Search

Introduction: Since its inception >50 years ago, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) has become ubiquitous in managing lower urinary tract dysfunction in children. Emphasis has been on its impact on daily life, but little on its implementation and adjustment in families. The aim of the current study was to discover how families learned to implement and manage their child's CIC needs by interviewing caregivers, adolescents, and young adults about their experiences. Interviews were designed to uncover facilitators and barriers to beginning CIC to initiate potential improvements in a multidisciplinary approach. Methods: A semi‐structured interview guide was developed and piloted initially to 12 families for validation. Between August 2018 and October 2019, 40 families (52 interviews of caregivers and patients >12 years) were then interviewed with open‐ended questions interspersed with more specific ones to generate discussion. Transcripts were coded using Dedoose software to create a base list with emergent codes. Inductive and deductive methods were employed to generate themes. Consensus was reached during successive team meetings. Results: Five major and several subthemes emerged regarding implementation of CIC by caregivers and patients learning CIC for the first time. Theme 1: Parental reaction to CIC: Caregivers described benefits of an adjustment period on learning their child's need for CIC. Prenatal information to caregivers of spina bifida children gave them time to mentally process the need for CIC. Theme 2: Ease of learning CIC: impact of age and gender: caregivers identified advantages of initiating CIC in infancy. Caregivers speculated CIC was physically easier in boys than girls due to meatus location. Developmentally ready children expressed a desire for independence and privacy as they learned to initiate CIC. Theme 3: The impact of additional caregiver support in learning and performing CIC: presence of multiple caregivers optimized learning and implementation of CIC. Having secondary caregivers available provided peace of mind and more flexibility in maintaining reliable CIC care. Patients learning CIC found it helpful to have a parent present at the teaching session. Occasionally, female caregivers reported feelings of anger and frustration when male caregivers were reluctant to be involved in catheterization, irrespective of their child's gender. Theme 4: Satisfaction with healthcare team's approach: The healthcare team's responsiveness to their learning needs affected how they mastered CIC. The healthcare team's teaching and reassurance helped build caregiver confidence. Developmentally appropriate children were able to learn self‐catheterization when supported by the healthcare team. Patients learning self‐CIC articulated having a supportive healthcare team was helpful with implementation. Theme 5: Effect of CIC on employment status relative to job changes, insurance, and daycare: implementing and performing CIC presented a spectrum of issues related to employment. Educating employers regarding CIC facilitated a caregiver's ability to both remain at work and administer to their child. Caregivers underscored the importance of adequate insurance when considering employment choices. Concerns about daycare availability affected caregivers' work schedules. Conclusions: It is anticipated this information will aid healthcare personnel to more effectively teach and initiate CIC in families, and in individuals learning for the first time. The findings should serve as the basis for conducting future patient satisfaction studies, which would determine the effectiveness and reproducibility of these approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Many primary care physicians order an ultrasound (US) before referral to specialist care for suspected undescended testis; however, the value of this practice is questionable.Objective: To determine the proportion of boys referred for suspected undescended testis who had accompanying US, the cost of this practice and the accuracy of US for testis localization when compared with physical examination by a pediatric urologist.Methods: This was a retrospective chart review at a pediatric urology service, including all patients referred for suspected undescended testis from 2008 to 2012. We determined the cost of US ordered, and calculated Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.Results: We identified 894 eligible patients; 32% (289/894) were accompanied by US. In 77% (223/289), the urologist was able to palpate the testis: 51% (147/289) had a normal/retractile testis and 26% (76/289) had a palpable undescended testis. At a cost of 71.10 CAD per US, 20 547.90 CAD was expended on this practice. Of the 223 patients with palpable testes, we were able to gather detailed US and physical examination results for 214 patients. Cohen's kappa was 0.06 (95% CI -0.005, 0.11; P = 0.10). US had 92.8% sensitivity (95% CI 84.1, 96.9%) and 15.2% specificity (95% CI 10.2, 21.9%) to detect an undescended testis. The positive predictive value was 34.2% (95% CI 27.8, 41.3%), while the negative predictive value was 81.5% (95% CI 63.3, 91.8%).Conclusions: Referral of patients for suspected undescended testis should not be accompanied by an US study as US is not useful in these cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]