Search

Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) is a master metabolic regulator that is active in nearly all proliferating eukaryotic cells; however, it is unclear whether mTORC1 activity changes throughout the cell cycle. We find that mTORC1 activity oscillates from lowest in mitosis/G1 to highest in S/G2. The interphase oscillation is mediated through the TSC complex but is independent of major known regulatory inputs, including Akt and Mek/Erk signaling. By contrast, suppression of mTORC1 activity in mitosis does not require the TSC complex. mTORC1 has long been known to promote progression through G1. We find that mTORC1 also promotes progression through S and G2 and is important for satisfying the Chk1/Wee1-dependent G2/M checkpoint to allow entry into mitosis. We also find that low mTORC1 activity in G1 sensitizes cells to autophagy induction in response to partial mTORC1 inhibition or reduced nutrient levels. Together, these findings demonstrate that mTORC1 is differentially regulated throughout the cell cycle, with important phase-specific consequences for proliferating cells. [Display omitted] • mTORC1 activity oscillates throughout the cell cycle, peaking in S/G2 and low in M/G1 • The interphase oscillation in mTORC1 activity is mediated through the TSC complex • mTORC1 promotes progression through G1, S, and G2 but not mitosis • Low mTORC1 activity in G1 sensitizes cells to induction of autophagy mTORC1 is a master metabolic regulator that stimulates anabolic cell growth and proliferation and suppresses catabolic processes such as autophagy. Joshi et al. find that mTORC1 activity oscillates throughout the cell cycle, promoting progression through interphase and entry into mitosis and resulting in differential sensitivity to autophagy induction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Premise: Phylogenetic relationships within major angiosperm clades are increasingly well resolved, but largely informed by plastid data. Areas of poor resolution persist within the Dipsacales, including placement of Heptacodium and Zabelia, and relationships within the Caprifolieae and Linnaeeae, hindering our interpretation of morphological evolution. Here, we sampled a significant number of nuclear loci using a Hyb‐Seq approach and used these data to infer the Dipsacales phylogeny and estimate divergence times. Methods: Sampling all major clades within the Dipsacales, we applied the Angiosperms353 probe set to 96 species. Data were filtered based on locus completeness and taxon recovery per locus, and trees were inferred using RAxML and ASTRAL. Plastid loci were assembled from off‐target reads, and 10 fossils were used to calibrate dated trees. Results: Varying numbers of targeted loci and off‐target plastomes were recovered from most taxa. Nuclear and plastid data confidently place Heptacodium with Caprifolieae, implying homoplasy in calyx morphology, ovary development, and fruit type. Placement of Zabelia, and relationships within the Caprifolieae and Linnaeeae, remain uncertain. Dipsacales diversification began earlier than suggested by previous angiosperm‐wide dating analyses, but many major splitting events date to the Eocene. Conclusions: The Angiosperms353 probe set facilitated the assembly of a large, single‐copy nuclear dataset for the Dipsacales. Nevertheless, many relationships remain unresolved, and resolution was poor for woody clades with low rates of molecular evolution. We favor expanding the Angiosperms353 probe set to include more variable loci and loci of special interest, such as developmental genes, within particular clades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]