Search

In the skeletal muscle tissue, cells are organized following an anisotropic architecture, which is both required during myogenesis when muscle precursor cells fuse to generate myotubes and for its contractile function. To build an in vitro skeletal muscle tissue, it is therefore essential to develop methods to organize cells in an anisotropic fashion, which can be particularly challenging, especially in 3D. In this study, we present a versatile muscle-on-chip system with adjustable collagen hollow tubes that can be seeded with muscle precursor cells. The collagen acts both as a tube-shaped hollow mold and as an extracellular matrix scaffold that can house other cell types for co-culture. We found that the diameter of the channel affects the organization of the muscle cells and that proper myogenesis was obtained at a diameter of 75 μm. In these conditions, muscle precursor cells fused into long myotubes aligned along these collagen channels, resulting in a fascicle-like structure. These myotubes exhibited actin striations and upregulation of multiple myogenic genes, reflecting their maturation. Moreover, we showed that our chip allowed muscle tissue culture and maturation over a month, with the possibility of fibroblast co-culture embedding in the collagen matrix. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During cell migration, Rho GTPases spontaneously form spatial gradients that define the front and back of cells. At the front, active Cdc42 forms a steep gradient whereas active Rac1 forms a more extended pattern peaking a few microns away. What are the mechanisms shaping these gradients, and what is the functional role of the shape of these gradients? Here we report, using a combination of optogenetics and micropatterning, that Cdc42 and Rac1 gradients are set by spatial patterns of activators and deactivators and not directly by transport mechanisms. Cdc42 simply follows the distribution of Guanine nucleotide Exchange Factors, whereas Rac1 shaping requires the activity of a GTPase-Activating Protein, β2-chimaerin, which is sharply localized at the tip of the cell through feedbacks from Cdc42 and Rac1. Functionally, the spatial extent of Rho GTPases gradients governs cell migration, a sharp Cdc42 gradient maximizes directionality while an extended Rac1 gradient controls the speed. A steep gradient of Cdc42 is at the front of migrating cells, whereas the active Rac1 gradient is graded. Here the authors show that Cdc42 gradients follow the distribution of GEFs and govern direction of migration, while Rac1 gradients require the activity of the GAP β2-chimaerin and control cell speed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]