Search

Breast cancer patients with absent or reduced CYP2D6 activity and consequently low endoxifen levels may benefit less from tamoxifen treatment. CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers may need a personalized increased tamoxifen dose to achieve effective endoxifen serum concentrations, without increasing toxicity. From a prospective study population of early breast cancer patients using tamoxifen (CYPTAM: NTR1509), 12 CYP2D6 poor and 12 intermediate metabolizers were selected and included in a one-step tamoxifen dose escalation study during 2 months. The escalated dose was calculated by multiplying the individual's endoxifen level at baseline relative to the average endoxifen concentration observed in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers by 20 mg (120 mg maximum). Endoxifen levels and tamoxifen toxicity were determined at baseline and after 2 months, just before patients returned to the standard dose of 20 mg. Tamoxifen dose escalation in CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers significantly increased endoxifen concentrations ( p < 0.001; p = 0.002, respectively) without increasing side effects. In intermediate metabolizers, dose escalation increased endoxifen to levels comparable with those observed in extensive metabolizers. In poor metabolizers, the mean endoxifen level increased from 24 to 81 % of the mean concentration in extensive metabolizers. In all patients, the endoxifen threshold of 5.97 ng/ml (=16.0 nM) reported by Madlensky et al. was reached following dose escalation. CYP2D6 genotype- and endoxifen-guided tamoxifen dose escalation increased endoxifen concentrations without increasing short-term side effects. Whether such tamoxifen dose escalation is effective and safe in view of long-term toxic effects is uncertain and needs to be explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are frequently not treated with standard immunochemotherapy, and this influences survival negatively. The purpose of this study was to gain more insight into treatment decision-making by hematologists. Case vignettes concerning patients with DLBCL were presented to hematologists in the Netherlands. Patient characteristics (age, comorbidity) differed per case. Respondents were asked in each case if they would treat the patient with curative intent by means of full-dose chemotherapy or chemotherapy with dose reduction or if they would not treat the patient with curative intent. The vast majority of respondents would treat an elderly patient diagnosed with DLBCL without a relevant medical history with full-dose chemotherapy irrespective of age. In the presence of comorbidity, lack of social support, cognitive disorders, and untreated depression dose reductions in advance are frequently applied or patients are not treated with curative intent. This is most pronounced for patients aged older than 80 years. Respondents working in a university hospital more frequently refrain form full-dose chemotherapy with curative intent compared to respondents working in tertiary medical teaching hospitals or general hospitals. Patients without a relevant medical history are generally treated with curative intent irrespective of age. Cognitive disorders, comorbidity, and depression reduce the change of being treated with curative intent. This is most prominent in the eldest patient category. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prognostic significance of age was studied in 372 patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, in relation to the prognostic factors of overexpressed BCL2 and p53 oncoprotein. Overexpression of BCL2 and p53 oncoprotein was defined when more than 50% of the tumor cells showed positive staining. The data were analyzed with respect to the age groups < 65 and &ges; 65 years of age. There was a trend for BCL2 overexpression to occur significantly more often among patients older than 65 years of age ( P  = 0.065). Patients with BCL2 overexpression showed significantly inferior disease free survival rate, but only for patients younger than 65 years (log-rank test P  = 0.0002), and the overexpression showed also an independent prognostic significance ( P  < 0.001). With respect to overexpressed p53 a significant difference was reached for complete remission rate ( P  = 0.01) and 5-year survival rate (log-rank test P  = 0.04), again only for the younger age group. When the analyses were repeated for the older patients who had been treated adequately, the same lack of significance was found, both for BCL2 and p53. This study demonstrates that the negative prognostic value of overexpressed BCL2 and p53 protein is not of concern for patients older than 65 years of age. Among elderly patients the International Prognostic Index score seems the predominant risk factor for inferior prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With rising age the incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), together with the fact that the proportion of people older than 65 years in Western populations will double during the next 40 years, poses the challenge to adequately meet the needs of elderly patients. After a general introduction on cancer in the elderly, a review is given concerning aspects of epidemiology and prognostic factors of NHL. Therapeutic strategies, including the use of hematopoietic growth factors, for the elderly with aggressive NHL are discussed. The future role for so-called comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to appropriately determine treatment possibilities is emphasized. Much scientific work has to be performed before the true value of CGA instruments can be acknowledged. Screening instruments are discussed and the role for specially trained oncology nurses in the assessment process is stipulated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When making decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, costs and benefits of treatment should be carefully weighed. In this process, patients' preferences are of major importance. The objectives of the present study were: (1) to determine the minimum benefits that patients need to find chemotherapy acceptable, and (2) to explore potential preference determinants, namely: positive experience of the treatment, reconciliation with the treatment decision, and demographic variables. Preferences were elicited from patients scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy (chemotherapy group:n = 38) before (T[SUB1]), during (T[SUB2]), and 1 month after chemotherapy (T[SUB3]),and were compared to responses from patients not scheduled for chemotherapy (no-chemotherapy group:n = 38). The patients were asked, for a hypothetical situation, to indicate the minimum benefit (in terms of improved 5-year disease-free survival) to find adjuvant chemotherapy acceptable. In the chemotherapy group, the median benefit was 1% at all 3 measurement points. In the no-chemotherapy group the attitude towards chemotherapy became more negative over time, although not statistically significantly so (T[SUB1]: 12%, T[SUB2]: 15%, T[SUB3]: 15%; P = 0.10). At all measurement points, the patients in the chemotherapy group indicated that they would accept chemotherapy for significantly (P < 0.01) less (benefit than the patients in the no-chemotherapy group. Of the demographic variables, age was related to preferences, but only at T[SUB2] and only in the no-chemotherapy group. The more positive attitude towards chemotherapy and the stability of preferences in the chemotherapy group indicated that reconciliation with the treatment decision was a more important determinant of patients' preferences than positive experience of the treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]