Search

Aims: Sarcoidosis with cardiac involvement is a rare pathological condition, and therefore cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with cardiac sarcoidosis is even further rare. We aimed to clarify the clinical features of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis who received CRT.Methods and results: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data on CRT at three cardiovascular centres to detect cardiac sarcoidosis patients. We identified 18 (8.9%) patients with cardiac sarcoidosis who met the inclusion criteria out of 202 with systolic heart failure who received CRT based on the guidelines. The majority of the patients were female [15 (83.3%)] and underwent an upgrade from a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator [13 (72.2%)]. We found 1 (5.6%) cardiovascular death during the follow-up period (mean ± SD, 4.7 ± 3.0 years). Seven (38.9%) patients had a composite outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization from worsening heart failure within 5 years after the CRT. Twelve (66.7%) patients had a history of sustained ventricular arrhythmias or those occurring after the CRT. Among the overall patients, no significant improvement was found in either the end-systolic volume or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 6 months after the CRT. A worsening LVEF was, however, more likely to be seen in 5 (27.8%) patients with ventricular arrhythmias after the CRT than in those without (P = 0.04). An improved clinical composite score was seen in 10 (55.6%) patients.Conclusions: Cardiac sarcoidosis patients receiving CRT may have poor LV reverse remodelling and a high incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: A worldwide survey reported that the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation was higher in high-volume centers compared with low-volume centers. We tested whether the procedure volume of each operator was associated with the outcome of AF ablation in high-volume centres.Methods and Results: We studied 471 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for the first time in three cardiovascular centers where the annual AF ablation volume was >100 procedures. We classified a total of 10 primary operators according to their operation volume on the basis of ACC/AHA/ACP CLINICAL COMPETENCE STATEMENT; high-volume operator (≥50 cases/year, N = 3) or low-volume operator (<50 cases/year, N = 7). The patients included were dichotomized according to the annual operation volume of their attending physician. The endpoints were the freedom from AF recurrence 1 year after the ablation, major complications including thromboembolisms, massive bleeding or death, and the procedural duration.Results: A complete isolation of the four PVs was achieved in 99.1%. The freedom from AF recurrence was more common in patients treated by high-volume operators than those treated by low-volume operators (165/216 [76.4%] vs. 160/255 [62.8%]; P = 0.001). A high-volume operator was the only independent predictor of the freedom from AF recurrence (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.23-2.48; P = 0.002). The patients treated by high-volume operators were less likely to have major complications (1.4% vs. 7.8%; P = 0.001), and had a shorter procedural duration (139.9 ± 25.3 vs. 149.3 ± 27.1 min; P = 0.03).Conclusions: Operator proficiency may predict the outcome after AF ablation even in high-volume centres. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]