Search

To evaluate the effects of achieved systolic blood pressure (SBP) during treatment on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, the authors measured event rates of a composite primary endpoint (CV death or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke) at on-treatment SBPs of ≥140 mm Hg and the 10 mm Hg intervals of <140 mm Hg, <130 mm Hg, and <120 mm Hg in 6459 patients with diabetes (mean age, 67) and 4246 patients without diabetes (mean age, 69) from the Avoiding Cardiovascular Events in Combination Therapy in Patients Living With Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial. In the diabetic cohort, the primary endpoint was 49% lower (P<.001) at <140 mm Hg than at ≥140 mm Hg, and the separate components of this endpoint were also significantly reduced. Further SBP reductions did not improve outcomes, and at <120 mm Hg they were no longer different (except for stroke) from ≥140 mm Hg. In contrast, in the nondiabetic cohort, the primary endpoint event rate fell steadily (although not significantly) through the decreasing SBP categories until it was reduced by 45% (P=.0413) at <120 mm Hg. Total stroke rates for both the diabetic (-56%, P=.0120) and nondiabetic (-68%, P=.0067) cohorts were lowest at <120 mm Hg, and adverse renal events (serum creatinine increase ≥50%) were significantly lowest in the range of 130 mm Hg to 139 mm Hg for both cohorts. Diabetic patients (<140 mm Hg or <130 mm Hg) and nondiabetic patients (<120 mm Hg) may require different SBP targets for optimal CV protection, although stroke and renal considerations should also influence the selection of blood pressure targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypothesis/Introduction: We investigated whether diabetes modified the effectiveness of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression in hypertensive patients in the Aliskiren in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (ALLAY) trial.Materials and methods: Participants (n=465) with LVH and a BMI > 25 kg/m2 were randomized to aliskiren 300mg, losartan 100mg or both daily for 36 weeks, and LVH regression was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Renin concentration, plasma renin activity and aldosterone were assessed in a subset of patients.Results: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) (n=111, 24%) were older (61±9 vs. 58±11 years, p=0.03), had higher BMI (32.2±4.2 vs. 30.7 ± 4 kg/m2, p=0.004), higher systolic blood pressure (148±14 vs. 145±14mmHg, p=0.03) and lower eGFR (79±16 vs. 84±16ml/min, p=0.03) at baseline. Combination therapy with aliskiren plus losartan was associated with greater LVH reduction than losartan alone in patients with DM (p=0.01), but not in patients without DM (p=0.91; unadjusted interaction p=0.06; adjusted p = 0.038). In a subset of 138 participants, plasma aldosterone was reduced to a greater extent in patients with DM (p-interaction = 0.004).Conclusions: Patients with DM and LVH may derive differential benefit with dual RAAS inhibition with a combination of aliskiren and losartan compared with losartan alone with respect to LVH reduction. Whether these findings will result in improved outcomes will be further explored in larger studies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

OBJECTIVE -- To evaluate whether in hypertensive patients the risk of cardiovascular disease is greater in association with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) or the sum of its individual components. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -- Cox regression analysis models were developed to assess the influence of age, sex, ethnicity, and the individual components of MetS on risk associated with the MetS (using several definitions) of coronary outcomes, stroke, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS -- MetS was significantly associated with coronary outcomes, stroke, and all-cause mortality after adjusting for age, sex, and ethnicity. However, when the model was further adjusted for the individual components, MetS was associated with significantly increased risk of stroke (hazard ratio 1.34 [95% CI 1.07-1.68]) and all-cause mortality (1.35 [1.16-1.58]) but not coronary outcomes (fatal coronary heart disease plus nonfatal myocardial infarction 1.16 [0.95-1.43] and total coronary events 1.06 [0.91-1.24]). CONCLUSIONS- MetS, independent of its individual components, is associated with increased risk of stroke and all-cause mortality but not coronary outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE -- The purpose of this study was to determine the baseline predictors of new-onset diabetes (NOD) in hypertensive patients and to develop a risk score to identify those at high risk of NOD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -- Among 19,257 hypertensive patients in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA) who were randomly assigned to receive one of two antihypertensive regimens (atenolol ± thiazide or amlodipine ± perindopril), 14,120 were at risk of developing diabetes at baseline. Of these, 1,366 (9.7%) subsequently developed NOD during median follow-up of 5.5 years. A multivariate Cox model was developed to identify the independent predictors of NOD and individual risk scores. RESULTS -- NOD was significantly associated with an increase in baseline fasting plasma glucose (FPG), BMI, serum triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure. In contrast, amlodipine ± perindopril in comparison with atenolol ± thiazide treatment (hazard ratio 0.66 [95% CI 0.59-0.741), high HDL cholesterol, alcohol use, and age >55 years were found to be significantly protective factors. FPG was the most powerful predictor with risk increasing by 5.8 times (95% CI 5.23-6.43) for each millimole per liter rise >5 mmol/l. The risk of NOD increased steadily with increasing quartile of risk score, with a 19-fold increase (95% CI 14.3-25.4) among those in the highest compared with those in the lowest quartile. The model showed excellent internal validity and discriminative ability. CONCLUSIONS -- Baseline FPG >5 mmol/l, BMI, and use of an atenolol ± diuretic regimen were among the major determinants of NOD in hypertensive patients. The model developed from these data allows accurate prediction of NOD among hypertensive subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines the effects of losartan or atenolol in hypertensive patients without clinically evident vascular disease. Administration of the treatment to patients; Reduction of blood pressure by losartan and atenolol; Comparison of the effectiveness of losartan with atenolol in hypertensive patients.