1. Does Zircon Shape Retain Petrogenetic Information?
- Author
-
Scharf, T., Kirkland, C. L., Barham, M., Yakymchuk, C., and Puzyrev, V.
- Subjects
ZIRCON ,URANIUM-lead dating ,FELSIC rocks ,SEDIMENTARY rocks ,MAFIC rocks ,CRYSTAL growth ,PHASE equilibrium - Abstract
Zircon shape is commonly reported during geochronology and geochemistry analyses of igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks, but the relationship of zircon shape to primary growth environmental conditions remains poorly constrained. Current models for the control on igneous zircon shape focus on the relative growth of crystal prisms and pyramids, which are not discernible in the imaging techniques used for rapid quantification of zircon shape in geochronology sample mounts. We model the relationship between whole‐rock composition and zircon 2D shape in mineral separates from 45 mafic to felsic igneous samples, representative of Archean and Proterozoic crust in Western Australia. Shape parameters are derived from semi‐automated measurement of photomicrographs of polished zircon crystals in epoxy resin mounts. Whole‐rock composition shows a statistically significant relationship to median magmatic zircon crystal area and mathematically defined "roundness." Zircon populations show reduced median area and increased median roundness as whole‐rock silica decreases. Phase equilibrium modeling based on whole‐rock composition, and automated electron microscopy mineral maps, indicates that the compositional predisposition of zircon shape is influenced by fundamentally different physical growth environments in mafic versus felsic melts. Specifically, influential factors that differ between mafic and felsic liquids include crystallization sequence and duration—which influence unconstrained growth space—and the potential for absorption/exsolution of zirconium from the accompanying mineral assemblage. We present quantitative, explanatory models for the relationship between zircon 2D shape and whole‐rock silica and demonstrate that the relationships are adhered to across a broad spectrum of whole‐rock compositions. Plain Language Summary: Zircon is a resilient mineral that can preserve chemical information over billions of years and is used to date different types of rocks. The 2D boundary shapes of polished zircon crystals are commonly reported during their analysis. However, it is challenging to interpret the geological meaning of the 2D shapes as little is known about how the crystals' growth environment affects them. Current understanding is mostly based on 3D crystal faces that are not easily interpreted from imaging techniques geared toward rapid measurements of large quantities of zircon grains, as used during typical isotopic analysis of this mineral. We investigate whether there is geological information in easily acquired 2D zircon boundary shape. We measured the 2D shapes of zircons from different rock types and model how the shape changes with rock composition. We then model how different rock types crystallize and compare the crystallization models to mineral growth relationships seen in the rocks. We find that the 2D shape of zircon is affected by growth space, growth duration, and competition for mineral components. These three factors vary with rock composition. Thus, zircon 2D shape varies with rock composition, hinting at potentially useful, currently untapped, additional information stored in zircon grains. Key Points: Parent magma silica content influences the median 2D shape of an igneous zircon populationMajor controls of median zircon 2D boundary shape appear extrinsic to the crystalPredominant zircon crystallization processes differ between mafic and felsic rocks [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF