Search

Copyright of Herz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Pericardial effusion (PE) is a common clinical condition that can develop as a result of systemic or cardiac diseases. Here, we report the results of cytology for patients who underwent pericardiocentesis for PE.Methods: The study comprised 283 patients who underwent primary percutaneous pericardiocentesis between 2007 and 2016. The mean age of the patients was 60.0 ± 16.6 years; 162 (57.2%) were male and 121 (42.8%) were female. The presence of reactive mesothelial cells, acute and chronic inflammatory cells, and/or blood without evidence of malignant cells was considered as benign. The presence of malignant cells with/without reactive mesothelial cells, inflammatory cells, and/or blood was considered as malignant.Results: The vast majority of PE specimens (219 cases; 77.4%) were classified as benign. Only 20 cases (7.1%) were classified as atypical, and malignant cells were present in the PE specimens of 44 cases (15.5%). The most common diagnosis was benign PE. The most commonly encountered malignancy was lung cancer. The rate of malignancy was 1.9% in the serous group and 24% in the hemorrhagic group, which was statistically significant.Conclusion: Benign PE was the most frequent cytological diagnosis in our study. Chronic nonspecific pericarditis was the most frequent type of pericarditis in the benign PE group, while lung adenocarcinoma was the most frequent malignancy in the malignant PE group. The rate of malignancy was significantly higher in the hemorrhagic group than in the serous group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We compared direct stenting (DS) with conventional stenting (CS) - i.e., stenting after predilation - during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) in terms of procedural results and long-term mortality in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI).Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2306 patients (mean age 59 years, 22% female) who underwent P‑PCI within 12 h of symptom onset. Patients were then followed up prospectively for clinical events. Patients were divided into a DS group (n = 597) and a CS group (n = 1709). The CS group was further divided into a CS-1 group (baseline thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow grade ≥ 1) and a CS-2 group (baseline TIMI flow grade 0). Main outcome measures were postprocedural myocardial reperfusion and all-cause mortality in long-term follow-up.Results: Patients in the DS group had a higher percentage of final TIMI-3 flow, myocardial blush grade 3 and complete ST-segment resolution, better left ventricular ejection fraction, and a lower incidence of distal embolization compared with CS patients. In-hospital (1.5 vs. 4.6%, respectively, p = 0.001) and long-term all-cause mortality (8.8 vs. 17.0%, respectively, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the DS group than in the CS group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed similar survival rates in the DS and CS-1 groups (log-rank p = 0.40), but significantly worse survival in the CS-2 group than in the other groups (log-rank p < 0.001). After adjusting for risk factors, DS was not found to be a predictor of long-term mortality.Conclusion: DS in P‑PCI was associated with better postprocedural angiographic results and long-term survival. However, the DS group had similar in-hospital and long-term mortality to matched patients in the CS group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Herz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Internal jugular vein thrombosis is a rarely seen condition which may be due to infection or neoplastic, thrombophilic, traumatic or iatrogenic causes. If the thrombosis in the jugular vein leads to pulmonary embolism, septic emboli or atrial or dural sinus thrombosis, it may be life-threatening. We report a successfully treated case of a 19-year-old female patient presenting with swelling and neck pain who was diagnosed with a stepwise approach of this rare condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiovascular hypersensitivity is a rare and well-documented side-effect of 5-FU (5-fluorouracil). Besides the common complications such as angina pectoris and myocardial infarction, it can also cause cardiogenic shock, and supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Studies have reported that FU-induced angina most commonly occurred due to vasospasm. In our case, 9 hours after stopping the infusion of 5-FU, the patients developed symptoms and electrocardiographic (ECG) findings consistent with acute myocardial infarction. We intend to share this rare case and discuss whether this late complication after 5-FU infusion is an FU-induced vasospasm or rather an allergic reaction leading to Kounis syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]