Search

Purpose: To study the effects of tumor site, stage, pathologic type and imaging findings on lung function in primary lung cancer, as well as the correlation between impulse oscillometry system (IOS) and pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters. Methods: The impact of tumor location, staging, and pathological type on lung function were evaluated in 219 patients with primary lung cancer through IOS and PFT. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the relationship between IOS parameters and PFT parameters. Results: The PFT parameters in adenocarcinoma were significantly higher than those in SCLC, while the other parameters in IOS were obviously lower than those in SCLC except X5Hz (P < 0.05). The PFT parameters of FVC%, FEV1% and MVV% in SCC were evidently higher than those in SCLC, while the parameters of IOS were significantly lower than those in SCLC (P < 0.05). The PFT parameters of adenocarcinoma were higher than those of SCC (P < 0.05). In the PFT parameters of stage I patients, FEV1/FVC%, MEF50%, MMEF75/25%, and DLCO% were markedly higher than those of stage II patients, and FVC%, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC%, MEF50%, MEF25%, PEF%, MMEF75/25%, TLC%, and DLCO% were obviously higher than those of stage III and IV patients; and the MVV%, Z5Hz%, R5Hz% in IOS parameters were obviously lower than those in stage III, while Fres (1/s) and X5Hz were significantly lower than those in stage IV (P < 0.05). Compared with Phase IV, the X5Hz of stage II patients was clearly higher (P = 0.023). Besides, PFT parameters of peripheral lung cancer were obviously higher than those of central lung cancer (P < 0.05), while Z5Hz%, Fres (1/s) and R5Hz% of IOS parameters were clearly lower than those of central lung cancer (P < 0.05). Moreover, for patients without and with other pulmonary imaging manifestations, the PFT parameters of the former were significantly higher than those of the latter (P < 0.05), while only Fres (1/s) of IOS parameters was significantly lower than the latter (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there is a low to moderate correlation between IOS parameters and PFT parameters. Conclusion: Patients with central SCLC and SCC and advanced lung cancer had the worst lung function. The IOS parameters show a good correlation with the traditional PFT parameters, and IOS can be used as an alternative measurement method for PFT when necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, the incorporation of LAMAs into asthma therapy has been expected to enhance symptom control. However, a significant number of patients with asthma continue to experience poorly managed symptoms. There have been limited investigations on LAMA-induced airway alterations in asthma treatment employing IOS. In this study, we administered a LAMA to patients with poorly controlled asthma, evaluated clinical responses and respiratory function, and investigated airway changes facilitated by LAMA treatments using the IOS. Methods: Of a total of 1282 consecutive patients with asthma, 118 exhibited uncontrolled symptoms. Among them, 42 switched their treatment to high-dose fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) (ICS/LABA/LAMA). The patients were then assessed using AHQ-33 or LCQ and ACT. Spirometry parameters (such as FEV1 or MMEF) and IOS parameters (such as R20 or AX) were measured and compared before and after exacerbations and the addition of LAMA. Results: Of the 42 patients, 17 who switched to FF/UMEC/VI caused by dyspnea exhibited decreased pulmonary function between period 1 and baseline, followed by an increase in pulmonary function between baseline and period 2. Significant differences were observed in IOS parameters such as R20, R5-R20, Fres, or AX between period 1 and baseline as well as between baseline and period 2. Among the patients who switched to inhaler due to cough, 25 were classified as responders (n = 17) and nonresponders (n = 8) based on treatment outcomes. Among nonresponders, there were no significant differences in spirometry parameters such as FEV1 or PEF and IOS parameters such as R20 or AX between period 1 and baseline. However, among responders, significant differences were observed in all IOS parameters, though not in most spirometry parameters, between period 1 and baseline. Furthermore, significant differences were noted between baseline and period 2 in terms of FEV1, %MMEF, %PEF, and all IOS parameters. Conclusion: ICS/LABA/LAMA demonstrates superiority over ICS/LABA in improving symptoms and lung function, which is primarily attributed to the addition of LAMA. Additionally, IOS revealed the effectiveness of LAMA across all airway segments, particularly in the periphery. Hence, LAMA can be effective against various asthma phenotypes characterized by airway inflammation, even in real-world cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the associations between particulate matter (PM), lung function and Impulse Oscillometry System (IOS) parameters in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and identity effects between different regions in Beijing, China. Methods: In this retrospective study, we recruited 1348 outpatients who visited hospitals between January 2016 and December 2019. Ambient air pollutant data were obtained from the central monitoring stations nearest the participants' residential addresses. We analyzed the effect of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5) exposure on lung function and IOS parameters using a multiple linear regression model, adjusting for sex, smoking history, education level, age, body mass index (BMI), mean temperature, and relative humidity. Results: The results showed a relationship between PM2.5, lung function and IOS parameters. An increase of 10 µg/m3 in PM2.5 was associated with a decline of 2.083% (95% CI: −3.047 to − 1.103) in forced expiratory volume in one second /predict (FEV1%pred), a decline of 193 ml/s (95% CI: −258 to − 43) in peak expiratory flow (PEF), a decline of 0.932% (95% CI: −1.518 to − 0.342) in maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF); an increase of 0.732 Hz (95% CI: 0.313 to 1.148) in resonant frequency (Fres), an increase of 36 kpa/(ml/s) (95% CI: 14 to 57) in impedance at 5 Hz (Z5) and an increase of 31 kpa/(ml/s) (95% CI: 2 to 54) in respiratory impedance at 5 Hz (R5). Compared to patients in the central district, those in the southern district had lower FEV1/FVC, FEV1%pred, PEF, FEF75%, MMEF, X5, and higher Fres, Z5 and R5 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Short-term exposure to PM2.5 was associated with reductions in lung function indices and an increase in IOS results in patients with COPD. The heavier the PM2.5, the more severe of COPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Bronchodilator responses (BDRs) from impulse oscillometry (IOS) are not interchangeable with those from spirometry. We aimed to identify the characteristics of children with small airway hyperresponsiveness and to determine whether BDR from IOS provides an important supplement to BDR from spirometry. Methods: The records of 592 children with asthma or suspected asthma who underwent spirometric and oscillometric BDRs were retrospectively reviewed. Oscillometric BDR was defined as positive when relative or absolute changes of Rrs5 or Xrs5 were beyond two standard deviations and spirometric BDR as positive when absolute change of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was ≥12%. Subjects were classified as positive for spirometric BDR only, positive for oscillometric BDR only, positive for both BDRs, or negative for both BDRs. Results: The results indicated that 101 (17.6%) subjects were positive for spirometric BDR only, 49 (8.5%) positive for oscillometric BDR only, 48 (8.3%) positive for both BDRs, and 377 (65.6%) negative for both BDRs. The agreement between spirometric and oscillometric BDRs was poor. Baseline FEV1, Rrs5, and Xrs5 values strongly influenced the BDRs. Subjects positive for oscillometric BDR only were found to be younger than those positive for spirometric BDR only (P < 0.001). Subjects positive for both BDRs were more likely to have asthma, atopic dermatitis, wheezing apart from cold, or decreased baseline lung function relative to those positive in either test (P < 0.001). Conclusions: There was a low concordance between spirometric and oscillometric BDRs. Use of IOS to detect small airway hyperresponsiveness may add more information about a clinical profile of subjects with asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]