Search

INTRODUCTION Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a critical condition with significant morbidity and mortality risks. Direct oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban, have emerged as effective alternatives for DVT management, yet their impact on recanalization rates remains underexplored. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective observational study conducted at UCMS Teaching Hospital enrolled 104 patients diagnosed with DVT of both upper and lower limbs from February to September 2024. Duplex ultrasonography assessed thrombus resolution at baseline and after six months of rivaroxaban therapy. This study evaluates the recanalization rates in patients with DVT treated with rivaroxaban using duplex ultrasonography. RESULTS Among 104 patients (41% male, 59% female), 23.8% achieved complete recanalization, 66.7% had partial recanalization, and 9.5% showed residual thrombi. Complete recanalization rates were highest in femoral veins (25.8%) and lowest in popliteal veins (24%). CONCLUSION Rivaroxaban demonstrates favorable recanalization outcomes in DVT patients, supporting its use as first-line therapy. Further studies are needed to optimize treatment and prevent complications like post-thrombotic syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Undifferentiated febrile illness (UFI) includes typhoid and typhus fevers and generally designates fever without any localizing signs. UFI is a great therapeutic challenge in countries like Nepal because of the lack of available point-of-care, rapid diagnostic tests. Often patients are empirically treated as presumed enteric fever. Due to the development of high-level resistance to traditionally used fluoroquinolones against enteric fever, azithromycin is now commonly used to treat enteric fever/UFI. The re-emergence of susceptibility of Salmonella typhi to co-trimoxazole makes it a promising oral treatment for UFIs in general. We present a protocol of a randomized controlled trial of azithromycin versus co-trimoxazole for the treatment of UFI.Methods/design: This is a parallel-group, double-blind, 1:1, randomized controlled trial of co-trimoxazole versus azithromycin for the treatment of UFI in Nepal. Participants will be patients aged 2 to 65 years, presenting with fever without clear focus for at least 4 days, complying with other study criteria and willing to provide written informed consent. Patients will be randomized either to azithromycin 20 mg/kg/day (maximum 1000 mg/day) in a single daily dose and an identical placebo or co-trimoxazole 60 mg/kg/day (maximum 3000 mg/day) in two divided doses for 7 days. Patients will be followed up with twice-daily telephone calls for 7 days or for at least 48 h after they become afebrile, whichever is later; by home visits on days 2 and 4 of treatment; and by hospital visits on days 7, 14, 28 and 63. The endpoints will be fever clearance time, treatment failure, time to treatment failure, and adverse events. The estimated sample size is 330. The primary analysis population will be all the randomized population and subanalysis will be repeated on patients with blood culture-confirmed enteric fever and culture-negative patients.Discussion: Both azithromycin and co-trimoxazole are available in Nepal and are extensively used in the treatment of UFI. Therefore, it is important to know the better orally administered antimicrobial to treat enteric fever and other UFIs especially against the background of fluoroquinolone-resistant enteric fever.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02773407 . Registered on 5 May 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Philadelphia chromosome/ BCR- ABL1 positive chronic myeloid leukaemia ( CML) can be successfully treated with Glivec (Imatinib), which is available free of cost through the Glivec International Patient Assistance programme ( GIPAP) to patients with proven CML without means to pay for the drug. We review the acquired mutations in the tyrosine kinase encoded by the BCR-ABL1 gene underlying Glivec failure or resistance in a cohort of 388 imatinib-treated CML patients (149 Female and 239 male) registered between February 2003 and June 2016 in Nepal. Forty-five patients (11 female 34 male) were studied; 18 different BCR- ABL1 mutations were seen in 33 patients. P-loop mutation, Kinase domain and A-loop mutations were seen in 9, 16 and 4 patients respectively. Other mutations were seen in five patients. A T315I mutation was the most common mutation, followed by F359V and M244V. Sixteen mutations showed intermediate activity to complete resistance to Glivec. Among the 45 patients evaluated for BCR- ABL1 mutations, 4 were lost to follow-up, 14 died and 27 are still alive. Among the surviving patients, 16 are receiving Nilotinib, 5 Dasatinib and 3 Ponatinib, while 3 patients were referred to India, one of who received allogenic bone marrow transplantation. Understanding the spectrum of further acquired mutations in BCR-ABL1 may help to choose more specific targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors that can be provided by GIPAP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]