Search

Background: Food insecurity (FI) is prevalent among children with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but its impact on health outcomes, and feasibility of prescribed diet restrictions is unknown. Accordingly, this study aims to explore associations of FI and CKD outcomes, and understand its role in following prescribed kidney diet recommendations. Methods: We performed a mixed-methods single-center cohort study of children with advanced CKD or kidney failure. Demographics, socioeconomic status, and health outcomes were compared across FI status; associations between FI and CKD outcomes were explored using multivariable regression. A qualitative sub-analysis of de-identified caregiver interview transcripts was analyzed for themes around diet restrictions. Results: There was a trend that FI patients were more likely to be of Black race (33% vs. 20%); have public insurance (67% vs. 48%); need more blood pressure medications (2 [0.75,3] vs. 1 [0,3]); and have a higher likelihood of emergency department (42% vs. 25%) or intensive care unit encounters (25% vs. 14%). There were no associations of FI and outcomes of interest. Major themes that emerged from caregiver interviews include (1) understanding of the kidney diet focuses on foods to avoid; (2) adapting to suggested dietary restrictions requires changes in meal preparation; and (3) challenges to adherence include social stigma, growth, budget, and time. Conclusions: The impact of FI on children's medical needs with CKD remains inconclusive but trends suggest a higher risk. Regardless of FI status, adhering to prescribed diet restrictions in kidney disease involves significant dedication. Challenges involve food availability, a child's response to restrictions, and social stigma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medical legal partnerships address individual legal needs that can create impediments to health. Little is known about outcomes from medical legal partnerships and their relationship to access to justice. This paper reports outcomes from one medical legal partnership from the perspective of the client, with specific emphasis on impact on health and concepts related to access to justice. We suggest a conceptual model for incorporating medical legal partnerships into a broader framework about access to justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]