Search

Background: Objective: This multicenter study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of high boost simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to pathologic lymph nodes compared to Sequential boost (Seq) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Materials and methods: 97 patients with pelvic and/or para-aortic (PAo) node-positive LACC treated by definitive chemoradiation were included. Two groups were analyzed: Sequential boost group and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) group. Endpoints were Distant Recurrence Free Survival (DRFS), Recurrence Free Survival (RFS), Overall Survival (OS), locoregional pelvic and PAo control and toxicities. Results: 3-years DRFS in SIB and Seq groups was 65% and 31% respectively (logrank p < 0.001). 3-years RFS was 58% and 26% respectively (log-rank p = 0.009). DRFS prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were SIB, PAo involvement and maximum pelvic node diameter ≥ 2cm. Adenocarcinoma histology and absence of brachytherapy tended to be prognostic factors. SIB provided the best pelvic control at first imaging with 97%. There was no significant difference in terms of toxicities between groups. Conclusions: Nodal SIB seems to be unavoidable in the treatment of node-positive LACC. It provides the best DRFS, RFS and pelvic control without additional toxicity, with a shortened treatment duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) potentially has a role in the management of oligometastatic melanoma. However, literature with data specific to this management is very limited. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the time to local control (LC) of extra-cranial melanoma metastases after SBRT treatment and to help establish if SBRT is a useful therapy for oligometastatic melanoma. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with data collected from two referral centers in France between 2007 and 2020. The oligometastatic status of patients was reported based on the latest recommendations with a maximum of three lesions prior to treatment. Results: A total of 69 patients receiving SBRT for 88 oligometastatic melanoma metastases were included. The median follow-up time was 42.6 months. Most patients were treated for metachronous oligometastatic lesions. Occurrence of oligoprogression, oligorecurrence, and oligopersistence was reported in 42.0%, 39.1%, and 17.4% of cases, respectively. Treated lesions were mostly pulmonary (40.6%), followed by lymph node (34.8%) and hepatic sites (24.6%). Progressionfree survival at 1, 2, and 3 years were 47.0% (35-59), 27.0% (16-39), and 25.0% (15.0-37.0), respectively. Time to LC rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 94.2% (87.0-98.1), 90.3% (81.3-96.1), and 90.3% (81.3-96.1), respectively. Overall survival at 1, 2, and 3 years were 87% (76.0-93.0), 74.0% (76.0-93.0), and 61.0% (47.0-73.0), respectively. Only 17.4% of patients experienced acute, grade 1 or grade 2 toxicities with no reports of grade 3 or higher toxicities. Conclusion: SBRT demonstrated efficacy in managing melanoma patients with extracranial oligometastases and showed an overall low toxicity profile. Future randomized studies are needed to establish the role of SBRT in therapeutic approaches for patients with oligometastatic melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cemiplimab is used in the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Synergistic antitumoral response by concurrent radiotherapy and immunotherapy seems promising. We collected data from patients who were administered cemiplimab in Caen Hospital. Our primary objective was to determine the best overall response and overall survival rate. The secondary objectives were the disease control rate, median time to response, progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit of radiotherapy, and safety data. The objective response rate was 45.5%, including 47.6% in the cemiplimab group and 41.6% in the concomitant group. Concurrent radiotherapy enables an earlier clinico-radiological response, and the response to treatment was prolonged despite discontinuation of cemiplimab. Radiation therapy also provided a therapeutic effect without increasing the occurrence of adverse events. Our real-life study confirms the efficacy of cemiplimab in the treatment of advanced cSCC and the benefit of concurrent radiotherapy in achieving a quicker and persistent clinico-radiological response, without any safety alert. Background: Cemiplimab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the PD-1, and phase II trials have shown its efficacy in the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation therapy as a first- or later-line treatment. A synergistic antitumoral response has been demonstrated with concurrent radiotherapy and PD1-immunotherapy. However, no real-life study has demonstrated this effect in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: We conducted a real-life retrospective cohort study to investigate the benefit of concomitant therapy in 33 patients treated with cemiplimab at the University Hospital of Caen, alone (C group) or concomitant to radiotherapy (C/RT group). Our primary objectives were to evaluate the best overall response and objective response rate. Our secondary objectives were the disease control rate, median time to response, progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit of radiotherapy, and safety data. After stopping cemiplimab administration, we performed a follow-up of our patients and performed a descriptive study. Results: We reported an objective response rate of 45.5%, including 47.6% in the cemiplimab group versus 41.6% in the concomitant group. The addition of radiotherapy to cemiplimab enables an earlier clinico-radiological response, with a median duration of 5.5 months in the cemiplimab group versus 3 months in the concomitant therapy group. The response to treatment was prolonged despite discontinuation of cemiplimab, with 91.6% (n = 11/12) and 83.3% (n = 10/12) patients in complete or partial remission at 6 months and 1 year after cessation of cemiplimab and no switch to another oncological treatment, respectively. Radiation therapy also provided a therapeutic effect in 83.3% of the patients in the concomitant group, without increasing the occurrence of adverse events. Conclusions: Our study confirms the efficacy of cemiplimab and radiotherapy in the management of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Concomitant therapy permitted to obtain an earlier radiological response, a beneficial local therapeutic effect of radiotherapy, without any safety alert. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Before the introduction of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), few teams used to implant a pelvic tissue expander to keep the bowel away from the radiation field, so as to reduce the risk of acute and late enteritis. However, this unexpected surgery could impact patient's overall treatment and may be no more necessary in the era of modern radiotherapy. Material and methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including 13 patients who underwent tissue expander implantation before radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for rectal or anal carcinoma between November 2008 and March 2019. First, we aim to show that IMRT could sometimes be insufficient to respect dosimetric constraints, and then we aim to report the impact of tissue expander implantation on the global strategy of care of patients with anal and rectal cancers. Results: Seventy-seven percent of the included patients were treated for anal neoplasms, while the remaining 23% had locally advanced rectal cancer. The median follow-up since implantation of the expander was 51 months [3.7–115]. Three patients recurred. One patient developed grade III toxicity related to the implantation of a tissue expander. The delay between diagnosis and the start of irradiation was significantly prolonged (median of 3 months), requiring unusual induction chemotherapy. Conclusion: Implantation of tissue expander prior to chemoradiotherapy should be considered, even in the era of IMRT, when irradiated peritoneal cavity volume (V15Gy–V45Gy) far exceeds usual dose constraints. However, it impacts the global strategy of care by delaying the start of irradiation, by introducing induction chemotherapy, and rarely by causing post-operative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]