Search

Background Currently, treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma who experience failed immunotherapy or targeted therapy are lacking. Recent studies suggest the antitumor activity of combined pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in patients with advanced melanoma progressing on immunotherapy. Herein, we report the clinical outcomes of combined lenvatinib and a programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor (PD-1) in this population. Materials and Methods This French multicenter real-world study was conducted between September 2020 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1). Secondary variables were treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR). Results Of the 67 patients included (median age, 69 years; median follow-up, 5.0 months), 85% had stage IV-M1c or M1d disease. The overall ORR was 28.4% (95% CI, 18%-41%), including 3 complete (4.5%) and 16 partial (23.9%) responses. Median DOR was 3.1 (interquartile range, 1.3-4.3) months. Median PFS and OS were 3.1 (95% CI, 2.5-3.7) and 9.8 (95% CI, 5.6-13.9) months, respectively. Grades 3-5 TRAEs occurred in 16 (24%) patients; common TRAEs were fatigue (43.3%), nausea/vomiting (26.8%), diarrhea (20.9%), and hypertension (20.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion Our real-world study demonstrates an interesting response rate and acceptable safety profile in a population with poor prognostic factors. Our data support this treatment option for refractory melanoma, as it is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration or European Medicines Agency, and highlight the need for new strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document provides a summary of various studies on the neurological side effects associated with targeted therapy (TT) for melanoma. The studies found that neurological adverse events (NAE) were reported in patients receiving TT, particularly those who had previously received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The NAE observed included conditions such as polyradiculoneuritis, encephalitis/meningoencephalitis, peripheral facial palsy, and sensory-motor axonal polyneuropathy. Treatment for NAE varied, with some patients receiving symptomatic treatment alone, while others received intravenous immunoglobulins or steroids. Most cases of NAE completely recovered or improved after treatment discontinuation. The studies emphasize the importance of accurate diagnosis and management of NAE to minimize long-term effects. [Extracted from the article]

Simple Summary: The long-term effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge for progressive or recurrent advanced melanoma following previous disease control induced by ICI has not been well-described in the literature. The objective of our retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge in patients with advanced melanoma who had achieved disease control with ICI in a real-life setting. Our study, which included 85 patients, predominantly rechallenged with anti-PD1 antibodies, confirms the efficacy of ICI rechallenge, with a best overall response rate of 54% and a disease control rate of 75%. Twenty-eight adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 patients (27%), including 18 grade 1–2 AEs and 10 grade 3–4 AEs. Therefore, ICI rechallenge should be considered as a compelling therapeutic option. Background: The long-term effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge for progressive or recurrent advanced melanoma following previous disease control induced by ICI has not been thoroughly described in the literature. Patients and methods: In this retrospective multicenter national real-life study, we enrolled patients who had been rechallenged with an ICI after achieving disease control with a first course of ICI, which was subsequently interrupted. The primary objective was to evaluate tumor response, while the secondary objectives included assessing the safety profile, identifying factors associated with tumor response, and evaluating survival outcomes. Results: A total of 85 patients from 12 centers were included in the study. These patients had advanced (unresectable stage III or stage IV) melanoma that had been previously treated and controlled with a first course of ICI before undergoing rechallenge with ICI. The rechallenge treatments consisted of pembrolizumab (n = 44, 52%), nivolumab (n = 35, 41%), ipilimumab (n = 2, 2%), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 4, 5%). The best overall response rate was 54%. The best response was a complete response in 30 patients (35%), a partial response in 16 patients (19%), stable disease in 18 patients (21%) and progressive disease in 21 patients (25%). Twenty-eight adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 patients (27%), including 18 grade 1–2 AEs in 14 patients (16%) and 10 grade 3–4 AEs in nine patients (11%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis. Patients who received another systemic treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy or clinical trial) between the two courses of ICI had a lower response to rechallenge (p = 0.035) and shorter PFS (p = 0.016). Conclusion: Rechallenging advanced melanoma patients with ICI after previous disease control induced by these inhibitors resulted in high response rates (54%) and disease control (75%). Therefore, ICI rechallenge should be considered as a relevant therapeutic option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The occurrence of immune-related myositis (irM) is increasing, yet there are no therapeutic guidelines. We sought to analyse the current therapeutic strategies of irM and evaluate the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) rechallenge. Methods We conducted a nationwide retrospective study between April 2018 and March 2020 including irM without myocardial involvement. Depending on the presence of cutaneous signs or unusual histopathological features, patients were classified into two groups: typical or atypical irM. Therapeutic strategies were analysed in both groups. The modalities and outcomes of ICI rechallenge were reviewed. Results Among the 20 patients, 16 presented typical irM. Regardless of severity, most typical irM were treated with steroid monotherapy (n  = 14/16) and all had a complete response within ≤3 weeks. The efficacy of oral steroids for non-severe typical irM (n  = 10) was the same with low-dose (≤0.5 mg/kg/day) or high-dose (1 mg/kg/day). Severe typical irM were successfully treated with intravenous methylprednisolone. Atypical irM (n  = 4) had a less favourable evolution, including one irM-related death, and required heavy immunosuppression. ICIs were safely reintroduced in nine patients presenting a moderate (n  = 6) or a severe (n  = 3) irM. Conclusion Our data highlight that steroid monotherapy is an effective treatment for typical irM, either with prednisone or with intravenous methylprednisone pulses depending on the severity. The identification of unusual features is important in determining the initial therapeutic strategy. The outcomes of rechallenged patients are in favour of a safe reintroduction of ICI following symptom resolution and creatin kinase (CK) normalization in moderate and severe forms of irM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The identification of the melanoma patients sensitive to anti-PD-1 inhibitors, nivolumab or pembrolizumab, is a major therapeutic challenge and an urgent need. We hypothesized that the natural history of the disease might partly reflect the immune state of the patients. Methods We analyzed our cohort of melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 from August 2014 to January 2016 in our institution. Objective response was defined as a complete or partial response according to v1.1 RECIST criteria. Results Among 63 metastatic melanoma patients, the overall response rate was 43%. Median time from diagnosis to anti-PD-1 initiation was longer among responders than non-responders (64 months vs. 35 months, p = 0.02). The response rate was 10% in patients starting anti-PD-1 within 1 year, 35% after 1 to 5 years and 63% after 5 years. Performance status (PS) 0 was also associated with enhanced tumor response: 70% of responders were PS 0 vs. 36% of non-responders ( p = 0.04). PS 0, normal LDH levels and wild-type BRAF status were significant predictors of progression free survival. Conclusion A long time lapse from diagnosis to anti-PD-1 initiation and PS 0 are associated with higher sensitivity to anti-PD-1 in melanoma patients. These two clinical features might reflect a potentially intact immune system of the host. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little is known on factors predicting toxicity of anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors. Sarcopenic obesity is associated with increased acute toxicity of cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies. We explored whether body composition also influenced the occurrence of early acute limiting toxicity (ALT) of anti-PD1 in melanoma patients. This is a monocentric, retrospective study analyzing toxicity outcome in consecutive melanoma patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Various parameters linked to the patient or the disease status have been analysed. Body mass index (BMI; kg/m) and muscle mass using CT were measured prior to treatment initiation. Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney's tests were used for the comparison of categorical and continuous variables respectively. Among 68 melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1 (47 pembrolizumab, 21 nivolumab), 38 (56%) patients had a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m and 11 (16%) a BMI ≥ 30, while 13 (19%) had both sarcopenia and a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m. For the 11 (16%) patients who experienced early ALT, the mean BMI was higher (27.9 versus 24.7 kg/m; p = 0.04). Among the 32 female patients, sarcopenic overweight patients had a 6.5-fold increased risk of ALT (50 versus 7.7%; p = 0.01). Sarcopenic overweight is associated with more early ALT of anti-PD1 in melanoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients treated with dabrafenib/trametinib (DAB/TRA) exhibit a large interindividual variability in clinical outcomes. The aims of this study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of DAB, hydroxy-dabrafenib (OHD), and TRA in BRAF-mutated patients and to investigate the exposure–response relationship for toxicity and efficacy in metastatic melanoma (MM) patients. Univariate Fisher and Wilcoxon models including drug systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration curve, AUC) were used to identify prognostic factors for the onset of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and Cox models for overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Seventy-three BRAF-mutated patients were included in pharmacokinetic (n = 424, NONMEM) and 52 in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Age and sex were identified as determinants of DAB and OHD clearances (p < 0.01). MM patients experiencing DLT were overexposed to DAB compared to patients without DLT (AUC: 9624 vs. 7485 ng∙h/mL, respectively, p < 0.01). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2 and plasma ratio AUCOHD/AUCDAB ≥ 1 were independently associated with shorter OS (HR: 6.58 (1.29–33.56); p = 0.023 and 10.61 (2.34–48.15), p = 0.022, respectively). A number of metastatic sites ≥3 and cerebral metastases were associated with shorter PFS (HR = 3.25 (1.11–9.50); p = 0.032 and HR = 1.23 (1.35–10.39), p = 0.011; respectively). TRA plasma exposure was neither associated with toxicity nor efficacy. Our results suggest that early drug monitoring could be helpful to prevent the onset of DLT in MM patients, especially in fragile patients such as the elderly. Regarding efficacy, the clinical benefit to monitor plasma ratio AUCOHD/AUCDAB deserves more investigation in a larger cohort of MM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]