Search

Endometriosis causes a decrease in fertility in affected patients. The different forms of the disease, peritoneal, ovarian, deep infiltrating and adenomiosis, are often present in varying degrees in the same patient, either together or individually, and cause infertility through a pathogenesis that is not yet clear. A significant number of women with endometriosis and endometriomas will eventually seek assisted reproductive technology (ART) for conception. The specific impact of endometriomas alone and the impact of surgical intervention for endometriomas on the reproductive outcome of women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) are areas that need further clarification and, for this reason, the management of endometriomas before clinical IVF is a very complex topic. In order to provide useful information for the clinical management of patients with endometriomas having IVF, in this review we investigated: the impact of the presence of endometriomas, both individually and associated with other types of the disease, on IVF techniques; the possible role of surgery and its possible negative effects; the risks and difficulties related to conservative management during IVF procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and hypothesis: Studies have observed a significant heterogeneity in efficacy data for single-incision minislings (SIMS) as surgical treatment for female urinary incontinence (UI). Our study aim was to test the hypothesis that different vaginal kits for SIMS have different long-term outcomes. Methods: One hundred and twenty women with stress (SUI) or mixed (MUI) UI were enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial (registration number NCT00751088) and treated with three different SIMS (Ajust, MiniArc, or TVT Secur System). Duration of follow-up was at least 24 months from surgery. The primary outcome was the subjective cure rate at 24 months from surgery; secondary outcomes were rates of total failure and reoperations for UI. Results: At study end, no difference was detected between groups in terms of total subjective cure rate [21 (52.5 %) vs. 26 (65.0 %) vs. 21 (52.5 %), in Ajust, MiniArc, and TVT Secur System group, respectively; P = 0.412] or in terms of total failure rate [24 (60.0 %) vs. 22 (55.0 %) vs. 27 (67.5 %), in Ajust, MiniArc, and TVT Secur System group, respectively; P = 0.432]. The proportion of patients who received a second surgery for UI was also not significantly different between groups [13 (32.5 %) vs. 10 (25.0 %) vs. 13 (32.5 %), in Ajust, MiniArc, and TVT Secur System, respectively; P = 0.831]. Conclusion: The long-term efficacy of SIMS does not differ between the vaginal kits examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

pregnancy, the implantation of a fertilized ovum outside the endometrial cavity, occurs in 1.5%-2% of pregnancies. It is one of the major causes (about 6%) of maternal death during the first trimester of pregnancy. The remaining 5% implant in the ovary, peritoneal cavity, within the cervix, and the omental pregnancy is the least common form of abdominal pregnancies. A review of the literature on Medline for the period 1958-2012 reported only 16 cases of omental pregnancy. Here we report a case of primary omental pregnancy in a nulliparous woman. A 24 year-old woman gravid 1, para 0, with lower abdominal pain. Her last menstrual period occurred 8 weeks before the visit. The physical examination revealed abdominal tenderness in the lower quadrants, she was not bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound showed: a free anechoic/hypoechoic area of 30 x 57 mm in the pouch of Douglas and the endometrium was homogeneus with a thickness of 12 mm and no evidence of gestational sac in the uterine cavity. Laboratory data revealed a normal cell blood count and beta hcg levels of 8047 IU / L. Because of continuing abdominal pain and a diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed, which showed hemoperitoneum. Further inspection of abdominal cavity revealed a bloody lesion that was tenaciously adherent to the omentum, using non traumatic laparoscopic forceps and bipolar scissors we carefully removed a friable mass of about 30 mm from the omental attachments. Histological examination showed the presence of blood clot material mixed with trophoblastic tissue. Ultrasound evaluation and and hCG assessment are important to determine the extrauterine location of the ectopic pregnancy but the early diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy requires also a laparoscopic evaluation and, as our case has highlighted, thorough abdominal exploration especially in the absence of adnexal findings when ectopic pregnancy is highly suspected. Early diagnosis of omental pregnancy is difficult but essential to reduce the high mortality risk for the mother. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. Brugada syndrome is characterized by a disruption of heart's normal rhythm. It is an autosomal dominant disease due to a mutation of SNC5A gene. Its prevalence is low all over the world, but it is a lethal disease. Sudden cardiac death is the result of phenotypic manifestation of Brugada syndrome. Among asymptomatic Brugada patients, arrhythmia could be provoked by physical activity, fever, or pregnancy. About obstetrical management, very few data or reports have been published since this syndrome has been diagnosed in late 1992. Case Presentation. A 20-year-old pregnant woman at 13 weeks of gestation was referred to our department because of her familial history of sudden cardiac deaths. Brothers and sisters of her mother died of Brugada syndrome in childhood or older and live components of this family were carrier of mutation in Brugada gene. The pregnancy was uneventful. The patient gave birth vaginally without any arrhythmia. Strictly cardiological monitoring was performed during labour, delivery, and 12 hours of the postpartum. Conclusion. Even though patient at low risk may never have arrhythmia, some conditions could represent a Brugada trigger. The management could be very easy and uneventful. Otherwise it could be very difficult with need of ECMO or antiarrhythmics drugs or intracardiac device. Obstetrical management of Brugada pregnant women should be very strict and multidisciplinary in cooperation with cardiologist and anaesthesiologist and should provide an informed consent to the couple. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]