Search

The burden of maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa is the highest in the world. As high fertility rates present an increased risk to women's health, programmes and services have been put in place to increase access to family planning. Several studies have identified sociocultural factors as limiting access to family planning, including male resistance and women's low decision-making power. However, these studies have often used a behavioural approach that anchors barriers to access in women's attitudes or motivations. In 2019, a qualitative evaluation of a family planning programme using a behavioural approach was conducted in rural Uganda, focusing on women's attitudes and unmet needs. With hindsight, we realised that our evaluation was insufficient to adequately capture barriers that extend beyond women's motivations. This paper shares three case studies that we analysed using a structural health vulnerabilities approach. Our analysis highlights political, economic, social and cultural structures that can impede access to family planning. Using a structural health vulnerabilities approach, we identify structural barriers which have their roots in the local realities women face and propose context-specific structural recommendations. Finally, we contrast our initial results with findings the case studies presented to highlight the relevance of taking structural vulnerabilities into account in future family planning programme evaluation and women's sexual and reproductive health studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Uganda, almost half of children under 5 years old suffer from undernutrition. Undernutrition, a common form of malnutrition in children, encompasses stunting, wasting and underweight. The causes of child undernutrition are complex, suggesting that interventions to tackle malnutrition must be multifaceted. Furthermore, limited access to healthcare for vulnerable populations restricts the potential of hospital‐based strategies. Community‐based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM), which includes nutritional counselling, ready‐to‐use therapeutic foods and the outpatient management of malnutrition by caregivers, is recognised as an effective approach for children's recovery. However, evaluations of CMAM programs are largely based on biomedical and behavioural health models, failing to incorporate structural factors that influence malnutrition management. The objective of this evaluation was to understand the factors influencing malnutrition management in a CMAM program in rural Uganda, using the socioecological model to assess the multilevel determinants of outpatient malnutrition management. This evaluation used qualitative methods to identify factors related to caregivers, healthcare providers and societal structures that influence children's outpatient care. Data were collected at a community health clinic in 2019 through observations and interviews with caregivers of malnourished children. We observed 14 caregiver‐provider encounters and interviewed 15 caregivers to examine factors hindering outpatient malnutrition management. Data were thematically analysed informed by the socioecological model. Findings showed that caregivers had a limited understanding of malnutrition. Counselling offered to caregivers was inconsistent and insufficient. Poverty and gender inequality limited caregivers' access to healthcare and their ability to care for their children. Factors at the caregiver and healthcare levels interacted with societal factors to shape malnutrition management. Results suggest that CMAM programs would benefit from providing holistic interventions to tackle the structural barriers to children's care. Using a socioecological approach to program evaluation could help move beyond individual determinants to address the social dynamics shaping malnutrition management in low‐ and middle‐income countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]