Search

Copyright of Der Onkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Onkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Many patients with advanced cancer receive aggressive chemotherapy close to death and are referred too late to palliative or hospice care. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate oncologists' and oncology nurses' perceptions of the optimal timing for discussions about forgoing cancer-specific therapy at the End-of-Life (EOL) and the reasons that might hinder them. Design: Qualitative in-depth interviews with oncologists and oncology nurses were carried out. The empirical data were evaluated from a normative perspective. Setting/participants: Twenty-nine physicians and nurses working at the Department of Hematology and Oncology of a German university hospital were interviewed. Results: Health-care professionals differed considerably in their understanding of when to initiate discussions about forgoing cancer-specific therapy at the EOL. However, their views could be consolidated into three approaches: (1) preparing patients gradually throughout the course of disease (anticipatory approach) which is best suited to empower patient self-determination in decision-making, (2) waiting until the patient him/herself starts the discussion about forgoing cancer-specific treatment, and (3) waiting until all tumor-specific therapeutic options are exhausted. Conclusion: The empirically informed ethical analysis clearly favors an approach that prepares patients for forgoing cancer-specific therapy throughout the course of disease. Since the last two approaches often preclude advance care planning, these approaches may be less ethically acceptable. The proposed framework could serve as a starting point for the development of concrete recommendations on the optimal timing for EOL discussions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The influence of personality on health related quality of life (QoL) and physical functioning in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (alloHSCT) is unknown. We conducted a joint evaluation within two independent cohorts of alloHSCT recipients to investigate the impact of personality on reported QoL and physical functioning. Two-hundred-eight patients (median age 44 years, range 18-72) of cohort 1 and 93 patients (median age 55 years, range 19-79) of cohort 2 after alloHSCT were evaluated. Personality was assessed using the 24-adjective measure (AM), which measures the Big-Five personality domains and the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), measuring optimism and pessimism. QoL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with bone marrow transplantation subscale (FACT-BMT), Short Form 36 (SF-36), the human activity profile (HAP), as well as the NIH criteria-based cGVHD activity assessment form and the Lee cGVHD symptom scale. Neuroticism was significantly associated with worse function measured by the HAP and FACT-BMT. Optimism significantly improved QoL captured by the FACT-BMT. Pessimism significantly impaired physical function captured by the HAP and SF-36. Extraversion was significantly associated with reduced depression and lower severity of cGVHD symptoms reported by the patient and the physician. The results suggest that personality traits and pre-treatment QoL assessments should be measured in clinical trials to facilitate the interpretation of QoL data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)