Search

Copyright of Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Glioblastoma (GBM) is fatal. The standard radiotherapy and chemotherapy (temozolomide) followed by an adjuvant phase of temozolomide provide patients with, on average, a 2.5 months benefit. New treatments that can improve sensitivity to the standard treatment are urgently needed. Herein, we review the mechanisms and utility of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in combination with radiation therapy as a treatment option for GBM patients and the role of phosphatase and tensin homologue mutations as a biomarker of response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy is not usually effective in neuroendocrine tumours (NET). Somatostatin analogues (SSA) such as octreotide (Sandostatin; octreotide LAR and lanreotide) are typically used to treat symptoms caused by NET, but not as the primary treatment aiming for an objective response. Recently, results from the PROMID (Placebo-controlled prospective Randomized study on the antiproliferative efficacy of Octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine MIDgut tumours) trial were published showing that octreotide LAR significantly lengthens the time to tumour progression compared with a placebo in patients with functionally active and inactive metastatic midgut NET. We report a retrospective descriptive analysis of six patients, treated at two Australian institutions, who obtained an objective radiological tumour response on long acting SSA. In this retrospective series of NET, radiological responses were observed using single agent SSA, which was administered mainly for symptom management. This could be due to an antiproliferative and/or antiangiogenic activity of this agent in NET. A response can occur beyond 12 months, which might explain why the response rate is under reported in NET trials. Further investigation in prospective trials is warranted and the possibility for late responses might have implications for trial design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]