3 results
Search Results
2. Clinically informed machine learning elucidates the shape of hospice racial disparities within hospitals.
- Author
-
Khayal, Inas S., O'Malley, A. James, and Barnato, Amber E.
- Subjects
HOSPITALS ,HOSPICE care ,DATA science ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,MACHINE learning ,INSTITUTIONAL racism ,MEDICAL care use ,SOCIOECONOMIC factors ,QUALITY assurance ,CLINICAL medicine ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,RESEARCH funding ,HEALTH equity ,ETHNIC groups ,MEDICARE ,ALGORITHMS - Abstract
Racial disparities in hospice care are well documented for patients with cancer, but the existence, direction, and extent of disparity findings are contradictory across the literature. Current methods to identify racial disparities aggregate data to produce single-value quality measures that exclude important patient quality elements and, consequently, lack information to identify actionable equity improvement insights. Our goal was to develop an explainable machine learning approach that elucidates healthcare disparities and provides more actionable quality improvement information. We infused clinical information with engineering systems modeling and data science to develop a time-by-utilization profile per patient group at each hospital using US Medicare hospice utilization data for a cohort of patients with advanced (poor-prognosis) cancer that died April-December 2016. We calculated the difference between group profiles for people of color and white people to identify racial disparity signatures. Using machine learning, we clustered racial disparity signatures across hospitals and compared these clusters to classic quality measures and hospital characteristics. With 45,125 patients across 362 hospitals, we identified 7 clusters; 4 clusters (n = 190 hospitals) showed more hospice utilization by people of color than white people, 2 clusters (n = 106) showed more hospice utilization by white people than people of color, and 1 cluster (n = 66) showed no difference. Within-hospital racial disparity behaviors cannot be predicted from quality measures, showing how the true shape of disparities can be distorted through the lens of quality measures. This approach elucidates the shape of hospice racial disparities algorithmically from the same data used to calculate quality measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
- Author
-
Megerian, Jonathan T., Dey, Sangeeta, Melmed, Raun D., Coury, Daniel L., Lerner, Marc, Nicholls, Christopher J., Sohl, Kristin, Rouhbakhsh, Rambod, Narasimhan, Anandhi, Romain, Jonathan, Golla, Sailaja, Shareef, Safiullah, Ostrovsky, Andrey, Shannon, Jennifer, Kraft, Colleen, Liu-Mayo, Stuart, Abbas, Halim, Gal-Szabo, Diana E., Wall, Dennis P., and Taraman, Sharief
- Subjects
DIAGNOSIS of autism ,RESEARCH ,COMPUTER software ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,CLINICAL trials ,ARTIFICIAL intelligence ,MACHINE learning ,PRIMARY health care ,BLIND experiment ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,CHILD psychopathology ,COMPUTER-aided diagnosis ,SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics) ,PHYSICIANS ,CLASSIFICATION of mental disorders ,LONGITUDINAL method ,ALGORITHMS - Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device designed to aid primary care healthcare providers (HCPs) in diagnosing ASD. The Device combines behavioral features from three distinct inputs (a caregiver questionnaire, analysis of two short home videos, and an HCP questionnaire) in a gradient boosted decision tree machine learning algorithm to produce either an ASD positive, ASD negative, or indeterminate output. This study compared Device outputs to diagnostic agreement by two or more independent specialists in a cohort of 18–72-month-olds with developmental delay concerns (425 study completers, 36% female, 29% ASD prevalence). Device output PPV for all study completers was 80.8% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 70.3%–88.8%) and NPV was 98.3% (90.6%–100%). For the 31.8% of participants who received a determinate output (ASD positive or negative) Device sensitivity was 98.4% (91.6%–100%) and specificity was 78.9% (67.6%–87.7%). The Device's indeterminate output acts as a risk control measure when inputs are insufficiently granular to make a determinate recommendation with confidence. If this risk control measure were removed, the sensitivity for all study completers would fall to 51.6% (63/122) (95% CI 42.4%, 60.8%), and specificity would fall to 18.5% (56/303) (95% CI 14.3%, 23.3%). Among participants for whom the Device abstained from providing a result, specialists identified that 91% had one or more complex neurodevelopmental disorders. No significant differences in Device performance were found across participants' sex, race/ethnicity, income, or education level. For nearly a third of this primary care sample, the Device enabled timely diagnostic evaluation with a high degree of accuracy. The Device shows promise to significantly increase the number of children able to be diagnosed with ASD in a primary care setting, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and more efficient use of specialist resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.