Search

Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a progressive plasma cell disorder caused by amyloid deposition resulting in organ damage and failure. Current standard-of-care treatments target clonal plasma cells, the source of misfolded light chains (amyloid precursors), yet only half of patients with advanced disease survive ≥6 months. The amyloid depleter birtamimab is an investigational humanized monoclonal antibody that binds misfolded κ and λ light chains with high specificity and was designed to neutralize soluble toxic light chain aggregates and promote phagocytic clearance of deposited amyloid. Post hoc analyses from the Phase 3 VITAL trial suggested birtamimab plus standard of care confers a survival benefit in patients with advanced (Mayo Stage IV) AL amyloidosis. AFFIRM-AL (NCT04973137), a Phase 3 confirmatory trial of birtamimab plus standard of care in patients with Mayo Stage IV AL amyloidosis, is ongoing. This review summarizes birtamimab's mechanism of action, attributes, and potential clinical utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Childhood cancer survivors are recommended to have lifelong survivorship care, yet many become disengaged during pediatric to adult care transitions. We implemented a pilot clinic for adult survivors of pediatric or adolescent and young adult (AYA) leukemia transitioning to adult-focused survivorship care. The clinic featured AYA-specific care, bidirectional communication with primary care, and a quality improvement (QI) cycle. During the 1-year QI period, 27 patients were seen and 21 completed postvisit interviews. The clinic was positively received by patients and primary care providers, showed promise for improving self-management and care coordination, and highlighted the need for novel approaches to connect survivors with primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study characterised real-world treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and cost-of-illness in patients with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Data were extracted from the US-based Optum® EHR and Clinformatics® Data Mart (claims) databases (2008–2019) for patients newly diagnosed with AL amyloidosis and who initiated anti-plasma cell therapies. Healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and related costs were compared across lines of therapy (LOT). Incidences of cardiac and renal failure were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. About 1347 patients (EHR, n = 776; claims, n = 571) were included. Median age was 68 years; 56.8% were male. At initial diagnosis, 33.1% and 15.1% of patients had cardiac and renal failure, respectively. Most patients received bortezomib-containing treatment in LOT1 (69%); bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone was most common (26%). HCRU was similar across LOTs. Mean per-patient-per-month and per-patient-per-LOT costs were $19,343 and $105,944 for LOT1, $19,183 and $95,793 for LOT2, and $16,611 and $128,446 for LOT3, respectively. Costs were primarily driven by anti-plasma cell therapies, outpatient visits, and hospitalisations. The 5-year cardiac and renal failure rates following initial diagnosis were 64.5% and 39.0%, respectively. AL amyloidosis is associated with substantial costs and suboptimal outcomes, highlighting the need for new therapeutic approaches to prevent organ deterioration, and reduce disease burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody that is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of multiple myeloma and light-chain amyloidosis. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) have been reported in 28% to 56% of individuals receiving the intravenous (IV) formulation of daratumumab, necessitating slow infusions and the frequent use of rescue medications. In 2020, subcutaneous (SC) daratumumab was approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma, and randomized data suggest a lower rate of IRRs compared with IV daratumumab. Guidelines regarding postinjection monitoring with SC daratumumab are not well-established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of SC daratumumab and to suggest guidelines for monitoring patients after the administration of SC daratumumab. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included patients with multiple myeloma and/ or light-chain amyloidosis who were receiving SC daratumumab at Stanford Health Care between June 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of IRRs. The secondary outcomes include the timing and severity of IRRs based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients received SC daratumumab during the study period. Of these patients, 49 (60%) had previously received IV daratumumab (daratumumab-exposed), and 33 (40%) had never received IV daratumumab previously (daratumumab-naïve). Of the total cohort, 8 (9.8%) had an IRR. All IRRs were grade 1 (N = 5; 63%) or grade 2 (N = 3; 38%) in severity. A total of 7 (21%) patients in the daratumumab-naïve group had an IRR, and 1 (2%) patient in the daratumumab- exposed group had IRRs with the first SC dose. Among the daratumumab-naïve patients, 6 had IRRs after receiving the first SC dose and 1 had IRRs after receiving the second SC dose. Of all the patients who had IRRs, 3 patients had immediate reactions (onset <15 minutes) and 4 patients had delayed reactions (onset >4 hours) after the SC administration of daratumumab (median, 11.9 hours; range, 5-24 hours). One patient had IRRs right before the 4-hour observation was completed. Among the patients with delayed reactions, 3 had reactions after being discharged from the treatment area, but their symptoms resolved without any intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study of patients who were receiving SC daratumumab, IRRs occurred in approximately 10% of patients and were more likely after a patient received the first dose of SC daratumumab than with subsequent doses. All reactions were mild to moderate in severity and could be managed in the outpatient setting. We suggest that patients who are receiving their first dose of SC daratumumab be monitored for 1 hour after administration. Monitoring is not necessary for patients who are transitioning from IV to SC daratumumab or in patients who are receiving subsequent doses of SC daratumumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks CD47, a 'do not eat me' signal overexpressed on tumor cells. CD47 is overexpressed in multiple myeloma (MM), which contributes to its pathogenesis. Preclinical studies have shown that CD47 blockade induces macrophage activation, resulting in elimination of myeloma cells, and that there is synergy between magrolimab and certain anticancer therapies. These findings suggest that magrolimab-based combinations may have a therapeutic benefit in MM. This phase II study investigates magrolimab in combination with commonly used myeloma therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory MM and includes a safety run-in phase followed by a dose-expansion phase. Primary end points include the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events (safety run-in) and the objective response rate (dose expansion). Magrolimab is a therapy that blocks a 'do not eat me' signal overexpressed by certain cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Studies have shown that blocking this signal leads to destruction of myeloma cells and that this cancer-killing effect may be increased by combining magrolimab with certain additional anticancer therapies. These findings suggest that magrolimab-based combinations may have a therapeutic benefit in MM. This study is investigating magrolimab in combination with commonly used myeloma therapies in patients with MM who have persistent disease despite prior treatment. Goals of the trial include assessing safety and response to treatment. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT04892446 (ClinicalTrials.gov) This phase II study investigates safety and treatment response to #magrolimab, an antibody that enhances phagocytosis of cancer cells, combined with commonly used therapies in patients with #multiplemyeloma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mature plasmacytoid dendritic cell proliferations (MPDCPs) are clonal, non-malignant pDC proliferations that have been reported to occur in association with myeloid neoplasms such as CMML, AML (pDC-AML), and, rarely, MDS or MPNs. Here we report the first case of a MPDCP associated with T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), a lymphoid neoplasm. The MPDCP in this case involved ~50% of the bone marrow, was found in nodular aggregates, expressed CD123, CD4, and CD303, and lacked CD56 and TCL1 expression. In addition, the MPDCP lacked CD34 and TdT but showed aberrant expression of CD7, CD5, CD10, and CD13, markers expressed by the abnormal T-lymphoblastic cells. Mutational analysis demonstrated mutations in JAK3, NOTCH1, NRAS, KRAS, DNMT3A, and SH2B3 but no mutations in TET2, ASLX1 or ZRSR2. Analysis of the pDC frequency in a separate cohort of T-ALL and control patients demonstrated that bone marrow pDCs are often decreased in patients with T-ALL compared to controls. This is the first report of a MPDCP associated with a lymphoid neoplasm and provides further support that MPDCP can arise from a multipotent hematopoietic progenitor with lymphoid and dendritic cell potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) linking a semi-synthetic derivative of calicheamicin, a DNA damage-inducing agent, to a humanized monoclonal antibody specific for CD33. Sixteen (55%) patients had ELN favorable-risk AML (5 [31%] by cytogenetics and 11 [69%] by genotype), 6 (21%) patients had ELN intermediate-risk AML, and 7 (24%) patients had ELN adverse-risk AML (4 [57%] by cytogenetics and 3 [43%] by genotype). In current practice, however, routine use of GO outside of the context of patients with core-binding factor (CBF) AML is relatively limited, despite 97% of patients in the ALFA-0701 study having non-CBF AML [[5], [12]]. Currently, 7 + 3 + GO is included in the recommendations of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for treatment induction in AML patients <60 years old with either favorable-risk cytogenetics ("preferred"), or with intermediate- or poor-risk disease excluding patients with therapy-related AML, AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), or AML with FLT3 mutations [[11]]. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The availability of novel agents (NAs), including blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), has improved the outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Because of the relative effectiveness, it is often a challenge for clinicians to determine how to best sequence these NAs with respect to efficacy and toxicity. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study of patients with RR ALL treated with blinatumomab, InO, or both, their efficacy as a first or second NA was compared. Results: Among 276 patients, 221 and 55 received blinatumomab and InO, respectively, as a first NA therapy. The complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 65% and 67% for the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively (P =.73). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 4% and 7% in the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively. Ninety‐two patients (43%) in the blinatumomab group and 13 patients (29%) in the InO group proceeded with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The median overall survival (OS) was 15 and 11.6 months in the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively. A subset analysis was performed for 61 patients who received both NAs (blinatumomab and then InO [n = 40] or InO and then blinatumomab [n = 21]). The CR/CRi rate was 58% for patients who received InO as the second NA and 52% for patients who received blinatumomab as the second NA. The median OS was 10.5 for patients who received InO as the second NA and 5.9 months for patients who received blinatumomab as the second NA (P =.09). Conclusions: Although the limited power of this study to detect a significant difference between subgroups is acknowledged, the data suggest that blinatumomab and InO may have comparable efficacy as a first or second NA therapy in RR ALL. Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin have comparable efficacy as a first or second novel agent therapy in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The sequencing of these novel agents should be tailored according to individual patient needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Methods: The efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a humanized anti‐CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the cytotoxic antibiotic calicheamicin, was evaluated in R/R ALL patients in the phase 1/2 study 1010 (NCT01363297) and open‐label, randomized, phase 3 study 1022 (INO‐VATE; NCT01564784). This analysis focused specifically on Ph+ R/R ALL patients. In study 1022, Ph+ patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to InO (n = 22) or standard intensive chemotherapy (SC) (n = 27) and 16 Ph+ patients in study 1010 received InO. Results: In study 1022, rates of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRi) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (patients achieving CR/CRi) were higher with InO (CR/CRi = 73%; MRD = 81%) versus SC (CR/CRi = 56%; MRD = 33%). The corresponding rates in study 1010 were 56% (CR/CRi) and 100% (MRD). The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) rate in study 1022 was 41% versus 19% for InO versus SC; however, there was no benefit in overall survival (median OS: 8.7 vs 8.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.64‐2.14]). The probability of being event‐free (progression‐free survival) at 12 months was greater with InO versus SC (20.1% vs 4.8%). Conclusion: Given the substantial improvement in responses and rates of HSCT, InO is an important treatment option for patients with R/R Ph+ ALL. Future studies need to consider better characterization of disease characteristics, more sensitive MRD measurements, MRD‐directed therapy before HSCT, and potentially combination therapies, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors. An analysis of 65 patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia shows that patients receiving inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) have higher rates of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery, minimal residual disease negativity, and subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation than those receiving standard intensive chemotherapy (SC). Although this does not result in prolonged progression‐free survival or overall survival compared with SC, InO remains an important treatment option for patients with resistant and difficult‐to–treat disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Venetoclax is efficacious in relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma, thus warranting investigation in light-chain amyloidosis (AL). This retrospective cohort includes 43 patients with previously treated AL, from 14 centers in the US and Europe. Thirty-one patients harbored t(11;14), 11 did not, and one t(11;14) status was unknown. Patients received a venetoclax-containing regimen for at least one 21- or 28-day cycle; the median prior treatments was three. The hematologic response rate for all patients was 68%; 63% achieved VGPR/CR. t(11;14) patients had higher hematologic response (81% vs. 40%) and higher VGPR/CR rate (78% vs. 30%, odds ratio: 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–0.62) than non-t(11;14) patients. For the unsegregated cohort, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 31.0 months and median OS was not reached (NR). For t(11;14), median PFS was NR and for non-t(11;14) median PFS was 6.7 months (HR: 0.14, 95% CI 0.04–0.53). Multivariate analysis incorporating age, sex, prior lines of therapy, and disease stage suggested a risk reduction for progression or death in t(11;14) patients. Median OS was NR for either subgroup. The organ response rate was 38%; most responders harbored t(11;14). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 19% with 7% due to infections. These promising results require confirmation in a randomized clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Identifying the causes of human diseases requires deconvolution of abnormal molecular phenotypes spanning DNA accessibility, gene expression and protein abundance1–3. We present a single-cell framework that integrates highly multiplexed protein quantification, transcriptome profiling and analysis of chromatin accessibility. Using this approach, we establish a normal epigenetic baseline for healthy blood development, which we then use to deconvolve aberrant molecular features within blood from patients with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia4,5. Despite widespread epigenetic heterogeneity within the patient cohort, we observe common malignant signatures across patients as well as patient-specific regulatory features that are shared across phenotypic compartments of individual patients. Integrative analysis of transcriptomic and chromatin-accessibility maps identified 91,601 putative peak-to-gene linkages and transcription factors that regulate leukemia-specific genes, such as RUNX1-linked regulatory elements proximal to the marker gene CD69. These results demonstrate how integrative, multiomic analysis of single cells within the framework of normal development can reveal both distinct and shared molecular mechanisms of disease from patient samples. Analyzing DNA accessibility, transcriptome and protein expression in single cells uncovers cancer-regulatory programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A majority of patients experienced at least one grade >=3 AE (21 patients [87-5%]) and/or serious adverse event (SAE) (13 patients [54-2%]). The SAEs experienced by >=5% of patients were thrombocytopenia (three patients [12-5%]), injection site reaction, acute kidney injury, and malaise (two patients [8-3%] in each PT). The most common treatment-emergent AEs, experienced by >=30% patients, were injection site reaction (19 patients [79-2%]), fatigue (15 patients [62-5%]), anemia (12 patients [50-0%]), thrombocytopenia (11 patients [45-8%]), nausea (ten patients [41-7%]), diarrhea (nine patients [37-5%]), and decreased appetite (eight patients [33-3%]). Patients had a median of 6 (range 3-9) prior lines of therapy and were refractory to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs, 46% of patients), proteasome inhibitors (54%), IMiDs and proteasome inhibitors (38%), and daratumumab (33%) (Supplementary Table 1). [Extracted from the article]

Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-drug conjugate used for adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The INotuzumab Ozogamicin trial to inVestigAte Tolerability and Efficacy (INO-VATE) previously reported improved outcomes with InO versus standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy. This article reports the final INO-VATE results (≥2 years of follow-up) and additional analyses of patient characteristics associated with improved outcomes.Methods: Between August 27, 2012, and January 4, 2015, this multicenter, parallel, open-label, phase 3 trial randomized 326 adults with relapsed/refractory ALL to InO (n = 164) or SoC (n = 162); 307 received 1 or more doses of the study drug (164 in the InO arm and 143 in the SoC arm).Results: The complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate was higher with InO versus SoC (73.8% vs 30.9%; 1-sided P < .0001), with consistent CR/CRi rates across patient subgroups. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.7 months with InO and 6.2 months with SoC, with 2-year OS rates of 22.8% and 10.0%, respectively (overall hazard ratio, 0.75; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.99; 1-sided P = .0105). The predictors of OS with InO were the best minimal residual disease status, baseline platelet count, duration of first remission, achievement of CR/CRi, and follow-up hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; all 2-sided P values < .05). More InO arm patients proceeded directly to HSCT after achieving CR/CRi before any follow-up induction therapy (39.6% [95% CI, 32.1%-47.6%] vs 10.5% [6.2%-16.3%]; 1-sided P < .0001). The most frequent all-grade and grade 3 or higher adverse events in both arms were hematologic. Veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) was more frequent with InO (23 of 164 [14.0%] vs 3 of 143 [2.1%]).Conclusions: In patients with relapsed/refractory BCP ALL in INO-VATE, InO was associated with a greater likelihood of CR/CRi across key patient subgroups, and it served as a bridge to HSCT. Potential VOD/SOS risk factors must be considered when InO treatment decisions are being made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer face significant challenges with regard to fatigue, reduced physical activity, and social isolation, which may negatively impact quality of life. This study investigated whether the use of digital wearable technology (Fitbits, along with synced iPads) can affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in AYA aged patients with cancer. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study that offered Fitbits and iPads to all AYA patients aged 15 to 29 at an academic medical center at the time of cancer diagnosis. Patients completed the Short Form Health Survey developed by RAND (RAND-36) assessing eight dimensions of HRQOL on entering the study and at the time of their 6-month follow-up or the end of treatment, whichever occurred first. At the time of follow-up, patients also completed a questionnaire that assessed user experience, including frequency of wearable device use, enjoyment, challenges, and participation, in online communities. Results: Thirty-three patients participated in the study. Most patients reported enjoying the digital technology and using the devices to track multiple aspects of their health (85%). Most also reported a subjective increase in physical activity (79%). After the intervention, participants demonstrated significant improvements across all eight dimensions of HRQOL measured by the RAND-36 (p < 0.00 to 0.01). Conclusion: Distributing wearable technology at the time of diagnosis may provide an avenue for improving HRQOL in adolescents and young adults with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This phase 1 study investigated the safety of the anthracycline amrubicin combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. A standard 3 + 3 design was used. Patients received intravenous amrubicin 40-80 mg/m2 on day one, lenalidomide 15 mg orally on days 1-14, and dexamethasone 40 mg orally weekly on 21 day cycles. 14 patients were enrolled, and completed a median of three cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. One patient experienced dose limiting toxicity of dizziness and diarrhea. The most frequent non-hematologic toxicity was infection (79%). Serious adverse events included cord compression and sepsis. Three patients (21%) had a partial response or better, and seven (50%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 4.4 months, and the median progression-free survival was 3 months. Amrubicin combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, was safe and demonstrated clinical activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01355705. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Weekly ixazomib with lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (Rd) is feasible and has shown activity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This phase 1/2 study (NCT01383928) evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of twice‐weekly ixazomib plus Rd in NDMM; 64 patients were enrolled across both phases. Patients received twice‐weekly oral ixazomib 3·0 or 3·7 mg plus lenalidomide 25 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg (10 mg in cycles 9–16) for up to sixteen 21‐day cycles, followed by maintenance with twice‐weekly ixazomib alone. No dose‐limiting toxicities were reported in cycle 1; the RP2D was 3·0 mg based on overall tolerability across multiple cycles. In 62 evaluable patients, the confirmed overall response rate was 94% (68% ≥very good partial response; 24% complete response). Median progression‐free survival was 24·9 months. Responses (median duration 36·9 months for patients receiving the RP2D) deepened during treatment. Grade 3 drug‐related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 64% of patients, including: rash, 13%; peripheral neuropathy, 8%; hyperglycaemia, 8%. There were no grade 4 drug‐related AEs. Thirteen patients discontinued due to AEs. Twice‐weekly ixazomib‐Rd offers substantial activity with promising long‐term outcomes in NDMM patients but may be associated with greater toxicity compared with weekly ixazomib‐Rd in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in patients aged 18 to 78 years with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the INO-VATE trial. This subset analysis compared the efficacy and safety of InO in younger and older patients.Methods: Intent-to-treat analyses of morphologic responses and overall survival (OS) included 326 randomized patients, and safety assessments included 307 patients receiving 1 or more doses of the study treatment. Of the 326 patients, 164 received InO at a starting dose of 1.8 mg/m2 /cycle (0.8 mg/m2 on day 1 and 0.5 mg/m2 on days 8 and 15 of a 21- to 28-day cycle [≤6 cycles]); 60 patients were aged ≥55 years, and 104 were aged <55 years.Results: For older and younger patients, the median duration of InO therapy and the types and frequencies of adverse events of any grade were generally similar. Although the remission rates, median duration of remission (DOR), and progression-free survival were similar with InO for those aged <55 years and those aged ≥55 years, OS was longer for younger patients (median, 8.6 vs 5.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.610). Among patients proceeding to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after InO treatment (28% of older patients and 58% of younger patients), the incidence of veno-occlusive disease was greater in older patients (41% vs 17%). The study database was not locked at the time of this analysis.Conclusions: InO was tolerable in older patients with relapsed/refractory ALL. Although OS was longer for younger patients versus older patients, InO demonstrated high response rates with similar DOR in the 2 age groups. Cancer 2018;124:1722-32. © 2018 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outcomes of relapsed adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved over time with the introduction of new therapies as well as better supportive care. However, there is still a need for easy-to-use and accurate prognostic tools for patients in first relapse. Whether complete response (CR) with incomplete count recovery (CRh) can be grouped with CR in relapsed ALL trials has not been formally studied. We analyzed 106 ALL patients at first relapse who were treated at three academic centers and achieved CR/CRh. White blood cell count at initial diagnosis and receiving hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) were independent predictors of overall survival after relapse, while minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity and performance of HCT were predictors of relapse free survival (RFS). Patients who achieved MRD negativity and underwent HCT had the best outcomes. Our results suggest that MRD is a more powerful predictor of outcome than CRh. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on the role of Grading cardiac response in Primary light chain amyloidosis (AL). It mentions AL as progressive disorder caused by clonal immunoglobulin light chain tissue deposition; and highlights the poorest prognosis of patients with symptomatic heart failure depending on the presenting N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide cells.

Pralatrexate inhibits folic acid metabolism, and preclinical studies have shown that it is cytotoxic to multiple myeloma cells. This phase 1 study investigated the safety and efficacy of pralatrexate in combination with bortezomib in adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. A standard 3 + 3 design was used. Patients received intravenous pralatrexate at doses ranging from 10 to 30 mg/m2 and intravenous bortezomib at a dose of 1·3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4-week cycle. Eleven patients were enrolled and completed a median of two cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was 20 mg/m2. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity of mucositis. The most frequent non-haematological toxicities were fatigue (55%) and mucositis (45%). There were three serious adverse events in three patients: rash, sepsis and hypotension. One patient (9%) had a very good partial response, 1 (9%) had a partial response, 1 (9%) had minimal response and two (18%) had progressive disease. The median duration of response was 4 months, the median time to next treatment was 3·4 months and the median time to progression was 4 months. Pralatrexate, in combination with bortezomib, was generally safe and demonstrated modest activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01114282. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The outcome of sequential azacitidine with lenalidomide has not been reported in previously treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This study describes a phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of this combination in elderly patients with AML and MDS with prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) and/or immunomodulatory agent exposure. Patients were treated on a 42-day cycle with azacitidine at 75 mg/m² SQ/IV daily on days 1-7, followed by lenalidomide 50 mg orally daily on days 8-28. The median number of treatment cycles on study was two (range = 1-11). Of 32 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 25%. Neutropenic fever was the most common serious adverse event, but overall the combination was well-tolerated. The median overall survival (OS) for responders vs non-responders was 9.8 vs 4.0 months, respectively (HR = 0.36, p = 0.016). In conclusion, this combination demonstrated modest clinical activity in this poor risk population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite high rates of complete remission in newly diagnosed adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), rates of long-term leukemia-free survival are disappointingly low. Treatment of relapsed disease with chemotherapy, even in patients able to pursue consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplant, has demonstrated limited success. There are no established standards of care in this setting and few standard treatment options. Novel agents targeting antigens on the lymphoblast cell surface offer unique side effect and anti-leukemic profiles which suggest that their use alone or in combination with chemotherapy may achieve improved outcomes for relapsed or refractory ALL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiplexed fluorescence or electrochemiluminescence immunoassays of soluble cytokines are commonly performed in the context of human serum or plasma, to look for disease biomarkers and to monitor the immune system in a simple and minimally invasive way. These assays provide challenges due to the complexities of the matrix (serum or plasma) and the presence of many cytokines near the limit of detection of the assay. Here, we compare the readout of matched serum and plasma samples, which are generally correlated. However, a subset of cytokines usually have higher levels in serum, and the non-specific background is significantly increased in serum versus plasma. Presumably as a result of this non-specific background, disease-related decreases in low-abundance cytokines can sometimes be detected in plasma but not in serum. We further show, through spike recovery experiments, that both serum and plasma inhibit the readout of many cytokines, with some variability between donors, but with serum causing greater inhibition than plasma in many cases. Standard diluents from different vendors can partially reverse this inhibition to varying degrees. Dilution of samples can also partly overcome the inhibitory effect of the matrix. We also show that dilution is nonlinear and differentially affects various cytokines. Together, these data argue that (1) plasma is a more sensitive matrix for detecting changes in certain low-abundance cytokines; (2) calculation of concentrations in serum or plasma matrices is inherently inaccurate; and (3) dilution of samples should not be assumed to be linear, i.e., all comparisons need to be made among similarly diluted samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to a national shortage of daunorubicin we evaluated the effects of substituting doxorubicin 1:1 in the induction phase for adult patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We identified 10 patients receiving doxorubicin instead of daunorubicin as part of their induction on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9511 or CALGB10403 and retrospectively compared them to 83 patients who received treatment on the same protocols with daunorubicin. Response rates were similar, independent of anthracycline received, with either CALGB9511 or CALGB10403. In either regimen, doxorubicin resulted in longer absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery time and hospitalization. Doxorubicin as part of CALGB9511 resulted in greater than three-fold higher mucositis. Sepsis and death during induction were significantly more frequent in patients who received doxorubicin on CALGB10403. While remission rates were similar, the use of doxorubicin was associated with prolonged neutropenia, higher risk of mucositis, infection and sepsis, and prolonged hospitalization. Higher induction mortality observed with doxorubicin substitution in this analysis needs further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The misassembly of soluble proteins into toxic aggregates, including amyloid fibrils, underlies a large number of human degenerative diseases. Cardiac amyloidoses, which are most commonly caused by aggregation of Ig light chains or transthyretin (TTR) in the cardiac interstitium and conducting system, represent an important and often underdiagnosed cause of heart failure. Two types of TTR-associated amyloid cardiomyopathies are clinically important. The Val122Ile (V122I) mutation, which alters the kinetic stability of TTR and affects 3% to 4% of African American subjects, can lead to development of familial amyloid cardiomyopathy. In addition, aggregation of WT TTR in individuals older than age 65 y causes senile systemic amyloidosis. TTR-mediated amyloid cardiomyopathies are chronic and progressive conditions that lead to arrhythmias, biventricular heart failure, and death. As no Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs are currently available for treatment of these diseases, the development of therapeutic agents that prevent TTR-mediated cardiotoxicity is desired. Here, we report the development of AG10, a potent and selective kinetic stabilizer of TTR. AG10 prevents dissociation of V122I-TTR in serum samples obtained from patients with familial amyloid cardiomyopathy. In contrast to other TTR stabilizers currently in clinical trials, AG10 stabilizes V122I- and WT-TTR equally well and also exceeds their efficacy to stabilize WT and mutant TTR in whole serum. Crystallographic studies of AG10 bound to V122I-TTR give valuable insights into how AG10 achieves such effective kinetic stabilization of TTR, which will also aid in designing better TTR stabilizers. The oral bioavailability of AG10, combined with additional desirable drug-like features, makes it a very promising candidate to treat TTR amyloid cardiomyopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence and prognostic value of a concomitant diagnosis of symptomatic or asymptomatic multiple myeloma ( MM), as defined by the current International Myeloma Working Group ( IMWG) criteria, in patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis ( AL), are unknown. We studied 46 consecutive patients with AL who underwent quantification of serum M-protein and clonal bone marrow plasma cells, as well as a comprehensive evaluation for end organ damage by MM. Using standard morphology and CD138 immunohistochemical staining, 57% and 80% of patients were found to have concomitant MM, respectively. Nine patients exhibited end organ damage consistent with a diagnosis of symptomatic MM. While overall survival was similar between AL patients with or without concurrent myeloma (1-year overall survival 68% vs. 87%; P = 0·27), a diagnosis of symptomatic myeloma was associated with inferior outcome (1-year overall survival 39% vs. 81%; P = 0·005). Quantification of bone marrow plasma cells by both standard morphology and CD138 immunohistochemistry identified a much higher prevalence of concurrent MM in patients with AL than previously reported. Evaluation of bone marrow plasma cell infiltration and presence of myeloma associated end organ damage could be clinically useful for prognostication of patients with AL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, life-threatening inflammatory disorder characterized by uncontrolled proliferation and activation of histiocytes with phagocytosis of normal hematopoietic cells. A 41-year-old woman, 19 weeks pregnant with twins, and a history of Still's disease, presented with rash, fever, and headache. Laboratory studies revealed transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia, and eventually severe neutropenia as well as elevations in ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein. A bone marrow biopsy confirmed HLH. She declined standard HLH-treatment but responded well to high-dose corticosteroids. Her blood counts remained stable following corticosteroid taper, and she delivered healthy twin girls at 30-week gestation. Few cases of HLH during pregnancy have been reported. In some cases, the condition has proved fatal. Therefore recognizing signs and symptoms of HLH is essential to avoid treatment delay. In our case, high-dose corticosteroids alone were a safe and effective therapy for the mother and fetuses resulting in long-term disease control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the previously published article on reversible high-output cardiac failure as market of disease status in multiple myeloma.

The oncogenic Bcr-Abl variant of the c-Abl tyrosine kinase transforms cells by a mechanism dependent on activation of the stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK). Other work has shown that c-Abl interacts with the SHPTP1 protein tyrosine phosphatase in induction of SAPK activity by genotoxic stress. The present studies demonstrate that Bcr-Abl binds constitutively to SHPTP1. We show that Bcr-Abl phosphorylates SHPTP1 on C-terminal Y536 and Y564 sites. The functional significance of the Bcr-Abl/SHPTP1 interaction is supported by the finding that SHPTP1 regulates Bcr-Abl-induced SAPK activity. Importantly, SHPTP1 also decreases Bcr-Abl-dependent transformation of fibroblasts. These findings indicate that SHPTP1 functions as a tumor suppressor in cells transformed by Bcr-Abl. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) have a poor prognosis, especially if disease burden is high. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 INO-VATE trial examined the efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) vs. standard of care chemotherapy (SC) among R/R ALL patients with low, moderate, or high disease burden, respectively, defined as bone marrow blasts (BMB) < 50% (n = 53 vs. 48), 50–90% (n = 79 vs. 83), and >90% (n = 30 vs. 30). Patients in the InO vs. SC arm with low, moderate, and high BMB%, respectively, had improved rates of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (74% vs. 46% [p = 0.0022], 75 vs. 27% [p < 0.0001], and 70 vs. 17% [p < 0.0001]), and improved overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.64 [p = 0.0260], 0.81 [p = 0.1109], and 0.60 [p = 0.0335]). Irrespective of BMB%, cytopenias were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events, and post-transplant veno-occlusive disease was more common with InO vs. SC. Patients with extramedullary disease or lymphoblastic lymphoma showed similar efficacy and safety outcomes. This favorable benefit-to-risk ratio of InO treatment irrespective of disease burden supports its use in challenging and high disease burden subpopulations. INO-VATE is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: #NCT01564784. Plain language summary: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL for short) is a type of blood cancer where the body makes too many immature white blood cells called lymphoblasts. This study involved people with ALL whose cancer had returned after, or stopped responding to, previous treatment. These people received either inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO for short) or standard chemotherapy. Researchers divided people into groups, based on the level of lymphoblast cells they had in their bone marrow (called disease burden): low, medium, or high disease burden. In this study, compared with people who received standard chemotherapy, people who received InO were more likely to have no signs of their cancer (called remission), live to the end of the study, and/or reach the end of the study without their cancer getting worse. The researchers saw these results across all disease burden groups. For people who received InO, those with high disease burden were equally as likely as those with low disease burden to achieve remission, and/or experience medical problems. For people who received standard chemotherapy, those with high disease burden were less likely than those with low disease burden to achieve remission. Further information in a plain language format is available in Supplementary Information (SI) Fig. S1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]