Search

Recent advances in the efficacy and tolerability of hepatitis C treatments and the introduction of a universal access scheme for the new Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) therapies in March 2016, has resulted in a rapid increase in the uptake of hepatitis C treatment in Australia. Despite these positive developments, recent data suggest a plateauing of treatment numbers, indicating that more work may need to be done to identify and address ongoing barriers to hepatitis C treatment access and uptake. This paper aims to contribute to our understanding of the ongoing barriers to DAA therapies, with a focus on people who inject drugs. The paper draws on participant interview data from a qualitative research study based on a participatory research design that included a peer researcher with direct experience of both hepatitis C DAA treatment and injecting drug use at all stages of the research process. The study’s findings show that residual barriers to DAA treatment exist at personal, provider and system levels and include poor venous access, DAA treatments not considered ‘core-business’ by opioid substitution treatment (OST) providers, and patients having to manage multiple health and social priorities that interfere with keeping medical appointments such as childcare and poor access to transport services. Further, efforts to increase access to and uptake of DAA hepatitis C treatment over time will require a focus on reducing stigma and discrimination towards people who inject drugs as this remains as a major barrier to care for many people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatitis C virus is stigmatised because of its association with injecting drug use. Although treatment is available, uptake remains low, especially among people who inject drugs. Ninety health workers completed a survey assessing attitudes towards people who inject drugs and support for treatment for three client scenarios: one who stopped injecting, one on methadone, and one continuing to inject. Support for hepatitis C virus treatment was significantly higher, where the client was not injecting. Participants who showed more negative attitudes towards people who inject drugs were less supportive of clients entering hepatitis C virus treatment, illustrating the influence of health workers’ attitudes in determining treatment options offered to clients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Deadly Liver Mob (DLM) is a peer-driven, incentivised health promotion program aimed at increasing understanding of hepatitis C, promoting harm reduction in relation to injecting drug use, and linking participants to screening for hepatitis C, other blood borne viruses and sexually transmissible infections among Aboriginal people in Western Sydney, NSW. This paper presents the evaluation of a pilot study examining the acceptability of the program as a first step of a scalability assessment. Methods: Deadly Liver Mob operated in co-located needle and syringe programs and sexual health clinics in two sites: (Site 1: two and a half years for 2 days/week; Site 2: 1 year for 1 day per week). Comparisons were made of the proportion of Aboriginal clients (Site 1) and occasions of service provided to Aboriginal clients (Site 2) in the 12 months prior and post-introduction of DLM. Interviews were conducted with 13 staff involved in delivery of DLM and with 19 clients. Results: A total of 655 and 55 Aboriginal clients, respectively, attended Site 1 and Site 2 for health education. The proportion of Aboriginal clients attending both sites was significantly higher during the DLM compared with prior to its implementation. Of those attending for health education, 79 and 73%, respectively, attended screening following education. DLM clients strongly endorsed the program. Some staff were concerned about workforce capacity to effectively engage Aboriginal clients with multiple and complex needs, managing the differing aims of the participating services involved, and about offering of incentives for attendance at health services. Conclusion: While acceptability was high among staff and clients and preliminary results show high engagement with Aboriginal communities, this evaluation of a pilot program raises some issues to consider in scale up of DLM to other sites. The initiation of additional DLM sites should address issues of alignment with governing strategies and workforce capacity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Aims: Gay and other homosexually active men (hereafter 'gay men') are at elevated risk of becoming infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) via injecting drug use and sexual risk practices. This paper aimed to measure HCV knowledge among gay men in Australia and whether knowledge differed according to HCV risk.Design and Methods: In 2013, a cross-sectional, online survey of 405 Australian gay men explored the social aspects of HCV. Bivariate and multivariate linear regressions were used to examine factors associated with higher HCV knowledge.Results: The mean age of respondents was 39.2 years (SD = 13.3), and most men (75.3%) were born in Australia. According to self-report, 32.1% were HIV-positive, 3.0% were HCV-positive and 8.9% were HIV/HCV co-infected. The mean number of correct HCV knowledge items was 8.2 (SD = 3.9; range 0-15). In a multivariate analysis, higher HCV knowledge was associated with higher educational attainment, being HCV-positive, being HIV-positive and injecting drug use.Discussion and Conclusions: HCV knowledge among gay men was moderately good, although knowledge of testing, treatment and natural history of HCV was generally quite poor. Encouragingly, higher knowledge was reported among men at highest HCV risk. Viral hepatitis and HIV organisations, together with general practitioners and other health services, should continue to target gay men at a high risk of acquiring HCV with education and health promotion. [Lea T, Hopwood M, Aggleton P. Hepatitis C knowledge among gay and other homosexually active men in Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 2016;35:477-483]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is increasingly reported among gay and bisexual men. However, little is known about the personal and social dimensions of HCV-related experience among these men in Australia. Methods An online survey of 474 Australian gay and bisexual men was conducted from August to December 2013. A subsample of 48 HCV mono-infected and HIV/HCV co-infected men was analysed to explore HCV knowledge, sources of information, unmet information needs and use of HCV-related services. Results More than half of respondents in the subsample were unaware that HIV infection increases the risk of sexually acquired HCV and most wanted information about how to prevent the sexual transmission of HCV A majority of respondents requested gay-specific HCV services, and approximately similar proportions of men indicated that they would like these services delivered by a hepatitis organization, a lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex(LGBTI) organization and a HIV organization. Men in receipt of HIV antiretroviral treatments were most likely to request that gay-specific HCV information and support services be delivered by a LGBTI or HIV organization (OR = 8.63). Conclusion These findings suggest that a variety of organizations a re required to address the information and support needs of Australian gay and bisexual men with HCV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adherence to treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with the successful eradication of infection. However, patients often have difficulty adhering to HCV treatment because of factors such as the psychiatric side effects of regimens and social disadvantage. Commonly, health professionals including specialist physicians, nurses, social workers and psychologists work together under a multidisciplinary model of shared-care to support patients’ adherence to HCV treatment. In some HCV treatment clinics, shared-care is not always available, or only partially implemented and this has implications for patient adherence. To explore the facilitators of adherence, an interview-based study was conducted in 2012 with a purposive sample of Australian physicians and nurses (N = 20). The findings reveal that when comprehensive shared-care was limited or unavailable, physicians and nurses filled in the gaps by assuming roles outside of their expertise to help patients adhere to HCV treatment. Physicians and nurses applied instrumental support strategies based on psychosocial interventions, namely patient advocacy, pragmatic problem-solving, treatment engagement and emotional support. These strategies were provided by dedicated physicians and nurses to address shortfalls in multidisciplinary shared-care. Although these interventions were reported to assist adherence, there is an increased risk of complications when physicians and nurses move beyond the bounds of their disciplinary training, for example, to assess and manage patients’ psychiatric side effects or advocate on their behalf for social services. Future research should measure the effectiveness of instrumental support strategies on HCV treatment adherence, and explore the costs associated with physicians and nurses providing instrumental support in the absence of comprehensive multidisciplinary shared-care. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Research indicates that patients treated with interferon-based regimens can experience persistent neurotoxicity after treatment ceases and new symptoms attributable to the regimens can emerge post-treatment. To explore post-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment outcomes, in-depth interviews were conducted with a self-selected sample of people from two Australian states who had completed an interferon-based regimen at least 24-weeks prior to being interviewed. Participants comprised almost equal numbers of men and women aged from 26 to 57 years, who were treated for HCV genotypes 1 through to 4, and included treatment responders, non-responders and those who had relapsed after treatment. Of 27 participants who volunteered to be part of this study, 25 reported persistent physical and psychological side-effects after treatment. Participants perceived a direct causal link between the treatment regimen and their ongoing symptoms. Reportedly, recovery from treatment was inhibited by an absence of a follow-up protocol that identified and addressed patients’ post-treatment needs, including medical care for persistent side-effects, referral, and information and advice about lifestyle issues. Although the study’s sample was not representative of all people treated for HCV, it is likely that persistent side-effects and their impact can affect other patients following completion of HCV treatments. Further prospective studies of HCV treatment outcomes are needed. In the meantime, the systematic implementation of a follow-up protocol in liver clinics might expedite recovery in patients who experience ongoing adverse health. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Aim: A cross-sectional study was conducted to explore knowledge of viral hepatitis among attendees of an Australian metropolitan university. Method: A short survey enquiring into viral hepatitis A, B and C (HAV, HBV and HCV, respectively) was administered to a convenience sample of people at a campus in Sydney, Australia during September 2011. Results: A total of 340 participants completed the survey. Among this sample, the risks for transmission of viral hepatitis, particularly HCV, were generally well understood; however, there were substantial gaps in knowledge about the hepatitis vaccines and treatments. Univariate analyzes indicated that participants who reported religion as unimportant to them had better overall knowledge about HBV and HCV than people for whom religion was reportedly important. Similarly, participants without children had better knowledge of HCV than participants who had children. Conclusions: Although the sample was not representative, these findings suggest that among Australians more work is needed to promote knowledge of HAV and HBV vaccines and HBV and HCV treatments. It is prudent to educate young people about the risks for viral hepatitis before they are sexually active, engaging in injecting drug use or planning body modification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatitis C treatment is known to produce significant physical and psychiatric side-effects. Healthcare workers in hepatitis C treatment clinics focus on preparing people to cope with these side-effects. Unrealistic optimism, or judging oneself to be at low risk of negative events, has been implicated in contributing to practices that place health at risk and to delays in seeking help or facilitating coping with negative events. In the context of hepatitis C treatment, patients with overly optimistic expectations of their ability to cope with treatment-related side-effects are less prepared for their impact and therefore may be more likely to discontinue treatment. In this exploratory qualitative study, data from semi-structured interviews with 20 people undergoing hepatitis C treatment and six healthcare workers at three hepatitis C treatment clinics in Sydney, Australia were explored for the presence of unrealistic optimism and also the impact that this had on patients' processing of information pre-treatment and management of side-effects during treatment. The concept of unrealistic optimism was evident in both patients' and healthcare workers' interview transcripts. Patients' descriptions of their preparation for hepatitis C treatment included references to delays in seeking help for depressive symptoms attributable to unrealistic optimism. Healthcare workers also discussed their observations of the effects of unrealistic optimism on patients' coping strategies. Data from this study contribute to an understanding of unrealistic optimism and its impact on the experience of hepatitis C treatment side-effects, patients' coping styles and potential for delays in seeking help. Unrealistic optimism should be explored as part of pre-treatment assessments for hepatitis C treatment and considered throughout treatment to avoid delays in help seeking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatitis C-related discrimination is reportedly common, however few studies have investigated this phenomenon. This paper presents findings from a cross-sectional study of people with self-reported hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection ( N ?=?504) conducted in New South Wales (NSW), Australia throughout 2001 and 2002. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire enquiring into their experience of living with HCV. Over a half of the participants (57.5%, n ?=?290) reported that they had acquired their infection from injecting drug use. Discrimination was reported by 64.7% ( n ?=?326) of participants and healthcare was the most commonly reported site where discrimination occurred. A logistic regression identified the predictors of any discrimination as: knowing many other people with HCV infection; feeling tired due to HCV symptoms; and being younger ( [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical trials of interferon-based treatments for hepatitis C infection show decrements in patients' health-related quality of life due to side effects of therapy. The impact of side effects on patients' overall quality of life still remains unclear. To explore this issue, the authors interviewed people living in New South Wales, Australia, who had undergone treatment for hepatitis C. Their aim in this article is to report participants' experiences of treatment side effects. In Australia, this information is important, because a new interferon-based regimen has been adopted as the mainstay of hepatitis C treatment, and it is predicted that many more people will seek treatment. The authors argue for further qualitative research to enhance knowledge of the impact of this therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Previous investigation has shown that the health sector is a main source of discrimination against people with hepatitis C. This paper examines the perceptions and experiences of people with hepatitis C of their interactions with healthcare workers, particularly examining the implementation of infection control precautions. We contend that rather than applying infection control precautions universally, health care workers make judgements about individual patients and the likelihood that they are infected with hepatitis C. Thus, infection control practices can be used as a tool to discriminate against people with hepatitis C. Social identity theory is used to illustrate these insights and to propose recommendations for education of health care workers. Method: Semi-structured interviews with 19 people who had hepatitis C were conducted. The analysis examines issues of diagnosis, discrimination and disclosure in relation to healthcare workers' use of infection control procedures during clinical interactions. Results: Participants described non-compliance with infection control guidelines by healthcare workers in a range of settings. In some instances, participants expressed disapproval of non-compliance, at other times participants felt vulnerable and discriminated against. Participants felt obliged to disclose their infections, but some decided against future disclosure because of negative reactions from healthcare workers. Infection control procedures were used as a tool to discriminate against some participants. Discussion: Non-compliance with infection control guidelines persists among healthcare workers and can be identified by patients. A minority of workers use infection control as a discriminatory tool against those with hepatitis C. Further intervention is required to ensure infection control guidelines are enacted in the manner intended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent advances in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection provide the possibility of eliminating HCV as a public health threat. This focus on HCV elimination through treatment, however, is also driving a concomitant focus on ‘achieving cure’ as the primary outcome of treatment. The aim of this paper is to explore what people who inject drugs consider to be important in relation to outcomes of HCV treatment, and whether there are outcomes ‘beyond cure’ that might be important to understand as part of improving engagement in treatment. Methods: A peer researcher with experience of both HCV treatment and injecting drug use conducted interviews with 24 people in the following groups in Melbourne, Australia: (1) people who had refused or deferred HCV treatment; (2) people who were actively thinking about, planning and/or about to commence HCV treatment; (3) people currently undertaking HCV treatment and (4) people who had recently completed HCV treatment. Results: The findings show that people who inject drugs are seeking outcomes ‘beyond cure’ including improved physical and mental health, positive changes in identity and social relationships and managing future health and risk. Participants indicated that these other outcomes had not been addressed within their experience of HCV treatment. Conclusion: While cure is an obvious outcome of HCV treatment, patients are seeking change in other areas of their lives. This study also provides valuable insights for the development of patient-reported measures in this context, which would be an important step towards more patient-centred approaches to HCV treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]