Search

Background: The overall survival rate of advanced cancer patients has improved thanks to the development of modern medical treatments, particularly new and innovative chemotherapeutic agents such as targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Current Concepts: Chemotherapy is administered in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings, and its ultimate goal is to improve overall survival. Chemotherapy has several proven and valuable clinical benefits, but also many side effects that cannot be ignored, especially in patients with poor European Cancer Oncology Group performance status. Therefore, we must carefully weigh and trade off the benefits and harms from many chemotherapy agents. In fact, it can be difficult to determine whether advanced cancer patients really benefit from chemotherapy, which is why a number of value measurement tools such as the American Society Clinical Oncology-Value Framework and the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale have been developed. Discussion and Conclusion: We need to include individual cancer patients in decision-making processes and use appropriate shared decision-making to decide whether or not to administer chemotherapy. Furthermore, we should perform rational trade-offs in consideration of limited health resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The overall survival rate of advanced cancer patients has improved thanks to the development of modern medical treatments, particularly new and innovative chemotherapeutic agents such as targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Current Concepts: Chemotherapy is administered in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings, and its ultimate goal is to improve overall survival. Chemotherapy has several proven and valuable clinical benefits, but also many side effects that cannot be ignored, especially in patients with poor European Cancer Oncology Group performance status. Therefore, we must carefully weigh and trade off the benefits and harms from many chemotherapy agents. In fact, it can be difficult to determine whether advanced cancer patients really benefit from chemotherapy, which is why a number of value measurement tools such as the American Society Clinical Oncology-Value Framework and the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale have been developed. Discussion and Conclusion: We need to include individual cancer patients in decision-making processes and use appropriate shared decision-making to decide whether or not to administer chemotherapy. Furthermore, we should perform rational trade-offs in consideration of limited health resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This study aimed to confirm the decision-making patterns for life-sustaining treatment (LST) and analyze medical service utilization changes after enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act. Materials and Methods Of 1,237 patients who completed legal forms for life-sustaining treatment (hereafter called the LST form) at three academic hospitals and died at the same institutions, 1,018 cancer patients were included. Medical service utilization and costs were analyzed using claims data. Results The median time to death from completion of the LST form was three days (range, 0 to 248 days). Of these, 517 people died within two days of completing the document, and 36.1% of all patients prepared the LST form themselves. The frequency of use of the intensive care unit, continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation was significantly higher when the families filled out the form without knowing the patient's intention. In the top 10% of the medical expense groups, the decision-makers for LST were family members rather than patients (28% patients vs. 32% family members who knew and 40% family members who did not know the patient's intention). Conclusion The cancer patient's own decision-making rather than the family's decision was associated with earlier decision-making, less use of some critical treatments (except chemotherapy) and expensive evaluations, and a trend toward lower medical costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: At the end of life, communication is a key factor for good care. However, in clinical practice, it is difficult to adequately discuss end-of-life care. In order to understand and analyze how decision-making related to life-sustaining treatment (LST) is performed, the shared decision-making (SDM) behaviors of physicians were investigated. Methods: A questionnaire was designed after reviewing the literature on attitudes toward SDM or decision-making related to LST. A final item was added after consulting experts. The survey was completed by internal medicine residents and hematologists/medical oncologists who treat terminal cancer patients. Results: In total, 202 respondents completed the questionnaire, and 88.6% said that the decision to continue or end LST is usually a result of SDM since they believed that sufficient explanation is provided to patients and caregivers, patients and caregivers make their own decisions according to their values, and there is sufficient time for patients and caregivers to make a decision. Expected satisfaction with the decisionmaking process was the highest for caregivers (57.4%), followed by physicians (49.5%) and patients (41.1%). In total, 38.1% of respondents said that SDM was adequately practiced when making decisions related to LST. The most common reason for inadequate SDM was time pressure (89.6%). Conclusion: Although most physicians answered that they practiced SDM when making decisions regarding LST, satisfactory SDM is rarely practiced in the clinical field. A model for the proper implementation of SDM is needed, and additional studies must be conducted to develop an SDM model in collaboration with other academic organizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The main purpose of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act recently enacted in Korea is to respect the patient's selfdetermination. We aimed to investigate the current status and features of patient self-determination after implementation of the law. Materials and Methods Between February 2018 and January 2019, 54,635 cancer deaths were identified from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database. We analyzed the characteristics of decedents who complied with the law process by self-determination compared with decedents with family determination and with decedents who did not comply with the law process. Results In multivariable analysis, patients with self-determination were younger, were less likely to live in rural areas, were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile, were less likely to be treated in general hospitals, and were more likely to show a longer time from cancer diagnosis compared with patients with family determination. Compared with patients who did not comply with the law process, patients with self-determination were younger, lived in Seoul or capital area, were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile, were treated in general hospitals, were less likely to have genitourinary or hematologic malignancies, scored higher on the Charlson comorbidity index, and showed a longer time from cancer diagnosis. Patients with self-determination were more likely to use hospice and less likely to use intensive care units (ICUs) at the end-of-life (EOL). Conclusion Decedents with self-determination were more likely to be younger, reside in the Seoul or capital area, show a longer time from cancer diagnosis, and were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile. They utilized hospice more frequently, and received less ICU care at the EOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose In Korea, the "Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life" was enacted on February 4, 2018. This study was conducted to analyze the current state of life-sustaining treatment decisions based on National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data after the law came into force. Materials and Methods The data of 173,028 cancer deaths were extracted from NHIS qualification data between November 2015 and January 2019. Results The number of cancer deaths complied with the law process was 14,438 of 54,635 cases (26.4%). The rate of patient self-determination was 49.0%. The patients complying with the law process have used a hospice center more frequently (28% vs. 14%). However, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the patients who complied with and without the law process (ICU admission, 23% vs. 21%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis in the comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the law and the analysis according to the compliance with the law. The patients who complied with the law process received cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a lower rate. Conclusion The law has positive effects on the rate of life-sustaining treatment decision by patient's determination. However, there was no sufficient effect on the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, which could protect the patient from unnecessary or harmful interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This study aimed to validate the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral to Care (SPARC) as an effective tool for screening palliative care needs among Korean cancer patients. Materials and Methods The English version of the SPARC was translated by four Korean oncologists and reconciled by a Korean language specialist and a medical oncologist fluent in English. After the first version of the Korean SPARC (K-SPARC) was developed, back-translation into English was performed by a professional translator and bilingual oncologist. The back-translated version was reviewed by the original author (S.H.A.), and modifications were made (ver. 2). The second version of the K-SPARC was tested against other questionnaires, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Results Thirty patients were enrolled in the pilot trial. Fifteen were male, and the median age was 64.5 years. Six patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or more. All patients except one were receiving chemotherapy. Regarding internal consistency, the Cronbach's a scores for physical symptoms, psychological issues, religious and spiritual issues, independency and activity, family and social issues, and treatment issues were 0.812, 0.804, 0.589, 0.843, 0.754, and 0.822, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the SPARC and FACT-G were 0.479 (p=0.007) for the physical domain and -0.130 (p=0.493) for the social domain. Conclusion This pilot study indicates that the K-SPARC could be a reliable tool to screen for palliative care needs among Korean cancer patients. A further study to validate our findings is ongoing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of burnout and occupational stress among medical oncologists in Korea. Materials and Methods A survey was conducted of medical oncologists who were members of Korean Society for Medical Oncology (KSMO) using the Korean Occupational Stress Scale, the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and supplemental questions about work and lifestyle factors. Results Among 220 active KSMO members, 111 responses were collected. The median age was 42 years (range, 32 to 63 years). Two-thirds of responders worked 6 days per week and half of them worked a total of 60-80 hours per week. Each medical oncologist treated a median of 90-120 patients per week in outpatient clinics and 20-30 patients per week in patient practices. MBI subscales indicated a high level of emotional exhaustion in 74%, a high level of depersonalization in 86%, and a low level of personal accomplishment in 65%: 68% had professional burnout according to high emotional exhaustion and high depersonalization scores. The risk of burnout was higher for medical oncologists aged from 30-39 than 40-49 years, and unmarried than married. Considering personal accomplishment, females had a higher risk of burnout. The median score of occupational stress was 63 (range, 43 to 88). Having night-duty call was the strongest risk factor on more stress. A higher stress score was associated with a higher prevalence of burnout. Conclusion Burnout and occupational stress are quite common amongst Korean medical oncologists. Achieving a healthy work-life balance, ensuring balanced workload distribution, and engaging in proper stress relief solutions are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Physician competency in end-of-life (EOL) care is becoming increasingly important. This study investigated the EOL care curricula in Korean medical schools. Methods: Questionnaires were issued to the faculty members responsible for the EOL care curricula at each of the medical schools. These included questions on the structure and content of the curricula, teaching methods, and faculty members' attitudes to the curricula. Results: Characteristics of the EOL care curricula were compiled from 27 (66%) of the 41 medical schools. All of the medical schools taught essential aspects of the EOL care curriculum either as a separate course or embedded within other medical education courses. The mean time spent on EOL care teaching was 10 hrs (range, 2~32 hrs). The most frequently taught topics were delivering bad news (100%) and symptom management (74%). When the palliative care education assessment tool (PEAT) was used to evaluate the curricula, a median of 11 PEAT objectives was met (range, 2~26; maximum, 83). More than two teaching methods were used in most of the curricula. However, lectures were the only teaching method used by three medical schools. 78% of faculty members who were responsible for curriculum reported dissatisfaction with it, whereas 18% believed that the time allotted to it was adequate. Only 7% of these faculty members believed that their students were adequately prepared to practice EOL care. Conclusion: There is a need to improve EOL care education in basic medical curricula and to take a more systematic approach to achieving learning outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study sought to explore the association between physician practice patterns and patient education, with a focus on breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). A nationwide online survey was conducted by 92 Korean physicians. Thirteen questions on Korean physician's assessment, prescription, patient education practices, and knowledge regarding BTcP were administered. Based on their responses, physicians were divided using two methods: (1) by their patient education practices, where the "education group" always explained the distinction between background pain and BTcP and the "less education group" which explained it less frequently; and (2) by their definition of BTcP, as occurring "after control of background pain" or "regardless of background pain." We compared practice patterns using Fisher's exact test or Student's t test and performed multiple logistic regression analysis. The "education group" (65 physicians, 70.7 %) was more likely than the "less education group" to assess BTcP meticulously (odds ratio [OR] 17.13, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.98-58.94), prepare rescue medications in advance (OR 3.67, 95 % CI 1.36-9.90), and give explicit instructions regarding medications (OR 36.68, 95 % CI 5.63-239.15). Physicians who defined BTcP as occurring "after control of background pain" were more likely to explain how to take rescue medication (P < 0.05) than physicians who defined BTcP as occurring "regardless of background pain." Korean physicians' BTcP practice patterns may be affected by whether they consistently educate patients on the distinction between background pain and BTcP, regardless of their knowledge of the definition of BTcP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To give informed consent, a patient needs to sufficiently understand the information provided by a physician to decide among treatment options. Although shared decision-making is becoming an important aspect of patient-centered care, little is known about decision-making by cancer patients in Korea.Objectives: This study assessed Korean cancer patients' understanding of treatment goals and the need to obtain further information after a physician obtained informed consent for radiotherapy.Methods: In this prospective study, doctors and patients completed questionnaires independently after informed consent for radiotherapy had been obtained. The questionnaires for the doctors and patients were comprised of matched items regarding treatment aims and the need for further information.Results: The study enrolled 103 cancer patients scheduled for radiotherapy. The proportion of respondents who stated that the intent of treatment was to bring about a cure was 80.6% among the patients (83 of 103 patients) and 53.4% (55 of 103 patients) among the doctors (p = 0.000). The proportion of respondents who believed that the aim was prolongation of life was 16.5 and 1.9%, respectively (p = 0.000). Regarding the need for further information, 42.7% (44/103) of the patients did not want further information because they had faith in the physicians' medical expertise.Conclusion: Many Korean cancer patients misunderstand the aims of treatment and half of participants do not want further information. Physicians should address whether specific interventions can solve these barriers so that Korean cancer patients can make truly autonomous treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This study was conducted to explore the process and operation of a cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) after the reimbursement decision in Korea, and to identify ways to overcome the major barriers to effective and sustainable MDTs. Materials and Methods Approximately 1,000 cancer specialists, including medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, and radiologists in general hospitals in Korea were invited to complete the survey. The questionnaire covered the following topics: organizational structure of MDTs, candidates for consulting, the clinical decision-making initiative, and responsibility for dealing with legal disputes. Results We collected a total of 179 responses (18%) from physicians at institutions where an MDT approach was active. A surgical oncologist (91%), internist (90%), radiologist (89%), radiation oncologist (86%), pathologist (71%), and trainees (20%) regularly participated in MDT operations. Approximately 55% of respondents stated that MDTs met regularly. In cases of a split opinion, the physician in charge (69%) or chairperson (17%) made the final decision, and most (86%) stated they followed the final decision. About 15% and 32% of respondents were "very satisfied" and "satisfied," respectively, with the current MDT's operations. Among 38 institutional representatives, 34% responded that the MDT operation became more active and 18% stated an MDT was newly implemented after the reimbursement decision. Conclusion The reimbursement decision invigorated MDT operations in almost half of eligible hospitals. Dissatisfaction regarding current MDTs was over 50%, and the high discordance rates regarding risk sharing suggest that it is necessary to revise the current system of MDTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adequate control of breakthrough pain is essential for patients with cancer. Managing breakthrough pain mainly depends on understanding the concept of breakthrough pain and the proper usage of rescue medication by physicians. This study aims to assess the attitudes and practice patterns of palliative physicians in managing breakthrough pain for patients in Korea. Methods: This study was based on data from the 2014 breakthrough cancer pain survey conducted by the Korean Society for Hospice and Palliative Care. One hundred physicians participated in the online survey. Among total 33 self-reported questionnaires, twelve items were selected in this analysis. Results: Rapid onset of action is the main influencing factor in selecting rescue opioids. Oral oxycodone (65%) and parenteral morphine (27%) are commonly used. A few physicians (3%) prefer to use transmucosal fentanyl. The percentage of physicians prescribing oral oxycodone due to its rapid onset of action is just 21.5%, whereas the percentage of physicians using parenteral morphine is 81.5%. Two thirds of respondents (66%) answered that breakthrough pain is not well controlled with rescue medications. Conclusion: There is a gap between the needs of physicians in terms of the perceived difficulties of managing breakthrough cancer pain and their practice patterns selecting rescue medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose We evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) in Korean patients admitted with cancer pain. Materials and Methods In-hospital patients with cancer pain completed a questionnaire concerning severity of background cancer pain (BCP), prevalence and treatment for BTcP, sleep disorders, and satisfaction with cancer pain treatment. Medical records showing medications for BCP and BTcP were also evaluated. Results Total 609 patients with controlled BCP enrolled. Mean age of the patients was 59.5 years old, and 59% were male. Of all patients, 177 (29%) complained of BTcP. No clinical characteristic predicted BTcP. Of the 177 patients with BTcP, 56% did not receive treatment for BTcP. Patients with BTcP showed significant association with a sleep disorder and dissatisfaction with pain control, compared to those without BTcP (p < 0.0001 and p=0.0498, respectively). Oxycodone-immediate release was the most commonly used short-acting analgesic, followed by intravenous morphine. Conclusion The prevalence of BTcP was 29% in patients admitted with controlled BCP. Although the patients had well-controlled BCP, BTcP showed association with a lower quality of life in patients with cancer. More medical attention is needed for detection and management of BTcP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation-induced hemorrhagic gastritis is an intractable and dangerous condition. We describe a 59-year-old female patient with radiation-induced hemorrhagic gastritis. The patient underwent postoperative radiation therapy with a dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions after a radical operation for a Klatskin tumor. Radiation volume included the gastric antrum. Approximately three months after radiation therapy, she was admitted for melena and anemia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed an area of bleeding in the gastric antrum that was so diffuse that effective laser coagulation was not feasible. After failure of various treatments and transfusion of 7,040 mL of packed red blood cells, we successfully stopped the hemorrhage using oral prednisolone treatment. Based on this case, we think that oral prednisolone treatment can be tried as a first treatment for potentially life-threatening radiation-induced hemorrhagic gastritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although cancer pain is prevalent, under-treatment still remains a problem. Knowledge of and compliance with guidelines for management of cancer pain were analyzed for exploration of physician-related barriers to cancer pain management. In addition, physicians' knowledge and its correlation with cancer pain control were audited. Materials and Methods: From July 8 to December 2, 2010, a nationwide survey of house staff enquired about their knowledge of cancer pain control guidelines, and the medical records of patients under their care were analyzed. Results: In total, 180 physicians participated in the study. Their average score for knowledge was 14.6 (range, 7 to 19; maximum possible, 20). When the knowledge score was divided into low, medium, and high scores, patients receiving care from physicians with high levels of knowledge tended to have better cancer pain control (p<0.001). Of the total patients with severe pain, 19.5% were not prescribed strong opioids, and 40% were not prescribed any medication for breakthrough pain. Conclusion: Physicians' knowledge of guidelines for control of cancer pain showed an association with improvement of pain management. Overall adherence to the guidelines was lacking. Continuous interventions such as education and audits regarding cancer pain control guidelines for physician are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prescription of essential or futile medications for terminal cancer patients during their final admission. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical charts of terminally ill cancer patients admitted to the Hemato-oncology Department of two teaching hospitals from March 1, 2007 to December 31, 2009. Essential medications were based on the drugs listed by the International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care, while futile medications were defined when short-term benefit to patients with respect to survival, quality of life, or symptom control was not anticipated. Results: A total of 196 patients were included. Among essential medications, strong opioids were the most frequently prescribed drugs during the last admission (62.2% fentanyl, 44.3% morphine), followed by megestrol (46.0%), and metoclopramide (37.2%); 51% of gastric protectors were prescribed with potential futility. Anti-hypertensive and antiglycemic agents were administered to those who experienced arterial blood pressure below 90 mm Hg (47.3%) or presented with a single measurement of fasting glucose below 50 mg/dL (10.7%), respectively. Statins were prescribed to 6.1% (12/196) of patients, and 75% of those prescriptions were regarded as futile. Conclusion: Our data suggest that effective prescription of essential medications and withdrawal from futile medications should be actively reconciled for improvement of a patient's end-of-life care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: End-of-dose failure is commonly observed as therapeutic levels of sustained-release opioids fall. However, little is known about using these medications for cancer pain control. To determine the dosing frequency of sustained-release opioids (morphine, oxycodone, and transdermal fentanyl) and the prevalence of end-of-dose failure in clinical practice, a patient-reported survey was performed. Methods: A multicenter survey was conducted in 56 hospitals in Korea between June and November 2008. Results: The study enrolled 1,097 cancer outpatients who were prescribed oral sustained-release opioids (morphine or oxycodone) or transdermal fentanyl. Of the oral sustained-release opioid patients, 67.0% took oral sustained-release oral opioids twice daily, while 26.2% took them more than twice daily. Of the transdermal fentanyl patients, 88.8% wore the patch for 72 h. Of the enrolled patients, 48.3% experienced worsening pain just before the next sustained-release opioid dose, and 36.8% of these patients took medication earlier than the prescribed dosing schedule. Patients felt that oral sustained-release opioids gave adequate pain control lasting an average of 9.6 h, versus an average of 62.9 h for transdermal fentanyl. Conclusion: This survey demonstrated that sustained-release opioids are used by patients in a manner that is inconsistent with standard recommendations. End-of-dose failure is suggested to explain increased dosing frequency, and patients reported that adequate pain relief lasted for less time than was stated in the manufacturers' prescription recommendation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To examine the current practices relating to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders for terminal patients with cancer at teaching hospitals in Korea. Methods: The records of 387 deaths from January 1 to December 31, 2005 at four cancer centers were identified and reviewed to assess the DNR delineation. Basic demographics, circumstances surrounding the establishment of the DNR directive, the percentage of orders for identified populations, and the time interval between DNR consent and death were evaluated. Results: An order of DNR consent was obtained from 296 patients (76%) of a total of 387 patients. All DNR consents were made between the physician and family, without involving the patient. Written preprinted DNR consent forms were used in 169 (57%) cases and 127 patients (43%) had verbal DNR permission. DNR consent was interpreted in two ways: one forbade resuscitation in two hospitals and the other implied limited care in two other hospitals. A unilateral physician decision to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was decided for 62 (16%) patients. Terminal CPR was performed on 29 (7%) patients. DNR discussion was made within 7 days of the day of death on 228 (77%) patient among the 296 DNR consenting patients. Conclusion: From our teaching-hospital–based analysis of terminal cancer patients in Korea, consent for a DNR order was common. However, DNR order forms were not standardized and lacked room to document patient involvement in the decision. Usually the DNR decision was made within last days of the patient's life. Our results reflect the need for the improvement of end-of-life care decisions in Korea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The C5a anaphylatoxin protein plays a central role in inflammation associated with complement activation. This protein is commonly regarded as one of the most potent inducers of the inflammatory response and a C5a peptide agonist was used as a molecular adjuvant. However, the full length C5a protein has not been tested as a potential tumor therapy. In this report, we describe the creation of a mini-gene construct that directs C5a expression to any cell of interest. Functional expression could be demonstrated in the murine mammary sarcoma, EMT6. When C5a expressing cells were injected into syngeneic mice, most C5a-expressing clones had significantly reduced tumor growth. Further characterization of a clone expressing low levels of C5a demonstrated that one-third of mice injected with this line had complete tumor regression. The mice whose tumors regressed were immune to subsequent challenge with unmodified EMT6 cells, suggesting that a component of the innate immune response can be used to augment adaptive immunity. Cellular analyses demonstrated that a significant difference in actual tumor cell number could be detected as early as day 10. A block in cell cycle progression was evident at all time points and high levels of apoptosis were observed early in the regression event. These data demonstrate that the complement protein C5a can play a significant protective role in tumor immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "A Nationwide Survey of Knowledge of and Compliance with Cancer Pain Management Guidelines by Korean Physicians" by D.Y. Kim and colleagues in October 2014 issue.