Search

Aims : The aim of this study was to document the incidence, types, and outcome of interstage catheter interventions following the Norwood surgical palliation. Patients and Methods : A retrospective single-center study of all patients surviving the Norwood operation was performed. All data concerning interstage catheter interventions up to the completion of the superior cavopulmonary shunt were collected. Results : Catheter interventions were performed in 62 of 94 patients (66%; 38 males). These included interventions on the aortic arch (n = 44), the branch pulmonary arteries (PAs) (n = 17), and the Sano shunt (n = 14). Multiple interventions and repeat interventions were common. The minimum aortic arch diameter (pre- versus posttreatment) increased from median 3.1 (2.3-3.3) mm to 5.1 (4.2-6.2) mm (P < 0.001). The catheter pullback gradient decreased from 40 (36-46) mmHg to 9 (5-10) mmHg (P < 0.001), and the echocardiographic gradient from 54 (45-64) mmHg to 12 (10-16) mmHg (P < 0.001). The branch PA diameters increased from 2.4 (2.1-3.0) mmHg to 4.7 (4.2-5.1) mmHg (P < 0.001). The minimum Sano shunt diameters increased from 2.0 (1.5-2.1) mm to 5.9 (5.8--6.0) mm (P < 0.001); this was associated with an improvement in systemic saturation from 63% (60%-65%) to 80% (79-82%) (P < 0.001). Unexpected interstage death at home occurred in two patients who had received no interventions. The remainder received a superior cavopulmonary shunt palliation. Conclusions : Catheter interventions were common. Systematic follow-up and a low threshold for reintervention are essential to the success of staged surgical palliation for this patient cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in patients after cardiac surgery and postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) is known to be associated with high mortality. Especially in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and PCS, ECLS is frequently established. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate factors associated with in‐hospital mortality in patients treated with ECLS due to PCS after CABG. Methods: Between August 2006 and January 2017, 92 consecutive patients with V‐A ECLS due to PCS after isolated CABG were identified and included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into survivors (S) and non‐survivors (NS) and analyzed with risk factors of in‐hospital mortality. Results: In‐hospital mortality added up to 61 patients (66%). Non‐survivors were significantly older (60 ± 812 (S) vs. 67 ± 10 (NS); p = 0.013). Bilateral internal mammary artery graft was significantly more frequently used in S (23% (S) vs. 2% (NS); p = 0.001). After 24 h of ECLS support, median lactate levels were significantly higher in NS (1.9 (1.3; 3.5) mmol/L (S) vs. 3.5 (2.1; 6.3) mmol/L (NS); p = 0.001). NS suffered more often acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (42% (S) vs. 74% (NS); p = 0.002). Conclusion: Mortality in patients with refractory PCS after CABG and consecutive ECLS support remains high. Failing end‐organ recovery under ECLS despite optimized concomitant medical therapy is an indicator of adverse outcomes in this specific patient cohort. Moreover, total‐arterial revascularization might be beneficial for cardiac recovery in patients suffering PCS after CABG and following ECLS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Stanford A acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening emergency, typically occurring in hypertensive patients, requiring immediate surgical repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate early outcomes and long-term survival of hypertensive patients in comparison to normotensive patients suffering from Stanford A AAD. Methods: In our center, 240 patients with Stanford A AAD underwent aortic surgical repair from January 2006 to April 2015. After statistical and logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival estimation was performed, with up to 9-year follow-up. Results: The proportion of hypertensive patients suffering from Stanford A AAD was 75.4% (n=181). There were only few statistically significant differences in terms of basic demographics, comorbidities, preoperative baseline and clinical characteristics of hypertensive patients in comparison to normotensive patients. Hypertensive patients were significantly older (p=0.008), more frequently received hemi-arch repair (p=0.028) and selective brain perfusion (p=0.001). Our study showed similar statistical results in terms of 30-day mortality (p=0.196), long-term overall cumulative survival of patients (Log-Rank p=0.506) and survival of patients free from cerebrovascular events (Log-Rank p=0.186). Furthermore, subgroup analysis for long-term survival in terms of men (Log-Rank p=0.853), women (Log-Rank p=0.227), patients under and above 65 years of age (Log-Rank p=0.188 and Log-Rank p=0.602, respectively) and patients undergoing one of the three types of aortic repair surgery showed similar results for normotensive and hypertensive patient groups. Subgroup analysis for long-term survival of patients free from cerebrovascular events for women, patients under 65 years of age and patients undergoing aortic arch repair showed significant differences between the two groups in favor of hypertensive patients. Conclusions: Hypertensive patients suffering from Stanford A AAD were older, more frequently received hemi-arch replacement and were not associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality and poorer long-term survival compared to normotensive patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preoperative risk stratification models have previously been suggested to predict cardiac surgery unit costs. However, there is a lack of consistency in their reliability in this field. In this study we aim to test the correlation between the values of six commonly known preoperative scoring systems and evaluate their reliability at predicting unit costs of cardiac surgery patients. Methods: Over a period of 14 months all consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass were prospectively classified using six preoperative scoring models (EuroSCORE, Parsonnet, Ontario, French, Pons and CABDEAL). Transplantation patients were the only patients we excluded. Total hospital costs for each patient were calculated independently on a daily basis using the bottom up method. The full unit costs were calculated including preoperative diagnostic tests, operating room cost, disposable materials, drugs, blood components as well as costs for personnel and fixed hospital costs. The correlation between hospital cost and the six models was determined by linear regression analysis. Both Spearman's and Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated from the regression lines. An analysis of residuals was performed to determine the quality of the regression. Results: A total of 887 patients were operated on for CABG (n = 608), valve (n = 142), CABG plus valve (n = 100), thoracic aorta (n = 33) and ventricular assist devices (n = 4). Mean age of the patients was 68.3±9.9 years, 27.6% were female. 30-day mortality rate was 4.1%. Correlation between the six models and hospital cost was weak (Pearson's: r < 0.30; Spearman's: r < 0.40). Conclusion: The risk stratification models in this study are not reliable at predicting total costs of cardiac surgical patients. We therefore do not recommend their use for this purpose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preoperative risk stratification models have previously been suggested to predict cardiac surgery unit costs. However, there is a lack of consistency in their reliability in this field. In this study we aim to test the correlation between the values of six commonly known preoperative scoring systems and evaluate their reliability at predicting unit costs of cardiac surgery patients.Methods: Over a period of 14 months all consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass were prospectively classified using six preoperative scoring models (EuroSCORE, Parsonnet, Ontario, French, Pons and CABDEAL). Transplantation patients were the only patients we excluded. Total hospital costs for each patient were calculated independently on a daily basis using the bottom up method. The full unit costs were calculated including preoperative diagnostic tests, operating room cost, disposable materials, drugs, blood components as well as costs for personnel and fixed hospital costs. The correlation between hospital cost and the six models was determined by linear regression analysis. Both Spearman's and Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated from the regression lines. An analysis of residuals was performed to determine the quality of the regression.Results: A total of 887 patients were operated on for CABG (n = 608), valve (n = 142), CABG plus valve (n = 100), thoracic aorta (n = 33) and ventricular assist devices (n = 4). Mean age of the patients was 68.3±9.9 years, 27.6% were female. 30-day mortality rate was 4.1%. Correlation between the six models and hospital cost was weak (Pearson's: r < 0.30; Spearman's: r < 0.40).Conclusion: The risk stratification models in this study are not reliable at predicting total costs of cardiac surgical patients. We therefore do not recommend their use for this purpose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]