1. A novel dual-level multi-source information fusion approach for multicriteria decision making applications.
- Author
-
Sharaf, Iman Mohamad, Albahri, O. S., Alsalem, M. A., Alamoodi, A. H., and Albahri, A. S.
- Subjects
MULTIPLE criteria decision making ,ANALYTIC hierarchy process ,RENEWABLE energy sources ,WIND power ,SOLAR energy - Abstract
The objective of this paper is to propose a novel dual-level multisource information fusion approach for handling open multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) issues related to accurately determining the weights of criteria while considering the relative importance of expert opinions, handling heterogeneous information, and selecting an appropriate MCDM ranking method. The proposed approach includes two levels. The first integrates the "analytic hierarchy process (AHP)—full consistency method (FUCOM)", which comprises two phases. In the first phase, criteria weights are assigned using AHP, and FUCOM is employed to correct inconsistencies. In the second phase, the weights are computed for decision-makers. Triangular fuzzy numbers are employed due to their ability to encapsulate all the utilized heterogeneous data types. At the second level of the approach, three well-known distance-based methods, including "technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution", "visekriterijumska optimizacija i kompromisno resenje", and "multiattributive border approximation area comparison", are fused to process a homogeneous decision matrix and provide comprehensive and robust rankings for alternatives. To develop our novel approach, a renewable energy source for Pakistan's electricity generation is adopted as a case study. The decision matrix contains four alternatives (i.e., hydropower, biomass energy, solar energy, and wind energy) and six main evaluation criteria (i.e., economic, quality of energy, social, political, environmental, and technical), with several subevaluation criteria under each criterion. The findings of the proposed approach were as follows: A2 was in the first rank with a score of 1.7889, and A4 was in the last rank with a score of 0.1199. The rest of the alternatives were distributed between them. The paper's implications include the advancement of decision-making methods, enhancement of decision-making outcomes, and addressing heterogeneous information to highlight the relative importance of experts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF