Search

Study aim: To evaluate the effects of the combination of Arabin pessary or cervical cerclage with vaginal micronised progesterone versus micronised progesterone or no medical management on the outcomes of pregnancies in women with large uterine fibroids Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, observational, controlled study in 120 women aged 18–45 years with large uterine (≥8 cm) fibroids diagnosed in the first trimester, who underwent treatment in the regional perinatal center of the Omsk Regional Clinical Hospital between 2015 and 2019. Women in Group A (n = 90) were divided into two subgroups. In Subgroup A1 (n = 35), participants received the combination of a cervical procedure (Arabin pessary or cerclage) and micronised progesterone, and in Subgroup A2 (n = 55) all participants additionally underwent myomectomy. In Group B (n = 18), only micronised progesterone was used. In Group C (n = 12), no medical therapy was administered during pregnancy. Results: Large uterine fibroids in pregnancy were associated with a threatened pregnancy loss in 46.4% of women and pain in almost 40% of women. Myomectomy in pregnancy was performed in 55 women. The combination of Arabin pessary or cervical cerclage with micronized progesterone reduced the rates of preterm delivery by 2.2-fold versus the progesterone-only group and by 11.2-fold versus no medical management group (X² = 19.4; p = .0001). Conclusion: The combination of Arabin pessary or cervical cerclage with micronized progesterone in our study helped achieve term deliveries in >90% of pregnant women with large fibroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cervical funneling is associated with spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). The aim of this analysis was to assess the relationship between funneling shape and the response to the McDonald cerclage, the Arabin pessary and the early total cervical occlusion (ETCO). We retrospectively analyzed data of 312 randomly selected singleton pregnancies with cervical shortening <25 mm or normal cervical length and evaluated them according to the progression of funneling: control group (n = 46), cervical shortening without funneling (n = 107), V-shaped funneling (n = 68), U-shaped funneling (n = 47), and prolapse of the amniotic sac (n = 44). We evaluated sPTB rates <34, <28, <32, and <37 weeks as well as prolongation of gestation and birthweight. Regarding the rate of sPTB <34 weeks there was no statistical significance in either of the comparisons between control group and each of the four risk groups. Regarding prolongation of gestation we demonstrated a statistical significance for all risk groups compared to the control group (all p <.05) with the lowest prolongation rate noted in the group with amnion prolapse and the highest in the group with isolated cervical shortening without funneling. Similarly, progression of funnel shape resulted in an absolute decrease of birthweight for all risk groups compared to the control group, albeit not significant for the group with U-shaped funneling (p =.1058). Independent of the treatment, there was a significant impact of funneling shape on pregnancy duration and birthweight. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Arabin pessary use in patients with cervical insufficiency or short cervix before the 24th week of gestation and the impact of cervical examination findings prior to pessary application on the outcome in terms of the gestational week. In our study, among the pregnancies between the 12th and 24th gestational weeks, 60 pregnant women with a preterm delivery history and/or cervical length less than 25 mm were included. Among these 60 patients, 43 of them had a short cervix, 17 of them had cervical insufficiency. Routine medical and obstetric history was obtained. In the vaginal examination, the cervix was evaluated in terms of patency, dilatation, and position. Cervical length, presence of debris, and funneling were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound. After receiving patients' approval a cervical pessary was applied to patients. Pessaries of pregnant women with 37 weeks of gestation were removed. Before reaching the 37th gestation week, pessaries were withdrawn in patients who had ongoing vaginal bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, and preterm contractions unresponsive to tocolytic treatment. Thirty-one pregnant women (51.7%) out of 60 pregnant women who underwent pessary, delivered at 37 weeks and below. Delivery rates in the short cervical measurement group and cervical insufficiency group at ≤28 weeks, ≤34 weeks and ≤37 weeks were respectively (n = 21) 34.8% vs 36.3% (p = 0.976), (n = 29) 41.8% vs 64.7% (p = 0.111), (n = 31) 44.2% vs 70.6% (p = 0.888). The presence of cervical funneling before pessary application shows a statistically significant difference in terms of patient's giving birth before or after 28 weeks (p = 0.033). In patients with cervical funneling, there was a significant increase in a birth before 28 weeks. Depending on whether or not patients applying with pain need for tocolysis, it shows the statistically meaningful difference in terms of the patients giving birth before or after 34 weeks (p = 0.001) (OR 7, 61, 95% GA 2.4–24.6). In the group without the need for tocolysis, there is a meaningful increase in birth after 34 weeks. Our findings showed that, alongside the defined cervical risk factors, cervical funneling and the need for tocolysis are remarkable prognostic variables in pessary application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The presence of sonographic funneling is a co-predictor of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). The aim of this study was to assess the outcome in patients with a short cervix and funneling after a McDonald cerclage or an Arabin pessary.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 238 singleton pregnancies with cervical shortening <25 mm subclassified by either isolated cervical shortening (n = 105) or cervical shortening and additional funneling (n = 133). In the group of isolated cervical shortening, a total of 93 patients had received a cervical pessary and 12 had McDonald cerclage. In the group of patients with additional funneling, 98 had received a cervical pessary and 35 had a cerclage. We evaluated PTB rates <28, <32, <34, and <37 weeks as well as prolongation of gestation, birth weight, and admission to NICU.Results: In the pessary groups (n = 191), funneling resulted in a significantly higher rate of PTB before 34 weeks as compared to patients with isolated cervical shortening (26.5 versus 8.6%, p=.0066). Similarly, in the cerclage groups (n = 47), funneling resulted in an absolute increase of PTB, albeit not significant (37.1 versus 0%, p=.1435) due to the smaller number. There were no significant differences in terms of prevention of PTB before 34 weeks in patients treated with pessary or cerclage, neither in the group of patients with isolated shortening nor in the group of patients with additional funneling (p=.9771 and p=.3916, respectively). However, in patients with funneling, we demonstrated a significantly lower neonatal admission rate in the pessary arm (n = 27, 27.6%) as compared to the cerclage arm (n = 31, 88.6%) (p = .0002). Similarly, the NICU admission time was shorter in both pessary groups -with and without funneling - as compared to patients treated with cerclage (p = .0000).Conclusion: Pessary placement and cerclage should optimally be considered before the presence of funneling. Furthermore, there were lower rates of neonatal admission during pregnancy and a shorter admission time of babies after birth when mothers received a cervical pessary as compared to the group with cervical cerclage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spontaneous preterm birth is a global issue that contributed to perinatal morbidities and mortalities worldwide. The study aimed to describe the experience at UKM Medical Center in managing women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth using the Arabin pessary.Methods: This is a retrospective observational study involving 58 pregnancies from 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2019. Inclusion criteria were previous mid-trimester miscarriage and/or preterm birth, previous cervical surgery or short cervical length on routine sonogram. The demographic data, characteristics of each pregnancy and details of outcomes and management were described.Results: The majority of women were Malay with mean age and body mass index of 32.9 ± 4.2 years and 27.1 ± 6.3 kg/m2 respectively. The most frequent indications for Arabin pessary insertion were previous mid-trimester miscarriage (46.4%) and early preterm birth (17.2%). A total of 73.4% of these women had the pessary inserted electively at a mean cervical length of 31.6 ± 9.1 mm at median gestation of 15.0 weeks. They were managed as outpatient (56.9%), inpatient (24.1%) or mixed (19.0%) with combination of progestogen (81.0%) and 53.4% received antenatal corticosteroids. Spontaneous preterm birth at or more than 34 weeks gestation occurred in 74.1% with birthweight at or more than 2000 g (82.4%). Despite cervical funneling in 12 women (20.7%), 66.7% delivered at or later than 34 weeks gestation and 2 (16.7%) resulted in miscarriage.Conclusions: Insertion of the Arabin pessary is beneficial to prevent spontaneous preterm birth in pregnant women who are at high risk. In particular, early insertion and close monitoring allows the best possible outcomes.Trial Registration: This study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04638023 ) on 20/11/2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with cervical shortening obtained by transvaginal ultrasound and/or previous preterm delivery are at increased risk for preterm birth in the current pregnancy. The aim of the present cohort study was to compare the rate of preterm birth and early neonatal parameters in patients at risk and screening patients who received either a cerclage or a combined treatment of cerclage and cervical pessary.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from March 2005 to March 2017 including all patients in our department which received a McDonald cerclage or a combined treatment of McDonald cerclage and an Arabin pessary. A total of 81 women with singleton pregnancies were considered the final sample of this cohort study, of whom 34 patients received a cerclage and 47 patients received a cerclage combined with a pessary. Patients "at risk" with a history of preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation, late-term abortion, conization, or cervical cerclage in a previous pregnancy because of a cervical shortening <10th percentile and women with no inherent historic risk factors but a current cervical length <3rd percentile (screening group) were analyzed separately. We defined delivery <34 weeks of gestation as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB) <28, <32, and <37 weeks of gestation, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), neonatal admission time, birthweight, and prolongation of the gestation.Results: There were no differences between the two study groups with regard to baseline characteristics. Delivery <34 weeks of gestation occurred in 32.4 and 27.7% of patients treated with cerclage versus combined treatment respectively (p = .48). Similarly, there was no difference in the rate of preterm birth at <28, <32, or <37 weeks of gestation. The mean neonatal admission time at the neonatal intensive care unit was shorter in the combined treatment group versus in the cerclage group (p = .02). There was a trend for higher birthweight (2368 g ± 962 vs. 2650 g ± 1063) in favor of the combined treatment arm (p = .077).Conclusion: The combined treatment of cerclage with an Arabin pessary seems to be a considerable alternative in the prevention of spontaneous PTB (sPTB), especially for patients with cervical length <3rd percentile, and in particular for patients with amnion prolapse in terms of birthweight and neonatal admission time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate whether the classification of a previous spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) as preterm labor (PTL) with intact membranes (IM) or as preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) impacts the efficacy of cervical pessary or vaginal progesterone for prevention of sPTB in pregnant women with short cervix on transvaginal ultrasound.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of asymptomatic high-risk singleton pregnancies with a short cervix and history of sPTB, treated using Arabin pessary or vaginal progesterone for primary PTB prevention, conducted at four European hospitals. A log-rank test on Kaplan-Meier curves was used to assess the difference in performance of pessary and progesterone, according to history of PTL-IM or PPROM. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate significant predictors of gestational age at delivery.Results: Between 2008 and 2015, 170 women were treated with a pessary and 88 with vaginal progesterone. In women treated with a pessary, rate of sPTB < 34 weeks was 16% in those with a history of PTL-IM and 55% in those with a history of PPROM. In women treated with progesterone, rate of sPTB < 34 weeks was 13% in those with a history of PTL-IM and 21% in those with a history of PPROM. Treatment with a pessary resulted in earlier delivery in women with previous PPROM than in any other subgroup (P < 0.0001). Linear regression analysis showed a clear effect of PPROM history (P < 0.0001), combination of PPROM history and treatment (P = 0.0003) and cervical length (P = 0.0004) on gestational age at birth.Conclusions: Cervical pessary may be a less efficacious treatment option for women with previous PPROM; however, these results require prospective validation before change in practice is recommended. Phenotype of previous preterm birth may be an important risk predictor and treatment effect modifier; this information should be reported in future clinical trials. © 2018 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Ginecología y Obstetricia de México is the property of Federacion Mexicana de Ginecologia y Obstetricia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Key content: Twin pregnancies are associated with a three‐fold greater perinatal mortality than singleton pregnancies. Prematurity is a main contributor, with 50% of twin pregnancies delivering before 37 weeks and 10% delivering before 32 weeks of gestation. The aetiology of preterm delivery in twin pregnancies is likely multifactorial and different from that of singletons. Cervical cerclage reduces preterm birth rates in singletons but has mixed results in twins with some studies showing harm. The use of progesterone to prevent preterm birth in singletons has conflicting results and has not been proven to prevent preterm birth in twins. Studies continue to determine whether the cervical pessary is effective in preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancies. There is a paucity of data available on the prevention of preterm birth in triplets/higher order multiples but similar principles to twin pregnancy apply. Learning objectives: To review the burden of preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. To understand the methods available for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancies and the evidence surrounding the use of each one. To be aware of the use of the Arabin pessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinically, once a woman has been identified as being at risk of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) due to a short cervical length, a decision regarding prophylactic treatment must be made. Three interventions have the potential to improve outcomes: cervical cerclage (stitch), vaginal progesterone and cervical pessary. Each has been shown to have similar benefit in reduction of sPTB, but there have been no randomised control trials (RCTs) to compare them. Methods: This open label multi-centre UK RCT trial, will evaluate whether the three interventions are equally efficacious to prevent premature birth in women who develop a short cervix (<25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound). Participants will be asymptomatic and between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation in singleton pregnancies. Eligible women will be randomised to cervical cerclage, Arabin pessary or vaginal progesterone (200 mg once daily) (n = 170 women per group). The obstetric endpoints are premature birth rate <37 weeks' of gestation (primary), 34 weeks and 30 weeks (secondary outcomes) and short-term neonatal outcomes (a composite of death and major morbidity). It will also explore whether intervention success can be predicted by pre-intervention biomarker status. Discussion: Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality and a short cervix is a useful way of identifying those most at risk. However, best management of these women has presented a clinical conundrum for decades. Given the promise offered by cerclage, Arabin pessary and vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in individual trials, direct comparison of these prophylactic interventions is now essential to establish whether one treatment is superior. If, as we hypothesise, the three interventions are equally efficacious, this study will empower women to make a choice of treatments based on personal preference and quality of life issues also explored by the study. Our exploratory analysis into whether the response to intervention is related to the pre-intervention biomarker status further our understanding of the pathophysiology of spontaneous preterm birth and help focus future research questions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Objective To help elucidate the mechanism of action of the Arabin cervical pessary in pregnancies at high risk for preterm delivery. Methods Cervical length and uterocervical angle were evaluated in relation to gestational age in 198 pregnancies not at high risk for preterm birth that underwent clinical fetal magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI). Additionally, in 73 singleton pregnancies at high risk for preterm birth, an Arabin cervical pessary was placed at 14-33 weeks' gestation. We performed MRI of the cervix immediately before and after placement and at monthly follow-up until removal of the pessary. In a subgroup of 54 pregnancies with a short cervix and pessary placement at 17-31 weeks' gestation, the uterocervical angle and cervical length at follow-up were compared with the preplacement values. Results In pregnancies not at high risk for preterm birth, the uterocervical angle did not vary, but cervical length showed a significant decrease with gestational age ( r = −0.15, P < 0.05). Among the high-risk patients, the cervical pessary was successfully placed at first attempt in 60 (82.2%) and by the second attempt in 66 (90.4%), remaining well positioned until removal. In five patients we failed to place the pessary after two attempts, in one patient the pessary dislodged during follow-up and in one case the pessary was partly placed in the external cervical canal and triggered labor the next day. Among the subgroup of 54 patients, the median uterocervical angle immediately after pessary placement was significantly more acute than that prior to placement in the 46 (85.2%) who delivered after 34 weeks (132° vs 146°, P < 0.01), but was unchanged in the eight patients who delivered before 34 weeks (143° vs 152°, P > 0.05). Conclusion In patients at high risk for preterm delivery, correct placement of the Arabin cervical pessary should be checked immediately; this can be performed quickly and easily using MRI. This study provides some evidence that, in singleton pregnancies with a short cervix, a cervical pessary delays birth through a mechanical effect on the uterocervical angle. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. The Arabin pessary may be beneficial in the treatment of cervical incompetence. The aim of the study was to analyse the efficacy of the treatment method of pregnant women with cervical incompetence. Methods. A non-randomised study performed in the obstetrical wards in Lodz, Poland utilising 54 pregnant women with cervical incompetence was developed to assess the efficiency of treatment methods of cervically incompetent women. These women were diagnosed by vaginal ultrasound examination during the course of the study. Patients with a cervical length of 15-30 mm before 28 weeks an Arabin cervical pessary were inserted, women whose cervical length was less than 15 mm were treated with cervical cerclage. The main end points of the study were preterm or term delivery. Results. In the Arabin pessary group, 1.9% of women delivered before the 29th week of gestation and 83.3% of women delivered after 37 weeks of pregnancy. Eighty-seven per cent of pregnant women treated for cervical incompetence by Arabin pessary delivered by normal spontaneous labour, 1.9% delivered by forceps labour and 11.1% of patients by caesarean section. Among pregnant women treated by Arabin pessary, 3.7% of newborns were estimated as having a score of 0-4 on the Apgar scale, 13% a score of 5-7 and 83.3% a score of 8-10. Conclusions. Cervical incompetence treatment effectively prolongs the duration of gestation. Application of the Arabin pessary is an effective method of cervical incompetence treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Ginecologia.ro is the property of MEDICHUB MEDIA, S.R.L. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Clinically, once a woman has been identified as being at risk of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) due to a short cervical length, a decision regarding prophylactic treatment must be made. Three interventions have the potential to improve outcomes: cervical cerclage (stitch), vaginal progesterone and cervical pessary. Each has been shown to have similar benefit in reduction of sPTB, but there have been no randomised control trials (RCTs) to compare them.Methods: This open label multi-centre UK RCT trial, will evaluate whether the three interventions are equally efficacious to prevent premature birth in women who develop a short cervix (<25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound). Participants will be asymptomatic and between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation in singleton pregnancies. Eligible women will be randomised to cervical cerclage, Arabin pessary or vaginal progesterone (200 mg once daily) (n = 170 women per group). The obstetric endpoints are premature birth rate <37 weeks' of gestation (primary), 34 weeks and 30 weeks (secondary outcomes) and short-term neonatal outcomes (a composite of death and major morbidity). It will also explore whether intervention success can be predicted by pre-intervention biomarker status.Discussion: Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality and a short cervix is a useful way of identifying those most at risk. However, best management of these women has presented a clinical conundrum for decades. Given the promise offered by cerclage, Arabin pessary and vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in individual trials, direct comparison of these prophylactic interventions is now essential to establish whether one treatment is superior. If, as we hypothesise, the three interventions are equally efficacious, this study will empower women to make a choice of treatments based on personal preference and quality of life issues also explored by the study. Our exploratory analysis into whether the response to intervention is related to the pre-intervention biomarker status further our understanding of the pathophysiology of spontaneous preterm birth and help focus future research questions.Trial Registration: EudraCT Number: 2015-000456-15 . Registered 11th March 2015. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]