Search

Aims: There is considerable controversy regarding optimal management of patients with paraesophageal hiatus hernia (pHH). This survey aims at identifying recommended strategies for work-up, surgical therapy, and postoperative follow-up using Delphi methodology. Methods: We conducted a 2-round, 33-question, web-based Delphi survey on perioperative management (preoperative work-up, surgical procedure and follow-up) of non-revisional, elective pHH among European surgeons with expertise in upper-GI. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Items from the questionnaire were defined as "recommended" or "discouraged" if positive or negative concordance among participants was > 75%. Items with lower concordance levels were labelled "acceptable" (neither recommended nor discouraged). Results: Seventy-two surgeons with a median (IQR) experience of 23 (14–30) years from 17 European countries participated (response rate 60%). The annual median (IQR) individual and institutional caseload was 25 (15–36) and 40 (28–60) pHH-surgeries, respectively. After Delphi round 2, "recommended" strategies were defined for preoperative work-up (endoscopy), indication for surgery (typical symptoms and/or chronic anemia), surgical dissection (hernia sac dissection and resection, preservation of the vagal nerves, crural fascia and pleura, resection of retrocardial lipoma) and reconstruction (posterior crurorrhaphy with single stitches, lower esophageal sphincter augmentation (Nissen or Toupet), and postoperative follow-up (contrast radiography). In addition, we identified "discouraged" strategies for preoperative work-up (endosonography), and surgical reconstruction (crurorrhaphy with running sutures, tension-free hiatus repair with mesh only). In contrast, many items from the questionnaire including most details of mesh augmentation (indication, material, shape, placement, and fixation technique) were "acceptable". Conclusions: This multinational European Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process to identify recommended strategies for the management of pHH. Our work may be useful in clinical practice to guide the diagnostic process, increase procedural consistency and standardization, and to foster collaborative research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is currently a lack of evidence-based guidelines regarding surveillance for recurrence after esophageal and gastric (OG) cancer surgical resection, and which symptoms should prompt endoscopic or radiological investigations for recurrence. The aim of this study was to develop a core symptom set using a modified Delphi consensus process that should guide clinicians to carry out investigations to look for suspected recurrent OG cancer in previously asymptomatic patients. Methods: A web-based survey of 42 questions was sent to surgeons performing OG cancer resections at high volume centers. The first section evaluated the structure of follow-up and the second, determinants of follow-up. Two rounds of a modified Delphi consensus process and a further consensus workshop were used to determine symptoms warranting further investigations. Symptoms with a 75% consensus agreement as suggestive of recurrent cancer were included in the core symptom set. Results: 27 surgeons completed the questionnaires. A total of 70.3% of centers reported standardized surveillance protocols, whereas 3.7% of surgeons did not undertake any surveillance in asymptomatic patients after OG cancer resection. In asymptomatic patients, 40.1% and 25.9% of centers performed routine imaging and endoscopy, respectively. The core set that reached consensus, consisted of eight symptoms that warranted further investigations included; dysphagia to solid food, dysphagia to liquids, vomiting, abdominal pain, chest pain, regurgitation of foods, unexpected weight loss and progressive hoarseness of voice. Conclusion: There is global variation in monitoring patients after OG cancer resection. Eight symptoms were identified by the consensus process as important in prompting radiological or endoscopic investigation for suspected recurrent malignancy. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to link surveillance strategies to survival outcomes and evaluate prognostic value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, minimally invasive Ivor Lewis (IL) esophagectomy with high intrathoracic anastomosis has emerged as surgical standard of care for esophageal cancer in expert centers. Alongside this process, many divergent technical aspects of this procedure have been devised in different centers. This study aims at achieving international consensus on the surgical steps of IL reconstruction using Delphi methodology. Methods: The expert panel consisted of specialized esophageal surgeons from 8 European countries. During a two-round Delphi process, a detailed analysis and consensus on key steps of intrathoracic gastric tube reconstruction (IL esophagectomy) was performed. Results: Response rates in Delphi rounds 1 and 2 were 100% (22 of 22 experts) and 83.3% (20 of 24 experts), respectively. Three essential technical areas of intrathoracic gastric tube reconstruction were identified: first, vascularization of the gastric conduit, second, gastric mobilization, tube formation and pull-up, and third, anastomotic technique. In addition, 3 main techniques for minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis are currently practiced: (i) end-to-side circular stapled, (ii) end-to-side double stapling, and (iii) side-to-side linear stapled technique. The step-by-step procedural analysis unveiled common approaches but also different expert practice. Conclusion: This precise technical description may serve as a clinical guideline for intrathoracic reconstruction after esophagectomy. In addition, the results may aid to harmonize the technical evolution of this complex surgical procedure and thereby facilitate surgical training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Goals-of-care discussions aim to establish patient values for shared medical decision-making. These discussions are relevant towards end-of-life as patients may receive non-beneficial treatments if they have never discussed preferences for care. End-of-life care is provided in Emergency Departments (EDs) but little is known regarding ED-led goals-of-care discussions. We aimed to explore practitioner perspectives on goals-of-care discussions for adult ED patients nearing end-of-life. We report the qualitative component of a mixed methods study regarding a 'Goals-of-Care' form in an Australian ED. Eighteen out of 34 doctors who completed the form were interviewed. We characterised ED-led goals-of-care consultations for the first time. Emergency doctors perceive goals-of-care discussions to be relevant to their practice and occurring frequently. They aim to ensure appropriate care is provided prior to review by the admitting team, focusing on limitations of treatment and clarity in the care process. ED doctors felt they could recognise end-of-life and that ED visits often prompt consideration of end-of-life care planning. They wanted long-term practitioners to initiate discussions prior to patient deterioration. There were numerous interpretations of palliative care concepts. Standardisation of language, education, collaboration and further research is required to ensure Emergency practitioners are equipped to facilitate these challenging conversations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective : There is limited literature to inform the content and format of Goals‐of‐Care forms, for use by doctors when they are undertaking these important conversations. Methods : This was a prospective, qualitative and quantitative study evaluating the utility of a new 'Goals‐of‐Care' form to doctors in a private, tertiary ED, used from December 2016 to February 2017 at Cabrini, Melbourne. A Goals‐of‐Care form was designed, incorporating medical aims of therapy and patient values and preferences. Doctors wishing to complete a Not‐for‐CPR form were also supplied with the trial Goals‐of‐Care form. Form use, content and patient progress were followed. Doctors completing a form were invited to interview. Results : Forms were used in 3% of attendances, 120 forms were taken for use and 108 were analysed. The median patient age was 91, 81% were Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) positive and patients had a 48% 6‐month mortality. A total of 34 doctors completed the forms, 16 were interviewed (two ED trainees, 11 senior ED doctors and three others). Theme saturation was only achieved for the senior doctors interviewed. Having a Goals‐of‐Care form was valued by 88% of doctors. The frequency of section use was: Aims‐of‐Care 91%; Quality‐of‐Life 75% (the term was polarising); Functional Impairments 35%; and Outcomes of Value 29%. Opinions regarding the ideal content and format varied. Some doctors liked free‐text space and others tick‐boxes. The median duration of the conversation and documentation was 10 min (interquartile range 6–20 min). Conclusions : Having a Goals‐of‐Care form in emergency medicine is supported; the ideal contents of the form was not determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We describe a novel ambulance diversion programme, piloted in Victoria. This article discusses creating increased emergency capacity during surge or disasters by utilising private EDs, tested during a recent thunderstorm asthma disaster and an influenza epidemic. Public hospitals and EDs often run at or over capacity during normal operations. This leaves limited ability to manage surges in demand, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for patients, public ED staff and ambulance services. It is feasible to create surge capacity in private EDs for public ambulance patients. Other states could consider this option to help manage health disasters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours are the most frequently occurring sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Current treatment involves complete resection although the surgical or pathological margin required remains unclear. In this study we aimed to examine the risk of local and distant recurrence following laparoscopic resection. Methods: From a prospective tumour database, we identified and risk stratified primary non-metastatic tumours treated by laparoscopic resection from 2002-2012. Local technique involves allowing a 1 cm margin for resection. We then identified all cases of tumour recurrence and tumour related death in order to calculate overall survival, freedom from GIST recurrence and disease-specific survival respectively. Results: 90 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 3.9 years (range 1 week to 12.3 years). Five-year freedom from GIST recurrence and disease-specific survival rates in the high-risk group stood at 0.63 and 0.90. In the moderate-risk group these figures stood at 0.61 and 0.80 respectively. The low- and very-low-risk groups had a 10-year recurrence-free survival of 100% with no incidences of tumour-related recurrence. There were no local recurrences seen in any group at up to 10 years. Conclusion: The low recurrence rate suggests that these tumours can safely be treated laparoscopically with an R0 resection using a macroscopic surgical margin of 10 mm. Disease-specific survival was high. This may reflect earlier detection and the use of adjuvant imatinib. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The timing of the risk factors cigarette smoking, alcohol and obesity in the development of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is unclear. Aims: To investigate these exposures in the aetiology of BE and EAC in the same population. Methods: The cohort included 24,068 men and women, aged 39-79 years, recruited between 1993 and 1997 into the prospective EPIC-Norfolk Study who provided information on anthropometry, smoking and alcohol intake. The cohort was monitored until December 2008 and incident cases identified. Results: One hundred and four participants were diagnosed with BE and 66 with EAC. A body mass index (BMI) above 23 kg/m was associated with a greater risk of BE [BMI ≥23 vs. 18.5 to <23, hazard ratio (HR) 3.73, 95 % CI 1.37-10.16], and within a normal BMI, the risk was greater in the higher category (HR 3.76, 95 % CI 1.30-10.85, BMI 23-25 vs. 18.5 to >23 kg/m). Neither smoking nor alcohol intake were associated with risk for BE. For EAC, all BMI categories were associated with risk, although statistically significant for only the highest (BMI >35 vs. BMI 18.5 to <23, HR 4.95, 95 % CI 1.11-22.17). The risk was greater in the higher category of a normal BMI (HR 2.73, 95 % CI 0.93-8.00, p = 0.07, BMI 23-25 vs. 18.5 to >23 kg/m). There was an inverse association with ≥7 units alcohol/week (HR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.29-0.88) and with wine (HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.23-1.04, p = 0.06, drinkers vs. non-drinkers). Conclusions: Obesity may be involved early in carcinogenesis and the association with EAC and wine should be explored. The data have implications for aetiological investigations and prevention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]