Effective anesthesia and analgesia for hip surgery are very important in terms of reducing morbidity and mortality, functional well-being and long-term surgical results. The inclusion of peripheral nerve blocks as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy in the treatment of these patients provides significant benefits supported by evidence (1). However, the search for an ideal method that will contribute to early functional recovery while providing effective analgesia for peripheral nerve blocks continues. There is a wide variety of peripheral nerve block options for hip surgery, from deep plexus blocks such as perioperative lumbar and sacral plexus to individual nerve blocks for analgesia. Femoral nerve block (FNB) and fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), which are frequently used among peripheral blocks, are easy and safe techniques, and they provide the patient with a pain-free positioning with a decrease in pain scores and opioid use. In addition, they cause a decrease in delirium, hospital stay, and pneumonia incidence (2). It has been demonstrated that the suprainguinal approach to the fascia iliaca block extends more consistently to all nerves and provides better pain control (3). However, since they target the femoral nerve and possibly the obturator nerve in both blocks, they inevitably cause motor block of the lower extremity (4). This situation has been associated with the risk of falling in patients. Although there are recent studies on the use of quadratus lumborum and erector spina plane blocks for analgesia in hip surgery, Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block stands out due to its potential motor block sparing feature. PENG block targets the higher articular branches of the femoral, accessory obturator and obturator nerves in the plane between the iliopsoas muscle and the pubic ramus in the iliopubic eminence. Thus, the sensory innervation of the anterior hip capsule, which is largely responsible for pain, is provided. PENG block has advantages such as reduction in preoperative position pain, potential motor protective effect, and analgesic effectiveness (5). However, an important limitation is that cutaneous sensory block cannot be achieved with PENG block. For this, combinations of local anesthetic skin infiltration or lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) can be used. The iliopsoas (IP) block is a PENG-like interfascial plane block that targets IP for analgesia of the anterior hip capsule. It differs from PENG block in terms of final needle position and injection volume, which play an important role in determining motor sparing properties. Currently available clinical data support IPB, though limited, as a motor-sparing hip block. As a conclusion in line with current knowledge, PENG block and similarly IP block may offer a motor-sparing approach for hip surgery, but more research is required to determine analgesic efficacy, feasibility, and safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]