Search

A steeper fall of fusion excitation function, compared to the predictions of coupled-channel (CC) models, at energies below the lowest barrier between the reaction partners, is termed as deep sub-barrier fusion hindrance. This phenomenon has been observed in many symmetric and nearly symmetric systems. Different physical origins of the hindrance have been proposed though a complete understanding is yet to be achieved. This work reports the measurement of the fusion (evaporation residue) cross sections for the system 19F+181Ta, from above the barrier down to the energies where fusion hindrance is expected to come into play. CC calculation with standard Woods–Saxon potential gives a fair description of the fusion excitation function down to energies ≃14% below the barrier. This is in contrast with the observation of increasing fusion hindrance in asymmetric reactions induced by increasingly heavier projectiles, viz. 6,7Li, 11B, 12C and 16O. The most likely reason for non-observation of fusion hindrance in the present system is the ‘softness’ of the collision partners. The ‘threshold’ for the onset of fusion hindrance in reactions involving well-deformed nuclei is expected to be at an energy lower than that estimated from the systematics. It is also noted that the asymmetric reactions, which have not shown any signature of fusion hindrance within the measured energy range, are induced by projectiles with low α-particle break-up threshold and have positive Q-values for most light particle pick-up channels. Since CC calculation reproduces the fusion excitation functions for these systems, probable roles of projectile break-up and particle transfer in fusion deep below the barrier are not conclusively proven. Further measurements and inclusion of break-up and transfer channels within the framework of CC formalism would be of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaporation residue (ER) and fission cross sections were measured for the reaction O+ forming the compound nucleus 212Rn. Fission fragment angular distributions and anisotropies are consistent with the saddle point model predictions. Measured ER cross sections were fitted with statistical model calculations assuming shell-corrected free energy fission barrier height. The non-zero dissipation strength required to fit the ER cross section supports the dissipative nature of fission dynamics in heavy ion fusion. In the present study shell closure effects are not observed in the dissipation strength. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]