Search

Introduction: Intrapericardial (IPC) delivery of antiarrhythmic agents is an appealing idea to increase the therapeutic width and reduce side effects of drugs, particularly in the thin atria. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of IPC versus intravenous (IV) d,l-sotalol and flecainide infusion on transmural atrial electrophysiology and sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) in the goat. Methods and Results: Effects of IPC and IV sotalol and flecainide infusion on epi- and endocardial atrial electrophysiology, ECG, and tissue drug concentrations were studied in goats without and with persistent AF (>24 hours). Epicardial atrial refractory period (AERP, bcl 400 ms) increased after 120 minutes of 1 mg/kg/hour IPC sotalol with 61 ± 8 ms (P = 0.02), whereas the endocardial AERP was not affected. One mg/kg/hour IPC flecainide increased the epicardial pacing threshold and the epicardial AERP with 4 ± 0.5 mA (P = 0.003) and 33 ± 11 ms (P = 0.05), respectively. Endocardial values were unchanged. Marked ST-elevations in the precordial ECG leads were observed after IPC flecainide. In the AF group, IPC drugs did not prolong AF cycle length to a greater extent than IV delivery. The number of cardioversions was not different between the two delivery routes. A steep transmural drug concentration gradient after IPC sotalol and flecainide was observed in all heart chambers. Conclusion: IPC sotalol and flecainide infusion in goats markedly affects epicardial atrial electrophysiology. IPC delivery, however, does not prolong AFCL or terminate AF to a greater extent than IV infusion. This suggests that the perpetuation of AF is not dominated by the epicardial and sub epicardial atrial layers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to separate the influence of radiologist experience from that of CT quality in the evaluation of CT examinations of patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Two radiologists from referral centers ('expert radiologists') and six radiologists from regional non-referral centers ('non-expert radiologists') performed 240 evaluations of 72 CT examinations of patients diagnosed with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer between 1994 and 2003. We used conditional logistic regression analysis to calculate odds ratios (OR) for the likelihood of a correct diagnosis. Expert radiologists made a correct diagnosis of the presence or absence of distant metastases according to the gold standard almost three times more frequently (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.4-6.3) than non-expert radiologists. For the subgroup of CT examinations showing distant metastases, a statistically significant correlation (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.4-9.1) was found between CT quality as judged by the radiologists and a correct diagnosis. Both radiologist experience and quality of the CT examination play a role in the detection of distant metastases in esophageal or gastric cardia cancer patients. Therefore, we suggest that staging procedures for esophageal and gastric cardia cancer should preferably be performed in centers with technically advanced equipment and experienced radiologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]