Search

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (E.R.A.S.) is a multimodal, evidence-based and patient-centered pathway designed to minimize surgical stress, enhancing recovery and improving perioperative outcomes. However, considering that the potential clinical implication of E.R.A.S. on patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (V.A.T.S.) has not properly defined, we proposed to implement our minimally invasive program with a specific clinical pathway able to enhance recovery after lung resection. Aim of this study was to assess the impact of this integrated program of Enhanced Pathway of Care (E.P.C.) in Uniportal V.A.T.S. patients undergoing lung resection, in terms of efficiency and safety. We conducted a retrospective, observational study enrolling patients undergoing uniportal V.A.T.S. resections from January 2015 to May 2020. Two groups were created: pre-E.P.C. and E.P.C. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to evaluate length of stay (LOS), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and readmission rate (READM). We analyzed 1167 patients (E.P.C. group: 182; pre-E.P.C. group: 985). E.P.C. group has a mean LOS shorter compared to pre-E.P.C. group (3.13 vs 4.19 days, p < 0.0001) without increasing on CPC (E.P.C. 12% vs pre-E.P.C. 11%, p = 0.74) and READM rate (E.P.C. 1.6% vs pre-E.P.C. 4.9%, p = 0.07). In particular, the LOS was shortened in the E.P.C. patients submitted to lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection. Moreover, the three subgroups had similar CPC and READM rates for E.P.C. and control patients. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the benefits and safety of E.P.C. program showing a reduction of LOS for patients undergoing uniportal V.A.T.S. resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Unpredictable difficult laryngoscopy remains a challenge for anaesthesiologists, especially if difficult ventilation occurs during standard laryngoscopy. Accurate airway assessment should always be performed, but the common clinical screening tests have shown low sensitivity and specificity with a limited predictive value. Ultrasound-based airway assessment has been proposed recently as a useful, simple, noninvasive bedside tool as an adjunct to clinical methods, but to date, few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation, and these are mostly limited to specific groups of patients.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the sonographic measurements of anterior cervical soft tissues thickness and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy in patients with normal clinical screening tests.Design: Prospective, single blinded, observational study.Setting: Operating theatre of a teaching hospital from May 2017 to September 2017.Patients: A total of 301 patients at least 18 years of age undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were included in the study.Outcome Measures: Pre-operative evaluation was performed before surgery, demographic variables were collected and clinical screening tests to predict a difficult airway were performed. Patients with predicted difficult intubation were excluded. A 10 to 13-MHz linear ultrasound transducer was placed in the transverse plane and the thickness of the anterior cervical soft tissues was measured at two levels [thyrohyoid membrane (pre-epiglottic space) and vocal cords (laryngeal inlet)] with the patient's head in a neutral position. At each level, the distance from the skin in the median axis and the surrounding area was measured. The laryngoscopic view was graded by a different anaesthetist with more than 5 years of experience with direct laryngoscopy, blinded to the ultrasound assessments.Results: The 'pre-epiglottic space thickness' at the level of thyrohyoid membrane was measured as the median distance from skin to epiglottis (mDSE) and the pre-epiglottic area was calculated; the mDSE cut-off value of 2.54 cm (sensitivity 82%, specificity 91%) and the pre-epiglottic area cut-off value of 5.04 cm (sensitivity 85%, specificity 88%) were the best predictors of a Cormack-Lehane grade at least 2b at direct laryngoscopy and of difficult intubation. The cut-off value of mDSE showed greater sensitivity in female patients (94 vs. 86%) and greater specificity in male patients (92 vs. 83%). No correlation was found between difficult laryngoscopy and ultrasound assessments at the level of the vocal cords.Conclusion: Airways ultrasounds might be considered as a predictor of restricted/difficult laryngoscopy and unpredicted difficult intubation.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03547193. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) has been considered a tempting mode of ventilation during acute respiratory failure within the concept of open lung ventilation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to verify whether adult patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure have a higher number of ventilator-free days at day 28 when ventilated in APRV compared to conventional ventilation strategy. Secondary outcomes were difference in PaO2/FiO2 at day 3, ICU length of stay (LOS), ICU and hospital mortality, mean arterial pressure (MAP), risk of barotrauma and level of sedation. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database until December 2018. Results: We considered five RCTs for the analysis enrolling a total of 330 patients. For ventilatory-free day at day 28, the overall mean difference (MD) between APRV and conventional ventilation was 6.04 days (95%CI 2.12, 9.96, p = 0.003; I2 = 65%, p = 0.02). Patients treated with APRV had a lower ICU LOS than patients treated with conventional ventilation (MD 3.94 days [95%CI 1.44, 6.45, p = 0.002; I2 = 37%, p = 0.19]) and a lower hospital mortality (RD 0.16 [95%CI 0.02, 0.29, p = 0.03; I2 = 0, p = 0.5]). PaO2/FiO2 at day 3 was not different between the two groups (MD 40.48 mmHg [95%CI − 25.78, 106.73, p = 0.23; I2 = 92%, p < 0.001]). MAP was significantly higher during APRV (MD 5 mmHg [95%CI 1.43, 8.58, p = 0.006; I2 = 0%, p = 0.92]). Then, there was no difference regarding the onset of pneumothorax under the two ventilation strategies (RR 1.94 [95%CI 0.54, 6.94, p = 0.31; I2 = 0%, p = 0.74]). ICU mortality and sedation level were not included into quantitative analysis. Conclusion: This study showed a higher number of ventilator-free days at 28 day and a lower hospital mortality in acute hypoxemic patients treated with APRV than conventional ventilation, without any negative hemodynamic impact or higher risk of barotrauma. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution because of the low-quality evidence supporting them and the moderate heterogeneity found. Other well-designed RCTs need to be conducted to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]