Search

The present Canadian study sought to identify predictors of emergency department (ED) use in a sample of adults who are homeless. Four hundred eighty-three participants were interviewed quarterly for two years, reporting their housing status, income, food security, physical/mental health, and other social determinants of health. Survey data were linked to administrative health and social services data. Predictors of ED visits were analyzed using negative binomial longitudinal mixed modelling. Emergency department visits were positively and reliably predicted by pre-baseline ED use, as well as by concurrent increased social assistance, primary care visits, ratings of physical health, substance use problems, and case management visits. Increased concurrent housing instability and food insecurity, and decreased homelessness history, positively predicted ED visits, but effect reliability was lower. Participant ill health appears to be a primary driver of ED utilization. The findings challenge misconceptions about the appropriateness of ED use among people who are homeless. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discourse in popular media, public policy, and academic literature contends that people who are homeless frequently make inappropriate use of hospital emergency department (ED) services. Although researchers have investigated the ED experiences of people who are homeless, no previous studies have examined how this population understands the role of the ED in their health care and in their day-to-day lives. In the present study, 16 individuals participated in semistructured interviews regarding their ED experiences, and narrative analysis was applied to their responses. Within the context of narratives of disempowerment and discrimination, participants viewed the ED in differing ways, but they generally interpreted it as a public, accessible space where they could exert agency. ED narratives were also paradoxical, depicting it as a fixed place for transient care, or a place where they were isolated yet felt a sense of belonging. Implications for policy and practice are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]