Search

Background: Cervicitis, an infectious or noninfectious inflammation of the cervix, encompasses a wide range of clinical conditions, from asymptomatic infections to severe lesions, making its diagnosis difficult. Acute cervicitis may develop into pelvic inflammatory disease. In patients with cervicitis, current guidelines recommend testing for herpes simplex virus when external genital lesions are present. Here, we present the case of a patient with an atypical primary herpes simplex virus 2 infection manifesting as cervicitis without genital lesions. Case presentation: A 29-year-old Caucasian woman was hospitalized for pelvic inflammatory disease. The patient complained of severe suprapubic pain, fever, and heavy vaginal discharge. The external genitalia were unremarkable, so empirical antibiotic treatment was initiated. Despite 48 hours of well-administered antibiotic therapy, her complaints persisted. Polymerase chain reaction for possible microbial causes was negative for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. There was no bacterial vaginosis. Repeat gynecological examinations with endovaginal ultrasound revealed an enlarged cervix, and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging supported a diagnosis of cervicitis. At this point, additional screening for other sexually transmitted infections and infectious disease-related etiologies of cervicitis was performed, and the polymerase chain reaction analysis of newly isolated samples was positive for herpes simplex virus 2. No antiviral treatment was initiated given the delay in diagnosing herpes simplex virus 2 infection and the slow but spontaneous abatement of symptoms. Conclusion: Herpes simplex virus infection should be considered as a possible cause of cervicitis, even in the absence of typical genital lesions. Early detection of herpes simplex virus allows early treatment, helping to reduce the duration and severity of symptoms and therefore potentially reducing recurrences and improving disease control. These data and data from future cases might spur changes in the guidelines on cervicitis testing and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This case describes the youngest patient documented in the literature who presented with a giant hydatidiform mole, effectively addressed through conservative treatment. Case presentation: Our department received a 20-year-old Caucasian patient who was admitted due to significant metrorrhagia in an undisclosed pregnancy. During examination, we identified a massive, highly vascularized hydatidiform mole measuring 22 cm (cm). We performed a surgical dilatation and curettage. The anatomopathological findings confirmed the presence of a complete hydatidiform mole (CHM). Following the established guidelines, we conducted weekly monitoring of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Unfortunately, the patient discontinued the follow-up and became pregnant again before achieving hCG negativation. Conclusion: This case suggests that conservative treatment is a viable option regardless of the size of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), especially when the preservation of fertility is a crucial consideration, as effectively demonstrated in our case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Surgery is the cornerstone of ovarian cancer treatment. However, surgery and perioperative inflammation have been described as potentially pro-metastagenic. In various animal models and other human cancers, intraoperative administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) appears to have a positive impact on patient outcomes. Materials and methods: In this unicentric retrospective study, we provide an exploratory analysis of the safety and potential benefit of intraoperative administration of ketorolac on the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer. The study population included all patients who were given a diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer by the multidisciplinary oncology committee (MOC) of the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc between 2015 and 2020. Results: We included 166 patients in our analyses, with a median follow-up of 21.8 months. Both progression-free survival and overall survival were superior in patients who received an intraoperative injection of ketorolac (34.4 months of progression-free survival in the ketorolac group versus 21.5 months in the non-ketorolac group (p = 0.002), and median overall survival was not reached in either group but there was significantly higher survival in the ketorolac group (p = 0.004)). We also performed subgroup analyses to minimise bias due to imbalance between groups on factors that could influence patient survival, and the group of patients receiving ketorolac systematically showed a better outcome. Uni- and multivariate analyses confirmed that administration of ketorolac intraoperatively was associated with better progression-free survival (HR = 0.47 on univariate analysis and 0.43 on multivariate analysis, p = 0.003 and 0.023, respectively). In terms of complications, there were no differences between the two groups, either intraoperatively or postoperatively. Conclusion: Our study has shown a favourable association between the use of ketorolac during surgery and the postoperative progression of ovarian cancer in a group of 166 patients, without any rise in intra- or postoperative complications. These encouraging results point to the need for a prospective study to confirm the benefit of intraoperative administration of ketorolac in ovarian cancer surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hydatidiform Mole (HM) is the most common form of gestational trophoblastic disease. Dilatation and curettage is the classical treatment of this affection. Hysteroscopic resection (HsR) is an alternative for the treatment of intra-uterine pathology. Objective: To describe the feasibility of HsR for the management of HM. Result: Case series of patients who had a complete or partial HM confirmed by histological examination of the trophoblastic tissue resected by operative hysteroscopy between 2007 and 2019. After approval of our ethics committee, we evaluated 36 patients who underwent hysteroscopic resection for molar pregnancy. Histological analysis showed partial HM in 28 patients (77.8%) and complete HM in 8 (22.2%). Main surgical complications were uterine perforation in one patient and glycine resorption in 10 patients with two cases of hyponatremia corrected by standard treatment. We performed an ultrasound control 1 month after the intervention in 19 patients (52.8%) as they had slow decrease of HCG or bleeding complaints and found retained product of conception (RPOC) in six patients (16.7%). Conclusion: This first report on a small number of patients demonstrate that hysteroscopic resection is a feasible procedure for the management of molar pregnancy. Direct visualization of the procedure helps the surgeon to control the resection. Further studies are mandatory to compare this technique with D&C in term of RPOC and fertility outcomes as it remains the standard treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hydatidiform Mole (HM) is the most common form of gestational trophoblastic disease. Dilatation and curettage is the classical treatment of this affection. Hysteroscopic resection (HsR) is an alternative for the treatment of intra-uterine pathology. Objective: To describe the feasibility of HsR for the management of HM. Result: Case series of patients who had a complete or partial HM confirmed by histological examination of the trophoblastic tissue resected by operative hysteroscopy between 2007 and 2019. After approval of our ethics committee, we evaluated 36 patients who underwent hysteroscopic resection for molar pregnancy. Histological analysis showed partial HM in 28 patients (77.8%) and complete HM in 8 (22.2%). Main surgical complications were uterine perforation in one patient and glycine resorption in 10 patients with two cases of hyponatremia corrected by standard treatment. We performed an ultrasound control 1 month after the intervention in 19 patients (52.8%) as they had slow decrease of HCG or bleeding complaints and found retained product of conception (RPOC) in six patients (16.7%). Conclusion: This first report on a small number of patients demonstrate that hysteroscopic resection is a feasible procedure for the management of molar pregnancy. Direct visualization of the procedure helps the surgeon to control the resection. Further studies are mandatory to compare this technique with D&C in term of RPOC and fertility outcomes as it remains the standard treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]