institution between January 2007 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups with aneurysms treated either with an IMC (IMC group) or without an IMC (non-IMC group). To investigate whether IMC use increased the rate of IPR, a propensity score-matched analysis was employed to control for age, sex, maximal aneurysm size, neck size, bleb formation, aneurysm location, proximal vessel tortuosity, balloon-assisted coiling, type of microcatheter, and type of framing coil. Results: Ultimately, 43 (22%) coil embolization used IMC. In univariate analysis, the incidence of IPR was significantly higher in the IMC group compared with the non-IMC group (14.0 vs. 3.3%, p  =  0.016). Propensity score matching was successful for pairs of 26 aneurysms in the IMC group and 52 aneurysms in the non-IMC group. The incidence of IPR was still significantly higher in the IMC group than in the non-IMC group (23.1 vs. 3.8%, p =  0.015). No significant differences in the incidences of ischemic complications and IMC-related parent artery dissection were observed between the two groups. Discussion: When using IMC for coil embolization of RIAs, the surgeons should be more careful and delicate in manipulating the microcatheter and inserting the coils to avoid IPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a serious complication of endovascular coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). Although outcomes after IPR are poor, methods to prevent subsequent neurological deterioration have not yet been investigated. We evaluated the risk factors and management strategies for IPR, particularly the role of balloon guiding catheters (BGCs) in rapid hemostasis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all UIA cases treated with coil embolization at three institutions between 2003 and 2021, focusing on preoperative radiological data, operative details, and outcomes. Results: In total, 2,172 aneurysms were treated in 2026 patients. Of these, 19 aneurysms in 19 patients (0.8%) ruptured during the procedure. Multivariate analysis revealed that aneurysms with a bleb (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.21 to 7.57, p = 0.017), small neck size (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.85,p = 0.007), and aneurysms in the posterior communicating artery (PcomA) (OR: 4.92, 95% CI: 1.19 to 20.18, p = 0.027) and anterior communicating artery (AcomA) (OR: 12.08, 95% CI: 2.99 to 48.79, p < 0.001) compared with the internal carotid artery without PcomA were significantly associated with IPR. The incidence of IPR was similar between the non-BGC and BGC groups (0.9% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.822); however, leveraging BGC was significantly associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates after IPR (0% vs. 44%, p = 0.033). Discussion: The incidence of IPR was relatively low. A bleb, small aneurysm neck, and location on PcomA and AcomA are independent risk factors for IPR. The use of BGC may prevent fatal clinical deterioration and achieve better clinical outcomes in patients with IPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thromboembolism is the most frequent complication of coil embolisation for intracranial aneurysm. Complications of thromboembolism can lead to stroke and have a serious impact on sequelae and mortality, necessitating appropriate rescue therapy. Here, we succeeded in recanalisation of an occluded stent by balloon-assisted local infusion of a thrombolytic agent following stent-assisted coil embolisation of an unruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysm. This method involves inflating a microballoon just distal to the occluded vessel and then administering a thrombolytic agent through a microcatheter. This technique may increase the rate of vessel reopening by maximising the local drug concentration. This method can be applied to any type of thrombolytic agent and helps reduce the dose of systemic drugs, which might decrease the incidence of haemorrhagic complications. Balloon-assisted intra-arterial thrombolytic infusion for an occluded vessel during endovascular coil embolisation could offer an alternative rescue therapy when conventional thrombolytic agent administration fails to improve thromboembolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The transradial approach (TRA) is less invasive than the transfemoral approach (TFA), but the higher conversion rate represents a drawback. Among target vessels, the left internal carotid artery (ICA) is particularly difficult to deliver the guiding catheter to through TRA. The purpose of this study was thus to explore anatomical and clinical features objectively predictive of the difficulty of delivering a guiding catheter into the left ICA via TRA. Methods: Among 78 consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms through TRA in a single institution between March 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022, all 29 patients (37%) who underwent delivery of the guiding catheter into the left ICA were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and anatomical features were analyzed to assess correlations with difficulty in guiding the catheter into the left ICA. Results: Of the 29 aneurysms requiring guidance of a catheter into the left ICA, 9 aneurysms (31%) required conversion from TRA to TFA. More acute innominate-left common carotid artery (CCA) angle (P < 0.001) and older age (P = 0.015) were associated with a higher conversion rate to TFA. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that optimal cutoff values for the innominate-left CCA angle and age to distinguish between nonconversion and conversion to TFA were 16° (area under the curve [AUC], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.00) and 74 years (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96), respectively. Conclusion: A more acute innominate-left CCA angle and older age appear associated with difficulty delivering the guiding catheter into the left ICA for neurointervention through TRA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Subdural hematoma (SDH) caused by traumatic intracranial aneurysm (TICA) is rare. TICAs are known to rupture easily, resulting in a high morbidity and mortality rate. Therefore, accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for preserving life. We describe a case of delayed SDH in the setting of posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysm. Case Report: A 42-year-old man presented with sustained head injury from a traffic accident, and was being followed-up conservatively for traumatic SDH and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Three weeks after the head trauma, the patient developed a sudden deterioration of mental status and disorientation. Computed tomography revealed de novo SDH at the cerebellar tentorium. Computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated TICA in the PCA. The patient was diagnosed with SDH due to a ruptured PCA aneurysm at the quadrigeminal segment. To avoid SDH growth due to re-rupture of the aneurysm, parent artery occlusion was subsequently performed with no complications. The patient was discharged home 2 months after endovascular treatment, with moderate disability. Follow-up angiography 2 years after the operation showed no recanalization, and the patient had returned to work. Conclusions: TICA in the PCA can cause tentorial SDH with or without the presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Routine cerebrovascular assessment is crucial for head trauma with hematoma adjacent to the cerebellar tentorium. Parent artery occlusion via an endovascular procedure is an alternative treatment for TICA in the PCA that is less invasive than other approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]