Search

Thirty years have passed since the concept of latex-fruit syndrome (LFS) was first introduced. Since then, this phenomenon, characterized by cross-reactivity between natural latex rubber allergens and certain fruit allergens, has been extensively studied. This literature review sought to determine the prevalence of LFS in latex-allergic patients, identify the most common cross-reactions with fruit allergens in individuals with LFS, and understand the clinical manifestations of this syndrome. An extensive literature search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus databases, while applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology. The analysis of original studies revealed a wide variation in LFS prevalence (4–88%) influenced by diverse diagnostic tools, different geographical regions, and the size of study populations. Our findings indicate that the most prevalent allergenic fruits in patients with LFS are banana, avocado, kiwifruit, and papaya. After evaluating the symptoms of the fruit hypersensitivity of patients with LFS, the clinical manifestation of hypersensitivity constituted 73% of systemic allergy symptoms and only 27% of reported symptoms described the localized allergy. Furthermore, the clinical picture of latex-fruit syndrome is illustrated through two cases, one typical and one with an unusual presentation. Their clinical features were assessed and contrasted utilizing different anaphylaxis severity grading criteria. To properly manage LFS, it is essential to establish standardized diagnostic criteria and severity grading systems, as these are crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fruit allergies manifest with a diverse array of clinical presentations, ranging from localized contact allergies and oral allergy syndrome to the potential for severe systemic reactions including anaphylaxis. The scope of population-level prevalence studies remains limited, largely derived from single-center or hospital-based investigations. In this comprehensive review, we conducted a systematic literature search spanning the years 2009 to 2023, with full acknowledgment of potential analytical biases, to provide a global overview of fruit allergy prevalence. The primary mechanistic underpinning of fruit allergies stems from cross-reactivity between aeroallergens and food allergens, a consequence of structurally similar epitopes—a phenomenon recognized as pollen food allergy syndrome (PFAS). In the era of molecular allergology, numerous studies have dissected allergen components with substantial clinical relevance. Within this review, we explore important allergenic molecules found in plant-based foods, scrutinize pertinent cross-reactivity patterns, and offer insights into management recommendations. Additionally, we compare guideline recommendations to enhance clinical understanding and inform decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Food Safety & Quality is the property of Journal of Food Safety & Quality Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Fruits are an important source of vitamins and antioxidants that can effectively delay aging and contribute to health and well-being of the human kind. However, they are growing to be one of the primary elicitors of food allergies around the world. Fruit allergens can induce an IgE-mediated (Immunoglobulin E) reaction, presenting with a symptom like localized oral allergy syndrome (OAS). Numerous studies showed that varying environmental and cultivation conditions can influence the fruit allergen content during flowering and ripening stages. Further, the variety, harvesting maturity, and storage conditions can also significantly influence the allergenicity potential. For example, unripe apples and tomatoes have lower levels of allergens compared to ripened fruits. Researchers have also reported that modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) can help reduce Mal d 3 content present in apples during storage. Post-harvest processing like peeling is also considered a good method to help reduce the overall allergenicity in few fruits whose peel might contain majority of the allergens. This review will discuss the overall influence of both pre-harvest and post-harvest factors on the fruit allergens. We will also discuss the progress regarding the cause, symptoms and diagnostic methods of fruit based allergies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plant lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are ubiquitous proteins that are found in divergent plant species. Although the exact function of LTPs is not fully understood, LTPs are conserved across a broad range of plant species. Because LTPs share structural features, there is an increased probability for significant allergic cross-reactivity. The molecular features of LTPs also decrease the probability of degradation due to cooking or digestion, thereby increasing the probability of systemic absorption and severe allergic reactions. LTP allergy, unlike other forms of anaphylaxis, tends to occur more frequently in areas of lower latitude. The geographic distribution of LTP allergy, along with evidence of increased sensitization after respiratory exposure, has led to the hypothesis that LTP-related food allergy may be secondary to sensitization via the respiratory route. Clinical reactions associated with LTPs have broad clinical phenotypes and can be severe in nature. Life-threatening clinical reactions have been associated with ingestion of a multitude of plant products. Component-resolved diagnosis has played a significant role in research applications for LTP allergy. In the future, component-resolved diagnosis may play a significant role in day-to-day clinical care. Also, quantitative analysis of LTPs in foodstuffs may allow for the identification and/or production of low-LTP foods, thereby decreasing the risk to patients with LTP allergy. Furthermore, sublingual immunotherapy may provide a therapeutic option for patients with LTP allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chinese bayberry Myrica rubra is a very popular fruit in southeastern China. In spite of its wide consumption, no allergies to this fruit have been reported previously. Here we report on a 40-year-old woman suffering from anaphylaxis to Chinese bayberry fruit. Prick-prick skin tests revealed strong reactions to fresh Chinese bayberry fruits as well as to peach, and weaker reactions to some other fruits including apple, melon, and banana. ImmunoCAP analysis revealed identical titers of specific IgE (4.3 kU/L) to peach extract and its lipid transfer protein (LTP, rPru p 3), which was confirmed by detection of a 9 kD band following immunoblotting. Immunoblot analysis with Chinese bayberry extract gave bands of 22, 45, and 90 kD, but no 9 kD band was recognized. There was also no evidence of LTP recognition for loquat (36 kD) or melon (24 kD). This first report of a severe allergic reaction to Chinese bayberry fruit in a patient with LTP-mediated peach allergy indicates that other as yet unidentified non-pollen related fruit allergens are involved in this new severe fruit allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High fruit intakes are associated with significant health benefits but fruit allergy sufferers may be discouraged from eating fruit due to the symptoms they experience. Knowledge about allergens involved in fruit allergy and the frequent cross-reactions to other allergens is essential to (a) design the best strategy for fruit allergy testing (b) prescribe optimal avoidance diets, and (c) design technological solutions for development of hypoallergenic fruits. The objective of this review was to investigate whether some characteristic disease entities could be identified in Europe for allergy to Rosaceae fruits. Five allergy patterns were found involving the allergen families PR-10, LTP, and profilin. In the Western Mediterranean area allergies to Rosaceae fruits are caused by monosensitization to LTP, monosensitization to profilin, or co-sensitization to both these allergens. On the contrary, monosensitization to PR-10 and, to a lesser degree, co-sensitization to profilin and PR-10 is dominant in Northern and Central Europe. LTP sensitization is present both in pollinosis and non-pollinosis patients and is associated with peach allergy in particular. The disease pattern for patients sensitized to profilin is characterized by several concomitant allergies including grass and other pollens, Rosaceae and non- Rosaceae fruits. Finally, PR-10 sensitization is primarily associated to concomitant birch pollen and apple allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regular consumption of fruits has a positive influence on human health by disease prevention. However parallel to dietetic benefits, IgE-mediated fruit allergies have been shown to be an increasing health risk for children and adults in the Northern hemisphere. The spectrum of food allergies ranges from chronical symptoms to more acute problems and even anaphylaxis. Fruit proteins with high primary sequence similarity display also homologous tertiary structures, resulting in similar epitopes to IgEs and consequently in cross-reactivity. In this review we present the major allergens of stone and pome fruits and discuss the presence of homologous proteins in small fruits. Interestingly these proteins, which might pose an allergenic potential for pre-sensitised individuals are expressed also in strawberry, raspberry and blueberry, otherwise rich in beneficial biofactors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An association between allergy to fruits and latex, and between pollen and plant‐derived food has been described. The cross‐reactive structures responsible for these associations have not yet been completely elucidated. Methods: IgE reactivity to the recombinant allergens Bet v 1 and Bet v 2, different pollens, natural latex, papain, and bromelain was Investigated In 29 patients with allergy to fruits or vegetables who lived in an area without birch trees. Results: Exactly 79.3% of patients were allergic to grass pollen, and two of them had clinical allergy to latex. Serum IgE reactivity (CAP) to birch pollen was found in 65% of patients, to Bet v 2 in 51.7%, to Bet v 1 in 3.4%, to latex in 58.6%, to bromelain in 51.7%, and to papain in 17.2% of patients. All subjects with positive IgE to Bet v 2 had also reactivity to latex, grass, olive tree, birch, and mugwort pollens. The six patients not allergic to pollen did not show IgE reactivity to latex. Bet v 1, or Bet v 2. A significant correlation was found between CAP to latex with Bet v 2 (r=0.86, P<0.001), with birch (r=0.86, P<0.001), and with ryegrass (r=0.81, P<0.001). Immunoblotting using nine sera with positive CAP to birch pollen showed IgE‐binding to a 15‐kDa band that was recognized by antiprofilin monoclonal antibody. Bet v 2 CAP could be inhibited up to 52% by ryegrass and up to 23% by mugwort. CAP to latex was almost completely inhibited by ryegrass pollen with sera from five subjects without symptoms due to latex, whereas no inhibition was observed with serum from one patient with allergy to latex. Conclusions: Patients with allergy to plant‐derived food and associated pollinosis showed a high frequency of IgE reactivity to Bet v 2, which may cause positive serum IgE determinations to latex and birch pollen due to the presence of cross‐reactive epitopes. IgE reactivity to Bet v 2 may serve as an indicator of broad sensitization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An association between allergy to fruits and latex, and between pollen and plant‐derived food has been described. The cross‐reactive structures responsible for these associations have not yet been completely elucidated. Methods: IgE reactivity to the recombinant allergens Bet v 1 and Bet v 2, different pollens, natural latex, papain, and bromelain was investigated in 29 patients with allergy to fruits or vegetables who lived in an area without birch trees. Results: Exactly 79.3% of patients were allergic to grass pollen, and two of them had clinical allergy to latex. Serum IgE reactivity (CAP) to birch pollen was found in 65% of patients, to Bet v 2 in 51.7%, to Bet v 1 in 3.4%, to latex in 58.6%, to bromelain in 51.7%, and to papain in 17.2% of patients. All subjects with positive IgE to Bet v 2 had also reactivity to latex, grass, olive tree, birch, and mugwort pollens. The six patients not allergic to pollen did not show IgE reactivity to latex, Bet v 1, or Bet v 2. A significant correlation was found between CAP to latex with Bet v 2 (r=0.86, P<0.001), with birch (r=0.86, P<0.001), and with ryegrass (r=0.81, P<0.001). Immunoblotting using nine sera with positive CAP to birch pollen showed IgE‐binding to a 15‐kDa band that was recognized by antiprofilin monoclonal antibody. Bet v 2 CAP could be inhibited up to 52% by ryegrass and up to 23% by mugwort. CAP to latex was almost completely inhibited by ryegrass pollen with sera from five subjects without symptoms due to latex, whereas no inhibition was observed with serum from one patient with allergy to latex. Conclusions: Patients with allergy to plant‐derived food and associated pollinosis showed a high frequency of IgE reactivity to Bet v 2, which may cause positive serum IgE determinations to latex and birch pollen due to the presence of cross‐reactive epitopes. IgE reactivity to Bet v 2 may serve as an indicator of broad sensitization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background It is not uncommon that patients allergic to fruits such as apple, pear, and peach, refer adverse reactions after the ingestion of the whole fruit, but subsequently tolerate the pulp. Objective This study aimed to compare the allergenicity of peels and pulps of apple, peach, and pear in 33 patients allergic to these fruits. Methods Clinical reactivity to the ingestion of whole fruit (peel + pulp) and pulp was established by medical history. Peels and pulps were tested separately in skin prick tests (SPTs), histamine release tests (HRTs) and RASTs. Cross-allergenicity between peel and pulp of apple and peach was studied by RAST inhibition. Results Adverse reactions appeared more frequently and were more severe when the whole fruit was eaten. More than 40% of patients allergic to apple and pear tolerated the ingestion of the pulp of these fruits, and reactions were only elicited by the intake of the whole fruit. Peels induced higher SPTs, HRTs and RASTs than pulps. An important cross-allergenicity was found between the peel and pulp of apple and peach, although the amount of the shared allergenic epitopes seemed to be higher in peels. Conclusion Our results suggest that peels of Rosaceae fruits such as apple, peach, and pear, have a higher allergenicity than pulps, which is clinically relevant. This aspect should be considered in the evaluation of patients allergic to Rosaceae fruits, and in the production of diagnostic materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The presence of IgE antibodies to the allergens rBet v 1 and rBet v 2 was investigated in patients with known sensitization to ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and/or olive (Olea europaea) pollen, by comparing a group of 10 patients who had allergic symptoms after ingestion of fruits (A) with a group of 17 patients who had only seasonal respiratory symptoms (B). There was no significant difference between the two groups for total IgE. All patients showed specific IgE to both L. perenne and O. europaea. No specific IgE binding to rBet v 1 was detected in any patient. The incidence of the presence of IgE antibodies to rBet v 2 was 90% in the group with fruit allergy (A) and 35% in group B. We found a significant association between presence of IgE antibodies to rBet v 2 and fruit allergy (P=0.007). Specific IgE values to O. europaea pollen were higher in the fruit-allergy group than the group without fruit allergy (P=0.032), In conclusion, pollen-allergic patients with specific IgE to birch pollen profilin show a significantly elevated frequency of fruit allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of latex allergy in fruit-allergic patients, and to assess its clinical significance. Fifty-seven fruit-allergic patients and 50 non-fruit-allergic atopic patient controls were studied. All patients were questioned about conventional immediate symptoms after contact with latex products. Patients also underwent skin prick testing and determination of specific serum IgE to latex, as well as a screening test for environmental allergens. Immunologic latex sensitization occurred in 49/57 (85.9%) fruit-allergic patients, who showed a positive STP and/or CAP to latex, but in only two controls (P<0.001). Six out of 57 (10.5%) fruit-allergic patients suffered from clinically relevant latex allergy. Symptoms included contact urticaria, angioedema. conjunctivitis, generalized urticaria, and moderate anaphylactic reactions. No control reported symptoms with latex products (P=0.052). In all patients, clinical symptoms to fruits preceded a history of latex allergy. The fruits most associated were melon, peach, and banana. From our data, we conclude that there is a potential for allergic reactions to latex in patients with allergy to fruit. All patients with fruit allergy should be screened for individual risk of latex allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A method based on ion-exchange column chromatography to enhance the protein content of fruit allergenic extracts was found to help make the subsequent SDS-PAGE immunoblotting assays possible; otherwise, they were difficult to achieve due to the high carbohydrate content. Fractionated extracts of apple, pear, and peach (peel and pulp) were obtained by anion-exchange chromatography (Q-Sepharose™ column), providing clear electrophoretic patterns which allowed IgE detection by enzymatic assays of the transferred membranes. This chromatographic method produced in one single step an enriched extract directly from the standard crude aqueous one, with an increment in the protein content of more than sixfold, on average; thus, it proved to be more suitable than the usual chemical fractionation procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Latex allergy is becoming a major health concern among healthcare workers, of whom approximately 2.8 to 18% are reportedly sensitized. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of a natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy screening program to identify sensitized hospital employees. Nurses ( n = 130) assigned to operating theaters and intensive care units were evaluated using a written questionnaire for symptoms of atopy (asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczyma), possible reactions to latex gloves, other medical devices and previous surgery. Serological testing for total immunoglobulin E (IgE), latex-specific IgE, and specific-IgE to melon, banana, kiwi, tomato, and chestnut were performed using Pharmacia CAP radioallergosorbent tests. Skin pick test (SPT) for latex allergen was also performed. Elevated serum total IgE was found in 22(16.9%) of the 130 nurses, 3(16.7%) of whom had increased latex-specific IgE further confirmed by SPT. The overall prevalence of latex allergy was 2.3% (3/130). No cross reactive fruit-allergy was found among the latex-sensitized nurses. This study supports the existence of other forms of atopy are related to an increased risk of latex sensitization. The NRL screening program used in this study is feasible for use in identifying latex-sensitized employees [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines case of urticaria and angiedema due to edible azufaifa fruit. Treatment of the patient with subcutaneous epinephrine and intravenous corticosteroids and antihistamines; Prevalence of fruit allergies in individuals allergic to latex; Explanation on the cross-reactivity between latex and azufaifa.

Examines the occurrence of adverse reactions to pomegranate. Symptoms of the allergy; Employment of skin prick tests; Sensitivity of patients to pollens.

Fruits and vegetables are commonly implicated in food allergy. In Spain, fresh fruits are the most frequent cause of food allergy, and fruits belonging to the Rosaceae family are the most frequently implicated. A 36-year-old man was referred to allergy department for allergologic investigation because, after eating cherries, he had immediately presented vomiting, dyspnea, itching, and generalized edema, mainly of his lips, eyelids, and scrotum. He had a clinical history of hay fever, but he had never had symptoms related to the ingestion of fruits or vegetables.