Search

Guidelines recommend an extended course of anticoagulation therapy for patients who experienced venous thromboembolism (VTE) without transient provocation, however, optimal duration remains uncertain. We assessed effectiveness and safety of extended use of apixaban and warfarin greater than 6 months of initial treatment in patients with VTE. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged greater than or equal to 18 years with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Patients were required to have initiated anticoagulants within 30 days of their first VTE diagnosis, completed 6 months of initial anticoagulant treatment, and received extended phase treatment with apixaban (the apixaban group) or warfarin (the warfarin group) or no extended therapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling with inverse probability treatment weighting was used to compare recurrent VTE, mortality, and major bleeding risks among the three groups. Mean extended-treatment duration was up to 10 months and 14 months in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively. Compared with no extended treatment, apixaban use was associated with decreased risks of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.08, [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.41]) and mortality (HR = 0.37, [95% CI: 0.27-0.51]) without increased major bleeding risk (HR = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.68-2.45]); warfarin use was associated not with recurrent VTE risk change but with increased major bleeding risk (HR = 2.14, [95% CI: 1.26-3.65]) and decreased mortality risk (HR = 0.39, [95% CI: 0.29-0.51]). Compared with warfarin, apixaban use was associated with decreased recurrent VTE (HR = 0.13, [95% CI: 0.03-0.63]) and major bleeding (HR = 0.56, [95% CI: 0.32-0.98]) risks. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses (e.g., intention-to-treat) findings remained consistent. Compared with warfarin or no extended therapy, extended-apixaban use was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VTE without increased major bleeding risk. Continuing anticoagulant therapy with apixaban greater than 6 months may be effective and safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: US Food and Drug Administration approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Our aim was to assess health care resource utilization and costs for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with systemic therapies in first line between January 2012 and December 2017. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic melanoma using MarketScan data. We included patients diagnosed with melanoma and secondary malignant neoplasm who used pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, BRAF-inhibitor (BRAF-i) plus MEK inhibitor (MEK-i), BRAF-i or MEK-i monotherapy, or chemotherapy in first line. We compared health care utilization and costs per patient per month (PPPM) using two-part and generalized linear models. RESULTS: We identified 1,870 patients, including 185 pembrolizumab, 103 nivolumab, 689 ipilimumab, 185 nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 214 BRAF-i plus MEK-i, 240 BRAF-i or MEK-i monotherapy, and 254 chemotherapy users. Highest PPPM rates of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and outpatient visits were observed in patients with ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy (adjusted difference v pembrolizumab [aDiff], 0.18, 0.12, and 0.88, respectively; all P < .001). Ipilimumab monotherapy users (aDiff, 0.07 and 0.93; all P < .001) and chemotherapy users (aDiff, 0.10 and 2.63; all P < .001) showed higher PPPM rates of hospitalizations and outpatient visits compared with pembrolizumab users, respectively. Utilization rates in nivolumab, BRAF-i plus MEK-i, and BRAF-i or MEK-i groups were similar to the pembrolizumab group. Highest PPPM total costs and drug-related costs were observed in the ipilimumab group ($80,139 US dollars [USD] and $70,051 USD; all P < .001), followed by the ipilimumab plus nivolumab ($71,689 USD and $56,217 USD; all P < .001) and the BRAF-i plus MEK-i group ($31,184 USD and $19,648 USD; all P < .001). PPPM costs in the nivolumab group were similar to the pembrolizumab group CONCLUSION: Significant differences in health care resource utilization and costs were found across first-line metastatic melanoma regimens. Utilization rates were highest in patients using ipilimumab-containing therapies. High drug costs constituted a major fraction of total PPPM health care costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]